Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for MDM2 Amplification as a Routine Ancillary Diagnostic Tool for Suspected Well-Differentiated and Dedifferentiated Liposarcomas: Experience at a Tertiary Center

Primary liposarcoma of the uterus with MDM2 negative

ABSTRACT

Liposarcoma is one of the most common soft-tissue sarcomas that originates from adipose tissue. Primary uterine liposarcoma is extremely rare. With the MDM2, negative is even rarer. We report a 37-year-old woman presented with lower abdominal discomfort and increase in vaginal secretions for more than 2 months. The ultrasonography revealed a hypoechoic mass sized 81 × 73 × 67 mm in the right adnexal area. Histopathologically, the neoplasm was mainly composed of mature adipose tissue, a small number of scattered lipoblasts, and the spindle cell which with mild atypia. Immunohistochemistry showed that the tumor cells were positive for CDK4 but negative for MDM2, and FISH analysis showed no MDM2 amplification. The patient only underwent tumor excision and is currently doing well.

Soft Tissue Sarcomas with Chromosomal Alterations in the 12q13-15 Region: Differential Diagnosis and Therapeutic Implications

The chromosomal region 12q13-15 is rich in oncogenes and contains several genes involved in the pathogenesis of various mesenchymal neoplasms. Notable genes in this region include MDM2, CDK4, STAT6, DDIT3, and GLI1. Amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 genes can be detected in various mesenchymal and nonmesenchymal neoplasms. Therefore, gene amplification alone is not entirely specific for making a definitive diagnosis and requires the integration of clinical, radiological, morphological, and immunohistochemical findings. Neoplasms with GLI1 alterations may exhibit either GLI1 rearrangements or amplifications of this gene. Despite the diagnostic implications that the overlap of genetic alterations in neoplasms with changes in genes within the 12q13-15 region could create, the discovery of coamplifications of MDM2 with CDK4 and GLI1 offers new therapeutic targets in neoplasms with MDM2/CDK4 amplification. Lastly, it is worth noting that MDM2 or CDK4 amplification is not exclusive to mesenchymal neoplasms; this genetic alteration has also been observed in other epithelial neoplasms or melanomas. This suggests the potential use of MDM2 or CDK4 inhibitors in neoplasms where alterations in these genes do not aid the pathological diagnosis but may help identify potential therapeutic targets. In this review, we delve into the diagnosis and therapeutic implications of tumors with genetic alterations involving the chromosomal region 12q13-15, mainly MDM2, CDK4, and GLI1.

Whole exome sequencing of well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma in older woman: a case report

Background

Common kinds of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) include well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS). In this case, we present a comprehensive clinical profile of a patient who underwent multiple recurrences during the progression from WDLPS to DDLPS.

Case presentation

A 62-year-old Asian female underwent retroperitoneal resection of a large tumor 11 years ago, the initial pathology revealed a fibrolipoma-like lesion. Over the next six years, the patient underwent three resections for recurrence of abdominal tumors. Postoperative histology shows mature adipose tissue with scattered "adipoblast"-like cells with moderate-to-severe heterogeneous spindle cells, pleomorphic cells, or tumor giant cells. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) demonstrated positive staining for MDM2 and CDK4, confirming that the abdominal tumor was WDLPS and gradually progressing to DDLPS. Post-operative targeted sequencing and IHC confirmed the POC1B::ROS1 fusion gene in DDLPS. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) revealed that WDLPS and DDLPS shared similar somatic mutations and copy number variations (CNVs), whereas DDLPS had more mutated genes and a higher and more concentrated amplification of the chromosome 12q region. Furthermore, somatic mutations in DDLPS were significantly reduced after treatment with CDK4 inhibitors, while CNVs remained elevated.

Conclusion

Due to the high likelihood of recurrence of liposarcoma, various effective treatments should be taken into consideration even if surgery is the primary treatment for recurrent liposarcoma. To effectively control the course of the disease following surgery, combination targeted therapy may be a viable alternative to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of liposarcoma.

MRI radiomics-based machine learning for classification of deep-seated lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor of the extremities

PURPOSE

To determine diagnostic performance of MRI radiomics-based machine learning for classification of deep-seated lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT) of the extremities.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study was performed at three tertiary sarcoma centers and included 150 patients with surgically treated and histology-proven lesions. The training-validation cohort consisted of 114 patients from centers 1 and 2 (n = 64 lipoma, n = 50 ALT). The external test cohort consisted of 36 patients from center 3 (n = 24 lipoma, n = 12 ALT). 3D segmentation was manually performed on T1- and T2-weighted MRI. After extraction and selection of radiomic features, three machine learning classifiers were trained and validated using nested fivefold cross-validation. The best-performing classifier according to previous analysis was evaluated and compared to an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist in the external test cohort.

RESULTS

Eight features passed feature selection and were incorporated into the machine learning models. After training and validation (74% ROC-AUC), the best-performing classifier (Random Forest) showed 92% sensitivity and 33% specificity in the external test cohort with no statistical difference compared to the radiologist (p = 0.474).

CONCLUSION

MRI radiomics-based machine learning may classify deep-seated lipoma and ALT of the extremities with high sensitivity and negative predictive value, thus potentially serving as a non-invasive screening tool to reduce unnecessary referral to tertiary tumor centers.

The impact of additional pathology analysis on the diagnosis and management of soft tissue tumours: a 10-year,retrospective study

In order to characterise soft tissue tumours, pathologists often utilise specialised additional tests, or may seek opinions from subspecialist pathologists due to rarity or complex morphology. Additionally, further review may be sought by subspecialist sarcoma pathologists, such as those at our tertiary referral centre in Sydney, Australia. The aim of this study was to examine the impact on diagnosis and management of this external review, following diagnosis at a specialised sarcoma unit. We collated the results of all additional external ancillary tests and specialist reviews over a 10-year period and characterised the impact on the preliminary diagnosis as 'confirmed', 'new' or 'no clear diagnosis'. We subsequently noted whether the additional findings resulted in a clinically significant change in management. Of the 136 cases sent away, 103 patients had their initial diagnosis confirmed, 29 patients received a new diagnosis and, for four patients, the diagnosis remained uncertain. Nine of the 29 patients receiving a new diagnosis had their management altered. This study demonstrated that within our specialised sarcoma unit, the majority of diagnoses provided by our specialist pathologists are confirmed on additional external testing and review, but external review does provide additional assurance and benefit to the patient.

FISH Diagnostic Assessment of MDM2 Amplification in Liposarcoma: Potential Pitfalls and Troubleshooting Recommendations

MDM2 amplification represents the leading oncogenic pathway and diagnostic hallmark of liposarcoma, whose assessment is based on Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) analysis. Despite its diagnostic relevance, no univocal interpretation criteria regarding FISH assessments of MDM2 amplification have been established so far, leading to several different approaches and potential diagnostic misinterpretations. This study aims to address the most common issues and proposes troubleshooting guidelines for MDM2 amplification assessments by FISH. We retrospectively retrieved 51 liposarcomas, 25 Lipomas, 5 Spindle Cell Lipoma/Pleomorphic Lipomas, and 2 Atypical Spindle Cell Lipomatous Tumors and the corresponding MDM2 FISH analysis. We observed MDM2 amplification in liposarcomas cases only (43 out of 51 cases) and identified three MDM2-amplified patterns (scattered (50% of cases), clustered (14% of cases), and mixed (36% of cases)) and two nonamplified patterns (low number of signals (82% of cases) and polysomic (18% of cases)). Based on these data and published evidence in the literature, we propose a set of criteria to guide MDM2 amplification analysis in liposarcoma. Kindled by the compelling importance of MDM2 assessments to improve diagnostic and therapeutic liposarcoma management, these suggestions could represent the first step to develop a univocal interpretation model and consensus guidelines.

Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: Imaging appearances, pitfalls and diagnostic algorithms

This article provides an overview of the current knowledge regarding diagnostic imaging of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, which is a heterogeneous group of rare mesenchymal malignancies. After an initial contextualization, diagnostic flow-chart based on initial radiological findings of soft-tissue masses (with specific focus on adipocytic soft-tissue tumors [STTs], hemorragic STTs and retroperitoneal STTs) are provided considering relevant results from novel researches, guidelines, and experts' viewpoints, with the aim to help radiologists and clinicians in their practice. Particularly, the central place of sarcoma reference centers in the diagnostic and therapeutic management is highlighted, as well as the pivotal role that radiologists should play to correctly identify patients with soft-tissue sarcoma at the initial stage of the disease. Indications and methods for performing imaging-guided biopsies are also discussed, as well as clues to improve soft-tissue sarcoma grading with conventional and quantitative imaging.

Differentiation Between Lipomas and Atypical Lipomatous Tumors of the Extremities Using Radiomics

BACKGROUND

The differentiation of soft tissue lipomas from atypical lipoma tumors (ALTs) of the extremities is important because of the distinction of the cytogenetic profiles and the treatment decisions.

PURPOSE

To investigate a radiomics method to differentiate between lipomas and ALTs of the extremities.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

Imaging data of 122 patients including 90 cases of lipomas and 32 cases of ALTs.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Axial T1-weighted imaging and fat suppressed T2-weighted imaging at 3.0T MRI.

ASSESSMENT

Analysis of variance and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator methods were used for feature selection and the random forest method was used to build three radiomics models based on T1WI, FS T2WI, and their combination (T1&T2WI). Three independent radiologists classified the tumors based on the subjective assessments.

STATISTICAL TESTS

The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, F1-score, specificity, and sensitivity were employed. The differences of the classifiers and discriminating ability of the radiologists and the radiomics model were compared by Delong test. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Kappa test was used to determine the inter-reader agreements between the radiologists.

RESULT

The AUCs were 0.952 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.785-0.998), 0.944 (95% CI: 0.774-0.997), and 0.968 (95% CI: 0.809-1) for T1WI, FS T2WI, and T1&T2WI models in testing sets respectively. Delong test showed there were no significant difference between the different radiomics models (P > 0.05). The AUCs of the radiologists were 0.893 (95% CI: 0.824-0.942), 0.831 (95% CI: 0.752-0.893), and 0.893 (95% CI: 0.824-0.94), respectively. There were significant difference between radiomics model and radiologists' model in the training and entire cohorts (P < 0.05) while there were no significant difference in the testing sets (P > 0.05).

DATA CONCLUSION

Radiomics has the potential to distinguish between lipomas and ALTs of the extremities and their discrimination ability is no weaker than the senor radiologists.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Molecular classification of soft tissue sarcomas for adequate diagnosis: A study on the northeast population of Morocco

Background

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogeneous group of tumors. For adequate therapeutic management, an accurate diagnosis is necessary. In Morocco, the diagnosis is essentially based on the morphological and immunohistochemical study. Compared to other techniques, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is easier to develop and less expensive. This study aims to assess the feasibility and utility of implementing FISH technique to improve diagnostic accuracy and establish a good classification.

Material and methods

This is a retrospective cohort study. 211 cases of mesenchymal tumors were included. Hematoxylin Eosin Safran (HES) staining was performed in all cases followed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). FISH was performed in all cases with suspected STS. The probes used were EWSR1, MDM2 and SS18. The performance of FISH and histopathological test were evaluated by the ROC curve method (receiver operating characteristic). We evaluated the concordance between FISH and real time PCR by Cohen test.

Results

The real-time PCR technique showed good agreement with the FISH test by a Kappa coefficient of 60% (p = 0.035). FISH was able to confirm that it is more accurate (Youden's Index = 91%) than histological/immunohistochemical analysis (Youden's Index = 51%), as well as the positive predictive value was higher (100%) with an ROC curve finding a larger area under the curve of 0.953 (95% CI: 0.918-0.988), p = 0.000 which supports that FISH shows high performance to present an accurate final diagnosis.

Conclusion

This is the first and the largest Moroccan series for the molecular diagnosis of STS by FISH. Our study shows that paraffin FISH is a sensitive and specific ancillary tool in the diagnosis of STS when used in the appropriate clinicopathological context.

Adjuvant Radiation after Primary Resection of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors of the Extremity Reduces Local Recurrence but Increases Complications: A Multicenter Evaluation

Background

Radiation after resection of an atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT) is controversial. This study evaluates local control and complications after the first resection of ALTs of the extremity with or without adjuvant radiation.

Methods

A dual institution, retrospective review of patients treated from 1995 to 2020 with first-time resection of an ALT in the extremity was performed. In total, 102 patients underwent adjuvant radiation (XRT group) and 68 patients were treated with surgery alone (no-XRT group). The median follow-up time was 4.6 years (interquartile range (IQR) 2.0–7.3 years). The median radiation dose was 60 Gy (IQR 55–66 Gy). Univariable and multivariable analyses evaluated the association of patient, tumor, and treatment variables with recurrence and complications. Kaplan–Meier analysis evaluated local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and time to complication.

Results

The overall incidence of local recurrence was 1% (1/102) in the XRT group and 24% (16/68) in the no-XRT group (p < 0.001). The median time-to-recurrence was 8.2 years (IQR 6.5–10.5 years). In the XRT and the no-XRT groups, 5-yr LRFS was 98% and 92% (p=0.21) and 10-yr LRFS was 98% and 41% (p < 0.001), respectively. The absence of radiation (HR = 23.63, 95% CI (3.09–180.48); p < 0.001) and R2 surgical resection margins (HR = 11.04, 95% CI (2.07–59.03); p < 0.001) incurred a 23-fold and 11-fold increased risk of local recurrence, respectively, while tumor size, depth, location, and neurovascular involvement were not found to be independent predictors of recurrence. The complication rate was 37% (38/102) in the XRT group and 10% (7/68) in the no-XRT group (p < 0.001). Eight patients (8/102, 8%) required surgical management for complication in the XRT group compared with two patients (2/68, 3%) in the no-XRT group (p=0.10). Higher radiation dose had a modest correlation with increased severity of complication (ρ=0.24; p=0.02).

Conclusions

Adjuvant radiation after first-time resection of an ALT of the extremity was associated with a significantly reduced risk of local recurrence but a three-fold increase in complication rate. These data support a 10-year follow-up for these patients and inform a notable clinical trade-off if considering adjuvant radiation for this tumor with recurrent potential.

MicroRNAs as Potential Biomarkers in the Differential Diagnosis of Lipomatous Tumors and Their Mimics

Adipocytic tumors are the most common subtype of soft tissue tumors. In current clinical practice, distinguishing benign lipomas from well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS), as well as dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS) from their morphologic mimics, remains a significant diagnostic challenge. This is especially so when examining small biopsy samples and without the aid of additional ancillary tests. Recognizing the important role that microRNAs (miRNAs) play in tumorigenesis and their potential utility in tumor classification, we analyzed routine clinical tissue samples of benign and malignant lipomatous tumors, as well as other sarcoma mimics, to identify distinguishing miRNA-based signatures that can aid in the differential diagnosis of these entities. We discovered a 6-miRNA signature that separated lipomas from WDLPS with high confidence (AUC of 0.963), as well as a separate 6-miRNA signature that distinguished DDLPS from their more aggressive histologic mimics (AUC of 0.740). Functional enrichment analysis unveiled possible mechanistic involvement of these predictive miRNAs in adipocytic cancer-related biological processes and pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK signaling, further supporting the relevance of these miRNAs as biomarkers for adipocytic tumors. Our results demonstrate that miRNA expression profiling may potentially be used as an adjunctive tool for the diagnosis of benign and malignant adipocytic tumors. Further validation studies are warranted.

Novel computer aided diagnostic models on multimodality medical images to differentiate well differentiated liposarcomas from lipomas approached by deep learning methods

BACKGROUND

Deep learning methods have great potential to predict tumor characterization, such as histological diagnosis and genetic aberration. The objective of this study was to evaluate and validate the predictive performance of multimodality imaging-derived models using computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) methods for prediction of MDM2 gene amplification to identify well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) and lipoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All 127 patients from two institutions were included with 89 patients in one institution for model training and 38 patients in the other institution for external validation between January 2012 and December 2018. For each modality, handcrafted radiomics analysis with manual segmentation was applied to extract 851 features for each modality, and six pretrained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) extracted 512-2048 deep learning features automatically. Extracted imaging-based features were selected via univariate filter selection methods and the recursive feature elimination algorithm, which were then classified by support vector machine for model construction. Integrated with two significant clinical variables, age and LDH level, a clinical-radiological model was constructed for identification WDLPS and lipoma. All differentiation models were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and their 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The multimodality model on deep learning features extracted from ResNet50 algorithm (RN-DL model) performed great differentiation performance with an AUC of 0.995 (95% CI 0.987-1.000) for the training cohort, and an AUC of 0.950 (95% CI 0.886-1.000), accuracy of 92.11%, sensitivity of 95.00% (95% CI 73.06-99.74%), specificity of 88.89% (95% CI 63.93-98.05%) in external validation. The integrated clinical-radiological model represented an AUC of 0.996 (95% CI 0.989-1.000) for the training cohort, and an AUC of 0.942 (95% CI 0.867-1.000), accuracy of 86.84%, sensitivity of 95.00% (95% CI 73.06-99.74%), and specificity of 77.78% (95% CI 51.92-92.63%) in external validation.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging-based multimodality models represent effective discrimination abilities between WDLPS and lipoma via CAD methods, and might be a practicable approach in assistance of treatment decision.

Histopathological Correlation of Chromosome 12 Polysomy by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization in Adipocytic Neoplasms

Background: Identification of MDM2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization is an important diagnostic tool for evaluation of adipocytic neoplasms. Rarely, neoplasms can show increased copies of MDM2 and CEP12 probes (polysomy) without amplification (MDM2/CEP12 ratio <2.0). While noted in the literature, this finding has not been the focus of any study to date. Methods: Consecutive cases were retrospectively screened for increased copies of MDM2 and CEP12 and were classified as: high polysomy (ratio<2.0, CEP12≥10.0), low polysomy (ratio<2.0, but >0.5, CEP12≥4.0 but <9.9), and CEP12 amplification (ratio≤0.5, CEP12 > 4.0). H&E slides were classified by a pathologist into diagnostic categories based on morphology without knowledge of MDM2 amplification result. Correlations between chromosome 12 polysomy and histological features in the same region of the tumor were investigated. Results: There were 19 (0.7%) high polysomy, 52 (2.0%) low polysomy and 3 (0.1%) CEP12 amplification cases identified in the 2541 cases screened. While low polysomy was seen across benign and malignant adipocytic tumors and other sarcomas, high level polysomy was primarily seen in liposarcomas, both atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS). No lipomas were high polysomy. Conclusion: Polysomy is an uncommon, but distinct, finding in adipocytic neoplasms found across the spectrum of benign to malignant with little insight into the pathophysiology or prognosis. While low polysomy is also observed in benign adipocytic neoplasms, high polysomy is almost always seen in malignant adipocytic neoplasms and is uncommon in benign adipocytic neoplasms.

When is a lipoma not a lipoma? Case report presenting a lipoblastoma-like tumor of the gluteal cleft in an older gentleman with literature review

Introduction and importance

Lipoblastoma-like tumors are rare tumors that can be confused with lipoblastomas and liposarcomas but have distinct characteristics. This tumor has previously been identified in the vulva of females, and recently in isolated cases of young males. Given its rarity, we present an instance of this tumor in an older man, demonstrating that this pathology is not limited to a specific age or sex, and surgeons and pathologists must be aware of it in their differential.

Case presentation

A 58-year-old male presented for evaluation of an enlarging mass in his right gluteal cleft. Prior to referral for surgical evaluation, the patient underwent an ultrasound-guided biopsy of the mass. Histologically, the tumor was a low-grade cellular spindle cell neoplasm in a fibrous to myxoid stroma. Immunohistochemical and molecular workup ruled out several malignant mesenchymal neoplasms, including myxoid liposarcoma, dedifferentiated liposarcoma, melanoma, low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, and sarcomatoid carcinoma. The patient initially declined surgery, but the mass continued to grow, and excision was chosen given the uncertain pathology. The tumor was resected with negative margins and histologically characterized as a “lipoblastoma-like lesion”, with features of a myxoid liposarcoma and spindle cell lipoma. Seven months post-resection, there were no signs of recurrence or metastasis.

Clinical discussion

Despite radiologic and pathologic similarities to malignant lipomatous tumors, lipoblastoma-like tumors are benign and have a good prognosis.

Conclusions

Clinicians should be aware of this entity despite its rarity as resection with negative margins is curative and may be needed to rule out more aggressive tumors.

•

Lipoblastoma-like tumors (LLTs) are rare soft tissue tumors.

•

LLTs can easily be confused clinically and pathologically for benign lipomas but also malignant liposarcomas.

•

Pathologic evaluation is able to distinguish these tumors from their more aggressive counterparts.

•

Because of their rare nature, clinicians may over or under-treat these tumors which require surgical excision.

•

Local recurrence is rare but is predicated on negative surgical margins.

Liposarcoma subtype recurrence and survival: A UK regional cohort study

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcome data in the United Kingdom, Europe, and the United States have yet to facilitate appropriately specific surveillance for liposarcoma histological subtypes, despite being one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas. Therefore, this study aims to demonstrate histologic-specific differences in liposarcoma recurrence, disease progression, and survival and discuss the implications.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This cohort study involves patients from a regional sarcoma service in the UK who have had a primary surgical excision of liposarcoma between October 2002 and September 2019. The median follow-up is five years. Confirmed histopathological diagnoses of liposarcoma (n = 193) are organised according to the World Health Organisation recognised subtypes: atypical lipomatous tumours (ALT), myxoid, pleomorphic, and dedifferentiated liposarcomas. In addition, retroperitoneal variants (n = 34) are included to illustrate the broader spectrum of phenotypes. The primary outcomes were local recurrence, distant disease progression, and disease-specific death, and compared using Kaplan-Meier analyses and tumour variables using Cox proportional hazard analyses. All three primary outcomes significantly differed (P < 0.0001, n = 193). There were no metastases or disease-specific death in patients with ALT (n = 92) and no metastases of their retroperitoneal counterparts (n = 17). Amongst the metastasising cases of rarer subtypes, there were pulmonary spread of pleomorphic (8/9, n = 20), dedifferentiated (4/5, n = 18), and myxoid (2/3, n = 29) liposarcomas.

CONCLUSION

An absence of metastases of ALT should be considered alongside global evidence. Surveillance protocols could better differentiate between these subtypes and, in doing so, save patients a considerable amount of irradiation, time, fear, and anxiety.

Diagnosis strategy of adipocytic soft-tissue tumors in adults: a consensus from European experts

Fat-containing tumors are very commonly found in daily practice with benign lipoma accounting for the majority of superficial tumors. Overlap in imaging findings between benign and intermediate or malignant fat-containing tumor is common. Guidelines recommend a core needle biopsy (CNB) for all deep tumors, and superficial tumors over 3 cm. However, specific strategy for diagnosis and referral to a sarcoma center should be applied on adipocytic tumors. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide a specific algorithm for adipocytic tumors, to discriminate patients who do require a CNB for preoperative diagnosis from those who can simply undergo active surveillance or a simple excision.

Undifferentiated and dedifferentiated soft tissue neoplasms: Immunohistochemical surrogates for differential diagnosis

Undifferentiated soft tissue sarcomas (USTS) are described in the current World Health Organization Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours as those showing no identifiable line of differentiation when analyzed by presently available technologies. This is a markedly heterogeneous group, and the diagnosis of USTS remains one of exclusion. USTS can be divided into four morphologic subgroups: pleomorphic, spindle cell, round cell and epithelioid undifferentiated sarcomas, with this combined group accounting for up to 20% of all soft tissue sarcomas. As molecular advances enable the stratification of emerging genetic subsets within USTS, particularly within undifferentiated round cell sarcomas, other groups, particularly the category of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS), still remain difficult to substratify and represent heterogeneous collections of neoplasms often representing the common morphologic endpoints of a variety of malignant tumors of various (mesenchymal and non-mesenchymal) lineages. However, recent molecular developments have also enabled the identification and correct classification of many tumors from various lines of differentiation that would previously have been bracketed under 'UPS'. This includes pleomorphic neoplasms and dedifferentiated neoplasms (the latter typically manifesting with an undifferentiated pleomorphic morphology) of mesenchymal (e.g. solitary fibrous tumor and gastrointestinal stromal tumor) and non-mesenchymal (e.g. melanoma and carcinoma) origin. The precise categorization of 'pleomorphic' or 'undifferentiated' neoplasms is critical for prognostication, as, for example, dedifferentiated liposarcoma typically behaves less aggressively than other pleomorphic sarcomas, and for management, including the potential for targeted therapies based on underlying recurrent molecular features. In this review we focus on undifferentiated and dedifferentiated pleomorphic and spindle cell neoplasms, summarizing their key genetic, morphologic and immunophenotypic features in the routine diagnostic setting, and the use of immunohistochemistry in their principal differential diagnosis, and highlight new developments and entities in the group of undifferentiated and dedifferentiated soft tissue sarcomas.

Lessons learnt from MDM2 fluorescence in-situ hybridisation analysis of 439 mature lipomatous lesions with an emphasis on atypical lipomatous tumour/well-differentiated liposarcoma lacking cytological atypia

AIMS

Amplification of the murine double minute-2 (MDM2) gene, which is usually detected with fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH), is the key driving event for atypical lipomatous tumours (ALTs)/well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLs). We sought to determine the concordance between the histopathological findings and MDM2 FISH in the diagnosis of ALT/WDL, and to identify the histological features of MDM2-amplified tumours lacking classic atypia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all mature lipomatous lesions subjected to MDM2 FISH analysis at our institution. MDM2 FISH analysis was performed on 439 mature lipomatous lesions: 364 (82.9%) were negative and 75 (17%) were positive. In 17 of 75 (22.6%) ALTs/WDLs, cytological atypia was not identified on initial histological assessment, thus favouring lipoma. On review, these cases shared common histological features, consisting of a very low number of relatively small stromal cells within the tumour lobules, with mildly coarse chromatin and oval nuclei, admixed with unremarkable adipocytes in a tumour background devoid of fibroconnective septa, areas of fibrosis, or blood vessels. These cells matched the cells in which FISH showed MDM2 amplification. In contrast, 13 cases (3.5%) regarded as suspicious for ALT/WDL on the basis of histology lacked MDM2 amplification and were reclassified following the FISH findings.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that a subset of lipoma-like ALTs/WDLs are not associated with any of the features typically described in ALT/WDL. Our study also showed that tumours >100 mm are more likely to be ALT/WDL; however, a history of recurrence or concerning clinical/radiological features was not significantly associated with classification as ALT/WDL.

Differential diagnosis of adipocytic differentiation in androgen-secreting mature ovarian teratoma with Leydig cell hyperplasia

Mature cystic teratomas (dermoid cysts) of the ovary are very rarely associated with androgen production. The source of androgens in these cysts may be tumours such as Sertoli-Leydig cell tumour or Leydig cell hyperplasia. In this study, we present a case of virilisation in a postmenopausal female patient, where Leydig cell hyperplasia in a mature cystic teratoma was found to be responsible for the production of testosterone. In addition, extensive areas of lipomatous differentiation were identified. These areas showed significant alterations in adipocytic morphology, and differential diagnoses such as spindle cell lipoma (SCL) and atypical lipomatous tumour (ALT) were excluded after additional workup. Adipose tissue is traditionally described as an energy reservoir, but recently it has become clear that adipose tissue is a complex endocrine organ with additional metabolic roles in whole body homeostasis. Exuberant proliferation of lipomatous tissue in this teratoma raises the possibility of a synergistic role of Leydig cells and adipocytes in the development of hyperandrogenism.

Diagnostic and management challenges for MDM2-, CDK4-negative fatty tumors of the retroperitoneum

BACKGROUND

Neoplasms of the retroperitoneum that contain a major fat component may represent either benign entities, such as lipomas or angiomyolipomas, or malignancy such as liposarcoma. Distinguishing these diagnoses has important implications for management. While liposarcomas often stain positively for MDM2 and CDK4 proteins, absence of these markers can lead to diagnostic and management challenges.

METHODS

We examined three cases in our institution of fat-containing masses of the retroperitoneum that lacked MDM2 and CDK4 markers to highlight the challenges in diagnosing and managing these cases. A thorough review of the literature examining radiologic and histologic features that can be used to determine that diagnosis was conducted and summarized.

RESULTS

The three cases we present represent the three main diagnostic entities that can be found in among fatty tumors of the retroperitoneum: lipoma, angiomyolipoma, and liposarcoma. While radiologic features and analysis of histology helped to inform management, these cases in conjunction with the literature also illustrate the limitations of the diagnostic work up and importance also factoring the biologic behavior of the tumor in its management.

CONCLUSION

Fat-containing tumors of the retroperitoneum that do not stain for MDM2 or CDK4 can pose a diagnostic challenge. Assessing radiologic and pathologic features in conjunction with the biologic behavior of these tumors should inform their management.

Detection of Structural Variants in Circulating Cell-Free DNA from Sarcoma Patients Using Next Generation Sequencing

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) analysis using next generation sequencing (NGS) is being implemented in clinical practice for treatment stratification and disease monitoring. However, using ctDNA to detect structural variants, a common occurrence in sarcoma, can be challenging. Here, we use a sarcoma-specific targeted NGS panel to identify translocations and copy number variants in a cohort of 12 tissue specimens and matched circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from soft tissue sarcoma patients, including alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 2), Ewing's Sarcoma (n = 2), synovial sarcoma (n = 2), extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (n = 1), clear cell sarcoma (n = 1), undifferentiated round cell sarcoma (n = 1), myxoid liposarcoma (n = 1), alveolar soft part cell sarcoma (n = 1) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (n = 1). Structural variants were detected in 11/12 (91.6%) and 6/12 (50%) of tissue and plasma samples, respectively. Structural variants were detected in cfDNA at variant allele frequencies >0.2% with an average sequencing depth of 1026×. The results from this cohort show clinical potential for using NGS in ctDNA to aid in the diagnosis and clinical monitoring of sarcomas and warrant additional studies in larger cohorts.

MDM2 gene amplification as selection tool for innovative targeted approaches in PD-L1 positive or negative muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma

AIMS

According to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), around 9% of bladder carcinomas usually show abnormalities of the murine double minute 2 (MDM2) gene, but a few studies have been investigated them. We profiled MDM2 gene amplification in a series of urothelial carcinomas (UC) considering the molecular subtypes and expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1).

METHODS

117 patients with muscle-invasive UC (pT2-3) without (N0) or with (N+) lymph-node metastases were revised. Only cases with availability of in toto specimens and follow-up were studied. Tissue microarray was built. p53, ER, RB1, GATA-3, CK20, CK5/6, CD44 and PD-L1 (clone sp263) immunoexpression was evaluated. Fluorescent in situ hybridisation was assessed by using the HER-2/neu, FGFR-3, CDKN2A and MDM2 probes. True (ratio 12q/CEP12 >2) MDM2 gene amplification was distinguished from polyploidy/gains (ratio <2, absolute copy number of MDM-2 >2). MDM2 and PD-L1 values were correlated to the TCGA molecular phenotypes. Statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

6/50 (12%) cases (5 N0 and 1 N+) were amplified for MDM2 without matching to molecular phenotypes. Of 50, 14 (37%) cases expressed PD-L1 at 1% cut-off; 3/50 (9%) at >50% cut-off; of these, 2 cases on side of neoplasia among inflammatory cells. Only one out of six (17%) cases amplified for MDM2 showed expression (>50% cut-off) of PD-L1. MDM2 amplification was independent to all documented profiles (k test=0.3) and was prevalent in recurrent UC.

CONCLUSION

MDM2 amplification has been seen in both PD-L1 positive and negative muscle-invasive bladder UC independently from the TCGA molecular phenotypes. MDM2 and PD-L1 might be assessed in order to predict a better response to combo/single targeted therapies.

Inflammatory Variant of Atypical Lipomatous Tumor/Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma of the Buccal Mucosa: An Overview and Case Report with a 10-Year Follow-Up

Liposarcomas of the oral cavity are rare. Those originating in the buccal mucosa cause challenging diagnostic and therapeutic issues since less than 40 cases of liposarcomas of the buccal mucosa and cheek have been reported in the worldwide literature. Herein, we present a case of atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma affecting a 45-year-old female patient. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a well-defined mass located in the right buccal mucosa, extending to the submucosal layers of the cheek. Histopathologically, a well-differentiated fatty neoplasm with presence of prominent stromal inflammatory cells was observed. Multifocally scattered bizarre hyperchromatic stromal cells, some of which multinucleated, were also observed. An immunohistochemical panel comprising vimentin, S-100, CD10, CD34, CD20, CD3, CD68, CD138, MDM2, Ki-67, and P53 was employed to better characterize the lesion. A local recurrence event occurred during a 10-year follow-up period. Surgical resection was performed during both episodes. We also provided an overview of demographic and clinicopathological characteristics, immunohistochemical features, imaging findings, and the differential diagnosis of liposarcoma of the oral cavity. Knowledge of the etiopathological and clinical aspects of this rare neoplasm is fundamental in order to rule out other conditions, including lipomatous lesions that affect the buccal mucosa.

Liposarcomas of the mediastinum

Liposarcoma is a malignant tumor of adipocytic differentiation that rarely arises within the mediastinum. Most of the existing data available comes from scattered case reports and a few small series. The World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes four basic types of liposarcoma: well-differentiated/atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT), dedifferentiated, myxoid and pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLS). All of these liposarcoma subtypes have been recorded to occur within the mediastinum. On morphologic grounds liposarcoma can present a challenge for diagnosis as it can be difficult to distinguish from benign adipocytic neoplasms, or in the case of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS), from virtually any other type of sarcoma. Molecularly the most common subtypes of liposarcoma are characterized by specific, recurrent genetic alterations involving amplification events of MDM2 and CDK4 in well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDL) and a recurrent t(12;16)(q13;p11) in myxoid liposarcoma (MLS). MDM2 and CDK4 amplification can be assessed by immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, or molecular techniques that evaluate copy number alterations and amplifications such as array based assays and next generation sequencing (NGS). In addition to WDL and MLS, a few additional rare subtypes of liposarcoma may occur in the mediastinum including PLS, myxoid WDL, thymoliposarcoma, and sclerosing high-grade liposarcoma. The present review will focus on the clinicopathologic features of the various histologic types of liposarcoma described in the mediastinum and their differential diagnosis. Data is derived from review of the largest series published in the more recent literature on these tumors.

Diagnostic Differences in Expert Second-Opinion Consultation Cases at a Tertiary Sarcoma Center

Soft tissue tumors are diagnostically challenging, and it is recommended that these are reported or reviewed by specialist soft tissue pathologists. We present our experience with second-opinion (consultation) cases in a specialist tertiary sarcoma center. The aim of this study was to determine areas of diagnostic difficulty in soft tissue pathology. We assessed 581 second-opinion cases which were reviewed by two experienced pathologists in a period of one year. There was 62% concordance between the original and the second-opinion diagnosis, with diagnostic discrepancy in 38%. The largest group of soft tissue neoplasms received for second opinion was fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumors, and most major diagnostic problems were encountered in adipocytic and so-called “fibrohistiocytic” tumors. Major diagnostic errors impacting management were found in 148 cases (25%). Morphologic assessment of tumors, judicious use of molecular techniques, newer immunostains and their interpretation, along with importance of knowledge of rarer entities were found to be most useful in avoiding errors.

[Fluorescence in situ hybridization for the diagnosis of soft-tissue and bone tumors]

Mesenchymal tumors, especially high-grade sarcomas, frequently harbor chaotic genotypes. Few tumors arise in association with genetic tumor predisposition syndromes with germline mutations in tumor suppressor genes. An increasing number of soft-tissue and bone tumors are characterized by recurrent genomic alterations, which can be utilized for diagnostic purposes. These include translocations and amplifications and less frequently deletions. These alterations can be detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization among other techniques. The rising number of whole genome sequencing of soft-tissue and bone tumors leads to an improved understanding of tumor genetics. On this basis, fluorescence in situ hybridization has gained relevance as a diagnostic tool. This review covers relevant genetic alterations in lipomatous tumors, soft-tissue tumors with spindle-cell and epithelioid morphology, vascular tumors, small-blue-round-cell tumors, and bone tumors that are detectable by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Well-differentiated liposarcoma primary from thymic stroma: Case report and literature review

Primary liposarcoma of thymic stroma is an exceptionally rare tumor. Histological findings are often definitive for diagnosis, however due to the variability of nuclear atypia and the overlapping with other adipocytic tumors, ancillary techniques are helpful as confirmatory tools. Currently, Fluorescent in situ hybridization for MDM2 is the gold standard for diagnosis of well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas, however a panel of immunohistochemical stainings, including MDM2, CDK4 and p16 is available as alternative method, helping to distinguish liposarcoma from its benign counterpart lipoma, especially in borderline cases. We describe the case of a young female diagnosed with a well-differentiated lipomatous tumor primary of thymic stroma with near cut-off result for MDM2-FISHand positive immunohistochemical staining for the panel described above. We discuss the challenges in the diagnosis of this rare entity andpresent an updated literature review.

A novel next generation sequencing approach to improve sarcoma diagnosis

Sarcoma is a rare disease affecting both bone and connective tissue and with over 100 pathologic entities, differential diagnosis can be difficult. Complementing immune-histological diagnosis with current ancillary diagnostic techniques, including FISH and RT-PCR, can lead to inconclusive results in a significant number of cases. We describe here the design and validation of a novel sequencing tool to improve sarcoma diagnosis. A NGS DNA capture panel containing probes for 87 fusion genes and 7 genes with frequent copy number changes was designed and optimized. A cohort of 113 DNA samples extracted from soft-tissue and bone sarcoma FFPE material with clinical FISH and/or RT-PCR results positive for either a translocation or gene amplification was used for validation of the NGS method. Sarcoma-specific translocations or gene amplifications were confirmed in 110 out of 113 cases using FISH and/or RT-PCR as gold-standard. MDM2/CDK4 amplification and a total of 25 distinct fusion genes were identified in this cohort of patients using the NGS approach. Overall, the sensitivity of the NGS panel is 97% with a specificity of 100 and 0% failure rate. Targeted NGS appears to be a feasible and cost-effective approach to improve sarcoma subtype diagnosis with the ability to screen for a wide range of genetic aberrations in one test.

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the spermatic cord: Case report and review of literature

•

Liposarcomas typically presents as bulky heterogeneous solid lesions that are larger/firmer than simple “cord lipoma.” Tumors range from 3 to 30 cm in diameter.

•

Current controversy in management of liposarcomas pertains to the use of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy and whether these treatment options decrease recurrence/survival.

•

We recommend an initial complete resection with wide margins without the use of adjuvant therapy with aggressive long-term surveillance.

•

Based on extrapolated data from studies pertaining to sarcomas of the extremities, adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy may serve a role but further research is crucial.

Introduction

Malignant spermatic cord tumors have an annual incidence of 0.3 cases/million. The vast majority of tumors in this region are benign. We present a rare case of a dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the spermatic cord successfully treated.

Presentation of case

A 59-year-old gentleman presented complaining of an enlarging painful right groin mass. On exam there was an obvious 10 cm inguinal mass. Imaging illustrated a right inguinal soft tissue mass that was not present on imaging 22 months prior.

The patient underwent a right inguinal exploration, en bloc resection of the mass, and radical orchiectomy to ensure negative margins. Histopathological analysis revealed a grade 2 dedifferentiated liposarcoma that measured 9 × 6 × 5 cm, with 5 cm negative margins. The patient did well and was discharged on postoperative day one. On 6-month follow-up there was no evidence of recurrence.

Discussion

We present a rare dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the spermatic cord that was successfully treated with surgical resection. This case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion coupled with a thorough history and physical examination when encountering an enlarging inguinal mass. This rare pathology is lacking level one evidence-based standardized treatment algorithms. The mainstay of treatment is surgical resection.

Conclusion

For spermatic cord liposarcomas, the surgical approach is en bloc resection with radical orchiectomy aiming for R0 margins. Prognosis depends on tumor grade, anatomic site, and the ability to achieve a microscopically tumor negative resection. Despite our patient’s disease free status, prolonged surveillance with physical examination and cross sectional imaging is still warranted.

Radiomics approach to distinguish between well differentiated liposarcomas and lipomas on MRI

Background

Well differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) can be difficult to distinguish from lipoma. Currently, this distinction is made by testing for MDM2 amplification, which requires a biopsy. The aim of this study was to develop a noninvasive method to predict MDM2 amplification status using radiomics features derived from MRI.

Methods

Patients with an MDM2‐negative lipoma or MDM2‐positive WDLPS and a pretreatment T1‐weighted MRI scan who were referred to Erasmus MC between 2009 and 2018 were included. When available, other MRI sequences were included in the radiomics analysis. Features describing intensity, shape and texture were extracted from the tumour region. Classification was performed using various machine learning approaches. Evaluation was performed through a 100 times random‐split cross‐validation. The performance of the models was compared with the performance of three expert radiologists.

Results

The data set included 116 tumours (58 patients with lipoma, 58 with WDLPS) and originated from 41 different MRI scanners, resulting in wide heterogeneity in imaging hardware and acquisition protocols. The radiomics model based on T1 imaging features alone resulted in a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0·83, sensitivity of 0·68 and specificity of 0·84. Adding the T2‐weighted imaging features in an explorative analysis improved the model to a mean AUC of 0·89, sensitivity of 0·74 and specificity of 0·88. The three radiologists scored an AUC of 0·74 and 0·72 and 0·61 respectively; a sensitivity of 0·74, 0·91 and 0·64; and a specificity of 0·55, 0·36 and 0·59.

Conclusion

Radiomics is a promising, non‐invasive method for differentiating between WDLPS and lipoma, outperforming the scores of the radiologists. Further optimization and validation is needed before introduction into clinical practice.

Correlation between percutaneous biopsy and final histopathology for retroperitoneal sarcoma: a single-centre study

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare soft tissue tumours accounting for 10-15% of soft tissue sarcomas. Patient prognosis and treatment recommendations (including extent of surgery and neoadjuvant strategies) are determined by the pre-operative histopathological subtype and grade obtained from biopsy and thus it is important to understand the accuracy of biopsy in retroperitoneal masses.

METHODS

This study presents a case series of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas managed at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (PMCC) between 2008 and 2019. Statistical analyses were performed to determine correlation between histopathology from percutaneous biopsy and surgical excision.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients who underwent percutaneous core biopsy and surgical excision of retroperitoneal sarcoma were included. Diagnostic accuracy varied with histopathological diagnosis, but overall precise concordance between biopsy and final histopathology was seen in 61% (κ = 0.57). Biopsy was most sensitive for identifying well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) (sensitivity 85%, 95% CI 0.06-0.96) and leiomyosarcoma (sensitivity 81%, 95% CI 0.54-0.96) and was least sensitive for identifying de-differentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) (sensitivity 40%, 95% CI 0.25-0.56). Overall agreement between biopsy and final histopathology increased with use of PET/CT scan pre-biopsy and with use of fluorescence in situ hybridisation testing on biopsy, however, neither test improved recognition of de-differentiated components within WD/DDLPS on core biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative biopsy is important for clinical decision making in the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma. A significant portion of patients with a WDLPS will have a de-differentiated component identified at the time of resection that was not identified on initial biopsy.

An evidence-based guideline on the application of molecular testing in the diagnosis, prediction of prognosis, and selection of therapy in non-GIST soft tissue sarcomas

AIMS

To make recommendations on the indications for molecular testing regarding the diagnosis, prediction of prognosis, and treatment selection in adult patients with s oft tissue sarcomas (STS) excluding gastrointestinal stromal tumour.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This guideline was developed by the Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC) and the Sarcoma Disease Site Group (DSG). The medline, embase, and Cochrane Library databases, main guideline websites, abstracts of relevant annual meetings, and PROSPERO databases were searched (January 2005 to October 2016). Internal and external reviews were conducted, with final approval by the PEBC and the Sarcoma DSG.

RESULTS

Based on the available evidence, we made three S trong Recommendations, 14 Recommendations, 9 Qualified Statements, and seven No Recommendations. The three Strong Recommendations include: i) MDM2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is recommended as a sensitive and specific test to differentiate patients with atypical lipomatous tumour/well-differentiated liposarcoma, or dedifferentiated liposarcoma from lipoma or other STS in the differential diagnosis; ii) SS18 (SYT) break-apart by FISH or SS18-SSX (SYT-SSX) fusion by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction is recommended as a sensitive and specific test to differentiate patients with synovial sarcoma from other sarcomas; iii) CTNNB1 S45F mutation by polymerase chain reaction is recommended as a prognostic factor for poor recurrence-free survival in patients with desmoid tumours.

CONCLUSION

This guideline may serve as a framework for the thoughtful implementation of molecular studies at cancer centres and other jurisdictions. Some of the recommendations may need to be updated when new evidence appears in the future.

Soft tissue tumours of the elbow: current concepts

Soft tissue tumours of the elbow are mostly benign. Malignant tumours in this area, although uncommon, often present unique clinical and histopathological characteristics that are helpful for diagnosis.Management of soft tissue tumours around the elbow may be challenging because of their rarity and the proximity to neurovascular structures. Careful staging, histological diagnosis and treatment are essential to optimize clinical outcome. A missed or delayed diagnosis or an improperly executed biopsy may have devastating consequences for the patient.This article reviews the most common benign and malignant soft tissue tumours of the elbow and discusses the clinicopathological findings, imaging features and current therapeutic concepts. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:668-677. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.190002.

Cracking the riddle of dedifferentiated liposarcoma: is EV-MDM2 a key?

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is molecularly characterized by wt p53 and MDM2 gene amplification causing MDM2 protein over-production, the key oncogenic process in DDLPS. Commonly located in fat-bearing retroperitoneal areas, almost 60% of DDLPS patients undergo multifocal recurrence, typically amenable to palliative treatment only, and occasionally develop distant metastasis. These factors lead to an abysmal 10% 10 year overall survival rate. Tumor cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) can facilitate loco-regional malignancy dissemination by depositing molecular factors that participate in the development of pre-metastatic niches for tumor cell implantation and growth. High number of MDM2 DNA molecules was identified within EVs from DDLPS patient serum (ROC vs normal; 0.95) as well as from DDLPS cell lines. This MDM2 DNA could be transferred to preadipocytes (P-a), a major and ubiquitous cellular component of the DDLPS tumor microenvironment (TME), with subsequent P-a production of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2), a critical component in the metastatic cascade. From here the hypothesis that the DDLPS microenvironment (specifically P-a cells) may participate in DDLPS recurrence events. Since multifocal loco-regional DDLPS spreading is the main cause of the remarkably high lethality of this disease, a better understanding of the underlying oncogenic processes and their regulatory mechanisms is essential to improve the outcome of this devastating disease.

Analysis of Dedifferentiated Liposarcomas Emphasizing the Diagnostic Dilemmas

Introduction: Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is defined as a progression of well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) to another nonlipogenic sarcoma. Since a variety of heterologous sarcomas can be encountered in dedifferentiation, clinical dilemmas arise. The present study analyzed the role of clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) features in the diagnosis of DDLPS and its differentiation from mimics. Materials and Methods: A retrospective and prospective study was conducted wherein all cases of liposarcoma from 2012 to 2017 were reviewed. DDLPS cases were identified among pleomorphic lesions. Clinical and histopathological details for these cases were retrieved from medical records section and department archives. Histomorphology and immunohistochemistry (MDM2, S100, and Ki-67) were analyzed for these cases. Results: Among 37 cases of liposarcomas reviewed, DDLPS was diagnosed in 12 cases (32.4%). Mean age of the patients was 54.3 years with equal gender distribution (M:F =1:1.2). Two patients had recurrent tumors. Most were retroperitoneal (58.3%) with mean duration of symptoms being 8.7 months. Mean tumor dimension was 17.5 cm. High-grade dedifferentiated component was most common (83.3%) with only one case each (8.3%) of low-grade and homologous dedifferentiation. Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma was the frequent nonlipogenic sarcoma. MDM2 overexpression was detected in 100%, focal S100 positivity seen in 66.6%, and mean Ki-67 labeling index was 24. Conclusion: DDLPS exhibits aggressive clinical behavior. Adequate sampling, correlation to clinical details, demonstration of transition from WDLPS to DDLPS aid in narrowing the differentials. Immunostaining with MDM2 helps in definite categorization and S100 highlights lipoblasts, when they are not easily identifiable. MDM2, CDK4, and p16 IHC panel is recommended in all cases and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis where IHC is noncontributory.

Diagnostic performance of MRI and histology in assessment of deep lipomatous tumours

BACKGROUND

Deep lipomatous tumours can be benign lipomas or intermediate/locally recurring atypical lipomatous tumours (ALTs). Differentiating between these two entities clinically and radiologically is difficult. The aims of this study were to report a series of deep lipomatous tumours, comparing the clinical, radiological and pathological features of ALTs and lipomas; and to predict the likelihood of a lipomatous tumour being ALT based on anatomical site and MRI characteristics.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients with deep lipomatous tumours presenting over 6 years to a tertiary sarcoma centre, with preoperative MRI, and preoperative or postoperative histology including MDM2 gene analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy in diagnosing ALT were calculated for MRI and histopathological features.

RESULTS

Some 248 patients were included; 81 (32·7 per cent) had a final diagnosis of ALT. ALTs were larger than lipomas (median 19 versus 10 cm; P < 0·001); there was no ALT smaller than 5 cm. A tumour presenting in the lower limb was more likely to be an ALT than a lesion at any other site (48·4 versus 13·5 per cent; P < 0·001). In patients with lipomatous tumours at sites other than the lower limbs, MRI had a negative predictive value of 95 per cent for excluding ALT.

CONCLUSION

Despite concern, most deep lipomatous tumours (nearly 70 per cent) are benign lipomas. Certain features imply that tumours are almost never ALT: smaller than 5 cm or located outside the lower limb with no suspicious characteristics on MRI. Tumours with these features might safely and confidently be managed outside tertiary sarcoma centres.

[Tumors with predominantly adipocytic morphology]

More than 20% of soft-tissue tumors belong to the group of adipocytic neoplasms. Difficulties may occur in the differential diagnosis of lipomas versus atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas, in the distinction of dedifferentiated liposarcomas from other soft-tissue sarcoma entities and in the detailed subtyping of liposarcomas. Especially in biopsies, the correct diagnosis and grading may be hampered due to limited tissue. Because of the ever-increasing molecular-pathological knowledge of soft-tissue tumors and the rising distribution of molecular diagnostic assays in institutes of pathology, differential diagnosis has been facilitated, as more than 90% of adipocytic tumors carry more or less specific genomic alterations. In the following, the most important subtypes of adipocytic tumors are described morphologically and genomically.

Well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma: An updated review

Well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDL)/atypical lipomatous tumor and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDL) together comprise the largest subgroup of liposarcomas, and constitute a histologic and behavioral spectrum of one disease. WDL and DDL typically occur in middle-aged to older adults, particularly within the retroperitoneum or extremities. WDL closely resembles mature adipose tissue, but typically shows fibrous septation with variable nuclear atypia and enlargement. WDL does not metastasize, but can dedifferentiate to DDL, which is associated with more aggressive clinical behavior, with a greater propensity for local recurrence and the capacity for metastasis. Although distant metastasis is rarer in DDL compared with other pleomorphic sarcomas, behavior is related to location, with a significantly worse outcome in retroperitoneal tumors. DDL typically has the appearance of undifferentiated pleomorphic or spindle cell sarcoma, and is usually a non-lipogenic sarcoma that is adjacent to WDL, occurs as a recurrence of WDL or which can arise de novo. WDL and DDL share similar background genetic aberrations; both are associated with high-level amplifications in the chromosomal 12q13-15 region, which includes the CDK4 and MDM2 cell cycle oncogenes. In addition, DDL harbor further genetic changes, particularly 6q23 and 1p32 coamplifications. While surgical excision remains the treatment mainstay with limited medical options for patients with aggressive recurrent disease or metastases, novel targeted therapies towards the gene products of chromosome 12 are being evaluated. This review summarizes the pathology of WDL and DDL, discussing morphology, immunohistochemistry, genetics and the differential diagnosis.

Molecular updates in adipocytic neoplasms✰

Adipocytic neoplasms include a diversity of both benign tumors (lipomas) and malignancies (liposarcomas), and each tumor type is characterized by its own unique molecular alterations driving tumorigenesis. Work over the past 30 years has established the diagnostic utility of several of these characteristic molecular alterations (e.g. MDM2 amplification in well- and dedifferentiated liposarcoma, FUS/EWSR1-DDIT3 gene fusions in myxoid liposarcoma, RB1 loss in spindle cell/pleomorphic lipoma). More recent studies have focused on additional molecular alterations which may have therapeutic or prognostic impact. This review will summarize several of the important molecular findings in adipocytic tumors that have been described over the past 10 years.

Clinical Utility of In Situ Hybridization Assays in Head and Neck Neoplasms

Head and neck pathology present a unique set of challenges including the morphological diversity of the neoplasms and presentation of metastases of unknown primary origin. The detection of human papillomavirus and Epstein-Barr virus associated with squamous cell carcinoma and newer entities like HPV-related carcinoma with adenoid cystic like features have critical prognostic and management implications. In salivary gland neoplasms, differential diagnoses can be broad and include non-neoplastic conditions as well as benign and malignant neoplasms. The detection of specific gene rearrangements can be immensely helpful in reaching the diagnosis in pleomorphic adenoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, secretory carcinoma, hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma. Furthermore, molecular techniques are essential in diagnosis of small round blue cell neoplasms and spindle cell neoplasms including Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, nodular fasciitis and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. The detection of genetic rearrangements is also important in lymphomas particularly in identifying 'double-hit' and 'triple-hit' lymphomas in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. This article reviews the use of in situ hybridization in the diagnosis of these neoplasms.

Subclassification of pleomorphic sarcomas: How and why should we care?

Pleomorphic sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal neoplasms with widely varied clinical behavior but overlapping histologic appearances. The following guidelines are helpful when approaching the diagnosis of a pleomorphic sarcoma. (1) Be aware of the relative incidence of the various sarcoma types: several pleomorphic sarcomas are relatively common (e.g., dedifferentiated liposarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma), whereas others are exceptionally rare. (2) Pay attention to anatomic location: some pleomorphic sarcomas have a predilection for somatic soft tissues, especially the thigh (e.g., undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, pleomorphic liposarcoma, pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma), whereas other pleomorphic sarcomas most often arise in the retroperitoneum (e.g., dedifferentiated liposarcoma). (3) Carefully sample the resection specimen, paying particular attention to areas with differences in gross appearances (e.g., fleshy, fibrous, mucoid, or gritty). (4) Search for histologic clues (i.e., myxoid stroma, lipoblasts, and osteoid matrix, in order to diagnose myxofibrosarcoma, pleomorphic liposarcoma, and extraskeletal osteosarcoma, respectively); these critical diagnostic features may be limited in extent. (5) Apply immunohistochemistry judiciously, after generating a differential diagnosis; always exclude metastatic sarcomatoid carcinoma and melanoma before diagnosing a pleomorphic sarcoma. This review will present an approach to the diagnosis of pleomorphic sarcomas, emphasizing differential diagnosis and the application of ancillary studies (immunohistochemistry and FISH), when relevant.

Esophageal carcinosarcoma comprised of minimally invasive squamous cell carcinoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma: A collision cancer?

Esophageal carcinosarcoma is a rare neoplasm with components of squamous cell carcinoma and sarcomatous spindle cell stroma. The latter may show overt mesenchymal differentiation but is thought to be derived from carcinoma cells in most cases. Here, we report a case of esophageal carcinosarcoma that appeared to be comprised of different origins of epithelial and mesenchymal tumor cells. The sarcomatous component formed an intralumial pedunculated large mass lesion that consisted of pleomorphic atypical histiocyte-like cells. The squamous epithelium exhibited features of mostly dysplasia with minor foci of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma. The invasive carcinoma was apart from the sarcoma, and no transitions were observed between the epithelial and sarcomatous cells. Immunohistochemistry showed that the sarcoma cells did not express any lineage-specific markers, including those for epithelial cells and histiocytes, which lead to the diagnosis of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. Although cyclin D1 was overexpressed in the carcinoma cells, it was nearly negative in the sarcoma cells. These findings indicate that the tumor may be a collision carcinosarcoma. It is highly likely that the patient's history of heavy smoking and alcohol consumption were relevant to the pathogenesis, at least for the epithelial component, of the tumor.