Are "Theory of Mind" Skills in People with Epilepsy Related to How Stigmatised They Feel? An Exploratory Study

Felt stigma proportion in people living with epilepsy: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Numerous inventories to identify felt stigma (FS) in people living with epilepsy (PLWE) have been developed. Past studies have mainly focused on the relationship between FS scores and clinical factors, making it challenging to delineate FS proportions and compare FS between groups. We aimed to integrate FS proportions in PLWE and compare them by continent.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. Among the identified studies, we chose the ones providing an FS proportion measured by Jacoby's Stigma Scale (JSS) and its revised version (JSS-R) in PLWE. We applied the random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 63 datasets from 47 studies were included. There were 29,924 PLWE, with 14,323 of them experiencing FS. The overall FS proportion was 48.4%. Of these datasets, 51 used JSS, and 12 used JSS-R. The FS proportions were 44.9% for the former and 62.1% for the latter, with significant heterogeneity. In the intercontinental comparison with 51 datasets employing JSS, the difference in FS proportions was insignificant: 51.2% in Africa, 47.2% in Europe, 35.4% in Asia, and 28.8% in the Middle East. Furthermore, the meta-regression revealed that the year of each primary study did not influence the FS proportion.

CONCLUSION

Among PLWE, FS proportions depended on the choice of a measurement tool. When measured using JSS, the FS proportion was 44.9%, while it was 62.1% when evaluated with JSS-R. Even though the FS proportions were integrated differently, no substantial differences were observed between continents.

Social cognition, psychiatric comorbidities, and quality of life in adults with epilepsy

Deficits in social cognition are an increasingly recognized complication of epilepsy and contribute to the deficits in social functioning and well-being experienced by patients with epilepsy. Although there has been an increase in studies exploring the measurement and biology of social cognition in patients with epilepsy, there are relatively few examining its clinical implications. Those studies that have been published highlight that social cognitive deficits contribute to impaired quality of life (QoL) in patients with epilepsy, independent of other comorbidities such as depression, anxiety, seizure frequency, and impairment in other cognitive domains. This raises the possibility of novel therapeutic approaches to improving the social well-being of patients with epilepsy.

Do mentalization skills affect the perception of stigma in patients with epilepsy?

PURPOSE

We aimed to study the relationship between the mentalizing ability and stigma in patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

Patients with epilepsy were administered the following battery of tests: Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) form, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (Eyes Test), Stigma Scale of Epilepsy (SSE), Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI).

RESULTS

Assessment of an association between the Eyes Test score, ISMI Scale total score, and subscale scores revealed a negative significant correlation of Eyes Test scores with approval of stereotypes, perceived discrimination, stigma resistance, and total score. Eyes Test score and BDI scores appears to be significant predictor of internalized stigma among the clinical variables that were studied. A positive significant correlation was detected between BDI score and alienation, perceived discrimination, and total score.

CONCLUSION

The presence of a correlation between the mentalization and stigma perception in our study demonstrates that these two concepts are connected and that this connection needs further study. In particular, mentalization-based therapy can have an effect on the reduction of the stigma perceptions and in this way can improve the course of the disease, potentially improving the patients' quality of life.

Correlates of stigma in adults with epilepsy: A systematic review of quantitative studies

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to identify quantitative correlates, predictors, and outcomes of stigma in adults with epilepsy living in Western countries.

METHODS

To identify relevant literature, four academic databases (PsycINFO, CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus) were systematically searched using key terms related to stigma and epilepsy.

RESULTS

Thirty-three research papers reporting findings from 25 quantitative studies of correlates of stigma in epilepsy were identified. The findings suggest that stigma can be predicted by demographic, illness-related, and psychosocial factors, although associations were found to be highly culturally specific. Outcomes of stigma in people with epilepsy were replicated more consistently across cultures, and its impact was significant. Detrimental effects included both worse physical health, including less effective management of the condition, and reduced psychological well-being, including difficulties such as depression and anxiety.

IMPLICATIONS

Educational initiatives and therapeutic interventions that aim to address stigma in people with epilepsy are recommended; however, these need to be culturally informed to ensure that they are valid and effective.

A disease, disorder, illness or condition: How to label epilepsy?

The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) is an important source of guidance for health professionals when it comes to epilepsy. Their latest recommendation that epilepsy should no longer be called a “disorder,” but a “disease” has though caused controversy. The ILAE contends the change will improve epilepsy's image. Some clinicians and other organizations fear the change may not though be accepted by patients as in common parlance “disease” can be associated with “contagiousness”/”infection.” To allow practicing clinicians to make informed judgements about what language they use, we completed the first study to assess the preferences of those with epilepsy and significant others and explore if any of their characteristics were associated with preference. Via epilepsy interest groups and associations in England, Wales, Scotland and the Republic of Ireland, 971 patients and significant others were surveyed. Participants identified which of four labels for epilepsy (“disorder,” “illness,” “disease,” “condition”) they favoured and rated each using a Likert‐scale. Patients’ median age was 39; 69% had experienced seizures in the prior year. “Condition” was favoured by most patients (74.3%) and significant others (71.2%). Only 2.2% of patients and 1.2% of significant others chose “disease”; it received a median Likert‐rating indicating “strongly dislike.” Multinomial logistic regression found it was not possible to reliably distinguish between participants favouring the different terms on the basis of demographics. The ILAE's position is at odds with what most patients and carers want and we discuss the implications of this.