The Biological Metallic versus Metallic Solution in Treating Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Outcome Assessment

Treatment of periprosthetic knee infection and coexistent periprosthetic fracture: A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and periprosthetic fracture (PPF) are among the most serious complications following total knee arthroplasty. Herein, we present one patient with these two complications with details on the characteristics, treatment strategy, and outcome.

CASE SUMMARY

A 69-year-old female patient who suffered from PJI and PPF following total knee arthroplasty was treated by a two-stage revision surgery. After thorough foreign material removal and debridement, we used a plate that was covered with antibiotic-loaded bone cement to link with a hand-made cement spacer to occupy the joint space and fix the fracture. Although the infection was cured, the fracture did not heal and caused bone defect due to the long interval between debridement and revision. In the revision surgery, a cemented stem and cortical allogenic splints were used to reconstruct the fracture and bone defect. At the final follow-up 27 mo after revision, the patient was satisfied with postoperative knee functions with satisfactory range of motion (104º) and Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (82 points). The radiographs showed no loosening of the prosthesis and that the bone grafts healed well with the femur.

CONCLUSION

Our two-stage revision surgery has proved to be successful and may be considered in other patients with PJI and PPF.

Interprosthetic and interimplant femoral fractures: is bone strut allograft augmentation with ORIF a validity alternative solution in elderly?

BACKGROUND

Nowadays orthopedic surgeons have a new challenge to treat the interimplants fractures. Although fixation strategies exist for periprosthetic hip and knee fractures, there is no standard of care regarding the more complex interprosthetic and interimplants fractures.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study is targeting the focus on the bone strut grafting to avoid the metal hardware failure and to achieve the bone healing in these injuries.

METHODS

A prospective case note review of all interprosthetic or interimplants femoral fractures admitted to our trauma center. There were 11 patients (2 males and 9 females) with a mean age over 85 years old. We treated all the patients by ORIF and medial graft strut allograft to reduce the main complication leading to re-operations and morbidity or mortality is the nonunion or delayed union. The criteria to evaluate the patients during the follow-up were: the survival and complication after the surgery; the objective quality of life measured by Activities of Daily Living Score (ADL). The bone healing was measured by X-rays control as the alignment was measured by radiographic UNION SCORE, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

All the patients reduced their ADL. In the most of cases we had a good x-rays reduction. We had not: No nonunion or Not delayed union. All patients died within 2 years from the surgery but not due by surgical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

According us, the purpose of this surgery is to limit comorbidities and early mortality not to improve optimal restoration of lower limb function.

Open reduction and locked compression plate fixation, with or without allograft strut, for periprosthetic fractures in patients who had a well-fixed femoral stem: a retrospective study with an average 2-year follow-up

Background

The use of cortical strut allograft has not been determined for Vancouver type B1 or C fracture. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term efficacy of locking compression plating with or without cortical strut allograft in managing these types of fractures.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed 32 patients (17 males, 15 females; 23–88 years, mean: 67.2 years) with Vancouver type B1 or C fractures. Seventeen patients (Group A; B1 fractures in 15 hips, C fractures in 2 hips) were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with locking compression plates (group A). The other 15 patients (Group B; B1 in 14 hips, C in 1 hip) were fixed by locking compression plating combined with cortical strut allografting (group B). The fracture healing rate, healing time, complications and function were compared between these two groups.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 32.4 months (12 to 66), and the overall fracture union rate of the 32 patients was 96.9%. Group B had a higher fracture union rate than Group A, but the difference was not statistically significant. Group A had one case of nonunion of type B1 fracture and one case of malunion; the mean time to fracture healing was 5.3 months (3 to 9). In group B, all patients reached bony union without malunion, with a mean time of fracture healing of 5.1 months (3 to 8).

Conclusion

Treatment of Vancouver type B1 or C fractures by locking compression plating, with or without cortical strut allografting, resulted in similar union rates in these patients. This suggest that, the use of cortical strut allografting should be decided cautiously.

The challenge of nonunion after osteosynthesis of the clavicle: is it a biomechanical or infection problem?

Introduction

The nonunion rate has been reported between 0.1% and 15%. There are also several predisposing factors for the onset of complications: general factors connected with the patient and specific factors related to the fracture site. The purpose of our study is to review the etiology of nonunion of the clavicle in its atrophic form and investigate the outcomes of the revision treatment in a single step.

Materials and methods

Retrospective study on 71 patients suffering from nonunions due to the following treatments: conservative in 13 patients; plate fixation in 12; closed reduction and fixation with K-wire in 24; open reduction and fixation with K-wire. All patients were operated on in beach chair position and classic approach to the clavicle by incising the previous surgical scar. The clinical and radiographic criteria for evaluating the outcomes were: the Short Form (12) Health Survey (SF-12), the Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) and the Disability Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Score (DASH) and radiographic Union Score (RUS) for bone healing. The evaluation endpoint was set at 12 months.

Results

Blood and culture tests showed 22 infected nonunions and 49 atrophic or oligoatrophic. In only 10 cases, before surgery, the inflammatory markers were positive. The isolated microorganisms were resistant to common antibiotics. In 70 out of 71 cases, plates and screws on the upper side and fibula allogenic splints at the bottom, associated with cancellous bone grafts taken from the patients' iliac crests, were implanted. In one case, however, it was decided to implant the plate on the front edge of the clavicle and the fibula allogeneic splint on the posterior margin, also associated with a cancellous bone graft taken from the patient's iliac crest. The radiographic bone healing was observed in 107.8 (range 82-160) days for the aseptic nonunions, while in 118.4 (range 82-203) days for the septic ones. The non-healing case was a serious failure that led to asubtotal excision of the clavicle.

Conclusions

The importance of classification and study of nonunions are essential to achieve positive outcomes. The guiding principle of our work is that aseptic nonunions heal in the operating room, while infected nonunions can be challenged and defeated on the operating table. Restoring the correct length of the clavicle interconnection between the sternum and the shoulder cingulum is indispensable to avoid functional deficits of the upper limb. The fibula splint and the tricorticale bone graft have both mechanical and strong biological values to quickly heal the nonunion. The return to pre-injury quality of life has to be our main goal.

The challenge of non-union in subtrochanteric fractures with breakage of intramedullary nail: evaluation of outcomes in surgery revision with angled blade plate and allograft bone strut

PURPOSE

Subtrochanteric fractures have a bimodal age distribution. They usually require open reduction and internal fixation. Closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation rate are increased for this type of fracture. As a result, the hardware breakage and non-union rate is high among such patients. Our purpose is to evaluate the outcomes of the role of blade plate and bone strut allograft in the management of subtrochanteric non-union by femoral nailing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reported a group of 22 patients with subtrochanteric non-union, associated with breakage of the intramedullary nail with medial femoral allograft bone and lateral blade plate and wire (PS) s; and a group of 13 patients with subtrochanteric non-union, associated with breakage of the intramedullary nail treated with lateral blade plate and screws (CG). The chosen criteria to evaluate the two group during the clinical and radiological follow-up were the quality of life, measured by The Short Form (12) Health Survey (SF-12), the hip function and quality of life related to it, measured by the Harris Hip Score (HHS), bone healing, measured by Radiographic Union Score (RUS) by XR and CT at 1 year after the surgery, and postoperative complications. The evaluation endpoint was set at 12 months.

RESULTS

The Bone healing measured by RUS occurred and also the full recovery before the first trauma measured by SF-12 and HHS are better in PS group. We only had three unimportant complications in PS while four breakage hardware in CG.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that in complicated non-unions, the use of blade plate and bone strut allograft has a definite positive role in the management of such cases.