Management of Deep Infection after Instrumentation on Lumbar Spinal Surgery in a Single Institution

The impact of negative pressure wound therapy on surgical wound infection, hospital stay and postoperative complications after spinal surgery: A meta-analysis

To systematically assess the effect of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on postoperative surgical wound infection, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications after spinal surgery. Relevant studies on the application of NPWT in spinal surgery were conducted via a computerised database search, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang, from inception to June 2023. The identified literature was rigorously screened and data extraction was performed by two investigators independently. The quality of the relevant studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). The effect size for count data was determined by the odds ratio (OR), while the impact size for measurement data was expressed as the standardised mean difference (SMD). The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for each effect magnitude. Stata 17.0 software was used for the meta-analysis. Ten papers, totalling 1448 patients, were finally included. This study demonstrated that NPWT led to a statistically significant reduction in the occurrence of postoperative surgical wound infections (OR: 0.377, 95% CI: 0.238-0.598, p < 0.001), fewer postoperative complications (OR: 0.526, 95% CI: 0.360-0.770, p = 0.001) and a shortened hospital stay (SMD: -0.678, 95%CI: -1.324 to -0.031, p = 0.040) after spinal surgery compared with the control group. When compared with other treatment approaches, NPWT also demonstrated a substantial reduction in surgical wound infections and postoperative complications, as well as a shorter duration of hospitalisation after spinal surgery.

Deep spinal infection in instrumented spinal surgery: diagnostic factors and therapy

AIM

Postoperative surgical site infections (SSI) are complication of spinal surgery. These complications may lead to a poor outcome with neurological deficits, spinal deformity and chronic pain. The purpose of this study is to explore the statistical value of diagnostic parameters and the proper therapy.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed 550 patients who underwent spinal instrumentation at our department from January 2011 to December 2015. The SSI was present in 16 patients out of 550 operated. Diagnostic criteria of SSI were the positivity of the surgical wound swab or blood culture, the clinical findings, positivity of laboratory tests and radiological elements. All patients had peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis. Diagnostic laboratory findings were compared with a homogeneous control group of 16 patients and analyzed by univariate statistical analysis with Chi-square test for the discrete variables. P<0,05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Matching the SSI patients with a group of control, fever was not statistically significant for diagnosis as number of leukocytes, neutrophils and lymphocytes. On the contrary values of ESR and CRP were statistically significant with p <0, 01. The hardware was removed only in 3 patients (18%) out of 16 SSI patients.

CONCLUSION

In this study the statistically significant parameters to diagnose SSI are ESR and CRP values. The leucocytes count, number of lymphocytes and presence of fever integrates the data of ESR and CRP with no statistical significance. Most patients with SSI reach clinical healing with favorable outcome by means of target antibiotic therapy without hardware removal.

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Instrumented Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of 24-Hour and 72-Hour Dosages

Study Design

Prospective study.

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of 24-hour and 72-hour antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing surgical site infections (SSIs).

Overview of Literature

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical practice has become a universally accepted protocol for minimizing postoperative complications related to infections. Although prophylaxis is an accepted practice, a debate exists with regard to the antibiotic type and its administration duration for various surgical procedures.

Methods

Our institute is a tertiary care hospital with more than 100 spinal surgeries per year for various spine disorders in the department of orthopedics. We conducted this prospective study in our department from June 2012 to January 2015. A total of 326 patients were enrolled in this study, with 156 patients in the 72-hour antibiotic prophylaxis group (group A) and 170 patients in the 24-hour group (group B). Cefazolin was the antibiotic used in both groups. Two surgeons were involved in conducting all the spinal procedures. Our study compared SSIs among patients undergoing instrumented spinal fusion.

Results

The overall rate of SSIs was 1.8% with no statistical difference between the two groups.

Conclusions

The 24-hour antimicrobial prophylaxis is as effective as the 72-hour dosage in instrumented spinal fusion surgery.