KRAS and BRAF Mutation Detection: Is Immunohistochemistry a Possible Alternative to Molecular Biology in Colorectal Cancer?

Eosinophilic Cells in Ovarian Borderline Serous Tumors as a Predictor of BRAF Mutation

According to recent reports, ovarian serous borderline tumor (SBT) harboring the BRAF V600E mutation is associated with a lower risk of progression to low-grade serous carcinoma. Preliminary observations suggest that there may be an association between eosinophilic cells (ECs) and the above-mentioned mutation, so this study aimed to evaluate interobserver reproducibility for assessing ECs. Forty-two samples of SBTs were analyzed for ECs with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. Immunohistochemical staining and genetic pro-filing were performed in all cases to verify the BRAF V600E mutation. A BRAF V600E mutation was found in 19 of 42 (45%) cases. Inter-observer reproducibility in the assessment of ECs was substantial (κ = 0.7). The sensitivity and specificity for predicting the mutation were 79% and 91%, respectively. Patients with BRAF-mutated SBTs were significantly younger than those without mutation (p = 0.005). SBTs with BRAF mutation were less likely to be accompanied by non-invasive implants than wild-type SBT: 12% (2/17) versus 33% (6/18). Seven cases were excluded due to incomplete cytoreductive surgery. Nevertheless, Fisher's exact test showed no significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.228). Overall, this study strengthens the idea that ECs in ovarian SBTs may represent a mutation with prognostic significance, which can serve as a primary screening test for BRAF V600E mutation in this pathologic entity.

The relationship of KRAS expression with KRAS status, prognosis, and tumor-infiltrated T lymphocytes in colorectal cancer

Background

The significance of Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) mutation in colorectal cancer (CRC) is well established; yet, its association with KRAS expression and prognosis warrants further investigation. While high KRAS expression is commonly linked with poorer prognosis in other cancers, its role in CRC remains relatively understudied.

Objective

To explore the correlation between KRAS expression, KRAS status, prognosis, and tumor-infiltrating T lymphocyte density in CRC.

Design

Single-center retrospective study.

Methods

Conducted between 2010 and 2020, this study utilized tumor samples to assess KRAS expression and quantify CD3+/CD8+ T lymphocytes. The Cox proportional hazards model and linear regression analysis were employed to examine the relationship between KRAS expression, prognosis, and tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes.

Results

This study included 265 CRC patients who underwent radical surgery. No significant association was observed between KRAS expression and KRAS status (p > 0.05). High KRAS expression was associated with poorer overall survival and disease-free survival (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that high KRAS expression remained indicative of a worse prognosis in the group with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and KRAS mutant type (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed KRAS expression as an unfavorable prognostic factor (p < 0.05). However, the significance of KRAS expression was lost in the dMMR and KRAS mutant-type group regarding overall survival (p > 0.05). Notably, KRAS expression showed a negative correlation with the density of CD8+ T lymphocytes in tumor tissue (p < 0.05), a finding also observed in the dMMR group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

No association was found between KRAS expression and KRAS mutation status in CRC. Higher KRAS expression was indicative of poorer prognosis for CRC patients, except for those with proficient mismatch repair and KRAS wild type. In addition, in patients with dMMR, KRAS expression was associated with a lower density of CD8+ T lymphocytes in tumor tissue.

Contiguous squamous proliferations in syringocystadenoma papilliferum: A retrospective study of 14 cases

BACKGROUND

Syringocystadenoma papilliferum is a benign adnexal neoplasm. Contiguous squamous proliferation has been rarely described in syringocystadenoma papilliferum.

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the spectrum and pathogenesis of contiguous squamous proliferation in syringocystadenoma papilliferum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All cases of syringocystadenoma papilliferum diagnosed over the past 12 years were screened for contiguous squamous proliferation. Cases with associated nevus sebaceous were excluded from the study. Immunohistochemistry for GATA3, CK7, BRAFV600E and p16 was performed. PCR for human papilloma virus, type 16 and 18, was carried out.

RESULTS

Of a total of 30 cases, 14 cases showed associated contiguous squamous proliferation which included four cases of verrucous hyperplasia, six cases with papillomatosis, two cases with mild squamous hyperplasia and one case each of Bowen's disease and squamous cell carcinoma. In the cases with non-neoplastic contiguous squamous proliferations, the squamous component did not express CK7 or GATA3. However, the squamous component of premalignant and malignant lesions expressed CK7 and GATA3 concordant with the adenomatous component. BRAF was positive in adenomatous component in five cases while the contiguous squamous proliferation component was negative for BRAF in all but one case. p16 was negative in both components of all cases and PCR for human papilloma virus was negative in all cases.

LIMITATIONS

Due to the rarity of disease, the sample size of our study was relatively small with two cases in the 2nd group, that is, syringocystadenoma papilliferum with malignant contiguous squamous proliferation. Detailed molecular studies such as gene sequencing were not performed.

CONCLUSION

Syringocystadenoma papilliferum with contiguous squamous proliferation is underreported, and most commonly displays verrucous hyperplasia. The premalignant and malignant contiguous squamous proliferations likely arise from syringocystadenoma papilliferum while the hyperplastic contiguous squamous proliferations likely arise from the adjacent epidermis. Relationship with high-risk human papilloma virus is unlikely. However, further molecular analysis of larger number of cases is required to establish the pathogenesis.

Regulation of KRAS protein expression by miR-544a and KRAS-LCS6 polymorphism in wild-type KRAS sporadic colon adenocarcinoma

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) results from the accumulation of genetic mutations and alterations in signaling pathways. KRAS is mutated in 40% of CRC cases and is involved in increased tumor cells proliferation and survival. Although KRAS mutations are a dominant event in CRC tumorigenesis, increased wild-type KRAS expression has a similar effect on accelerated tumor growth. In this study, we investigated the KRAS status in correlation with clinicopathological features in sporadic CRC and more importantly the role of let-7a-5p and miR-544a-3p in the regulation of wild-type KRAS protein expression in the tumor center (T1) and invasive tumor front (T2). Analysis showed that 39.1% of tumor samples had KRAS mutations. In wild-type KRAS tumors, 62.0% were positive for KRAS protein expression and there was a higher percentage of KRAS-positive tumor cells and a higher intensity of immunohistochemical reaction in T2 than in T1 samples. This could not be attributed to differences in KRAS mRNA levels, suggesting regulation via miR-544a-3p expression which was significantly decreased in T2 samples. Furthermore, we demonstrated that tumor samples carrying the KRAS-LCS6 variant allele had significantly higher protein expression of the wild-type KRAS. Our results suggest the role of the KRAS-LCS6 polymorphism and miR-544a-3p expression in the regulation of wild-type KRAS protein expression in sporadic CRC.

Colorectal Cancer: From Genetic Landscape to Targeted Therapy

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer type and the second cause of death worldwide. The advancement in understanding molecular pathways involved in CRC has led to new classifications based on the molecular characteristics of each tumor and also improved CRC management through the integration of targeted therapy into clinical practice. In this review, we will present the main molecular pathways involved in CRC carcinogenesis, the molecular classifications. The anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR therapies currently used in CRC treatment and those under clinical investigation will also be outlined, as well as the mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab). Targeted therapy has led to great improvement in the treatment of metastatic CRC. However, there has been variability in CRC treatment outcomes due to molecular heterogeneity in colorectal tumors, which underscores the need for identifying prognostic and predictive biomarkers for CRC-targeted drugs.

Molecular Features of the Serrated Pathway to Colorectal Cancer: Current Knowledge and Future Directions

Serrated lesions are the precursor lesions of a new model of colorectal carcinogenesis. From a molecular standpoint, the serrated pathway is thought to be responsible for up to 30% of all colorectal cancer cases. The three major processes of this molecular mechanism are alterations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, production of the CpG island methylation phenotype, and generation of microsatellite instability. Other contributing processes are activation of WNT, alterations in the regulation of tumor suppressor genes, and alterations in microRNAs or in MUC5AC hypomethylation. Although alterations in the serrated pathway also contribute, their precise roles remain obscure because of the various methodologies and definitions used by different research groups. This knowledge gap affects clinical assessment of precursor lesions for their carcinogenic risk. The present review describes the current literature reporting the molecular mechanisms underlying each type of serrated lesion and each phenotype of serrated pathway colorectal cancer, identifying those areas that merit additional research. We also propose a unified serrated carcinogenesis pathway combining molecular alterations and types of serrated lesions, which ends in different serrated pathway colorectal cancer phenotypes depending on the route followed. Finally, we describe some key issues that need to be addressed in order to incorporate the newest technologies in serrated pathway research and to improve overall knowledge for developing specific prevention strategies and new therapeutic targets.

Detection of MAPK/ERK pathway proteins and KRAS mutations in adenomatoid odontogenic tumors

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the frequency of KRAS mutation and its association with the presence of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway proteins in adenomatoid odontogenic tumors.

STUDY DESIGN

Paraffin-embedded tissue samples from nine cases of adenomatoid odontogenic tumor were used. Genomic DNA was extracted from each sample; in one case, genetic mutations in 50 cancer-associated genes were examined by next-generation sequencing. Hotspot mutations in the RAS family were analyzed by Luminex assay using the remaining eight cases. Subsequently, immunohistochemistry for KRAS, CRAF, BRAF, EGFR, ERK, MEK, and BRAFV600E was performed.

RESULTS

A KRAS G12D missense mutation was detected in the DNA sequence of the tumor cells, but it was not detected in the stromal tissue. KRAS G12V and KRAS G12R mutations were detected in two and four cases, respectively. For immunohistochemistry, all the cases were EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, CRAF positive, one case was ERK negative,and one case was MEK and ERK negative, all the other remaining cases were MEK and ERK positive.

CONCLUSION

KRAS mutation at codon 12 and the presence of MAPK/ERK pathway proteins were detected suggesting their association with tumorigenesis of adenomatoid odontogenic tumors.

An immunohistochemical approach to detect oncogenic CTNNB1 mutations in primary neoplastic tissues

The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is dysregulated in different types of neoplasms including colorectal cancer (CRC). Aberrant activation of this signaling pathway is a key early event in the development of colorectal neoplasms, and is mainly caused by loss of function mutations in Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC), and less frequently by β-catenin stabilization mutations via missense or interstitial genomic deletions in CTNNB1. In this study, we have defined an immunohistochemical algorithm to dissect Wnt pathway alterations in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded neoplastic tissues. Basically, consecutive sections of tumor specimens were stained by immunohistochemistry with two different monoclonal antibodies against β-catenin: one (anti-active β-catenin antibody) recognizes hypo-phosphorylated β-catenin and the other recognizes the total pool of β-catenin. We validated the strategy in the HCT116 CRC cell line which has an in-frame deletion of β-catenin serine 45, and then studied human tumor microarrays containing colon adenomas, CRCs, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas as well as the whole tissue sections of CRCs, desmoid fibromatosis, and pilomatrixoma of the skin. In some tumors, we found strong β-catenin cytoplasmic and/or nuclear staining with the total β-catenin antibody but no staining with the anti-active β-catenin antibody. This was inferred to be an altered/mutant β-catenin staining pattern. All six colon adenomas of the 126 total adenomas studied for the altered/mutant β-catenin staining pattern had presumptively pathogenic point mutations or deletions in CTNNB1. Four of 10 CRCs with the alterated/mutant β-catenin staining pattern studied in depth, from 181 total CRCs from tissue microarray, had pathogenic CTNNB1 mutations. The frequencies of CTNNB1 alterations in non-colonic tumors with altered/mutant β-catenin staining ranged between 46 and 100%. Our results demonstrate that the immunohistochemical approach described here can detect oncogenic forms of β-catenin in primary tissue samples and can also highlight other tumors with presumptive novel defects activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

EGFR mutation status in Tunisian non-small-cell lung cancer patients evaluated by mutation-specific immunohistochemistry

Background

Screening mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) to analyze non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) profile is the criterion to choose the best therapeutic strategy.

New Oncology guidelines recommend EGFR mutation analysis before prescribing tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment.

Majority of lung cancer patients are diagnosed at advanced stages and generally only small biopsies materials are available for diagnostic and molecular characterization. The aim of this first work is to screen EGFR mutation status in Tunisian NSCLC by mutation-specific immunohistochemistry (IHC) and molecular biology, to estimate the relevance of proposing TKIs as a new therapeutic line.

Methods

E746-A750 deletion and L858R mutations were screened in 50 unselected NSCLC formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples. Mutation expression by IHC was evaluated by intensity and percentage of staining and correlated to patients’ data. DNA was extracted and EGFR mutations were analyzed by Sanger sequencing. Positive and negative controls were included for EGFR mutations in order to support the results.

Results

Among our patients (48 men and 2 women) all adenocarcinoma (confirmed by histology and IHC with TTF1/Napsin A), 94% were smokers exceeding the tobacco risk threshold (at least 25 pack-years) and the women were none. 44% had EGFR mutation by IHC: 26% had simple mutation and 18% had concurrent mutation. All mutated cases were smokers except a woman who was none. Concurrent mutations patients exceeded 40 pack-years. 91.4% of IHC results were validated by molecular analysis (100% of negative and 85% of positive cases) showing either T > G (exon 21) or 2235–2249 del (exon 19).

Conclusions

These preliminary results confirm the usefulness of IHC to detect EGFR mutations but the frequency of concurrent mutations doesn’t appear in favor of EGFR TKIs treatment. In fact, literature reports a significantly worse response compared to those with single mutation when treated by TKIs.

Concomitant KIT/BRAF and PDGFRA/BRAF mutations are rare events in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

AIM

The BRAF mutation is a rare pathogenetic alternative to KIT/PDGFRA mutation in GIST and causes Imatinib resistance. A recent description of KIT and BRAF mutations co-occurring in an untreated GIST has challenged the concept of their being mutually exclusive and may account for ab initio resistance to Imatinib, even in the presence of Imatinib-sensitive KIT mutations. BRAF sequencing is generally limited to KIT/PDGFRA wild-type cases. Hence, the frequency of concomitant mutations may be underestimated.

METHODS

We screened for KIT (exon 9, 11, 13, 17), PDGFRA (exon 12,14, 18) and BRAF (exon 15) mutations a series of 407 GIST. Additionally, we evaluated the BRAF V600E mutation-specific antibody, VE1, as a surrogate for V600E mutation, on a series of 313 GIST (24 on whole sections, 288 cases on tissue array), including 6 cases molecularly ascertained to carry the BRAF V600E mutation.

RESULTS

No concomitant KIT/BRAF or PDGFRA/BRAF mutations were detected. BRAF mutation was detected only in one case, wild-type for KIT/PDGFRA. All the 6 BRAF-mutant cases stained positive with the VE1 antibody. A weak VE1 expression was observed in 14/287 (4.9%) BRAF wild-type cases, as observed also in 2/6 BRAF-mutant cases. Overall in our series, sensitivity and specificity of the VE1 antobody were 100% and 95.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The concomitance of BRAF mutation with either KIT or PDGFRA mutation is rare in GIST. In these tumors, moderate/strong VE1 immunoreactivity is a valuable surrogate for molecular analysis. Instead, genotyping is warranted in the presence of weak VE1 staining.

Immunohistochemistry with Anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) Mouse Monoclonal Antibody is a Sensitive Method for Detection of the BRAF V600E Mutation in Colon Cancer: Evaluation of 120 Cases with and without KRAS Mutation and Literature Review

The major aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody in colorectal tumors with and without KRAS mutation. KRAS and BRAF are two major oncogenic drivers of colorectal cancer (CRC) that have been frequently described as mutually exclusive, thus the BRAF V600E mutation is not expected to be present in the cases with KRAS mutation. In addition, a review of 25 studies comparing immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody with BRAF V600E molecular testing in 4041 patient samples was included. One-hundred and twenty cases with/without KRAS or BRAF mutations were acquired. The tissue were immunostained with anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody with OptiView DAB IHC detection kit. The KRAS mutated cases with equivocal immunostaining were further evaluated by Sanger sequencing for BRAF V600E mutation. Thirty cases with BRAF V600E mutation showed unequivocal, diffuse, uniform, positive cytoplasmic staining and 30 cases with wild-type KRAS and BRAF showed negative staining with anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody. Out of 60 cases with KRAS mutation, 56 cases (93.3%) were negative for BRAF V600E mutation by IHC. Four cases showed weak, equivocal, heterogeneous, cytoplasmic staining along with nuclear staining in 25-90% of tumor cells. These cases were confirmed to be negative for BRAF V600E mutation by Sanger sequencing. Overall, IHC with anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody using recommended protocol with OptiView detection is optimal for detection of BRAF V600E mutation in CRC. Our data are consistent with previous reports indicating that KRAS and BRAF V600E mutation are mutually exclusive.

Pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: analysis of prognostic factors affecting survival

Background

Pulmonary metastasectomy is considered a standard procedure in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Different prognostic factors including multiple metastatic nodules, the presence of extra-pulmonary metastases and BRAF mutation status have been associated with poor survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate which factors influenced survival in CRC patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy by studying primary tumors and pulmonary metastases.

Methods

All patients treated for primary CRC who presented pulmonary metastases in a 10-year period were considered (group A). A control group treated for primary CRC who did not develop any pulmonary or extra-pulmonary metastases was taken for comparison (group B). Different prognostic factors including gender, age, tumor location, histological type, inflammatory infiltrate, BRAF, CDX2 and extra-pulmonary metastases were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and patients' survival after pulmonary metastasectomy were also considered.

Results

Fifty-four patients were evaluated in group A and twenty-three in group B. In group A, BRAF immunohistochemistry did not significantly differ between primary tumors and pulmonary metastases; no difference of BRAF expression was found between group A and B. Even the expression of CDX2 was not significantly different in primary tumors and metastases. Similarly, in group B CDX2 did not significantly differ from primary CRC of group A. The most significant prognostic factor was the presence of extra-pulmonary metastases. Patients with extra-pulmonary metastases experienced a significant shorter survival compared to patients with pulmonary metastases alone (P=0.001 with log-rank test vs. P=0.003 with univariate Cox regression). Interestingly, patients with right pulmonary metastases presented a significant longer survival than those with left pulmonary metastases (P=0.027 with log-rank test vs. 0.04 with univariate Cox regression).

Conclusions

The main prognostic factor associated with poor survival after lung resection of CRC metastases is a history of extra-pulmonary metastases. BRAF and CDX2 did not have a significant role in this small series of patients.

Progress and potential of RAS mutation detection for diagnostics and companion diagnostics

INTRODUCTION

The importance of RAS mutation in carcinogenesis is established, and knowledge of an individual cancer's mutation status is important for optimal treatment. Areas covered: This paper is restricted to RAS testing in cancer, and highlights papers relevant to current practice. Expert commentary: Multiple laboratory methods are available for RAS gene analysis. PCR is commonly used to determine RAS status, providing a robust and inexpensive technology for clinical use. Next generation sequencing (NGS) platforms are changing the way in which mutation status is determined, though they require considerable expertise. Pre-analytical issues affect both methods and should be considered. The interpretation and reporting of results is not simple, particularly for NGS. External quality assurance is a pre-requisite for success, and is mandated by most laboratory accreditation schemes. The use of RAS testing is now extending beyond biopsy material to include the detection of mutations in circulating cell-free DNA and tumour cells.

The Potential Value of Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancers: Review of the Evidence for Programmed Death-1 Inhibitor Therapy

Colorectal cancers (CRCs) have been identified as potential targets for immunotherapy with programmed cell death (PD)-1 inhibitors. English-language publications from MedLine and Embase that evaluated PD-1/PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) in the CRC tumor microenvironment and clinical trials that assessed PD-1 inhibitors were included. Sixteen abstracts were screened. Fifteen met the inclusion criteria. After review of the full texts, this resulted in a final reference list of 8 studies eligible for review. Five studies that assessed PD-1/PD-L1 in CRC and 3 trials that assessed PD-1 inhibitors were included. PD-1-positive (PD-1⁺) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1⁺ cancer cells featured more prominently in high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) CRCs compared with microsatellite stable (MSS) CRCs, except in 1 study in which PD-L1 expression was higher in MSS CRCs. In the 3 trials that assessed PD-1 inhibitor, all 3 studies recruited patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). One study also included patients with recurrent CRC. The objective response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria was 0% (19 CRC patients with unknown microsatellite instability status) in the nivolumab study. In the pembrolizumab study, the objective response to PD-1 inhibitor was 40% and 0% in patients with MSI-H and MSS mCRC, respectively (10 patients in the MSI-H group, 18 patients in the MSS group). Seventy-eight percent of the patients in the MSI-H mCRC group compared with 11% in the MSS mCRC group (P < .005) showed no further disease progression at 12 weeks. In the nivolumab with or without ipilimumab study, objective partial response at 12 weeks to PD-1 inhibitor with or without cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitor was 25.5% to 33.3% and 5% in the MSI-H and MSS groups, respectively (100 patients in the MSI-H group, 20 patients in the MSS group). Clinical trials that assessed PD-1 inhibitor immunotherapy in patients with CRC have recruited only small cohorts of patients with mCRC. Studies on the tumor microenvironment have been on the basis of archival specimens with different antibody PD-1 and PD-L1 preparations for immunohistochemistry, independent from immunotherapy trials. Immunotherapy with PD-1 therapy has potential benefit for immunogenic MSI-H CRCs whereas there is no evidence to date to suggest immunotherapy benefit in MSS CRCs. The available data are limited, and there is no information on non-mCRCs. Future trials are under way to determine its benefits.

Precision medicine in colorectal cancer: evolving genomic landscape and emerging consensus

Colorectal cancer is the third most lethal cancer in men and women in the USA. Although surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment, many patients develop local and widely metastatic disease and become resistant to conventional chemotherapeutics. Recent comprehensive molecular characterization has led to subclassification of colorectal adenocarcinoma based on molecular properties, such as microsatellite instability and high CpG island methylation. These emerging subclassifications are associate with varying frequencies of RAS, BRAF, APC and other genetic events and have the ability to redefine therapeutic regimens. In this review, we examine how molecular diagnostics are currently used while providing insight into emerging implications for molecular analysis for personalized therapy in colorectal cancer.