1
|
Alves TA, Nascimento E, de Castro LB, Fabreti-Oliveira RA. Impact of HLA eplet mismatch load in immunological outcomes after living donor kidney transplantation. Transpl Immunol 2023; 80:101908. [PMID: 37536379 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION HLA eplets mismatches (eMM) have been associated with negative kidney outcomes after transplantation, such as the development of de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), and early graft loss. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effects of the HLA eMM load on dnDSA development, ABMR, renal function, allograft survival and graft loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study involved 159 living donor kidney transplant patients categorized into groups based on antigen HLA mismatches assessed traditionally and HLA eMM load. Patients had followed for at least one year. The EpViX online program was used to evaluate the HLA eMM load. Cox models were constructed to assess the risk of graft loss. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were carried out. The analyses had performed using the R program and p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS From all 159 patients, 28 (17.6%) lost their allografts. Rejection episodes occurred in 37.1% of patients, 13.6% of whom were ABMR. Patients with rejection episodes had higher HLA-AB (p = 0.032) and HLA-DR (p = 0.008) HLA eMM load, HLA-AB (p = 0.006) and HLA-DR (p = 0.009) antigens mismatches, and higher proportions of the following eMM in the HLA-DR locus: 70R eMM (p = 0.015), 70RE (p = 0.015), 74E (p = 0.015) and 48Q (p = 0.047). In multiple models, the presence of HLA-DR 70qq eMM (HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.47; 9.55) add an increase in creatinine levels at 1-year (HR 3.87, 95% CI 2.30, 6.53) were associated with the risk of graft loss. CONCLUSION The HLA eMM load was related to episodes of rejection and allograft loss. The HLA-DR eMM was most strongly associated with a worse immunologic outcome than eMM mismatches for HLA-AB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thiago Abramo Alves
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil; University Hospital of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| | - Evaldo Nascimento
- IMUNOLAB - Laboratory of Histocompatibility, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Institute of Research and Education of the Hospital Santa Casa, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| | | | - Raquel Aparecida Fabreti-Oliveira
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil; IMUNOLAB - Laboratory of Histocompatibility, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Farshbafnadi M, Razi S, Rezaei N. Transplantation. Clin Immunol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818006-8.00008-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
3
|
Filippone EJ, Gulati R, Farber JL. Noninvasive Assessment of the Alloimmune Response in Kidney Transplantation. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2021; 28:548-560. [PMID: 35367023 DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2021.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Transplantation remains the optimal mode of kidney replacement therapy, but unfortunately long-term graft survival after 1 year remains suboptimal. The main mechanism of chronic allograft injury is alloimmune, and current clinical monitoring of kidney transplants includes measuring serum creatinine, proteinuria, and immunosuppressive drug levels. The most important biomarker routinely monitored is human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) with the frequency based on underlying immunologic risk. HLA-DSA should be measured if there is graft dysfunction, immunosuppression minimization, or nonadherence. Antibody strength is semiquantitatively estimated as mean fluorescence intensity, with titration studies for equivocal cases and for following response to treatment. Determination of in vitro C1q or C3d positivity or HLA-DSA IgG subclass analysis remains of uncertain significance, but we do not recommend these for routine use. Current evidence does not support routine monitoring of non-HLA antibodies except anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies when the phenotype is appropriate. The monitoring of both donor-derived cell-free DNA in blood or gene expression profiling of serum and/or urine may detect subclinical rejection, although mainly as a supplement and not as a replacement for biopsy. The optimal frequency and cost-effectiveness of using these noninvasive assays remain to be determined. We review the available literature and make recommendations.
Collapse
|
4
|
Rosser C, Sage D. Approaches for the characterization of clinically relevant pre-transplant human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in solid organ transplant patients. Int J Immunogenet 2021; 48:385-402. [PMID: 34346180 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The avoidance of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) attributed to human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibody incompatibility remains an essential function of clinical Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (H&I) laboratories who are supporting solid organ transplantation. Developments in HLA antibody identification assays over the past thirty years have greatly reduced unexpected positive cellular crossmatches and improved solid organ transplant outcomes. For sensitized patients, the decision to register unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches is often heavily influenced by results from solid phase antibody assays, particularly the Luminex® Single Antigen Bead (SAB) assays, although the clinical relevance of antibodies identified solely by these assays remains unclear. As such, the identification of non-clinically relevant antibodies may proportionally increase the number of unacceptable transplant mismatches registered, with an associated increase in waiting time for a compatible organ. We reflect on the clinical relevance of antibodies identified solely by the Luminex SAB® assays and consider whether the application of additional assays and/or tools could further develop our ability to define the clinical relevance of antibodies identified in patient sera. Improvements in this area would assist equity of access to a compatible transplant for highly sensitized patients awaiting a solid organ transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Rosser
- NHS Blood and Transplant (Tooting), Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, London, UK
| | - Deborah Sage
- NHS Blood and Transplant (Tooting), Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lammerts RGM, Lagendijk LM, Tiller G, Dam WA, Lancaster HL, Daha MR, Seelen MA, Hepkema BG, Pol RA, Leuvenink HGD, Molema G, van den Born J, Berger SP. Machine-perfused donor kidneys as a source of human renal endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2021; 320:F947-F962. [PMID: 33719571 DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00541.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Renal endothelial cells (ECs) play crucial roles in vasorelaxation, ultrafiltration, and selective transport of electrolytes and water, but also in leakage of the glomerular filtration barrier and inflammatory processes like complement activation and leukocyte recruitment. In addition, they are target cells for both cellular and antibody-mediated rejection in the transplanted kidney. To study the molecular and cellular processes underlying EC behavior in renal disease, well-characterized primary renal ECs are indispensible. In this report, we describe a straightforward procedure to isolate ECs from the perfusion fluid of human donor kidneys by a combination of negative selection of monocytes/macrophages, positive selection by CD31 Dynabeads, and propagation in endothelium-specific culture medium. Thus, we isolated and propagated renal ECs from 102 donor kidneys, representative of all blood groups and major human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II antigens. The obtained ECs were positive for CD31 and von Willebrand factor, expressed other endothelial markers such as CD34, VEGF receptor-2, TIE2, and plasmalemmal vesicle associated protein-1 to a variable extent, and were negative for the monocyte marker CD14 and lymphatic endothelial marker podoplanin. HLA class II was either constitutively expressed or could be induced by interferon-γ. Furthermore, as a proof of principle, we showed the diagnostic value of this renal endothelial biobank in renal endothelium-specific cross-matching tests for HLA antibodies.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We describe a new and widely accessible approach to obtain human primary renal endothelial cells in a standardized fashion, by isolating from the perfusate of machine-perfused donor kidneys. Characterization of the cells showed a mixed population originating from different compartments of the kidney. As a proof of principle, we demonstrated a possible diagnostic application in an endothelium-specific cross-match. Next to transplantation, we foresee further applications in the field renal endothelial research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa G M Lammerts
- Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lisanne M Lagendijk
- Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gesa Tiller
- Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy A Dam
- Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Harriet L Lancaster
- Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mohamed R Daha
- Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marc A Seelen
- Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bouke G Hepkema
- Transplantation Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert A Pol
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Henri G D Leuvenink
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Grietje Molema
- Medical Biology Section, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob van den Born
- Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan P Berger
- Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hönger G, Niemann M, Schawalder L, Jones J, van Heck MR, van de Pasch LAL, Vendelbosch S, Rozemuller EH, Hösli I, Blümel S, Schaub S. Toward defining the immunogenicity of HLA epitopes: Impact of HLA class I eplets on antibody formation during pregnancy. HLA 2020; 96:589-600. [PMID: 32829523 DOI: 10.1111/tan.14054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Eplets are functional units of structural epitopes on donor HLA, potentially recognized by complementarity-determining regions of the paratope of the recipients' B-cell receptors or antibodies (Ab). Their individual immunogenicity is poorly described, yet this feature would be of clinical importance for pretransplant risk assessment. The aim of this study was to determine the relative immunogenicity of HLA class I eplets in the pregnancy setting, where mismatched eplets are present on paternal HLA antigens of the unborn child. One hundred fifty-nine predominantly Caucasian mothers giving birth at the University Hospital Basel and their first newborns were HLA-typed at high-resolution by next-generation sequencing (NGS) (NGSgo Workflow and NGSengine from GenDx; sequencing with a Miseq from Illumina) and eplets were determined using HLAMatchmaker. HLA class I specific IgG Ab was assessed in maternal sera drawn immediately after full-term delivery, by OneLambda LABScreen single antigen ibeads. The Ab profile was subsequently evaluated for eplet-associated patterns. All 72 currently Ab-verified HLA class I eplets were examined for their immunogenicity according to the frequency of child-specific HLA Ab (CSA) directed against their structures. Four hundred twelve of 477 (86.4%) paternal HLA-A, -B or -C alleles were mismatched. CSA were present in 46 mothers (28.9%), directed against 80 (19.4%) of these mismatches. The 10 most immunogenic eplets were 62GK, 145KHA, 144TKH, 62GE, 107W, 80I, 82LR, 41T, 127K, 45KE with immunogenicity rates between 45.8% and 27.3%. This pregnancy study also identified five non-reactive eplets: 62RR, 76ESN, 80TLR, 156DA, 163RW. Based on our results, immunogenic hot and cold spots on the surface of HLA class I molecules were localized and visualized on 3D models. This study strengthens the presumption that different eplets represent different immunogenic potentials. Validation of these results in the clinical transplant setting is an essential next step in identifying those eplets representing a particularly high-risk potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gideon Hönger
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Transplantation Immunology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,HLA-Diagnostics and Immunogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Lara Schawalder
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - James Jones
- H&I Department, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Irene Hösli
- Department of Obstetrics and Fetomaternal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Blümel
- Transplantation Immunology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Transplantation Immunology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,HLA-Diagnostics and Immunogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an update of the literature on the use of new biomarkers of rejection in kidney transplant recipients. RECENT FINDINGS The kidney allograft biopsy is currently considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of rejection. However, the kidney biopsy is invasive and could be indeterminate. A significant progress has been made in discovery of new biomarkers of rejection, and some of them have been introduced recently for potential use in clinical practice including measurement of serum donor-derived cell free DNA, allo-specific CD154 + T-cytotoxic memory cells, and gene-expression 'signatures'. The literature supports that these biomarkers provide fair and reliable diagnostic accuracy and may be helpful in clinical decision-making when the kidney biopsy is contraindicated or is inconclusive. SUMMARY The new biomarkers provide a promising approach to detect acute rejections in a noninvasive way.
Collapse
|
8
|
Epitope-based human leukocyte antigen matching for transplantation: a personal perspective of its future. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2019; 23:486-492. [PMID: 29995674 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This study reflects my personal experience with the characterization of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) epitopes and their significance in HLA matching for transplantation. It offers a subjective assessment what further studies are needed to have this concept be applied in the clinical setting. RECENT FINDINGS This study addresses the structural characteristics of antibody-reactive HLA epitopes determined by different methods, eplet-associated antibody analysis and acceptable mismatching for sensitized patients and eplet immunogenicity and determination of mismatch permissibility. BASIC IMPLICATIONS: for clinical practice and research consider the need for further studies of the structural basis of antibody-verified HLA epitopes determined in different techniques and their clinical relevance, the biological basis of epitope immunogenicity and determinations of permissible mismatches and a computerized clinical transplant database with an Artificial Intelligence component that can generate evidence-based information for the practical application of epitope-based HLA matching.
Collapse
|
9
|
Michielsen LA, Wisse BW, Kamburova EG, Verhaar MC, Joosten I, Allebes WA, van der Meer A, Hilbrands LB, Baas MC, Spierings E, Hack CE, van Reekum FE, Bots ML, Drop ACAD, Plaisier L, Seelen MAJ, Sanders JSF, Hepkema BG, Lambeck AJ, Bungener LB, Roozendaal C, Tilanus MGJ, Voorter CE, Wieten L, van Duijnhoven EM, Gelens M, Christiaans MHL, van Ittersum FJ, Nurmohamed SA, Lardy NM, Swelsen W, van der Pant KA, van der Weerd NC, ten Berge IJM, Bemelman FJ, Hoitsma A, van der Boog PJM, de Fijter JW, Betjes MGH, Heidt S, Roelen DL, Claas FH, Otten HG, van Zuilen AD. A paired kidney analysis on the impact of pre-transplant anti-HLA antibodies on graft survival. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018; 34:1056-1063. [DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Michielsen
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram W Wisse
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Elena G Kamburova
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne C Verhaar
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Irma Joosten
- Laboratory Medicine, Lab Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wil A Allebes
- Laboratory Medicine, Lab Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Arnold van der Meer
- Laboratory Medicine, Lab Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marije C Baas
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Spierings
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis E Hack
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Franka E van Reekum
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel L Bots
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan C A D Drop
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Loes Plaisier
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc A J Seelen
- Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan F Sanders
- Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bouke G Hepkema
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annechien J Lambeck
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Laura B Bungener
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline Roozendaal
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel G J Tilanus
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christien E Voorter
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte Wieten
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elizabeth M van Duijnhoven
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle Gelens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten H L Christiaans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frans J van Ittersum
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shaikh A Nurmohamed
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neubury M Lardy
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy Swelsen
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn A van der Pant
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neelke C van der Weerd
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ineke J M ten Berge
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries Hoitsma
- Dutch Organ Transplant Registry (NOTR), Dutch Transplant Foundation (NTS), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Johan W de Fijter
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frans H Claas
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henderikus G Otten
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan D van Zuilen
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alelign T, Ahmed MM, Bobosha K, Tadesse Y, Howe R, Petros B. Kidney Transplantation: The Challenge of Human Leukocyte Antigen and Its Therapeutic Strategies. J Immunol Res 2018; 2018:5986740. [PMID: 29693023 PMCID: PMC5859822 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5986740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplantation remains the treatment of choice for end-stage renal failure. When the immune system of the recipient recognizes the transplanted kidney as a foreign object, graft rejection occurs. As part of the host immune defense mechanism, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is a major challenge for graft rejection in transplantation therapy. The impact of HLA mismatches between the donor and the potential recipient prolongs the time for renal transplantation therapy, tethered to dialysis, latter reduces graft survival, and increases mortality. The formation of pretransplant alloantibodies against HLA class I and II molecules can be sensitized through exposures to blood transfusions, prior transplants, and pregnancy. These preformed HLA antibodies are associated with rejection in kidney transplantation. On the other hand, the development of de novo antibodies may increase the risk for acute and chronic rejections. Allograft rejection results from a complex interplay involving both the innate and the adaptive immune systems. Thus, further insights into the mechanisms of tissue rejection and the risk of HLA sensitization is crucial in developing new therapies that may blunt the immune system against transplanted organs. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to highlight facts about HLA and its sensitization, various mechanisms of allograft rejection, the current immunosuppressive approaches, and the directions for future therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilahun Alelign
- College of Natural Sciences, Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Department of Biology, Debre Berhan University, P.O. Box 445, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
- Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Momina M. Ahmed
- St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College and Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Kidist Bobosha
- Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Yewondwossen Tadesse
- School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Rawleigh Howe
- Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Beyene Petros
- College of Natural Sciences, Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Transplant glomerulopathy. Mod Pathol 2018; 31:235-252. [PMID: 29027535 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Revised: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In the renal allograft, transplant glomerulopathy represents a morphologic lesion and not a specific diagnosis. The hallmark pathologic feature is glomerular basement membrane reduplication by light microscopy or electron microscopy in the absence of immune complex deposits. Transplant glomerulopathy results from chronic, recurring endothelial cell injury that can be mediated by HLA alloantibodies (donor-specific antibodies), various autoantibodies, cell-mediated immune injury, thrombotic microangiopathy, or chronic hepatitis C. Clinically, transplant glomerulopathy may be silent, detectable on protocol biopsy, or present with overt manifestations, including up to nephrotic range proteinuria, hypertension, and declining glomerular filtration rate. In either case, transplant glomerulopathy is associated with reduced graft survival. This review details the morphologic features of transplant glomerulopathy found on light microscopy, immunofluorescence microscopy, and electron microscopy. The pathophysiology of the causes and risk factors are discussed. Clinical manifestations are emphasized and potential therapeutic modalities are examined.
Collapse
|
12
|
Gates KV, Pereira NL, Griffiths LG. Cardiac Non-Human Leukocyte Antigen Identification: Techniques and Troubles. Front Immunol 2017; 8:1332. [PMID: 29093713 PMCID: PMC5651233 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Historically efforts have focused on the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) as the major cause for acute and chronic rejection following cardiac transplantation. However, rising evidence indicates that non-HLA antibodies can be both primary initiators and modifiers of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). The purpose of this review is to assess currently available technologies for non-HLA identification and leveraging such responses toward antibody quantification. Several techniques have been used to identify antigenic determinants of recipient graft-specific non-HLA humoral immune responses, but each comes with its own set of benefits and caveats. Improving our ability to detect non-HLA humoral immune response will aid in our understanding of the underlying antigenic determinants of AMR and CAV, as well as improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine V Gates
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.,Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Naveen L Pereira
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Leigh G Griffiths
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kim I, Wu G, Chai NN, Klein AS, Jordan S. Ibrutinib suppresses alloantibody responses in a mouse model of allosensitization. Transpl Immunol 2017; 45:59-64. [PMID: 28951258 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2017.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Revised: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ibrutinib is a Bruton's tyrosine Kinase (BTK) antagonist that inhibits B cell receptor (BCR) signaling. Complete BTK deficiency is associated with absence of B-cells. Ibrutinb is currently approved by FDA for treatment of B-cell malignancies, including Waldenström macroglobulinaemia. We recently carried out studies to determine if ibrutinib could modify alloantibody responses. MATERIALS AND METHODS A mouse model of allogenic sensitization using a C57BL/6 mouse as the recipient of a skin allograft from an HLA-A2 transgenic mouse was utilized to examine the effects of ibrutinib on alloantibody responses and B cell effector functions. Donor-specific antibody (DSA) levels were measured in a flow-cytometric antibody binding assay. Splenic T and B cell subsets and plasma cells were analyzed in flow cytometry. RESULTS Control mice developed peak levels of DSA IgM at day 14 PTx while the ibrutinib treated mice had significantly lower levels of DSA IgM (p=0.0047). Control mice developed HLA.A2-specific IgG antibodies at day 14 (230±60 MFI) and reached peak levels at day 21 (426±61 MFI). In contrast, mice in the treatment group had low levels of HLA.A2-specific IgG at day 14 (109±59 MFI, p=0.004) and day 21 (241±86 MFI, p=0.003). FACS analysis found a reduction of B220+ or CD19+ B cell population (p<0.05). In addition, ibrutinib attenuated recall DSA IgG responses to re-sensitization (p<0.05) and reduced CD38+CD138+ plasma cells (p<0.05) in the spleens. CONCLUSIONS Ibrutinib is effective in suppressing alloantibody responses through blocking BTK-mediated BCR signaling, leading to reduction of B cells and short-lived plasma cells in the spleens. Use of ibrutinib may provide benefits to HLA-sensitized transplant patients for alloantibody suppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Kim
- Comprehensive Transplant Center at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 9700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Gordon Wu
- Comprehensive Transplant Center at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 9700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Ning-Ning Chai
- Comprehensive Transplant Center at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 9700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Andrew S Klein
- Comprehensive Transplant Center at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 9700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Stanley Jordan
- Comprehensive Transplant Center at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 9700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liu P, Souma T, Wei AZS, Xie X, Luo X, Jin J. Personalized Peptide Arrays for Detection of HLA Alloantibodies in Organ Transplantation. J Vis Exp 2017. [PMID: 28930983 DOI: 10.3791/56278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In organ transplantation, the function and longevity of the graft critically rely on the success of controlling immunological rejection reactivity against human leukocyte antigens (HLA). Histocompatibility guidelines are based on laboratory tests of anti-HLA immunity, which presents either as pre-existing or de novo generated HLA antibodies that constitute a major transplantation barrier. Current tests are built on a single-antigen beads (SAB) platform using a fixed set of ~100 preselected recombinant HLA antigens to probe transplant sera. However, in humans there exist a far greater variety of HLA types, with no two individuals other than identical twins who can share the same combination of HLA sequences. While advanced technologies for HLA typing and direct sequencing can precisely capture any mismatches in DNA sequence between a donor's and recipient's HLA, the SAB assay, due to its limited variety in sequence representation, is unable to precisely detect alloantibodies specifically against the donor HLA mismatches. We sought to develop a complementary method using a different technology to detect and characterize anti-donor HLA antibodies on a personalized basis. The screening tool is a custom peptide array of donor HLA-derived sequences for probing post-transplant sera of the organ recipient to assess the risk for antibody-mediated rejection. On a single array for one donor-recipient pair, up to 600 unique peptides are made based on the donor's HLA protein sequences, each peptide carrying at least one mismatched residue in a 15-amino acid sequence. In our pilot experiments to compare antigen patterns for pre- and post-transplant sera on these arrays, we were able to detect anti-HLA signals with the resolution that also allowed us to pinpoint the immune epitopes involved. These personalized antigen arrays allow high-resolution detection of donor-specific HLA epitopes in organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pan Liu
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, and the Center for Kidney Research and Therapeutics at the Feinberg Cardiovascular Research Institute, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
| | - Tomokazu Souma
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, and the Center for Kidney Research and Therapeutics at the Feinberg Cardiovascular Research Institute, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
| | - Andrew Zu-Sern Wei
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, and the Center for Kidney Research and Therapeutics at the Feinberg Cardiovascular Research Institute, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
| | - Xueying Xie
- School of Biological Sciences and Medical Engineering, Southeast University
| | - Xunrong Luo
- Surgery-Organ Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
| | - Jing Jin
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, and the Center for Kidney Research and Therapeutics at the Feinberg Cardiovascular Research Institute, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine;
| |
Collapse
|