Relationship between Sustained Reductions in Plasma Lipid and Lipoprotein Concentrations with Apheresis and Plasma Levels and mRNA Expression of PTX3 and Plasma Levels of hsCRP in Patients with HyperLp(a)lipoproteinemia

Relationship between high sensitivity C-reactive protein and angiographic severity of coronary artery disease

Background

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Cytokines play a potential role in atherosclerosis pathogenesis and progression. We investigated the association between high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and severity of CAD.

Methods

CAD patients were stratified according to hsCRP cut-off value into high levels hsCRP group (≥ 8.4 mg/L) and low levels hsCRP group (< 8.4 mg/L). Severity of CAD was assessed according to artery stenosis degree and the number of vessel involved. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, version 23.0).

Results

The mean age was 60.3 ± 11.0 years. The level of hsCRP was increased and ranged from 0.2 to 1020.0 mg/L. Biochemical risk factors and severity of CAD didn't show significant differences between the two groups. In multivariate linear analysis, cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and serum amyloid A (SAA) were predictors of hsCRP. As shown in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis performed in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and compared to myonecrosis biomarkers, hsCRP (area under the curve (AUC): 0.905; 95%CI: 0.844-0.966; P < 0.001) could be a powerful predictor marker in evaluating the infarct size after myocardial infarction but not better than cTnI.

Conclusions

HsCRP levels were not associated with the severity of CAD but could be useful in the evaluation of myocardial necrosis in patients with STEMI.

Long-term lipoprotein apheresis in the treatment of severe familial hypercholesterolemia refractory to high intensity statin therapy: Three year experience at a lipoprotein apheresis centre

BACKGROUND

Severe familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) individuals, refractory to conventional lipidlowering medications are at exceptionally high risk of cardiovascular events. The established therapeutic option of last choice is lipoprotein apheresis (LA). Herein, it was sought to investigate the clinical usefulness of LA in a highly selected group of severe heterozygous FH (HeFH), as recently described by the International Atherosclerosis Society (IAS), for their efficacy in lipid reduction and safety.

METHODS

Efficacy and safety of LA were investigated in 318 sessions of 7 severe HeFH females with cardiovascular disease, over a mean period of 26.9 ± 6.5 months. Relative reduction of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 60%, clinical complications and vascular access problems were evaluated and compared between the direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) and lipoprotein filtration (Membrane Filtration Optimized Novel Extracorporeal Treatment [MONET]). Additionally, lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG) and fibrinogen concentrations were investigated.

RESULTS

The relative reduction of LDL-C, TC, TG and Lp(a) were 69.4 ± 12.9%, 59.7 ± 9.1, 51.5 ± ± 14.2% and 71.3 ± 14.4%, respectively. A similar efficacy was found in both systems in LDL-C removal. DALI system led to larger depletions of Lp(a) (80.0 [76-83]% vs. 73.0 [64.7-78.8]%; p < 0.001). The frequency of clinical side effects and vascular access problems were low (8.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term LA in severe HeFH individuals is safe and efficiently reduces LDL-C and Lp(a). Higher efficacy of the DALI system than MONET in Lp(a) removal may indicate the need for individualized application of the LA system in severe HeFH individuals.

From lipoprotein apheresis to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors: Impact on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and C-reactive protein levels in cardiovascular disease patients

In this observational study, we compared the effect of lipoprotein apheresis and evolocumab or alirocumab on levels of lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and inflammatory markers (C reactive protein and interleukin 6) in cardiovascular patients ( n = 9). Patients were monitored during the last year of lipoprotein apheresis followed by six months of treatment with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. The biochemical parameters were determined pre- and post- every apheresis procedure for 12 months and then after one, three and six months of treatment with evolocumab (140 mg every two weeks [Q2W]) or alirocumab (75 mg or 150 mg every two weeks [Q2W]). Lipoprotein apheresis significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from 138 ± 32 mg/dl to 46 ± 16 mg/dl ( p < 0.001), with an inter-apheresis level of 114 ± 26 mg/dl. Lipoprotein(a) was also reduced from a median of 42 mg/dl to 17 mg/dl ( p < 0.01). Upon anti-proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 therapy, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were similar to post-apheresis (59 ± 25, 41 ± 22 and 42 ± 21mg/dl at one, three and six months, respectively) as well as those of lipoprotein(a) (18 mg/dl). However, an opposite effect was observed on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels: –16.0% from pre- to post-apheresis and +34.0% between pre-apheresis and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. Apheresis significantly reduced high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (1.5 ± 1.2 mg/l pre-apheresis to 0.6 ± 0.6 mg/l post-apheresis), while no changes were found upon proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 mAbs administration. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that, by switching from lipoprotein apheresis to anti-proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 therapies, patients reached similar low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) levels, increased those of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and showed no changes on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

From vulnerable plaque to blood healthy therapy

Cardiovascular atherosclerotic disease is the leading cause of death in China and in Western nations. People with plaque or stenosis in the coronary artery or the carotid artery are the most susceptible population to suffer from acute events. Current investigations showed that plaque with the characteristics of intra-plaque hemorrhage or a thin cap with a large lipid core was causally associated with vulnerable plaque and plaque rupture. Of the many plaque ruptures occurring in patients with atherosclerotic disease, very few will trigger symptomatic events, rendering it exceedingly difficult to predict adverse outcomes. The assumption that identifying lesions prone to rupture will prevent acute coronary events was unrealistic. Factors in blood, especially those risk factors associated with thrombosis, play an important role as a bridge between plaque rupture and subsequent clinical events. Since there is little management to efficiently decrease the frequency of plaque rupture or erosion, blood healthy therapy, as a therapeutic apheresis to decrease the blood hypercoagulability to modulate the blood to be thrombosis resisting, should be considered as a potential therapeutic approach to reducing the incidence of acute coronary syndrome and stroke.

Lipoprotein apheresis in the management of severe hypercholesterolemia and of elevation of lipoprotein(a): current perspectives and patient selection

This review reports the current situation with respect to therapeutic options (lifestyle and drugs) reducing the concentrations of atherogenic low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]). Three lipoprotein apheresis (LA) principles have been realized: precipitation, filtration, and adsorption. Available LA methods are herein described in detail - major components, pumps, extracorporeal volume, treated volume, and anticoagulation. General features of all LA methods as well as pleotropic effects are elaborated. Indications for LA therapy are quoted: homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HCH), severe HCH, and isolated elevation of Lp(a) and progress of atherosclerotic disease. A major focus is on the evidence of the effect of LA on cardiovascular outcome data, and the most important publications are cited in this context. The best studies have been performed in patients with elevated Lp(a) in whom cardiovascular events were reduced by more than 80%. Major adverse effects and contraindications are listed. The impact of an LA therapy on patient quality of life and the requirements they have to fulfill are also highlighted. Finally, the future role of LA in treating high-risk patients with high LDL-C and/or high Lp(a) is discussed. It is probable that the significance of LA for treating patients with elevated LDL-C will decrease (with the exception of homozygous familial HCH) due to the application of PCSK9 inhibitors. The antisense oligonucleotide against apolipoprotein(a) could replace LA in patients with high Lp(a), provided positive outcome data are generated.