Intercalary reconstruction after wide resection of malignant bone tumors of the lower extremity using a composite graft with a devitalized autograft and a vascularized fibula

Bone-based versus soft-tissue free flaps in lower extremity reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Most lower extremity defects and minor bone defect wounds requiring a free flap are treatable with soft-tissue flaps, whereas large bone defect wounds are treated with bone-based flaps. This study aimed to compare bone-based and soft-tissue-free flaps in terms of operative procedures and postoperative complications, including long-term outcomes of lower extremity reconstruction.

METHODS

This two-center retrospective cohort study collected data from all lower-extremity reconstructions with free flaps performed between March 2014 and February 2022; the level of evidence is considered to be therapeutic level III. We investigated the operative procedure and postoperative complications classified as being related to either bone-based or soft-tissue flaps. The data were further classified into the trauma and non-trauma groups and the long-term postoperative outcomes of patients who were followed up for ≥12 months were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 122 free flaps were included: 29 bone-based flaps (1 scapular and 28 fibular flaps) and 93 soft-tissue flaps (22 muscle-based and 71 fasciocutaneous flaps). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications, including long-term outcomes, between the free flap types, regardless of etiology. Vein grafts were used more often for bone-based flaps than for soft-tissue flaps (20.7% vs. 7.5%; p = 0.045). The donor veins of bone-based flaps were more often anastomosed to superficial veins than were those of soft-tissue flaps (37.9% vs. 10.8%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Using bone-based free flaps resulted in no significant differences in postoperative complications, including long-term outcomes, despite involving more complicated operative procedures than soft-tissue flaps. Thus, the use of vein grafts and anastomosis to the superficial venous system of the vascularized fibula graft may help avoid flap-related complications in bone-based free flaps.

Intercalary Prosthetic Reconstruction with Three-Dimensional-Printed Custom-Made Porous Component for Defects of Long Bones with Short Residual Bone Segments After Tumor Resection

BACKGROUND

Intercalary reconstruction for patients with short residual bone segments remains challenging. Three-dimensional (3D)-printed custom-made porous implants are a promising technique for short-segment fixation in these patients. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of 3D-printed custom-made porous components (3DCPCs) for short-segment fixation, focusing on prosthesis survivorship, radiographic results, and potential complications.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 39 patients who underwent intercalary prosthetic reconstruction with 3DCPCs after tumor resection of the femur, tibia, or humerus from June 2015 to October 2020. Segment bone loss involved the femur (n = 15), tibia (n = 16), and humerus (n = 8), leaving 78 residual bone segments. There were 46 short segments requiring 46 3DCPCs and 32 segments with the ability to accommodate 32 off-the-shelf standard uncemented stems for prosthesis fixation. Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated. Prosthesis-overall survivorship and prosthesis-specific survivorship were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Radiographic results and modes of failure of using this technique were also examined.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 41 months. The prosthesis-overall survivorship was 87.2% and 84.6% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. The prosthesis-specific survivorship was 92.1% and 89.5% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. There was not a substantial difference in prosthesis survivorship among the femur, tibia, and humerus. The average MSTS score was 26.2, ranging from 22 to 28. The radiographic evaluation results revealed excellent or good interface (38/46) in most of the 46 porous components. A total of 38 of 46 bone segments' remolding demonstrated no change. In total, seven patients (16.3%) had complications requiring further surgery.

CONCLUSION

The prosthesis survivorship of using 3DCPCs for short-segment fixation is similar or better compared to other studies involving intercalary prosthetic reconstruction with short-segment fixation. Radiographic evaluation revealed good osteointegration and avoidance of stress shielding. Overall, intercalary prosthetic reconstruction with 3DCPC is a feasible modality for patients with short residual bone segments after tumor resection.

Limb salvage surgery reconstructive techniques following long-bone lower limb oncological resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage surgery (LSS) is now considered the gold standard surgical treatment for lower limb bone sarcomas. However, there is a paucity of literature comparing the various LSS reconstructive options. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare functional outcomes and complications of LSS reconstructive techniques.

METHODS

The primary aim of the meta-analysis was to determine functional outcomes from the pooled data utilizing the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score (MSTS). Comparisons could then made for this outcome between biological and prosthetic, vascularised and non-vascularised, and prosthetic and composite reconstructions. The secondary aim was to compare complication outcomes of each reconstruction. Standardized mean difference (Cohen's d) and odds ratios were estimated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with a total of 785 patients were included. We found structural failure was 75% less likely to occur in prosthetic reconstruction compared to biological (OR = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.07-0.79; P = 0.02). We did not find any evidence of difference in function (MSTS score) between vascularised verses non-vascularised reconstructions (Cohen's d = -1.14; 95% CI = -3.06 to 0.78; I2  = 87%). Other analyses comparing complications found no difference between the reconstructive groups.

CONCLUSION

The study found no correlation between functional outcomes and the type of LSS reconstruction. Structural failure was more likely to occur in biological when compared with prosthetic reconstruction. There was no correlation between the incidence of other complications and the type of LSS technique. This suggests a role for improved approaches to reconstruction methods including bioprinting and bioresorbable devices.

Is liquid nitrogen recycled bone and vascular fibula combination the biological reconstruction of choice in lower extremity long bone tumor-related defects?

INTRODUCTION

Combination techniques, which encompass the combined use of vascularized bone grafts with massive allografts or autografts (recycled bone grafts), are especially important in the biological reconstruction of tumor-related lower extremity long bone defects. Liquid nitrogen recycled bone (frozen autograft) and free vascular fibula graft (FVFG) combination, which was coined as the "frozen hotdog (FH)" method by the authors, has not been as widely used nor its outcomes reported for significantly sized patient groups. This study aims to provide an answer to whether FH is a safe and effective reconstructive tool for limb salvage in malignant tumors of the lower extremity regarding radiological, functional, and oncological outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-six (male/female: 33/33) patients, who underwent FH reconstruction for tumor-related massive defects of lower extremity long bones between 2006 and 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age was 15.8 (3.8-46.7) years. The most common tumor localizations were distal femur (42.4%) and proximal tibia (21.2%) while classic osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma were the most common pathologies (60.6% and 22.7%, respectively). Mean resection and FVFG lengths were 160 (90-320) mm and 192 (125-350) mm, respectively. The mean follow-up was 73.9 (24-192) months.

RESULTS

The mean MSTS score was 25.4 (15-30) and the mean ISOLS radiographic score was 22.6 (13-24). Mean time to full weight bearing without any assistive devices was 15.4 (6-40) months and the median time was 12 months. MSTS score negatively correlated with resected segment length and vascular fibula length (p < 0.001; p = 0.006). Although full contact apposition of the FH segment correlated with earlier full weight bearing compared to partial apposition (mean 13.7 vs. 17.9 months) (p = 0.042), the quality of reduction did not affect the ISOLS radiographic score at LFU. Overall limb survival rate was 96.3% at 5 and 10 years while FH survival rate was 91.0% and 88.1% at 5 and 10 years. Local recurrence-free survival rates were 88.8% and 85.9%, and overall survival was 89.9% and 86.1% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Limb length discrepancy was the most common complication with 34 (51.5%) patients while shell nonunion was seen in 21 (31.8%) patients and graft fracture in 6 (9.1%).

CONCLUSION

The "FH" method is a safe, effective, and extremely cost-efficient reconstructive tool for tumor-related lower extremity long bone defects. Patient compliance to protracted weight-bearing, ensuring the vitality of the FVFG, and achieving an oncologically safe resection are key factors for a successful outcome.

Addition of a Vascular Bundle Accelerates Bone Union in Femoral Bone Defects

BACKGROUND

 The Masquelet method has become increasingly popular for the treatment of bone defects in recent years. In this method, an induced membrane (IM) with abundant blood circulation, stem cells, and osteogenesis-promoting factors is formed by implanting bone cement during the first surgery. This IM stimulates bone formation in the bone defect after implantation of the bone graft during the second surgery. However, the Masquelet method requires two surgeries and thus a longer treatment period. In the present study, we investigated whether bone defects could be reconstructed in a single surgery by introducing a vascular bundle into the bone defect as an alternative to the IM, in addition to bone grafting.

METHODS

 Thirty-six 12-week-old female Sprague-Dawley rats were used. After creating a 5-mm long bone defect in the femur, a mixture of autologous and artificial bone was grafted into the defect, and a saphenous arteriovenous vascular bundle was introduced. The animals were divided into three groups: the control group (bone defect only), the BG group (bone grafting only), and the BG + V group (bone grafting + vascular bundle introduction). After surgery, radiological and histological evaluations were performed to assess osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone defects.

RESULTS

 In the BG + V group, significant bone formation was observed in the bone defect on radiological and histological evaluations, and the amount of bone formation was significantly higher than that in the other two groups. Furthermore, cortical bone continuity was observed in many specimens in the BG + V group. On histological evaluation, the number of blood vessels was also significantly higher in the BG + V group than in the other two groups.

CONCLUSION

 Our results suggest that the introduction of a vascular bundle in addition to bone grafting can promote bone formation in bone defects and allow for complete bone defect reconstruction in a single surgery.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Biological Reconstruction with Free Fibular Graft after Resection of Extremity Diaphyseal Bone Tumors

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of reconstruction with a composite free fibula inside other biological grafts. We retrospectively reviewed 26 patients who underwent reconstruction after bone tumor resection of the diaphysis of the long bone. Surgical data, time to bony union, functional outcomes, and complications were evaluated in all cases. The median follow-up was 72.5 months. The limb salvage rate was 100%. Primary osseous union was achieved in 90.4% of the junctions. The union rates at the metaphyseal and diaphyseal junctions were 100% and 85.7%, respectively (p = 0.255). The mean time of bony union in the upper (87.5%) and lower (91.7%) extremity was 4.6 ± 1.6 months and 6.9 ± 2 months, respectively. The mean MSTS score was 27.2 ± 3.2, with a mean MSTS rating of 90.7%. Complications occurred in 15.4% of the cases. The administration of vascularized or non-vascularized grafts did not significantly influence the union time (p = 0.875), functional outcome (p = 0.501), or blood loss (p = 0.189), but showed differences in operation time (p = 0.012) in lower extremity reconstruction. A composite free fibula inside other biological grafts provides a reasonable and durable option for osseous oncologic reconstruction of the long bone diaphysis of the extremities with an acceptable rate of complications. A higher union rate was achieved after secondary bone grafting. In lower-extremity reconstruction, two plates may be considered a better option for internal fixation. Vascularizing the fibula did not significantly affect the union time.

Factors Influencing Nonunion and Fracture Following Biological Intercalary Reconstruction for Lower-Extremity Bone Tumors: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine nonunion rate, fracture rate, and their risk factors following biological intercalary reconstruction for lower extremity bone tumors.

METHODS

A systematic review and pooled analysis were conducted. PubMed, Embase, and Wiley Cochrane Library were searched from inception up to June 01, 2020. Studies concerning biological intercalary reconstruction after resection of lower extremity bone tumors were included. Overall nonunion and fracture rates were calculated. For studies reporting patient outcomes individually with precise graft characteristics and fixation methods, the individual data were extracted. Patients with demographical and clinical characteristics, including age, sex, tumor location, graft characteristics, and fixation method, were pooled for a multivariate analysis. For each factor of interest, odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and p-value from logistic regression were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 2776 articles were identified from the initial literature search and 76 studies (2052 patients) were included. Sixty-nine studies were case series and seven were comparative studies. The overall nonunion rate was 19% (382/2052; range: 0%-53%), and the overall fracture rate was 17% (344/2052; range: 0%-75%). Thirty of the 76 studies (362 patients) reported patients' characteristics individually and were thus included in the pooled multivariate analysis. Intramedullary nail fixation was associated with a significantly higher nonunion rate compared to plate fixation (OR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.23-4.10, p = 0.009). Reconstruction with a vascularized fibula graft had a statistically non-significant lower nonunion rate than reconstruction without the graft (OR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.34-1.07, p = 0.086). Devitalized autografts had a lower fracture risk than allografts (OR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.14-0.64, p = 0.002), and males tended to have higher fracture risk than females (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.00-4.44, p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction with intramedullary nail fixation is related to an elevated risk of nonunion. Allografts and males have a higher fracture risk than devitalized autografts and females, respectively. Further high-quality comparative analyses with large sample sizes and adequate follow-up duration are needed to validate these findings.

Intercalary allograft reconstruction following femoral tumour resection: mid- and long-term results and benefits of adding a vascularised fibula autograft

Purpose

Bone healing in femoral reconstructions using intercalary allografts can be compromised in a tumour context. There is also a high revision rate for non-union, infection, and fractures in this context. The advantages and disadvantages of an associated vascularised fibula graft (VFG) are still a matter of debate.

Methods

In a multicentre study, we retrospectively analysed 46 allograft reconstructions, operated on between 1984 and 2017, of which 18 were associated with a VFG (VFG+) and 28 without (VFG−), with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We determined the cumulative probability of bone union as well as the mid- and long-term revision risks for both categories by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a multivariate Cox model. We also compared the MSTS scores.

Results

Significant differences in favour of VFG+ reconstruction were observed in the survival analyses for the probability of bone union (log-rank, p = 0.017) and in mid- and long-term revisions (log-rank, p = 0.032). No significant difference was observed for the MSTS, with a mean MSTS of 27.6 in our overall cohort (p = 0.060). The multivariate Cox model confirmed that VFG+ was the main positive factor for bone union, and it identified irradiated allografts as a major risk factor for the occurrence of mid- and long-term revisions.

Conclusion

Bone union was achieved earlier in both survival and Cox model analyses for the VFG+ group. It also reduced the mid- and long-term revision risk, except when an irradiated allograft was used. In case of a tumour, we thus recommend using VFG+ from a fresh-frozen allograft, as it appears to be a more reliable long-term option.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02650-x.

Lower Limb Reconstruction Using Tibial Strut Autograft after Resection of Primary Malignant Bone Tumors in Skeletally Immature Patients

Background

Reconstruction of large bone defects in skeletally immature patients remains a surgical challenge. We report the long-term clinical outcomes of a novel surgical technique for lower limb reconstruction using the tibia as a strut autograft following resection of primary malignant bone tumors in skeletally immature patients.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of six patients diagnosed with lower limb primary bone sarcoma. All patients underwent tumor resection and reconstruction using tibial strut autograft. The radiological and clinical outcomes including complications at the recipient and donor sites were assessed.

Results

The mean age at presentation was ten years (range 6-15 years). Two cases had osteosarcoma and four had Ewing sarcoma. The mean length of the resected tumor and tibial autografts were 20.83 and 19.33 cm respectively. Union at both ends was achieved in five grafts while one graft achieved union only at the distal end. The mean time for union of the proximal and distal junctions was 4 and 8.8 months respectively. The mean follow-up period was 8.4 years (range 14 months-20 years). One patient developed a foot drop, and three patients underwent subsequent joint arthrodesis (2 knees and 1 ankle). The mean musculoskeletal tumor society functional score was 80.8%. Two patients had clinically significant leg-length discrepancy that needs further lengthening procedure. Four patients survived with no evidence of disease and two patients died due to their primary oncologic disease. All donor sites regenerated, with the earliest signs of new bone formation at (2-4) weeks post-operatively.

Conclusion

Reconstruction using non-vascularized‎ tibia strut autograft after resection of primary malignant lower limb bone tumors can be a viable alternative method for reconstructing large bone defects in the immature skeleton.

Strategies for large bone defect reconstruction after trauma, infections or tumour excision: a comprehensive review of the literature

Large bone defects resulting from musculoskeletal tumours, infections, or trauma are often unable to heal spontaneously. The challenge for surgeons is to avoid amputation, and provide the best functional outcomes. Allograft, vascularized fibular or iliac graft, hybrid graft, extracorporeal devitalized autograft, distraction osteogenesis, induced-membrane technique, and segmental prostheses are the most common surgical strategies to manage large bone defects. Given its optimal osteogenesis, osteoinduction, osteoconduction, and histocompatibility properties, along with the lower the risk of immunological rejection, autologous graft represents the most common used strategy for reconstruction of bone defects. However, the choice of the best surgical technique is still debated, and no consensus has been reached. The present study investigated the current reconstructive strategies for large bone defect after trauma, infections, or tumour excision, discussed advantages and disadvantages of each technique, debated available techniques and materials, and evaluated complications and new perspectives.

Assessment of the Viability and Union Feature of Diaphysis Reconstruction Using Pasteurized Tumor Bone and Intramedullary Free Fibular After Tumor Resection

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction using pasteurized tumor bone (PTM) and intramedullary-placed vascularized free fibular (VFG) has the combined advantages of mechanical strength and biological activity. The aims of this study were to investigate scintigraphic viability and radiographic union patterns of composite grafts after surgery, union rates, functional outcomes, and complication rates.

METHODS

Seventeen patients underwent intercalary composite reconstruction using PTM and VFG (12 male, 2 female, mean age: 10.9 y). Retrospective evaluation of radiography and bone scintigraphy was performed. The most common diagnosis was osteosarcoma (12/14, 85.7%). All radiography and bone scintigraphy was reviewed for bone healing and tracer uptake semiquantitatively using the ratio of the reconstructed portion to the contralateral side. Complications and oncological and functional outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 33.1 months, primary union was achieved in all 28 host-graft junctions in all 14 patients. The respective mean times to proximal and distal junction bone union were 6.9 and 6.5 months. Metaphyseal junctions healed faster than diaphysis junctions (5.2 vs. 8.0 mo, P=0.02). Free fibular was integrated with surrounding bone after a mean of 10.1 months. The mean tracer uptake ratio was 1.1 after a mean of 4.8 months postoperatively. Half patients (50%) had higher uptake on bone scan than contralateral side. There was no significant correlation between uptake value and bone healing time. Five complications occurred in 4 patients (28.6%), and 1 patient (7.1%) contracted an infection. No fractures or breakages were observed. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 score was 87.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction using PTM combined with VFG is associated with good short-term biological activity as indicated by bone scintigraphy, a high union rate, and an acceptable complication rate. The technique is a useful reconstruction option for large segmental bone defects after tumor resection in lower extremities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-therapeutic study.

Lower limb reconstruction for malignant bone tumours in children

Malignant bone tumours of the lower limb represent the majority of cases in both osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma in the growth period. Surgical treatment represents a key element of treatment. Different localizations and age groups require a differentiated surgical approach. Life and limb salvage are first on the list of treatment goals, followed by functional and cosmetic considerations. This review article delivers and discusses current surgical treatment strategies and outcomes for lower limb malignant bone tumours in children.

Preliminary Results of the "Capasquelet" Technique for Managing Femoral Bone Defects-Combining a Masquelet Induced Membrane and Capanna Vascularized Fibula with an Allograft

We describe the preliminary results of a novel two-stage reconstruction technique for extended femoral bone defects using an allograft in accordance with the Capanna technique with an embedded vascularized fibula graft in an induced membrane according to the Masquelet technique. We performed what we refer to as "Capasquelet" surgery in femoral diaphyseal bone loss of at least 10 cm. Four patients were operated on using this technique: two tumors and two traumatic bone defects in a septic context with a minimum follow up of one year. Consolidation on both sides, when achieved, occurred at 5.5 months (4-7), with full weight-bearing at 11 weeks (8-12). The functional scores were satisfactory with an EQ5D of 63.3 (45-75). The time to bone union and early weight-bearing with this combined technique are promising compared to the literature. The osteoinductive role of the induced membrane could play a positive role in the evolution of the graft. Longer follow up and a larger cohort are needed to better assess the implications. Nonetheless, this two-stage technique appears to have ample promise, especially in a septic context or in adjuvant radiotherapy in an oncological context.

Comparative efficacy of intraoperative extracorporeal irradiated and alcohol-inactivated autograft reimplantation for the management of osteosarcomas-a multicentre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Biologic bone reconstruction in limb salvage surgery for the treatment of malignant bone tumours has always been controversial. The various inactivation methods, their convenience and stability, the curative effects elicited and associated costs all need to be considered. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of intraoperative extracorporeal irradiated reimplantation with alcohol-inactivated autograft reimplantation for limb salvage surgery in patients with osteosarcoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 28 patients with osteosarcoma, 14 patients treated with intraoperative cobalt 60 irradiation and reimplantation (group A), and 14 patients treated by alcohol-inactivated autograft reimplantation (group B). The postoperative complications and clinical efficacy of each treatment method were compared by statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The local recurrence rate was 14.3% in each group. Complete bony union was achieved in 64.3% of patients in group A and 71.4% of patients in group B. The overall 5-year survival rate was 71.4% in group A and 78.6% in group B. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 25.33 ± 4.72 (range 15-30) in group A and 24.00 ± 5.85 (range 15-30) in group B, and the mean International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) score was 25.79 ± 5.13 (range 20-36) in group A and 26.14 ± 5.33 (range 20-30) in group B. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. The results showed that the long-term clinical efficacy did not differ significantly between the two methods.

CONCLUSIONS

In limb salvage surgery for osteosarcoma, intraoperative extracorporeal irradiation and alcohol-inactivated autograft reimplantation yielded equivalent outcomes. The alcohol-inactivated method may be a much more convenient and inexpensive way to reconstruct bone defects. Additional studies as well as more case studies are needed to fully evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of this treatment method.

Devitalized Autograft Associated with the Vascularized Fibula Graft: Irradiation versus Freezing Methods

BACKGROUND

 Among the alternatives for the management of malignant bone tumors is the "devitalized autograft associated with vascularized fibula graft." The devitalization process is achieved by pasteurization, irradiation, or freezing. The combination of these grafts has been broadly researched for more than 25 years. However, there is no research currently published comparing the various methods or their respective outcomes.

METHODS

 A retrospective study was compiled of 26 devitalized autografts associated with vascularized fibula performed to limb salvage of malignant bone tumors. They were divided into two groups according to the devitalization method: either freezing (12 procedures) or irradiation (14 procedures). Clinical, radiographic, and scintigraphic results were assessed at least 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

 The union rates reached 83.3% in the freezing group and 92.8% in the irradiated group but did not express different outcomes. Scintigraphic viability was observed in all the grafts that achieved radiographic union (Mann-Whitney U-test: p = 0.005). Three patients had nonunion, with only one having no viability in the scintigraphy (Mann-Whitney U-test: p = 0.001). There was no malignant recurrence in the autograft, only in surrounding soft tissues. Local recurrence was statistically higher in larger tumors (Mann-Whitney U-test: p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

 Both groups presented similar union rates and are considered safe to devitalize bone graft despite different outcomes observed. The survivor rates observed could be limited by the existence of the techniques.

Complication of osteo reconstruction by utilizing free vascularized fibular bone graft

The success of free vascularized fibular bone graft (FVFBG) has accelerated the osteo reconstruction which results from trauma, resection of a tumor or an infectious bone segment, or correction of congenital deformity. But the complication behind should not be overlooked. The failure could necessitate a second surgery, which prolong the rehabilitation period and produce further health cost. Worst, the patients may suffer a permanent impaired ankle function, or a sustained morpho-functional loss on reconstructive area which are hard to save. To provide an overview of the complication related to reconstruction by FVFBG, a narrative review is conducted to identify the complications including their types and rates, the contributing factors, the approaches to measure and the techniques to avoid. Methodologically, by quick research on Pubmed and abstract reading of reviews, we characterize five reconstructive areas where FVFBG were most frequently applied: extremities, mandible, spine, osteonecrosis of femoral head, and penile. Following, the complications on different reconstructive areas are retrieved, studied and presented in five (or more specifically, six) separate sections. By the way, meaningful difference between FVFBG and other bone flap was presented in a few words if necessary. Donor-site morbidities were studied and summarized as a whole. In these literatures, the evidences documented on limb and mandibular reconstruction have the fullest detail, followed by the spine and lastly the penile. In conclusion, FVFBG, though a mature technique, needs further deep and comprehensive study and maybe device-based assistance to achieve better reconstructive effect and minimize donor-site damage.

Joint-preservation surgery for pediatric osteosarcoma of the knee joint

The multi-disciplinary approach involving imaging, multi-agent chemotherapy, meticulous surgical procedures, and careful postoperative care has facilitated an increase in the use of limb-sparing surgery for pediatric osteosarcoma. Osteosarcoma usually occurs around the metaphysis of the distal femur or proximal tibia and needs wide excision with the adjacent joint and replacement by a megaprosthesis. The recent advancement in imaging modalities and surgical techniques supports joint-preservation surgery (JPS), involving the preservation of the adjacent epiphysis, for select patients following careful assessment of the tumor margins and precise tumor excision. An advantage of this surgery is that it maintains the adjacent joint and preserves the growth of the residual epiphysis, which provides excellent limb function. Various reconstruction options are available, including allograft, tumor-devitalized autograft, vascularized fibula graft, distraction osteogenesis, and custom-made implants. However, several complications are inevitable with these options, such as loosening, non-union at the host-graft junction, infection, fracture, implant loosening, breakage, deformity, limb-length discrepancy related to the reconstruction methods, or patient growth in pediatric osteosarcoma. Surgeons should fully understand the advantages and disadvantages of this procedure. In this review, we discuss the concept of JPS, types of reconstruction methods, and current treatment outcomes. It is our opinion that the further analysis by multi-institutional setting is necessary to clarify long-term outcomes and establish global guidelines on the indications and surgical procedure for JPS.

Limb Salvage and Reconstruction Options in Osteosarcoma

Advances in chemotherapy, sophisticated imaging, and surgical techniques over the last few decades have allowed limb-salvage surgery (LSS) to become the preferred surgical treatment for bone sarcomas of the extremities. The goal of LLS is to maximize limb functionality to allow for the maintenance of quality of life without compromising overall survival and tumor local recurrence rates. Today, limb-salvage procedures are performed on 80-95% of patients with extremity osteosarcoma, and the 5-year survival rate in extremity osteosarcoma patients is now 60-75%.This chapter will focus on LSS for extremity osteosarcoma. Common types of surgical reconstruction techniques including endoprostheses, intercalary or osteoarticular allografts, vascularized fibular autografts, and allograft prosthetic composites (APC), and their complications such as infection, local recurrence, graft fracture, implant failure, and nonunion will be discussed in detail. Anatomic locations of lesions discussed include the proximal femur, distal femur, proximal tibia, distal tibia, proximal humerus, distal humerus, and forearm bones.

Tips to secure healing at the free vascularised fibular graft-to-host bone junction

The most commonly used vascularized bone graft in Orthopedics for difficult reconstructive problems requiring biological augmentation properties is the fibula. It provides immediate structure and with a patent pedicle, increases blood flow at the recipient site, promoting healing and hypertrophy in response to mechanical stress. The vascular supply from the nutrient branch and the periosteal vessels allows a variety of graft harvesting configurations for a broad spectrum of reconstructive challenges. We present the details on how to optimize healing and graft incorporation at the junction sites.

Complications following allograft reconstruction for primary bone tumors: Considerations for management

Introduction

The aim of this study was to investigate complication rates and types following allograft reconstruction and discuss unique considerations for management.

Methods

Seventy-four consecutive patients underwent large segment allograft reconstruction following resection of primary musculoskeletal tumors from 1991 to 2016. Mean patient age was 32 ± 20 years (range, 5-71 years). Minimum follow-up was 2 years unless patients were lost to disease prior. Mean follow-up was 105 months.

Results

Thirty-five patients had complications requiring subsequent surgery at a mean of 30 months (range, 1-146 months) post-operatively. Individual complication rates were 29%, 50%, and 42% for Allograft Prosthetic Composite, Intercalary, and Osteoarticular allograft reconstruction, respectively. Risk factors for complication included age less than 30 (OR 4.5; p = 0.002), male gender (OR 2.8; p = 0.031), chemotherapy (OR 4.4; p = 0.003), lower extremity disease (OR 3.4; p = 0.025). In patients with complications, limb-retention rate was 91% and mean MSTS scores were 23.6.

Conclusion

Despite considerable complication rates, management with a systematic approach results in successful outcomes with limb-retention greater than 90% and mean MSTS scores of 79%. In carefully selected patients, allografts provide a reliable method of reconstruction with treatable complications occurring at a mean of 30 months.

Are Pasteurized Autografts Durable for Reconstructions After Bone Tumor Resections?

BACKGROUND

Pasteurized autograft is regarded as a biologic reconstructive option for managing bone defects after tumor resection; however, reports on long-term outcomes from large patient series are scarce. Contrary to previous favorable reports, we have observed many patients with failures, in particular as the duration of followup increased. Because pasteurized autografts are used in many countries as a reconstruction option, we wished to formally evaluate patients who underwent this approach at one specialty center.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the graft survival and what proportion of patients achieved union when pasteurized autografts were used for bone defects after tumor resection? (2) What are the complications and causes of graft removal? (3) What factors are related to the likelihood of union and graft survival? (4) What is the survival and cause of failure by type of pasteurized autograft reconstruction?

METHODS

Over a 26-year period from 1988 to 2013, we performed 1358 tumor resections in our center. Of these, 353 were reconstructed with pasteurized autograft. Other reconstructions included endoprostheses (508 patients), instant arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail and bone cement (286 patients), allografts (97 patients), and resection only (114 patients). During the period in question, we generally used this approach when tumor showed an osteoblastic pattern and less than one-third cortical destruction in osteolytic tumor. We generally avoided this approach when the tumor showed an extensive osteolytic pattern. We excluded 75 (21% [75 of 353]) patients, 21 (6% [21 of 353]) for incomplete clinical data and 54 (15% [54 of 353]) with a followup < 2 years or those lost to followup leaving 278 autografts eligible. The mean followup was 113 months (range, 25-295 months). Of these 278 patients, 242 patients had primary bone sarcomas, 22 patients had soft tissue tumor invading bone, seven patients had metastatic carcinoma, and seven patients had aggressive benign bone tumors. From a chart review, we obtained the age, sex, location, tumor volume, histologic diagnosis, use of chemotherapy, graft length, fixation modality, type of pasteurized bone used, proportion of union, complications, and oncologic outcome of the patients. In total, 377 junctional sites were assessed for union with serial radiographs. We defined junctions showing union < 2 years as union and > 2 years as delayed union. We grouped our patients into type of pasteurized bone use: pasteurized autograft-prosthesis composites (PPCs) were performed in 149, intercalary grafts in 71, hemicortical grafts in 15, osteoarticular in 12, and fusion of a joint in 31 patients. The endpoint of interest included removal of the autograft with implant loosening, infection, fracture of the graft, or any reoperation resulting in removal. Survival of the graft was determined by Kaplan-Meier plot and intergroup differences were determined using log-rank test.

RESULTS

Five, 10-, and 20-year survival of 278 autografts was 73% ± 5.5%, 59% ± 6.7%, and 40% ± 13.6%, respectively. Of 278 autografts, 105 (38%) were removed with complications. Cause of removal included infection in 13% (33 patients), nonunion in 7% (18 patients), fracture of graft in 6% (16 patients), resorption of the graft in 5% (14 patients), and local recurrence in 4% (11 patients). Univariate survival analysis revealed that patient age ≤ 15 years (p = 0.027; hazard ratio [HR], 1.541), male sex (p = 0.004; HR, 1.810), and pelvic location (p = 0.05; HR, 2.518) were associated with graft removal. The 20-year survival rate of osteoarticular and hemicortical methods was 92% (95% confidence interval, -15.6% to +8.3%) and 80% ± 20%, respectively. For intercalary and fusion, it was 46% ± 15% and 28% ± 22%, respectively, although for PPC, it was 37% ± 22%. Log-rank survival analysis showed the osteoarticular and hemicortical groups had better graft survival compared with other types of reconstruction (p = 0.028; HR, 0.499). The most prevalent cause of graft removal in three major types of reconstruction was as follows: (1) PPC type was infection (30% [17 of 56]); (2) intercalary graft was infection, nonunion, and local recurrence in even proportions of 29% (86% [24 of 28]); and (3) fusion was infection (35% [six of 17]). Two hundred ten (56%) of 377 junctional sites showed union within 2 years (average, 14 months), 51 (13%) junctions showed delayed union after 2 years (average, 40 months), and the remaining 116 (31%) junctions showed nonunion. Diaphyseal junction (p = 0.029) and male sex (p = 0.004) showed a higher proportion of nonunion by univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the favorable short-term and small cohort reports, survival of pasteurized autograft in this long-term large cohort was disappointing. We believe that pasteurized autograft should be used with caution in children and adolescents, in the pelvic region, and in PPC form. When bone stock destruction is minimal, it is worth considering this approach for small intercalary or distal long bone reconstruction. We believe this procedure is best indicated after hemicortical resection of long bone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Intraoperative Extracorporeal Irradiation and Frozen Treatment on Tumor-bearing Autografts Show Equivalent Outcomes for Biologic Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Immediately recycling the resected bone segment in a biologic limb salvage reconstruction is an option after wide resection of bone. Intraoperative extracorporeal irradiation and freezing are the two major tumor-killing techniques applied on the fresh tumor-bearing autografts. However, graft-derived tumor recurrence and complications are concerns affecting graft survival.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore asked: (1) Is there a difference in the proportion of patients achieving union by 18 months after surgery between the groups with extracorporeal-irradiated autografts and frozen-treated autografts? (2) Is there any difference in the frequency of graft-related complications for patients receiving either an extracorporeal-irradiated or a frozen-treated autograft? (3) Is there a difference between the techniques in terms of graft-derived recurrence? (4) Are there differences in failure-free grafts, and limb and overall survivorship between autografts treated by extracorporeal irradiation or by freezing?

METHODS

During the study period we treated a total of 333 patients with high-grade osteosarcoma. One hundred sixty-nine patients were excluded. Overall, 79 of the enrolled 164 patients received recycled autografts treated with extracorporeal irradiation whereas the other 85 received frozen-treated autografts. The mean followup was 82 ± 54 months for the extracorporeal irradiation group and 70 ± 25 months for the frozen autograft group, and one patient was lost to followup. Complications and graft failure (revision required for primary graft removal) were characterized by adapting the International Society of Limb Society (ISOLS) system modified for inclusion of biologic and expandable reconstruction. The primary study endpoints were the proportion of patients in each group who achieved radiographic union, and had an ISOLS grade of fair or good host graft fusion at 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after surgery. Five-year survival data for graft failure and limb amputation were analyzed by a cumulative incidence function regression model whereas the Kaplan-Meier function was used to test the 5-year overall survival rate between the two techniques.

RESULTS

With the numbers available, no differences were found in the accumulated proportion of patients achieving union between the groups at 6, 9, 12, and 18 months. Radiographic evaluation did not show differences in the average scores of compared criteria. However in the subchondral bone subcriterion, more patients receiving frozen-treated autografts had higher scores (p = 0.03). Complications leading to a second surgery were not different between extracorporeal irradiation and frozen autografts in aspects of soft tissue failure (Type 1B), nonunion (Type 2B), structural failure (Type 3A and Type 3B), or infection (Type 4A and Type 4B). No graft-originating tumor recurrence was found and there was no difference in Type 5A tumor progression originating from soft tissue in the groups (odds ratio, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.3-2.1; p = 0.7). Neither group showed a difference in the cumulative incidence for graft failure and limb amputation. Five-year overall survival rates were 83% and 84% (p = 0.69) for extracorporeal-irradiated and frozen autografts respectively. A decrease in survivorship was seen at 50 to 100 months after surgery for the extracorporeal irradiation group.

CONCLUSION

We segregated the ISOLS criteria evaluating the graft-mediated tumor progression into host- or graft-derived complications (Types 5B and 5C) in this study. With the available data, there was no difference in the incidence of tumor recurrence derived from irradiation- or frozen-treated autografts. Ongoing evaluations comparing 10-year survivorship for both groups will be helpful to elucidate the possible difference found after 100 months.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE LEVEL

III, therapeutic study.

Long-term Results of Intercalary Endoprosthetic Short Segment Fixation Following Extended Diaphysectomy

Intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction following diaphyseal resection of osseous tumors offers functional advantages through preservation of native joints adjacent to the resected defect. Use of such implants is restricted by the amount of bone available for stem fixation adjacent to the defect. This study aimed to determine whether short osseous segment fixation with acceptable outcomes and complication rate can be reliably achieved with a customized intercalary endoprosthesis following extended diaphysectomy. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on 6 patients receiving customized anchor plugs for short segment fixation with a double compressive osseointegration intercalary implant to reconstruct segmental defects. Five of the implants were augmented with cement to support fixation in metaphyseal bone. Patient age at surgery ranged from 12 to 86 years. At mean follow-up of 39 months, mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score was 26.3, with 5 of 6 patients achieving scores of 27 or greater. Stable fixation was achieved in all patients, with the shortest segment of bone 3.7 cm in length. Three mechanical implant failures requiring revision surgery occurred. No patient required revision of the entire implant, secondary adjacent joint replacement, or secondary amputation. No patient exhibited aseptic loosening, and no case was complicated by infection. Excellent functional outcomes were seen with follow-up out to 9 years. This suggests that cement-augmented double compressive osseointegration intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction can extend the benefits of intercalary replacement to many patients who otherwise might require adjacent joint or physeal sacrifice. However, patients should be counseled on the high risk of implant failure with subsequent need for revision surgery. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(6):e964-e970.].

Vascularised fibular grafts for reconstruction of extremity bone defects after resection of bone and soft-tissue tumours : a single institutional study of 49 patients

AIMS

The aims of this study were to analyse the long-term outcome of vascularised fibular graft (VFG) reconstruction after tumour resection and to evaluate the usefulness of the method.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 49 patients who had undergone resection of a sarcoma and reconstruction using a VFG between 1988 and 2015. Their mean follow-up was 98 months (5 to 317). Reconstruction was with an osteochondral graft (n = 13), intercalary graft (n = 12), inlay graft (n = 4), or resection arthrodesis (n = 20). We analysed the oncological and functional outcome, and the rate of bony union and complications.

RESULTS

Five- and ten-year overall survival rates were 89% and 86%, respectively. Local recurrence occurred in two patients. Eight patients developed pulmonary metastases. Bone union was achieved in 44 patients (90%). Fracture occurred in six patients (12%), infection in three (6%), and nonunion in five (10%). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores were as follows: osteochondral graft 70%; intercalary graft 73%; inlay graft 89%; and resection arthrodesis 83%.

CONCLUSION

Although associated with a relatively high rate of complications, each reconstruction method is useful, with a high rate of successful limb salvage and a good long-term functional outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1237-43.

Prognostic significance of chemotherapy-induced necrosis in osteosarcoma patients receiving pasteurized autografts

Background

Among various reconstruction methods after wide excision for osteosarcoma, pasteurized autograft is often preferred. While the whole area of the tumor can be assessed for chemotherapy-induced necrosis, one of the important prognostic factors, in other reconstructive techniques, only a portion removed from a wide-resection specimen is available when using pasteurized autograft method. The assessment, therefore, may be unreliable. We analyzed the prognostic significance of the chemotherapy-induced necrosis in osteosarcoma patients who underwent reconstruction with pasteurized autografts.

Patients and methods

We reviewed the records of osteosarcoma patients who underwent treatment in our institution from 1998 to 2013. Cases of reconstruction with pasteurized autografts were defined as the patient group, and the same number of patients who underwent other reconstruction methods served as controls. Chemotherapy-induced necrosis was evaluated for removed extra-osseous and curetted intramedullary tumor tissues.

Results

A total of 22 patients were identified; the median age was 15.5 years, and there were 12 males. The most common tumor location was the distal femur. The most common histological subtype was osteoblastic. Median size was 8.1 cm. Disease status was stage IIB in 13 patients and IIA in 9. Median follow-up was 76 months. No differences between the patient and control groups were observed in potential prognostic factors, overall survival, metastasis-free survival, or recurrence-free survival. Univariate analyses demonstrated that histological response was a significant prognostic factor for metastasis-free survival and also significant for recurrence-free survival.

Conclusion

Chemotherapy-induced necrosis grading, using only available tumor tissues, could be a prognostic factor for osteosarcoma patients receiving pasteurized autografts for reconstructive surgery.

Simultaneous reconstruction of the bone and vessels for complex femoral defect

Background

Several methods have been reported for intercalary reconstruction of femoral defects. Of these, free vascularized fibula grafts (FVFG) are preferred because of their durability, bone-healing potential, and tolerance to infection. If the bone tumor invades the femoral vessels, simultaneous vascular reconstruction also becomes necessary and significant technical hurdles make limb salvage difficult.

Case presentation

We present a 10-year-old girl who underwent limb-sparing surgery for a distal femur osteosarcoma. The femoral defect was 15 cm long, and the femoral vessel defect was 10 cm long. The femur was reconstructed with bilateral FVFG, and the femoral vessels were reconstructed with saphenous vein grafts. The grafts survived without vascular compromise, and the affected limb was preserved successfully.

Conclusions

Combined use of bilateral FVFG and autologous vein grafts makes limb-sparing surgery for a large osteosarcoma of the femur possible.