Sexual absorption of vaginal progesterone: a randomized control trial

Luteal phase support using micronized vaginal progesterone as pessaries or capsules in artificial cycles: is there any difference?

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is there a difference between the proportion of patients with serum progesterone <8.8 ng/ml on the day of embryo transfer when micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) for luteal phase support (LPS) is given as pessaries versus capsules?

DESIGN

This retrospective, matched-cohort, single-centre study compared pessaries (Cyclogest) versus capsules (Utrogestan, Progeffik) for LPS in hormone replacement treatment-embryo transfer (HRT-ET) cycles. Patients under 50 years old with a triple-layer endometrial thickness of ≥6.5 mm underwent transfer of one or two blastocysts. Serum progesterone concentrations were measured on the day of transfer; patients with concentrations <8.8 ng/ml received a single 'rescue' dose of additional progesterone by subcutaneous injection.

RESULTS

In total 2665 HRT-ET cycles were analysed; 663 (24.9%) used pessaries for LPS and 2002 (75.1%) used capsules. Mean serum progesterone concentrations with standard deviations on the day of embryo transfer were significantly higher in the group using MVP pessaries compared with those using capsules (14.5 ± 5.1 versus 13.0 ± 4.8 ng/ml; P = 0.000). The percentage of participants with suboptimal serum progesterone concentrations on the day of embryo transfer (<8.8 ng/ml) was significantly lower in the pessary group than the capsule group (10.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9-12.6% versus 17.9%, 95% CI 16.2-19.6%; adjusted odds ratio 0.426, 95% CI 0.290-0.625; P = 0.000). No differences in pregnancy outcome were observed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Using MVP pessaries rather than capsules for LPS resulted in significantly fewer patients having suboptimal serum progesterone concentrations on the day of embryo transfer. Consequently, almost 50% fewer patients in the pessary group needed rescue treatment.

Circadian serum progesterone variations on the day of frozen embryo transfer in artificially prepared cycles

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the intra-day variation of serum progesterone related to vaginal progesterone administration on the day of frozen embryo transfer (FET) in an artificial cycle?

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study was conducted including 22 patients undergoing a single blastocyst artificial cycle (AC)-FET from August to December 2022. Endometrial preparation was achieved by administering oestradiol valerate (2 mg three times daily) and consecutively micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP; 400 mg twice daily). A blastocyst FET was performed on the 6th day of MVP administration. Serum progesterone concentrations were measured on the day of transfer at 08:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00 hours. The first and last blood samples were collected just before MVP was administered.

RESULTS

The mean age and body mass index of the study population were 33.95 ± 3.98 years and 23.10 ± 1.95 kg/m2. The mean P-values at 08:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00 hours were 11.72 ± 4.99, 13.59 ± 6.33, 10.23 ± 3.81 and 9.28 ± 3.09 ng/ml, respectively. A significant decline, of 2.41 ng/ml (95% confidence interval 0.81-4.00), was found between the first and last progesterone measurements.

CONCLUSION

A statistically significant intra-day variation of serum progesterone concentrations on the day of FET in artificially prepared cycles was observed. This highlights the importance of a standardized procedure for the timing of progesterone measurement on the day of AC-FET. Of note, the study results are applicable only to women using MVP for luteal phase support; therefore it is necessary to confirm its validity in comparison with the different existing administration routes of progesterone.

Serum progesterone concentration on pregnancy test day might predict ongoing pregnancy after controlled ovarian stimulation and fresh embryo transfer

Progesterone (P4) is essential for pregnancy. A controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) leads to a iatrogenic luteal defect that indicates a luteal phase support (LPS) at least until pregnancy test day. Some clinicians continue the LPS until week 8 or later, when P4 is mainly secreted by syncytiotrophoblast cells.Measuring serum P4 on pregnancy test day after a fresh embryo transfer could help to identify women who might benefit from prolonged LPS. In women with LPS based on P4 administered by the rectal route, P4 concentration on pregnancy test day was significantly higher in patients with ongoing pregnancy than in patients with abnormal pregnancy.This monocentric retrospective study used data on 99 consecutive cycles of COS, triggered with human chorionic gonadotropin, followed by fresh embryo transfer resulting in a positive pregnancy test (>100 IU/L) (from November 2020 to November 2022). Patients undergoing preimplantation genetic screening or with ectopic pregnancy were excluded. All patients received standard luteal phase support (i.e. micronized vaginal progesterone 600 mg per day for 15 days). The primary endpoint was P4 concentration at day 15 after oocyte retrieval (pregnancy test day) in women with ongoing pregnancy for >12 weeks and in patients with miscarriage before week 12 of pregnancy.The median P4 concentration [range] at pregnancy test day was higher in women with ongoing pregnancy than in women with miscarriage (55.9 ng/mL [11.6; 290.6] versus 18.1 ng/mL [8.3; 140.9], p = 0.002). A P4 concentration ≥16.5 ng/mL at pregnancy test day was associated with higher ongoing pregnancy rate (OR = 12.5, 95% CI 3.61 - 43.33, p <0.001). A P4 concentration ≥16.5 ng/mL at pregnancy test day was significantly associated with higher live birth rate (OR = 11.88, 95% CI 3.30-42.71, p <0.001).After COS and fresh embryo transfer, the risk of miscarriage is higher in women who discontinue luteal support after 15 days, as recommended, but with P4 concentration <16.5 ng/mL. The benefit of individualized prolonged luteal phase support should be evaluated.

[Comparison of oral dydrogesterone with micronized vaginal progesterone in fresh embryo transfert in IVF/ICSI]

INTRODUCTION

Luteal insufficiency corresponds to a progesterone deficiency affecting women who receive treatment for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Different routes of progesterone administration exist and have varying degrees of acceptability to patients. The aim of this study was to compare two luteal phase support (LPS) treatments: oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone on the clinical pregnancy occurrence after fresh embryo transfer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was a monocentric historical and observational cohort study carried out in the reproductive medicine department at the University Hospital, Femme Mère Enfant in Lyon. All the data were collected retrospectively. Women between 18 and 43 years old, who completed an IVF cycle with or without ICSI, followed by fresh embryo transfer on the second or third day after oocyte retrieval (D2 or D3) or at the blastocyst stage (D5 or D6) between July 2019 and July 2020 were included. The 290 patients included between July 2019 and January 2020 received 600mg per day of PMV. The 290 patients in the OD group included between January and July 2020 received 30mg OD per day.

RESULTS

In the univariate analysis, the clinical pregnancy occurrence per transfer was comparable between the MVP and OD groups (P>0.05) (OR [95% CI]): 0.904 [0.630 ; 1.296]. In the multivariate analysis, OD also appeared to be associated with a similar pregnancy occurrence compared to MVP, with a non-significant difference (OR [95% CI]): 0.940 [0.640; 1.380]. The use of OD compared to MVP did not significantly influence the clinical pregnancy occurrence in any age group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the clinical pregnancy occurrence, whether the patients belonged to the reference population of the center or not (P>0.05) (OR [95% CI]): 2.367 [0.568; 3.568].

CONCLUSION

This important French retrospective study confirms the safety and efficacy of OD.

Impact of endometrial preparation on early pregnancy loss and live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer: a large multicenter cohort study (14,421 frozen cycles)

STUDY QUESTION

Does the endometrial preparation protocol (artificial cycle (AC) vs natural cycle (NC) vs stimulated cycle (SC)) impact the risk of early pregnancy loss and live birth rate after frozen/thawed embryo transfer (FET)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

In FET, ACs were significantly associated with a higher pregnancy loss rate and a lower live birth rate compared with SC or NC.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

To date, there is no consensus on the optimal endometrial preparation in terms of outcomes. Although some studies have reported a higher pregnancy loss rate using AC compared with NC or SC, no significant difference was found concerning the pregnancy rate or live birth rate. Furthermore, no study has compared the three protocols in a large population.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted in nine reproductive health units in France using the same software to record medical files between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016. FET using endometrial preparation by AC, modified NC or SC were included. The primary outcome was the pregnancy loss rate at 10 weeks of gestation. The sample size required was calculated to detect an increase of 5% in the pregnancy loss rate (21–26%), with an alpha risk of 0.5 and a power of 0.8. We calculated that 1126 pregnancies were needed in each group, i.e. 3378 in total.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Data were collected by automatic extraction using the same protocol. All consecutive autologous FET cycles were included: 14 421 cycles (AC: n = 8139; NC: n = 3126; SC: n = 3156) corresponding to 3844 pregnancies (hCG > 100 IU/l) (AC: n = 2214; NC: n = 812; SC: n = 818). Each center completed an online questionnaire describing its routine practice for FET, particularly the reason for choosing one protocol over another.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

AC represented 56.5% of FET cycles. Mean age of women was 33.5 (SD ± 4.3) years. The mean number of embryos transferred was 1.5 (±0.5). Groups were comparable, except for history of ovulation disorders (P = 0.01) and prior delivery (P = 0.03), which were significantly higher with AC. Overall, the early pregnancy loss rate was 31.5% (AC: 36.5%; NC: 25.6%; SC: 23.6%). Univariable analysis showed a significant association between early pregnancy loss rate and age >38 years, history of early pregnancy loss, ovulation disorders and duration of cryopreservation >6 months. After adjustment (multivariable regression), the early pregnancy loss rate remained significantly higher in AC vs NC (odds ratio (OR) 1.63 (95% CI) [1.35–1.97]; P < 0.0001) and in AC vs SC (OR 1.87 [1.55–2.26]; P < 0.0001). The biochemical pregnancy rate (hCG > 10 and lower than 100 IU/l) was comparable between the three protocols: 10.7% per transfer.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study is limited by its retrospective design that generates missing data. Routine practice within centers was heterogeneous. However, luteal phase support and timing of embryo transfer were similar in AC. Univariable analysis showed no difference between centers. Moreover, a large number of parameters were included in the analysis.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our study shows a significant increase in early pregnancy loss when using AC for endometrial preparation before FET. These results suggest either a larger use of NC or SC, or an improvement of AC by individualizing hormone replacement therapy for patients in order to avoid an excess of pregnancy losses.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this work. G.P.-B. declares consulting fees from Ferring, Gedeon-Richter, Merck KGaA, Theramex, Teva; Speaker’s fees or equivalent from Merck KGaA, Ferring, Gedeon-Richter, Theramex, Teva. N.C. declares consulting fees from Ferring, Merck KGaA, Theramex, Teva; Speaker’s fees or equivalent from Merck KGaA, Ferring. C.R. declares a research grant from Ferring, Gedeon-Richter; consulting fees from Gedeon-Richter, Merck KGaA; Speaker’s fees or equivalent from Merck KGaA, Ferring, Gedeon-Richter; E.M.d’A. declares Speaker’s fees or equivalent from Merck KGaA, MSD, Ferring, Gedeon-Richter, Theramex, Teva. I.C-D. declares Speaker’s fees or equivalent from Merck KGaA, MSD, Ferring, Gedeon-Richter, IBSA. N.M. declares a research grant from Merck KGaA, MSD, IBSA; consulting fees from MSD, Ferring, Gedeon-Richter, Merck KGaA; Speaker’s fees or equivalent from Merck KGaA, MSD, Ferring, Gedeon-Richter, Teva, Goodlife, General Electrics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Low Luteal Serum Progesterone Levels Are Associated With Lower Ongoing Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates in ART: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

Progesterone plays a key role in implantation. Several studies reported that lower luteal progesterone levels might be related to decreased chances of pregnancy. This systematic review was conducted using appropriate key words, on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, from 1990 up to March 2021 to assess if luteal serum progesterone levels are associated with ongoing pregnancy (OP) and live birth (LB) rates (primary outcomes) and miscarriage rate (secondary outcome), according to the number of corpora lutea (CLs). Overall 2,632 non-duplicate records were identified, of which 32 relevant studies were available for quantitative analysis. In artificial cycles with no CL, OP and LB rates were significantly decreased when the luteal progesterone level falls below a certain threshold (risk ratio [RR] 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.84 and 0.73; 95% CI 0.59-0.90, respectively), while the miscarriage rate was increased (RR 1.48; 95% CI 1.17-1.86). In stimulated cycles with several CLs, the mean luteal progesterone level in the no OP and no LB groups was significantly lower than in the OP and LB groups [difference in means 68.8 (95% CI 45.6-92.0) and 272.4 (95% CI 10.8-533.9), ng/ml, respectively]. Monitoring luteal serum progesterone levels could help in individualizing progesterone administration to enhance OP and LB rates, especially in cycles without corpus luteum.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=139019, identifier 139019.

Individualized luteal phase support based on serum progesterone levels in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles maximizes reproductive outcomes in a cohort undergoing preimplantation genetic testing

INTRODUCTION

Low serum progesterone concentration on frozen embryo transfer (FET) day in hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycles results in lower reproductive outcomes. Recent studies showed the efficiency of a "rescue protocol'' to restore reproductive outcomes in these patients. Here, we compared reproductive outcomes in HRT FET cycles in women with low serum progesterone levels who received individualized luteal phase support (iLPS) and in women with adequate serum progesterone levels who underwent in vitro fertilization for pre-implantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements or monogenic disorders.

DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included women (18-43 years of age) undergoing HRT FET cycles with pre-implantation genetic testing at Montpellier University Hospital between June 2020 and May 2022. A standard HRT was used: vaginal micronized estradiol (6mg/day) followed by vaginal micronized progesterone (VMP; 800 mg/day). Serum progesterone was measured after four doses of VMP: if <11ng/ml, 25mg/day subcutaneous progesterone or 30mg/day oral dydrogesterone was introduced.

RESULTS

125 HRT FET cycles were performed in 111 patients. Oral/subcutaneous progesterone supplementation concerned 39 cycles (n=20 with subcutaneous progesterone and n=19 with oral dydrogesterone). Clinical and laboratory parameters of the cycles were comparable between groups. The ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) was 41.03% in the supplemented group and 18.60% in the non-supplemented group (p= 0.008). The biochemical pregnancy rate and miscarriages rate tended to be higher in the non-supplemented group versus the supplemented group: 13.95% versus 5.13% and 38.46% versus 15.79% (p=0.147 and 0.182 respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that progesterone supplementation was significantly associated with higher OPR ​​ (adjusted OR = 3.25, 95% CI [1.38 - 7.68], p=0.007).

CONCLUSION

In HRT FET cycles, progesterone supplementation in patients with serum progesterone concentration <11 ng/mL after four doses of VMP significantly increases the OPR.

Polymer Architecture Effects on Poly(N,N-Diethyl Acrylamide)-b-Poly(Ethylene Glycol)-b-Poly(N,N-Diethyl Acrylamide) Thermoreversible Gels and Their Evaluation as a Healthcare Material

Thermoreversible gels which transition between liquid-like and solid-like states when warmed have enabled significant novel healthcare technologies. Poly(N,N-diethyl acrylamide) (PDEA) is a thermoresponsive polymer which can be used as a trigger to form thermoreversible gels, however its use in these materials is limited and crucial design principles are unknown. Herein ABA copolymers with the structure PDEA-b-poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-b-PDEA are synthesized to give four block copolymers with varied molecular weight of PDEA and PEG blocks. Rheometry on solutions of the block copolymers reveals that high molecular weight PEG blocks are required to form thermoreversible gels with predominantly solid-like behavior. Furthermore, small-angle X-ray scattering elucidates clear differences in the nanostructure of the copolymer library which can be linked to distinct rheological behaviors. A thermoreversible gel formulation based on PDEA (20 kDa)-b-PEG (10 kDa)-b-PDEA (20 kDa) is designed by optimizing the polymer concentration and ionic strength. It is found that the gel is mucoadhesive, stable, and non-toxic, as well as giving controlled release of a hydrophobic drug. Overall, this study provides insight into the effect of polymer architecture on the nanostructure and rheology of PDEA-b-PEG-b-PDEA and presents the development of a highly functional thermoreversible gel with high promise for healthcare applications.

Low serum progesterone affects live birth rate in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles using hormone replacement therapy

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does serum progesterone concentration on the day of vitrified-warmed embryo transfer affect live birth rate (LBR) with hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) cycles?

DESIGN

Observational cohort study of patients (n = 915) undergoing single autologous vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer under HRT using vaginal micronized progesterone. Women were included once, between January 2019 and March 2020. Serum progesterone concentration was measured by a single laboratory on the morning of embryo transfer. The primary end point was LBR. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Median (25th-75th percentile) serum progesterone concentration on the day of embryo transfer was 12.5 ng/ml (9.8-15.3). The LBR was 31.5% (288/915) in the overall population. No significant differences were found in implantation rates (40.7% versus 44.9%); LBR was significantly lower in women with a progesterone concentration ≤25th percentile (≤9.8 ng/ml) (26.1% versus 33.2%, P = 0.045) versus women with a progesterone concentration >25th percentile. This correlated with a significantly higher early miscarriage rate (35.9% versus 21.6%, P = 0.005). After adjusting for potential confounding factors in multivariate analysis, low serum progesterone levels (≤9.8 ng/ml) remained significantly associated with lower LBR (OR 0.68 95% CI 0.48 to 0.97).

CONCLUSION

A minimum serum progesterone concentration is needed to optimize reproductive outcomes in HRT cycles with single autologous vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer. Whether modifications of progesterone administration routes, dosage, or both, can improve pregnancy rates needs further study so that treatment of patients undergoing HRT cycles can be further individualized.

Individualized luteal phase support normalizes live birth rate in women with low progesterone levels on the day of embryo transfer in artificial endometrial preparation cycles

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the impact on live birth rates (LBRs) of the individualized luteal phase support (termed iLPS) in patients with low serum progesterone (P) levels compared with patients without iLPS.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study, December 1, 2018, to May 30, 2019.

SETTING

Private medical center.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 2,275 patients checked for serum P on the day of blastocyst transfer were analyzed. During the study period, 1,299 patients showed serum P levels of ≥9.2 ng/mL, whereas 550 showed serum P levels of <9.2 ng/mL and received iLPS. Additionally, a historical group of 426 patients with serum P levels of <9.2 ng/mL but no iLPS were used for comparison. Eligible patients were aged ≤50 years with adequate endometrium morphology after receiving estrogens. Luteal phase support was provided with micronized vaginal P (MVP) to all women. Patients with personalized initiation of exogenous P according to the endometrial receptivity assay test, polyps, fibroids distorting the cavity, or hydrosalpinx were not included in the analysis.

INTERVENTION(S)

As routine practice since December 2018, patients with low serum P levels received an iLPS with a daily injection of 25 mg of subcutaneous P from the day of embryo transfer (ET) in addition to standard LPS (400 mg of MVP twice a day).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Live birth rate.

RESULT(S)

The LBR was 44.9% in the iLPS cases vs. 45.0% in patients with normal serum P levels (crude odds ratio [OR], 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.22). By regression analysis, low serum P levels did not affect the LBR after adjusting for possible confounders (age, oocyte origin, fresh vs. frozen, day of ET, embryo quality, number of embryos transferred) (adjusted OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.79-1.25). Similarly, no differences were observed in other pregnancy outcomes between groups. The LBR was significantly higher in the group of patients who received additional subcutaneous P (iLPS) compared with the historical group with low serum P levels and no iLPS (44.9% vs. 37.3%; OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06-1.78). In the overall population, patients showing P levels of <9.2 ng/mL on the day of ET were slightly younger and had higher body mass index and lower estradiol and P levels during the proliferative phase compared with patients with P levels of ≥9.2 ng/mL. No differences were observed with regard to the time in between the last dose of MVP and the serum P determination. After a multivariable logistic regression analysis, only body mass index and estradiol levels in the proliferative phase reminded statistically significant. Significant differences in the LBR were observed between patients with serum P levels of <9.2 ng/mL without iLPS and patients with serum P levels of ≥9.2 ng/mL when using either own or donated oocytes.

CONCLUSION(S)

Individualized LPS for patients with low serum P levels produces LBRs similar to those of patients with adequate serum P levels.

Women utilizing oocyte donation have a decreased live birth rate if they displayed a low progesterone level in a previous hormonal replacement mock cycle

PURPOSE

Is serum progesterone(P) level on day 2 of vaginal P administration in a hormonally substituted mock cycle predictive of live birth in oocyte donation(OD)?

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 110 mock cycles from 2008 to 2016 of OD recipients having at least one subsequent embryo transfer (ET). Endometrial preparation consisted of sequential administration of vaginal estradiol, followed by transdermal estradiol and 600 mg/day vaginal micronized P. In mock cycles, serum P was measured 2 days after vaginal P introduction. OD was performed 1 to 3 years later, without P measurement.

RESULTS

In mock cycles, mean serum P level on day 2 was 12.8 ± 4.5 ng/mL (range: 4-28 ng/mL). A total of 32% patients had P < 10 ng/mL. At the time of first OD, age of recipients and donors, number of retrieved and attributed oocytes, and number of transferred embryos were comparable between patients with P < 10 ng/mL in their mock cycles compared with P ≥ 10 ng/mL. Pregnancy and live birth rate after first ET were significantly lower for patients with P < 10ng/mL (9% vs. 35 %; P = 0.002 and 9% vs. 32%; P = 0.008, respectively). Considering both fresh and subsequent frozen-thawed ET, cumulative live birth rate per-patient and per-transfer were significantly lower in patients with P < 10 ng/mL in their mock cycle (14% vs. 35%; P = 0.02 and 11% vs. 27%; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

A low P level in hormonally substituted cycles several years before ET performed with the same endometrial preparation is associated with a significantly lower chance of live birth. This suggests that altered vaginal P absorption is a permanent phenomenon. Monitoring serum P in hormonally substituted cycles appears mandatory to adjust luteal P substitution.

Serum progesterone level and ongoing pregnancy rate following frozen-thawed embryo transfer after artificial endometrial preparation: a monocentric retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

In some studies, early pregnancy loss (EPL) rate is higher with artificial cycle (AC) endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo (FET) transfer than with other protocols, even though pregnancy rates are similar. An inadequate luteal phase support could explain these findings. The aim of this study was to compare, among the patients who had a pregnancy after FET with AC endometrial preparation, serum progesterone (PG) levels between those who experienced an EPL or an ongoing pregnancy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A monocentric retrospective cohort study, conducted at a University affiliated fertility center, studied 130 FET cycles with AC endometrial preparation between June 2016 and July 2017. Serum PG rates were compared according to reproductive outcomes and to endometrial preparation protocol on day 10 or 12 after FET (PG0) according to the embryo stage, and every 48h in case of pregnancy (i.e. PG1; PG2).

RESULTS

Among patients who had a pregnancy after FET with AC (n=33), serum PG levels were higher in case of an ongoing pregnancy than EPL, only significantly at PG1 (PG0 12.4ng/mL [7.5-14.6] vs 8.2ng/mL [6.0-13.0], p= 0.320; PG1 15.0 ng/mL [14.0-15.9] vs 8.5ng/mL [5.9-13.8], p= 0.048).

DISCUSSION

We found that serum PG level was lower in women experiencing early pregnancy loss after FET with AC endometrial preparation, potentially reflecting a lack of appropriate luteal phase support with PG. A cycle AC test, monitoring serum PG levels after its steady state, could detect this lack of PG, allowing physicians to adapt PG supplementation.

Factors associated with serum progesterone concentrations the day before cryopreserved embryo transfer in artificial cycles

RESEARCH QUESTION

What factors determine serum progesterone concentrations the day before cryopreserved embryo transfer in artificially prepared cycles?

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study at a university-affiliated fertility centre including infertile women under 45 years old using own oocytes who underwent a total of 685 single cryopreserved blastocyst transfers under hormonal therapy. Determinants that affected live birth rate (LBR) were analysed using a multivariate logistic regression. Univariate analysis and multivariate linear regression were used to evaluate independent factors that affect serum progesterone concentrations.

RESULTS

Age (odds ratio [OR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.96), duration of oestradiol (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.92-0.99), serum progesterone concentrations (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.08) and patients who underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.55-3.03) were independently associated with LBR. After univariate analysis, determinants of progesterone concentrations were: age, weight, history of a previous cryopreserved embryo transfer with serum progesterone concentrations <10 ng/ml, and time of blood extraction. The multivariate linear regression showed that increasing age presented a positive correlation with progesterone concentrations (β = 0.11; 95% CI 0.01-0.20). On the contrary, significant negative correlations with progesterone concentrations were shown for a previous history of serum progesterone value <10 ng/ml (β = -3.13; 95% CI -4.45 to -1.81]), higher weight (β = -0.05; 95% CI -0.08 to -0.01) and the time of blood sampling during the day (β = -0.13; 95% CI -0.25 to -0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study adds more evidence regarding the importance of serum progesterone concentrations before frozen embryo transfer (FET). It also showed that body weight, age, time of blood sampling and a history of low progesterone are determinants associated with progesterone concentrations before blastocyst FET.

[Progesterone and frozen-thawed embryo transfer after hormonal replacement therapy for endometrial preparation: An update on medical practices]

Frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) has recently become the most frequently performed ART procedure. Many protocols for endometrial preparation are used, without any evidence-based superiority of one protocol above the others. Most French fertility centers mainly use hormonal replacement treatment (HRT) for endometrial preparation for organizational reasons. According to some studies, early pregnancy losses rate is higher with HRT endometrial preparation for FET than with other protocols, leading to new insights in improving outcomes into ART centers. There is a lack of consensual guidelines regarding the use of HRT for FET: there are various protocols, with different dosages, duration and routes for progesterone (PG) prescription. To date, the vaginal route is the most popular around the world as it gives higher intra-uterine concentration of PG because of the first uterine pass. However, recent scientific publications have pointed the importance of PG measurement in order to detect a lack of PG supplementation. Whatever the route of administration, it seems that a significant proportion of patients do not reach adequate PG concentrations for successful implantation and ongoing pregnancy. Timing of the measurement and ideal serum PG rate to reach are yet to be defined. What treatment strategy to adopt according to the results is still under investigation. Individualization of PG doses and routes of administration could lead to a decrease in miscarriages and better outcome.

Measuring the serum progesterone level on the day of transfer can be an additional tool to maximize ongoing pregnancies in single euploid frozen blastocyst transfers

BACKGROUND

Endometrial preparation with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is the preferred regimen for clinicians due to the opportunity to schedule the day of embryo transfer and for patients due to the requirement of fewer visits for frozen-warmed embryo transfers (FET). The increasing number of FETs raises the question of the serum P levels required to optimize the pregnancy outcome on the embryo transfer day.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study includes patients who underwent single euploid FET. All patients received HRT with oestradiol valerate (EV) and 100 mg of intramuscular (IM) progesterone (P). FET was scheduled 117-120 h after the first IM administration of 100 mg P. The serum P level was analyzed 1 h before the embryo transfer (ET). In all cycles, only embryos that were biopsied on day 5 were utilized for FET. Next generation sequencing (NGS) was used for comprehensive chromosomal analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, the ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) was 58.9% (99/168). Data were then categorized according to the presence (Group I; n = 99) or the absence (Group II; n = 69) of an ongoing pregnancy. No significant differences regarding, female age, body mass index (BMI), number of previous miscarriages, number of previous live birth, sperm concentration, number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature oocytes (MII), rate of fertilized oocytes with two pronuclei (2PN), trophectoderm score, inner cell mass (ICM) score, endometrial thickness (mm), oestrodiol (E₂) and P levels prior to IM P administration were found between two groups. The P levels on the day of ET (ng/ml) were significantly higher in Group I (28 (5.6-76.4) vs 16.4 (7.4-60) p = 0.039). The P level on the day of ET was a predictor of a higher OPR (p < 0.001 OR: 1.033 95%CI [1.009-1.056]) after multivariate analysis. The ROC curve showed a significant predictive value of serum P levels on the day of ET for OPR, with an AUC (95%CI) = 0.716 (0.637-0.795). The optimal cut-off value for prediction of the OPR was a P level of 20.6 ng/ml (71.7% sensitivity, 56.5% specificity).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests a minimum threshold of the serum P value on the day of ET that needs to be reached in HRT cycles to optimize the clinical outcome. Individualization of the P dosage should be evaluated in further studies.

Higher live birth rate with stimulated rather than artificial cycle for frozen-thawed embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

To study which endometrial preparation allows a better ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) and live birth rate (LBR) after frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) between mild gonadotropin ovarian stimulation (OS) and artificial cycles (AC).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective follow-up study including all FET performed in one fertility center from 2013 to 2016. In the OS group, gonadotropins were followed by r-hCG triggering. Vaginal micronized progesterone (200 mg/day) was given systematically. In the AC group, estradiol (E2) was started on Day 1. Vaginal micronized progesterone (600 mg/d) was added to E2 for 12 weeks. Data were analyzed using a multiple regression model.

RESULTS

Among 1021 FETs, 35% underwent OS preparation, 65% had an AC. As expected, patients in the AC group suffered more from endometriosis (18.5% vs. 12.9%; p = .021) and polycystic ovarian syndrome (21.7% vs. 10.9%; p < .0001) than patients in the OS group. There was no difference between groups with respect to endometrial thickness, number of embryos transferred, development stage at FET, cryopreservation technique. Despite a similar clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (24.4% vs. 20.8%; p = .189), the OPR was significantly higher in the OS than in the AC group (17.9% vs. 11%; p = .002), leading to an increased LBR (17.1% vs. 9.8%; p < .001). After adjusting for parameters usually linked to early pregnancy losses or potential bias (patient age at freezing, smoking status, PCOS, endometriosis, rank of transfer and previous miscarriages), the results remained significant.

CONCLUSION

Despite a similar CPR, LBR was significantly higher with mild OS than with the AC preparation, even after adjusting for potential confounders. In light of these results, the first-line endometrial preparation could be OS instead of an AC. In an AC, a potential defect of the luteal phase may exist, treatment could be optimized to avoid pregnancy losses. A randomized controlled trial should be undertaken to assess the role of OS and ACs in FET.

Oral dydrogesterone vs. vaginal progesterone capsules for luteal-phase support in women undergoing embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To identify, appraise, and summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral dydrogesterone to vaginal progesterone capsules for luteal-phase support (LPS) in women offered fresh or frozen embryo transfers following in vitro fertilization.

METHODS

Two independent authors screened the literature for papers based on titles and abstracts, then selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Dydrogesterone and progesterone were compared based on risk ratios (RR) and the precision of the estimates was assessed through the 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

An electronic search performed on June 7, 2017 retrieved 376 records, nine of which were papers deemed eligible and included in this systematic review and quantitative analysis. Good quality evidence indicates that oral dydrogesterone provided at least similar results than vaginal progesterone capsules on live birth/ongoing pregnancy (RR=1.08, 95%CI=0.92-1.26, I2=29%, 8 RCTs, 3,386 women) and clinical pregnancy rates (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.27; I2=43%; 9 RCTs; 4,061 women). Additionally, moderate quality evidence suggests there is no relevant difference on miscarriage rates (RR=0.92, 95%CI=0.68-1.26, I2=6%, 8 RCTs, 988 clinical pregnancies; the quality of the evidence was downgraded because of imprecision).

CONCLUSIONS

Good quality evidence from RCTs suggest that oral dydrogesterone provides at least similar reproductive outcomes than vaginal progesterone capsules when used for LPS in women undergoing embryo transfers. Dydrogesterone is a reasonable option and the choice of either of the medications should be based on cost and side effects.

Dydrogesterone vs progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of dydrogesterone and progesterone for luteal-phase support (LPS) in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques (ART).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by searching the following electronic databases: Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN Registry and WHO ICTRP.

RESULTS

The last search was performed in October 2015. Eight RCTs were considered eligible and were included in the review and meta-analyses. There was no relevant difference between oral dydrogesterone and vaginal progesterone for LPS with respect to rate of ongoing pregnancy (risk ratio (RR), 1.04 (95% CI, 0.92-1.18); I(2) , 0%; seven RCTs, 3134 women), clinical pregnancy (RR, 1.07 (95% CI, 0.93-1.23); I(2) , 34%; eight RCTs, 3809 women) or miscarriage (RR, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.53-1.10); I(2) , 0%; seven RCTs, 906 clinical pregnancies). Two of the three studies reporting on dissatisfaction of treatment identified lower levels of dissatisfaction among women using oral dydrogesterone than among women using vaginal progesterone (oral dydrogesterone vs vaginal progesterone capsules: 2/79 (2.5%) vs 90/351 (25.6%), respectively; oral dydrogesterone vs vaginal progesterone gel: 19/411 (4.6%) vs 74/411 (18.0%), respectively). The third study showed no difference in dissatisfaction rate (oral dydrogesterone vs vaginal progesterone capsules: 8/96 (8.3%) vs 8/114 (7.0%), respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral dydrogesterone seems to be as effective as vaginal progesterone for LPS in ART cycles, and appears to be better tolerated . Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.