Posterior Segment Intraocular Foreign Body: Extraction Surgical Techniques, Timing, and Indications for Vitrectomy

Advances in the management of intraocular foreign bodies

Intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) remain a severe complication of ocular trauma commonly encountered worldwide. This literature review aimed to discuss current practice patterns, areas of controversy, and advances in the management of IOFBs. Injuries involving IOFBs carry significant ocular morbidity and management can be extremely challenging. A systematic approach to preoperative evaluation and IOFB surgical management is detailed in this article and should be applied in each case. The location and composition of an IOFB have important implications on surgical approach and timing, especially in cases of toxic metals and vegetable matter. The advantages, disadvantages, and previous literature regarding immediate versus delayed foreign body removal are presented. Surgical approaches are described, with an emphasis on posterior chamber IOFB management and removal via pars plana vitrectomy. Final visual acuity is variable, but approaches have been used to prognosticate outcomes including the Ocular Trauma Score. By synthesizing current IOFB literature, the goal is to provide practitioners with guidance that will maximize the chances of surgical success and patient outcomes.

Microsurgical Vitrectomy with Pars Plana Incision for the Removal of Posterior Segment Intraocular Foreign Bodies

This study describes a pars plana incision surgical technique combined with 23 or 25-gauge vitrectomy in the management of intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) and to assess its anatomical and functional results. Sixteen patients with ocular trauma complicated with IOFB were enrolled in our study. The mean preoperative visual acuity was 2.01 ± 0.55 LogMAR, and the mean postoperative visual acuity at the final visit was improved to 0.91 ± 0.58 LogMAR (p < 0.001). Until the last follow-up, all IOFBs were successfully removed and anatomic success was obtained. Complications, such as endophthalmitis, silicone oil-dependent, and ocular hypotonia, were not observed. Microsurgical vitrectomy with modified pars plana incision is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of retained IOFB, especially associated with transparent lens and posterior segment injury.

Comparing forceps and self-assembled intraocular rare earth magnet in removing metallic intraocular foreign bodies in 25-guage vitrectomy

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and efficiency of self-assembled intraocular rare earth magnet and forceps in removing intraocular foreign bodies(IOFBs) undergoing 25-gauge(G) pars plana vitrectomy.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients with metallic IOFB underwent 25-G PPV were enrolled into this study. Self-assembled intraocular rare earth magnet were used in 15 patients(bar group), and forceps were used in 15 patients(forceps group). Success rate of removing IOFB, time taken to remove IOFB, incidence of IOFB slippage and fall, iatrogenic retinal damages were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in success rate of removing IOFBs between the groups(93.3% and 100%, P > 0.99). The median time taken of removing FB was significantly shorter in bar group than in forceps group(112 and 295 s, P = 0.001). None of the patients in bar group had IOFB slippage and fall, or related iatrogenic retinal damage in the process of removal. In forceps group, IOFB slippage and fall during removal were observed in 7 of 15(47.6%) patients, related iatrogenic retinal injuries were recorded in 6 of 15(40.0%) patients, both were significantly higher than bar group(P = 0.003 and P = 0.017, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with forceps, the assembled intraocular magnet can greatly reduce the possibility of IOFB slippage and fall, prevent related iatrogenic retinal damage, and shorten the time taken to remove IOFB. The assembled intraocular magnet can be an useful tool in removing metallic IOFBs in PPV.

Combined Phacovitrectomy with Metallic Intraocular Foreign Body Removal through Corneal Incision Using A Novel "Magnetic Conduction" Technique

PURPOSE

To describe a "magnetic conduction" technique for the removal of metallic intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) in the posterior segment combined with cataract extraction and pars plana vitrectomy and to report its outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 42 eyes of 42 patients with posterior metallic IOFBs between April 2020 and February 2022. In all patients, cataract extraction was combined with pars plana vitrectomy. With an external magnet, the IOFBs were captured by a magnetized vitrectomy cutter, delivered to the anterior chamber, and then extracted through a corneal phacoemulsification incision.

RESULTS

All patients were men, with a mean age of 45.6 ± 10.7 years. The mean size of the IOFBs was 3.5 ± 1.7 mm (range, 1.5-8.9 mm) in their longest dimension. A final best-corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or better was noted in 24 of 42 patients (57.1%). Postoperatively, recurrent retinal detachment was seen in three eyes. There were no other intraoperative or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

The "magnetic conduction" technique combined with phacovitrectomy is a safe and feasible approach to removing IOFBs in the posterior segment.

Total Filling of the Vitreous Cavity With a Cohesive Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device to Support the Removal of the Intraocular Foreign Body

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of loading the vitreous cavity with a cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device in aiding the removal of the posterior segment intraocular foreign body (IOFB).

METHODS

Seven consecutive patients underwent a small-gauge vitrectomy due to eye trauma with the IOFB between January 2019 and December 2019. The IOFB removal was initiated after total filling the vitreous cavity with the ophthalmic viscosurgical device (Eyefill C or Bio-Hyalur Plus) to facilitate maneuvering and slow the descent in cases of the unintendedly released IOFBs. The eye examination was performed at presentation and at 1 day, 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. The best-corrected visual acuity and intraocular pressure were evaluated.

RESULTS

In all eyes, IOFBs were elevated into the center of the vitreous cavity and could be securely gripped while suspended in the ophthalmic viscosurgical device to allow the surgeon for successful and harmless removal. In the 3-month follow-up, the best-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in 5 patients and 20/25 in 2 patients. In the early postoperative period, the elevation of intraocular pressure did not occur. No patient developed endophthalmitis.

CONCLUSION

The authors demonstrated that this uncomplicated technique is an effective surgical option for more reliable removal of posterior segment IOFBs.

Endoscopic Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Patients With Open-Globe Injury and Corneal Opacity

Purpose: To determine the 1-year outcomes of endoscopic pars plana vitrectomy (EPPV) and its impact on the corneal transplantation rate in patients with open-globe injury (OGI) and corneal opacity. Methods: This retrospective cohort study collected data between December 2018 and August 2021. All EPPVs were performed at a level I trauma center. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with a history of OGI complicated by corneal opacification that prevented fundus visualization. The main outcome measures were the rate of successful retinal reattachment, final visual acuity (VA), and number of patients who had penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) within 1 year of the OGI. Results: Ten patients (3 women; 7 men) with a mean age of 63.4 ± 22.7 years (SD) met the inclusion criteria. The indications for EPPV were intraocular foreign bodies in 2 patients, dense vitreous hemorrhage in 3 patients (1 with a retinal tear; 1 with a choroidal hemorrhage), and retinal detachment in 5 patients. The final VA ranged from 20/40 to no light perception. All 4 repaired detachments remained attached after 1 year. Corneal opacity was treated with PKP in 3 patients. Conclusions: Results indicate EPPV can be a useful tool to treat posterior segment pathology in patients with a recent OGI and corneal opacity. EPPV can help address posterior segment disease and postpone corneal transplantation until the visual potential can be fully determined. Larger prospective studies are needed.

"IRIS SHELF" TECHNIQUE FOR MANAGEMENT OF POSTERIOR SEGMENT INTRAOCULAR FOREIGN BODIES

PURPOSE

To describe "iris shelf" technique for removal of posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) through a corneal incision combined with phacovitrectomy and to report its outcomes.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with posterior segment metallic IOFBs who had combined phacovitrectomy were collected and analyzed. In all patients, the IOFB was placed on the iris surface after forming the anterior chamber with viscoelastic to be extracted through a corneal phacoemulsification incision.

RESULTS

Thirty-three eyes of 33 male patients with a mean age of 31.6 ± 8.3 years were included in the study. The mechanism of injury was hammering in 24 eyes (72.7%) and gunshot in 9 eyes (27.3%). The mean interval between injury and IOFB removal was 14.76 ± 6 days. The mean IOFB volume was 8.5 ± 5.5 mm3, and its longest dimension was 3.45 mm (range, 1-8 mm). The mean preoperative corrected distance visual acuity changed from 20/1,500 (1.79 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) to 20/94 (0.67 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), postoperatively (P < 0.001). Postoperative complications included retinal detachment (two eyes), proliferative vitreoretinopathy (one eye), epiretinal membrane (one eye), and posterior synechiae (three eyes).

CONCLUSION

The "iris shelf" technique with phacovitrectomy is a safe and reproducible approach for posterior segment IOFB extraction through a corneal incision with favorable visual and anatomical outcomes.

Long-Term Outcome of Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Retained Posterior Segment Intraocular Foreign Body Secondary to Gunshot Injury

Purpose

To report the long-term outcome of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for management of retained posterior segment intraocular foreign body (IOFB) secondary to gunshot injury.

Methods

This is a retrospective interventional case series including consecutive patients who had PPV for retained posterior segment IOFB secondary to gunshot injury. Main outcome measures were final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), long-term globe survival and detection of complications. Spearman correlation analyzed relationships between numerical data. Kruskal–Wallis test compared differences in initial BCVA and final BCVA across variables. Categorical variables were tested using Chi square or Fisher’s exact test. P value is significant at 0.05.

Results

The study included 103 eyes of 103 patients. Mean baseline BCVA was 0.01 decimal unit (2 logMAR). Mean duration from primary repair to PPV was 3 weeks. Mean duration of post-operative follow-up was 60 months. Mean final BCVA was 0.04 decimal unit (1.3 logMAR), p 0.001. Post-operatively, BCVA improved in 58.2% of patients. Nineteen patients (18%) gained ≥2 lines of vision, and 15 patients (14.5%) achieved final BCVA of 0.4 decimal unit (logMAR 0.4). All complications were related to the original injury. These included macular scar (19%), macular pucker (6%), recurrent retinal detachment (4%), subretinal fibrosis (3%), consecutive optic atrophy (3%), and PVR (3%). Phthisis bulbi or sympathetic ophthalmia did not develop in any case.

Conclusion

PPV for removal of IOFB caused by gunshot injury yielded long-term favorable functional outcome with excellent globe survival. Poor initial BCVA, location of IOFB in the posterior pole, associated lens injury and retinal detachment are significant adverse prognostic factors for final BCVA but not for globe survival.

Ocular siderosis: a misdiagnosed cause of visual loss due to ferrous intraocular foreign bodies-epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical signs, imaging and available treatment options

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to provide a meaningful literature review about the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical signs, imaging and treatment of ocular siderosis (OS).

Methods

A computerized search from inception up to March 2020 of the online electronic database PubMed was performed using the following search strings: “ocular siderosis” and “siderosis bulbi”. The reference list in each article was analysed for additional relevant publications.

Results

OS is an uncommon cause of visual loss due to a retained ferrous intraocular foreign body (IOFB). It may develop from 18 days to years after a penetrating trauma that usually occurs during hammering. On average, patients are 22–25 years old, and the vast majority are male. The most common cause of OS development is delayed presentation by the patient or missed diagnosis of IOFB after trauma. The pathophysiology is not fully understood; nevertheless, iron deposition causes hydroxyl radical formation, which damages photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium. Moreover, iron damages retinal vessels with consequent inner retinal layers degeneration. The most frequent signs are iris heterochromia, pupillary mydriasis, cataract development and retinal arteriolar narrowing with pigmentary retinal degeneration. Electroretinogram signs, in particular, b-wave amplitude reduction, arise earlier than clinical signs. Orbital CT scans and ultrasonography play an essential role in detecting IOFBs. Treatment depends on the IOFB location and OS development. However, it is crucial to remove the IOFB after OS development because visual acuity and clinical signs may improve. Anterior segment IOFBs can be dislodged using an intraocular magnet (IOM) or forceps through limbal paracentesis. In contrast, posterior segment IOFBs require a pars plana vitrectomy and IOM or forceps to be removed through an enlarged sclerotomy or the limbus.

Conclusion

Recommending the usage of protective glasses and spreading knowledge about OS may further benefit patient care.

Transscleral Extraction of an Intraocular Foreign Body from the Posterior Segment of the Eye without Pars Plana Vitrectomy

PURPOSE

Penetrating eye trauma with an intraocular foreign body is very frequent, especially in men in their productive age. Pars plana vitrectomy would be the standard surgical method at our department. However, in indicated cases (metallic intraocular bodies in the posterior eye segment in young patients with well transparent ocular media without detached ZSM and without any evident vitreoretinal traction) transscleral extraction of the intraocular foreign body is performed using the exo magnet, eventually endo magnet with a minimal PPV without PVD induction under the visual control of endo-illumination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2003 and June 2018, 66 eyes of 66 patients diagnosed with a penetrating eye trauma caused by an intraocular foreign body located in the posterior eye segment were treated. In 18 eyes (27,3 %) with a metallic foreign body in vitreous (body) or in retina, no PPV or a minimal PPV without PVD was used as a surgical method. In the remaining 48 eyes (72,7 %), a standard 20G, respectively 23G PPV method were used together with PVD induction and the foreign body extraction via endo or exo magnet.

CONCLUSIONS

As demonstrated by our survey/study, in the cases of a thoroughly considered indication an experimented vitreoretinal surgeon can perform a safe NCT transscleral extraction from the posterior eye segment via exo magnet, eventually endo magnet under the visual control of a contact display system with a minimal PPV. Thereby, the surgeon can enhance the patient´s chance to preserve their own lens and its accommodative abilities as well as reduce the risk of further surgical interventions of the afflicted eye.

The Use of Electrotherapeutics in Ophthalmology

PURPOSE

To present a perspective on the use of electrotherapeutics in the history of ophthalmology along with the development of novel contemporary ophthalmic instrumentation.

DESIGN

Perspective study.

METHODS

We reviewed historical journals, articles, and books discussing the use of electricity and electrotherapeutics in ophthalmology.

RESULTS

Electrotherapeutic applications have been researched and used to treat ocular diseases as far back as the 18th century. By the 20th century, research in electrotherapeutics in ophthalmology had caught the eye of Edward Jackson, the first president of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology and first editor of the present (third) series American Journal of Ophthalmology. Edward Jackson published an extensive review on this topic and reported a variety of modalities used to treat ocular diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

While many early therapeutic uses of electricity did not produce effective and replicable results, studies on electrical stimulation of the eye provided the foundation for the development of clinically significant vision enhancing and restoring instrumentation.

Conservative management of penetrating ocular trauma caused by a nail gun

Purpose

To report the conservative management of a penetrating ocular trauma caused by a nail gun with a six-month follow up.

Observations

A 21 year-old healthy female suffered an ocular penetrating trauma with a nail gun. She presented with a metallic foreign body that partially entered her left eye through the nasal sclera via pars plana, 3 mm posterior to the limbus, but did not reach the retina. Surgical removal of the foreign body and closure of the scleral wound, without vitrectomy, was performed 16 h after the injury. Intravitreal prophylactic antibiotic was administered. Retinal atrophy developed in the areas that had commotio retinae at presentation, but no further complications were observed.

Conclusions and importance

Pars plana vitrectomy may not be necessary in all penetrating ocular traumas with intraocular foreign body, as long as the foreign body is accessible from the exterior of the eye and there are no other conditions (such as vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, etc) that are an indication for vitrectomy.

DISLODGEMENT OF FLUOCINOLONE ACETONIDE INTRAVITREAL IMPLANT INTO THE INFUSION CANNULA DURING VITRECTOMY FOR RETINAL DETACHMENT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To report a case of dislodgement of an Iluvien (fluocinolone acetonide) intravitreal implant into the infusion cannula during pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment.

METHODS

The patient's surgery was video recorded, and the medical notes were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A patient developed a macula off retinal detachment over 1 year after intravitreal injection of Iluvien for diabetic maculopathy. The patient underwent pars plana vitrectomy, removal of implant, and successful retinal reattachment. Although we planned to remove the implant through a sclerostomy, we were not able to localize it after performing peripheral indented vitrectomy. As the intraocular pressure was fluctuating, we suspected that the implant might have dislodged into the infusion cannula. However, despite increasing the intraocular pressure to 60 mmHg and performing repeated fluid-air exchange, we could not eject the implant back into the vitreous cavity. Therefore, after completing the surgery safely, we flushed the infusion cannula with balanced salt solution and we found the implant.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the intraocular pressure and performing fluid-air exchange were not sufficient to eject the implant probably because of the strong surface adherence between the infusion cannula and the implant's coating material. We, therefore, recommend removing and flushing the infusion cannula if the implant cannot be localized in the eye. In addition, clinicians should be aware that a fluctuating intraocular pressure might be the first sign of a partially blocked infusion cannula by the implant.