1
|
Kazi IA, Siddiqui MA, Thimmappa ND, Abdelaziz A, Gaballah AH, Davis R, Kimchi E, Hammoud G, Syed KA, Nasrullah A. Post-operative complications of cholecystectomy: what the radiologist needs to know. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04387-5. [PMID: 38940909 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04387-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
Cholecystectomy is one of the most performed surgical procedures. The safety of this surgery notwithstanding, the sheer volume of operations results in a notable incidence of post-cholecystectomy complications. Early and accurate diagnosis of such complications is essential for timely and effective management. Imaging techniques are critical for this purpose, aiding in distinguishing between expected postsurgical changes and true complications. This review highlights current knowledge on the indications for cholecystectomy, pertinent surgical anatomy and surgical technique, and the recognition of anatomical variants that may complicate surgery. The article also outlines the roles of various imaging modalities in identifying complications, the spectrum of possible postsurgical anatomical changes, and the implications of such findings. Furthermore, we explore the array of complications that can arise post-cholecystectomy, such as biliary system injuries, gallstone-related issues, vascular complications, and the formation of postsurgical collections. Radiologists should be adept at identifying normal and abnormal postoperative findings to guide patient management effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irfan Amir Kazi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, University of Missouri, 1 Hospital Drive, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA.
| | - M Azfar Siddiqui
- Department of Radiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | | | - Amr Abdelaziz
- Department of Radiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Ayman H Gaballah
- Department of Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ryan Davis
- Department of Radiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Eric Kimchi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Ghassan Hammoud
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Kazi A Syed
- Medical Student, Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas, MO, USA
| | - Ayesha Nasrullah
- Department of Radiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morris SM, Abbas N, Osei-Bordom DC, Bach SP, Tripathi D, Rajoriya N. Cirrhosis and non-hepatic surgery in 2023 - a precision medicine approach. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:155-173. [PMID: 36594658 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2163627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with liver disease and portal hypertension frequently require surgery carrying high morbidity and mortality. Accurately estimating surgical risk remains challenging despite improved medical and surgical management. AREAS COVERED This review aims to outline a comprehensive approach to preoperative assessment, appraise methods used to predict surgical risk, and provide an up-to-date overview of outcomes for patients with cirrhosis undergoing non-hepatic surgery. EXPERT OPINION Robust preoperative, individually tailored, and precise risk assessment can reduce peri- and postoperative complications in patients with cirrhosis. Established prognostic scores aid stratification, providing an estimation of postoperative mortality, albeit with limitations. VOCAL-Penn Risk Score may provide greater precision than established liver severity scores. Amelioration of portal hypertension in advance of surgery may be considered, with prospective data demonstrating hepatic venous pressure gradient as a promising surrogate marker of postoperative outcomes. Morbidity and mortality vary between types of surgery with further studies required in patients with more advanced liver disease. Patient-specific considerations and practicing precision medicine may allow for improved postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean M Morris
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nadir Abbas
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Daniel-Clement Osei-Bordom
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Simon P Bach
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Dhiraj Tripathi
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Neil Rajoriya
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Johnson KM, Newman KL, Green PK, Berry K, Cornia PB, Wu P, Beste LA, Itani K, Harris AHS, Kamath PS, Ioannou GN. Incidence and Risk Factors of Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity After Elective Versus Emergent Abdominal Surgery in a National Sample of 8193 Patients With Cirrhosis. Ann Surg 2021; 274:e345-e354. [PMID: 31714310 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the incidence and risk factors for mortality and morbidity in patients with cirrhosis undergoing elective or emergent abdominal surgeries. BACKGROUND Postoperative morbidity and mortality are higher in patients with cirrhosis; variation by surgical procedure type and cirrhosis severity remain unclear. METHODS We analyzed prospectively-collected data from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Surgical Quality Improvement Program for 8193 patients with cirrhosis, 864 noncirrhotic controls with chronic hepatitis B infection, and 5468 noncirrhotic controls without chronic liver disease, who underwent abdominal surgery from 2001 to 2017. Data were analyzed using random-effects models controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS Patients with cirrhosis had significantly higher 30-day mortality than noncirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis B [4.4% vs 1.3%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57-4.98] or with no chronic liver disease (0.8%, aOR 4.68, 95% CI 3.27-6.69); mortality difference was highest in patients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score ≥10. Among patients with cirrhosis, postoperative mortality was almost 6 times higher after emergent rather than elective surgery (17.2% vs. 2.1%, aOR 5.82, 95% CI 4.66-7.27). For elective surgeries, 30-day mortality was highest after colorectal resection (7.0%) and lowest after inguinal hernia repair (0.6%). Predictors of postoperative mortality included cirrhosis-related characteristics (high MELD score, low serum albumin, ascites, encephalopathy), surgery-related characteristics (emergent vs elective, type of surgery, intraoperative blood transfusion), comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, sepsis, ventilator dependence, functional status), and age. CONCLUSIONS Accurate preoperative risk assessments in patients with cirrhosis should account for cirrhosis severity, comorbidities, type of procedure, and whether the procedure is emergent versus elective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay M Johnson
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service Line, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Kira L Newman
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Pamela K Green
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA
| | - Kristin Berry
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA
| | - Paul B Cornia
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service Line, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Peter Wu
- Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Lauren A Beste
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA
- Primary Care Service, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | - Kamal Itani
- Department of Surgery, Boston VA Health Care System, and Department of Surgery, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Alex H S Harris
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Patrick S Kamath
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - George N Ioannou
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roos FJM, Verstegen MMA, Muñoz Albarinos L, Roest HP, Poley JW, Tetteroo GWM, IJzermans JNM, van der Laan LJW. Human Bile Contains Cholangiocyte Organoid-Initiating Cells Which Expand as Functional Cholangiocytes in Non-canonical Wnt Stimulating Conditions. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021; 8:630492. [PMID: 33634107 PMCID: PMC7900156 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.630492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Diseases of the bile duct (cholangiopathies) remain a common indication for liver transplantation, while little progress has been made over the last decade in understanding the underlying pathophysiology. This is largely due to lack of proper in vitro model systems to study cholangiopathies. Recently, a culture method has been developed that allows for expansion of human bile duct epithelial cells grown as extrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids (ncECOs) in non-canonical Wnt-stimulating conditions. These ncECOs closely resemble cholangiocytes in culture and have shown to efficiently repopulate collagen scaffolds that could act as functional biliary tissue in mice. Thus far, initiation of ncECOs required tissue samples, thereby limiting broad patient-specific applications. Here, we report that bile fluid, which can be less invasively obtained and with low risk for the patients, is an alternative source for culturing ncECOs. Further characterization showed that bile-derived cholangiocyte organoids (ncBCOs) are highly similar to ncECOs obtained from bile duct tissue biopsies. Compared to the previously reported bile-cholangiocyte organoids cultured in canonical Wnt-stimulation conditions, ncBCOs have superior function of cholangiocyte ion channels and are able to respond to secretin and somatostatin. In conclusion, bile is a new, less invasive, source for patient-derived cholangiocyte organoids and makes their regenerative medicine applications more safe and feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floris J M Roos
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Monique M A Verstegen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Laura Muñoz Albarinos
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Henk P Roest
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Geert W M Tetteroo
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands
| | - Jan N M IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Luc J W van der Laan
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Függer R. Challenging situations in cholecystectomy and strategies to overcome them. Eur Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s10353-020-00687-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
Summary
Background
Cholecystectomy may be difficult and hazardous, causing major morbidity and mortality. This review aims to identify situations increasing the probability of difficult gallbladders and present today’s best practice to overcome them.
Methods
Review of the literature and expert comment.
Results
One in six gallbladders is expected to be a difficult cholecystectomy. The majority can be predicted by patient history, clinical symptoms, and pre-existing comorbidities. Acute cholecystitis, mild biliary pancreatitis, prior endoscopic sphincterotomy, and liver cirrhosis are the predominant underlying diseases. Early or delayed cholecystectomy, percutaneous cholecystostomy, and pure conservative treatment are evidence-based options. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is of advantage in patients fit for surgery, with subtotal cholecystectomy or conversion to open surgery as bail-out strategies. The choice of the procedure depends on the experience of the surgeon.
Conclusion
Clinical decisions should follow a pathway based on patients’ risk, favoring laparoscopic cholecystectomy whenever possible. The implementation of an institutional pathway to deal with difficult gallbladders is recommended.
Collapse
|
6
|
Newman KL, Johnson KM, Cornia PB, Wu P, Itani K, Ioannou GN. Perioperative Evaluation and Management of Patients With Cirrhosis: Risk Assessment, Surgical Outcomes, and Future Directions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:2398-2414.e3. [PMID: 31376494 PMCID: PMC6994232 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Patients with cirrhosis are at increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. We provide a narrative review of the available data regarding perioperative morbidity and mortality, risk assessment, and management of patients with cirrhosis undergoing non-hepatic surgical procedures. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature from 1998-2018 and identified 87 studies reporting perioperative outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. We extracted elements of study design and perioperative mortality by surgical procedure, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score reported in these 87 studies to support our narrative review. RESULTS Overall, perioperative mortality is 2-10 times higher in patients with cirrhosis compared to patients without cirrhosis, depending on the severity of liver dysfunction. For elective procedures, patients with compensated cirrhosis (CTP class A, or MELD <10) have minimal increase in operative mortality. CTP class C patients (or MELD >15) are at high risk for mortality; liver transplantation or alternatives to surgery should be considered. Very little data exist to guide perioperative management of patients with cirrhosis, so most recommendations are based on case series and expert opinion. Existing risk calculators are inadequate. CONCLUSIONS Severity of liver dysfunction, medical comorbidities and the type and complexity of surgery, including whether it is elective versus emergent, are all determinants of perioperative mortality and morbidity in patients with cirrhosis. There are major limitations to the existing clinical research on risk assessment and perioperative management that warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kira L Newman
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Kay M Johnson
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paul B Cornia
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Peter Wu
- Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kamal Itani
- Boston VA Health Care System and Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - George N Ioannou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington; Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Emergent cholecystectomy in patients on antithrombotic therapy. Sci Rep 2020; 10:10122. [PMID: 32572122 PMCID: PMC7308317 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67272-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) recommend emergent cholecystectomy (EC) for acute cholecystitis. However, the number of patients on antithrombotic therapy (AT) has increased significantly, and no evidence has yet suggested that EC should be performed for acute cholecystitis in such patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether EC is as safe for patients on AT as for patients not on AT. We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent EC from 2007 to 2018 at a single center. First, patients were divided into two groups according to the use of antithrombotic agents: AT; and no-AT. Second, the AT group was divided into three sub-groups according to the use of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), or anticoagulant with or without antiplatelet therapy (AC ± APT). We then evaluated outcomes of EC among all four groups. The primary outcome was 30- and 90- day mortality rate, and secondary outcomes were morbidity rate and surgical outcomes. A total of 478 patients were enrolled (AT, n = 123, no-AT, n = 355) patients. No differences in morbidity rate (6.5% vs. 3.7%, respectively; P = 0.203), 30-day mortality rate (1.6% vs. 1.4%, respectively; P = 1.0) or 90-day mortality rate (1.6% vs. 1.4%, respectively; P = 1.0) were evident between AT and no-AT groups. Between the no-AT and AC ± APT groups, a significant difference was seen in blood loss (10 mL vs. 114 mL, respectively; P = 0.017). Among the three AT sub-groups and the no-AT group, no differences were evident in morbidity rate (3.7% vs. 8.9% vs. 0% vs. 6.5%, respectively; P = 0.201) or 30-day mortality (1.4% vs. 0% vs. 0% vs. 4.3%, respectively; P = 0.351). No hemorrhagic or thrombotic morbidities were identified after EC in any group. In conclusion, EC for acute cholecystitis is as safe for patients on AT as for patients not on AT.
Collapse
|
8
|
Patel KP, Mumtaz K, Li F, Luthra AK, Hinton A, Lara LF, Conwell DL, Krishna SG. Index admission cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis favorably impacts outcomes of hospitalization in cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 35:284-290. [PMID: 31264249 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Despite higher rates of gallstones in patients with cirrhosis, there are no population-based studies evaluating outcomes of acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). Therefore, we sought to evaluate the predictors of early readmission and mortality in this high-risk population. METHODS We utilized the Nationwide Readmission Database (2011-2014) to evaluate all adults admitted with ABP. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess independent predictors for 30-day readmission, index admission mortality, and calendar year mortality. RESULTS Among 184 611 index admissions with ABP, 4344 (2.4%) subjects had cirrhosis (1649 with decompensation). Subjects with cirrhosis, when compared with those without, incurred higher rates of 30-day readmission (20.9% vs 11.2%; P < 0.001), index mortality (2.0% vs 1.0%; P < 0.001), and calendar year mortality (4.2% vs 0.9%; P < 0.001). Decompensation in cirrhosis was associated with significantly fewer cholecystectomies (26.7% vs 60.2%; P < 0.001) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (23.3% vs 29.9%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that severe acute pancreatitis (odds ratio [OR]: 14.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3, 41.2), sepsis (OR: 12.6; 95% CI: 5.8, 27.4), and decompensation (OR: 3.1; 96% CI: 1.4, 6.6) were associated with increased index admission mortality. Decompensated cirrhosis (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1, 3.0) and 30-day readmission (OR: 5.6; 95% CI: 3.3, 9.5) were predictors of calendar year mortality. However, index admission cholecystectomy was associated with decreased 30-day readmissions (OR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4, 0.7) and calendar year mortality (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.78). CONCLUSIONS The presence of cirrhosis adversely impacts hospital outcomes of patients with ABP. Among modifiable factors, index admission cholecystectomy portends favorable prognosis by reducing risk of early readmission and consequent calendar year mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kishan P Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Khalid Mumtaz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Feng Li
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Anjuli K Luthra
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Alice Hinton
- Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Luis F Lara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Darwin L Conwell
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Somashekar G Krishna
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shabanzadeh DM, Novovic S. Alcohol, smoking and benign hepato-biliary disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2017; 31:519-527. [PMID: 29195671 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Revised: 08/29/2017] [Accepted: 09/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Gallstone disease and pancreatitis are the most frequent benign hepato-biliary causes of hospital admissions. Gallstone disease is prevalent, but symptomatic disease develops only in about one out of five carriers. Alcohol intake seems to protect gallstone formation in cohort studies possibly through effects on bile cholesterol metabolism, the enterohepatic circulation, and gallbladder function. The impact of smoking on gallstone formation seems minor. Both alcohol intake and smoking do not alter the clinical course of gallstone disease carriers. Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease. Studies about the impact of alcohol and smoking on the post-cholecystectomy state are few and future studies should be performed. Pancreatitis is associated with both excessive alcohol intake and smoking in observational studies. Interpretation of associations with pancreatitis is hampered by an incomplete understanding of underlying mechanisms and by the co-existence of excessive alcohol intake and smoking. Smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence is recommended in the treatment of pancreatitis, but higher-level evidence is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Mønsted Shabanzadeh
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Denmark.
| | - Srdan Novovic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ko-iam W, Sandhu T, Paiboonworachat S, Pongchairerks P, Chotirosniramit A, Chotirosniramit N, Chandacham K, Jirapongcharoenlap T, Junrungsee S. Predictive Factors for a Long Hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Int J Hepatol 2017; 2017:5497936. [PMID: 28239497 PMCID: PMC5292377 DOI: 10.1155/2017/5497936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2016] [Accepted: 12/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Although the advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) over open cholecystectomy are immediately obvious and appreciated, several patients need a postoperative hospital stay of more than 24 hours. Thus, the predictive factors for this longer stay need to be investigated. The aim of this study was to identify the causes of a long hospital stay after LC. Methods. This is a retrospective cohort study with 500 successful elective LC patients being included in the analysis. Short hospital stay was defined as being discharged within 24 hours after the operation, whereas long hospital stay was defined as the need for a stay of more than 24 hours after the operation. Results. Using multivariable analysis, ten independent predictive factors were identified for a long hospital stay. These included patients with cirrhosis, patients with a history of previous acute cholecystitis, cholangitis, or pancreatitis, patients on anticoagulation with warfarin, patients with standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum, patients who had been given metoclopramide as an intraoperative antiemetic drug, patients who had been using abdominal drain, patients who had numeric rating scale for pain > 3, patients with an oral analgesia requirement > 2 doses, complications, and private ward admission. Conclusions. LC difficulties were important predictive factors for a long hospital stay, as well as medication and operative factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wasana Ko-iam
- Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Trichak Sandhu
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | | | | | - Anon Chotirosniramit
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | | | - Kamtone Chandacham
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | | | - Sunhawit Junrungsee
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|