Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of the Pancreatic Tumors: A Promising Tool in Management of Pancreatic Tumors

Treatment Outcome of Endoscopic Ultrasound Radiofrequency Ablation for Incidentaloma Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor in Young Female Patient: A 2-year Follow-Up

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) or islet cell tumors are neuroendocrine neoplasms that arise from cells of the endocrine and nervous system within the pancreas. Patients with PNET sometimes do not show any symptoms, known as nonfunctioning (NF) sporadic PNET. It is still debatable regarding the best approach in the NF for small PNET. Currently, the surgical approach is considered the best; however, it is a highly invasive procedure, and it has a potentially high risk of complications as it requires a skilled and experienced operator. Herewith, we reported a 48-year-old female with incidentaloma of nonfunctioning PNET (NF-PNET) whose tumor has been successfully treated with endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation (EUSRA). There was no adverse event observed during and after the EUS procedure, and even 1 week after the procedure. One year later, abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination was carried out and size of the tumor was significantly getting smaller where it could hardly be seen anymore. After 2 years of follow-up, the latest abdominal MRI study showed no solid part of the tumor could be seen anymore. In conclusion, EUSRA can be an alternative option for incidentaloma of NF-PNET management.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for management of pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been used to treat various abdominal tumors including pancreatic tumors. Multiple approaches such as laparoscopic, open, and percutaneous have been used for pancreatic tissue ablation. More recently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided RFA has emerged as a new technique for pancreatic tissue ablation. The role of EUS-RFA in management of pancreatic lesions is still not well-established. In this study, our aim is to assess efficacy and safety of EUS-RFA for management of pancreatic lesions.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify studies reporting EUS-RFA of pancreatic lesions with outcomes of interest. Studies with <5 patients were excluded. Clinical success was defined as symptom resolution, decrease in tumor size, and/or evidence of necrosis on radiologic imaging. Efficacy was assessed by the pooled clinical response rate whereas safety was assessed by the pooled adverse events rate. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2. Pooled estimates and the 95% CI were calculated using random-effect model.

RESULTS

Ten studies (5 retrospective and 5 prospective) involving 115 patients with 125 pancreatic lesions were included. 152 EUS-RFA procedures were performed. The lesions comprised of 37.6% non-functional neuroendocrine tumors (NFNETs), 15.4% were insulinomas, 26.5% were pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs), and 19.7% were pancreatic adenocarcinomas. The majority were present in the pancreatic head (40.2%), 38.3% in the body, 11.2% in the tail, and 10.3% in the uncinate process. Pooled overall clinical response rate was 88.9% (95% CI: 82.4-93.7, I2=38.1%). Pooled overall adverse events rate was 6.7% (95% CI: 3.4-11.7, I2=34.0%). The most common complication was acute pancreatitis (3.3%) followed by pancreatic duct stenosis, peripancreatic fluid collection, and ascites (2.8%) each. Only one case of perforation was reported with pooled rate of (2.1%).

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that EUS-RFA is an effective treatment modality for pancreatic lesions, especially functional neuroendocrine tumors such as insulinomas.

State of the Art in Endoscopic Therapy for the Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NENs) comprise a heterogeneous group of slow growing tumors arising from the neuroendocrine cells of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Although they are considered relatively rare, their incidence is rising and it is believed that the more frequent use of endoscopy and imaging studies have at least in part contributed to the increased diagnosis especially of localized neoplasms. The management of these neoplasms should be guided by a multidisciplinary NEN team following appropriate staging investigations. Localized neoplasms of the GI tract may be suitable for endoscopic therapy, while patients with pancreatic NENs, unsuitable for surgery, should be considered for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided ablation. In this review, we discuss the evidence regarding endoscopic resection of luminal NENs and EUS-guided therapy of pancreatic NENs. The efficacy, safety, and other longer-term outcomes of these techniques are summarized. In conclusion, this review of endoscopic therapies for localized NENs may be a useful guide for NEN clinicians and endoscopists who are considering these therapeutic options for the management of focal GEP NENs.

PPAR-α Modulators as Current and Potential Cancer Treatments

Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. PPAR modulators may hold great potential for the management of cancer patients. Indeed, PPARs are critical sensors and regulators of lipid, and they are able to promote eNOS activation, regulate immunity and inflammation response, and affect proliferation and differentiation of cancer cells. Cancer, a name given to a group of diseases, is characterized by multiple distinctive biological behaviors, including angiogenesis, abnormal cell proliferation, aerobic glycolysis, inflammation, etc. In the last decade, emerging evidence has shown that PPAR-α, a nuclear hormone receptor, can modulate carcinogenesis via exerting effects on one or several characteristic pathological behaviors of cancer. Therefore, the multi-functional PPAR modulators have substantial promise in various types of cancer therapies. This review aims to consolidate the functions of PPAR-α, as well as discuss the current and potential applications of PPAR-α agonists and antagonists in tackling cancer.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to evaluate the emerging role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the guidance of tumor-targeted therapies for patients with pancreatic cancer (PC).

RECENT FINDINGS

EUS-guided ablation, brachytherapy, fiducial marker placement, and antitumor agent injection have been described to date. EUS-guided fiducial placement for SBRT in pancreatic cancer has entered the clinical practice and is performed at many centers clinically without a research protocol. EUS-guided brachytherapy and RFA have been shown to be feasible and safe procedures, and potentially offer local disease control. Other potential techniques of EUS-guided treatment of pancreatic cancer are still considered experimental, with many of them appearing to be safe and reasonably well tolerated. However, their effectiveness and exact role in oncological treatment have yet to be established. Clinical trials with many of the techniques/agents described are underway and multicentric randomized trials with prospective design are eagerly awaited.

Systematic review of endoscopy ultrasound-guided thermal ablation treatment for pancreatic cancer

The development of curvilinear-array EUS and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has led these approaches to become interventional procedures rather than purely diagnostic, as a minimally invasive antitumor therapeutic alternative to radiological and surgical treatments. The possibility to accurately position needle devices and to reach a deep target like the pancreas gland under real-time imaging guidance has expanded the use of EUS to ablate tumors. Currently, a variety of probes specifically designed for EUS ablation are available, including radiofrequency, hybrid cryothermal ablation (combining radiofrequency with cryotechnology), photodynamic therapy, and laser ablation. To date, several studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of these ablation techniques in the pancreatic setting, but only a few small series on pancreatic thermal ablation under EUS guidance are available. EUS-guided thermal ablation is primarily used for pancreatic cancer. It is well suited to this disease because of its superior anatomical access compared with other imaging modalities and the dismal prognosis despite improvements in chemoradiotherapy and surgery in the management of pancreatic cancer. Other targets are pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and pancreatic cystic neoplasms, which are curable by surgical resection, but some patients are poor surgical candidates or prefer conservative management. This is a literature review of previously published clinical studies on EUS-guided thermal ablative therapies. Data on the long-term efficacy of EUS-guided antitumor thermal ablation therapy and large prospective randomized studies are still needed to confirm the real clinical benefits of these techniques for the management of pancreatic neoplasms.

Prophylactic dendritic cell vaccination controls pancreatic cancer growth in a mouse model

PURPOSE

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths with high recurrence after surgery due to a paucity of effective post-surgical adjuvant treatments. DC vaccines can activate multiple anti-tumor immune responses but have not been explored for post-surgery PDAC recurrence. Intraperitoneal (IP) delivery may allow increased DC vaccine dosage and migration to lymph nodes. Here, we investigated the role of prophylactic DC vaccination controlling PDAC tumor growth with IP delivery as an administration route for DC vaccination.

METHODS

DC vaccines were generated using ex vivo differentiation and maturation of bone marrow-derived precursors. Twenty mice were divided into four groups (n = 5) and treated with DC vaccines, unpulsed mature DCs, Panc02 lysates or no treatment. After tumor induction, mice underwent three magnetic resonance imaging scans to track tumor growth. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging measurement of tumor microstructure, was calculated. Survival was tracked. Tumor tissue was collected after death and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Masson's trichrome, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling and anti-CD8 stains for histology.

RESULTS

DC-vaccinated mice demonstrated stronger anti-tumor cytotoxicity compared with control groups on lactate dehydrogenase assay. DC vaccine mice also demonstrated decreased tumor volume, prolonged survival and increased ΔADC compared with control groups. On histology, the DC vaccine group had increased apoptosis, increased CD8+ T cells and decreased collagen. ΔADC negatively correlated with % collagen in tumor tissues.

DISCUSSION

Prophylactic DC vaccination may inhibit PDAC tumor growth during recurrence and prolong survival. ΔADC may be a potential imaging biomarker that correlates with tumor histological features.

Activation of PPARα by clofibrate sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to radiation through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway

Radiotherapy is emerging as an important modality for the local control of pancreatic cancer, but pancreatic cancer cell radioresistance remains a serious concern. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) is a member of the PPAR nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, which can be activated by fibrate ligands. The clinical relevance of PPARα and its biological function in pancreatic cancer radiosensitivity have not been previously described. In this study, we examined PPARα expression in tissue samples of pancreatic cancer patients. We found significantly higher expression of PPARα in pancreatic cancer tissues than in tumor-adjacent tissues and that the PPARα expression level is inversely associated with higher overall patient survival rate. We further observed that PPARα activation by its agonist clofibrate sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to radiation by modulating cell cycle progression and apoptosis in several pancreatic cancer cell lines. Small interfering RNA-mediated PPARα silencing and PPARα blockade by the antagonist GW6471 abolish the effect of clofibrate on radiosensitization. An in vivo study showed that PANC1 xenografts treated with clofibrate are more sensitive to radiation than untreated xenografts. mRNA profiling by microarray analysis revealed that the expression of PTPRZ1 and Wnt8a, two core components of the β-catenin pathway, is downregulated by clofibrate. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis confirmed that clofibrate abrogates the binding of nuclear factor-κB to the PTPRZ1 and Wnt8a promoters, ultimately decreasing Wnt/β-catenin signaling activity, which is associated with radiosensitivity. Overall, we demonstrate that PPARα is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer tissues and clofibrate-mediated PPARα activation sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to radiation through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation in gastroenterology: New horizons in search

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been widely used for the treatment of various solid organ malignancies. Over the last decade, endosonographers have gradually shifted the application of RFA from porcine models to humans to treat a spectrum of diseases. RFA is performed in patients with pancreatic carcinoma who are not candidates for surgery. In this paper, we will discuss various indications for RFA, its procedural details and complications. At present, endoscopic ultrasound-guided RFA is gradually incorporated into the management of various diseases and opens a new avenue for disease treatment.

Endoscopy-guided ablation of pancreatic lesions: Technical possibilities and clinical outlook

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided ablation procedures are emerging as a minimally invasive therapeutic alternative to radiological and surgical treatments for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs), and pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). The advantages of treatment under endoscopic control are the real-time imaging guidance and the possibility to reach a deep target like the pancreas. Currently, radiofrequency probes specifically designed for ERCP or EUS ablation are available as well as hybrid cryotherm probe combining radiofrequency with cryotechnology. To date, many reports and case series have confirmed the safety and feasibility of that kind of ablation technique in the pancreatic setting. Moreover, EUS-guided fine-needle injection is emerging as a method to deliver ablative and anti-tumoral agents inside the tumuor. Ethanol injection has been proposed mostly for the treatment of PCLs and for symptomatic functioning PNETs, and the use of gemcitabine and paclitaxel is also interesting in this setting. EUS-guided injection of chemical or biological agents including mixed lymphocyte culture, oncolytic viruses, and immature dendritic cells has been investigated for the treatment of LAPC. Data on the long-term efficacy of these approaches, and large prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm the real clinical benefits of these techniques for the management of pancreatic lesions.