Cytoreductive Surgery plus Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Management of Peritoneal Sarcomatosis: A Preliminary Single-Center Experience from Saudi Arabia

Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and intraoperative radiation therapy in the management of gallbladder cancer: a case report

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare and highly aggressive malignancy, often characterized by nonspecific clinical presentations and late diagnosis, which contribute to its poor prognosis. It is commonly detected at advanced stages, leading to low survival rates. Surgical resection is the primary treatment, with the extent of surgery depending on the T stage of the cancer. In advanced cases, surgery is only considered if it can potentially be curative. Despite various treatment approaches for advanced GBC, survival outcomes remain poor. In our case series, we introduce a novel treatment approach combining cytoreductive surgery, intraoperative radiation therapy, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Remarkably, we observed a 100% one-year survival rate, with one patient achieving eight years of disease-free survival without recurrence or metastasis. This aggressive treatment strategy did not lead to increased morbidity or mortality, suggesting its safety and feasibility. However, larger-scale studies are required to draw definitive conclusions.

The Use of Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT) in Multimodality Management of Cancer Patients: a Single Institution Experience

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is a highly conformal type of radiation therapy given at time of surgery aiming for better tumor local control. It increases the tumor radiation dose without exceeding normal tissues tolerance doses.

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of IORT and short-term toxicities in patients with different cancer sites treated with multidisciplinary protocol including IORT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of cancer patients who received IORT as a part of their multidisciplinary treatment at King Faisal Specialized Hospital and Research center (KFSH&RC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from January 2013 until December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients with 210 IORT applications were analyzed. Twenty-two patients had two applications at the same time. One hundred sixteen patients were males. Median age at time of diagnosis was 49.5 years (19-77). One hundred thirty-four patients had primary, while 54 cases had recurrent disease. Gastroesophageal cancer and soft tissue sarcoma were the most frequent diagnosis in 49 patients followed by colorectal cancer in 35 patients. Major surgeries with curative intent done in 183 patients (97.3%). Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was performed in 118 (62.8%) patients. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 3.2%. Fifty-four (28.7%) patients develop grades III-IV complications according to Clavien-Dindo grading system.

CONCLUSION

The data presented discusses using of IORT treatment for different malignant tumors as a part of multimodality treatment. IORT seems safe and feasible; however, a longer follow-up period is needed for proper evaluation and to define the role of IORT in a tailored multimodality approach.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the management of peritoneal surface malignancies - An evidence-based review

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) were considered terminal diseases because of their advanced nature, therefore, systemic chemotherapy was given with palliative intent only. As a result, very poor survival outcomes were observed. But with the introduction of complete Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), the scenario has changed dramatically.

METHODOLOGY

An objective electronic database search was performed in Pubmed, NLM Catalog, Google scholar, Bookshelf, and Pubmed Central published in the time period from 2000 till 2020. All the randomized studies were included. In the absence of randomized studies, both prospective and retrospective studies were included. The outcomes of HIPEC were measured in terms of median survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, complications and drug toxicities.

RESULTS

CRS and HIPEC are considered the standard of care for PMP and MPM even in the absence of level 1 evidence due to lack of an effective alternative treatment. In colorectal and gastric cancer, several phase-three trials are showing overall survival benefit in selected cases while there is a prophylactic and palliative role of HIPEC in gastric cancer. Three reported phase 3 trials showed positive results in ovarian cancer. In peritoneal sarcomatosis, the role of HIPEC is yet to be proven.

CONCLUSION

The patient selection is the key to the successful outcomes after HIPEC. HIPEC should be performed by the experienced surgeons in specialized centres with a strong critical care and intensive care support to reduce the morbidity and mortality. Ongoing trials and future directions will prove to be an indispensable arm in the oncological armamentarium.

Mucinous Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma Penetrated the Quadratus Lumborum Muscle Posteriorly and Presented as Gluteal Abscess Managed Aggressively with Drainage Followed by Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Combined with Intraoperative Radiotherapy. a Case Report and Review of the Literature

Appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma is a term that was given for invasive appendiceal tumors. It is always present with pseudomyxoma peritonei which is a complex disease. These tumors have the tendency to surround the primary tumor then extend primarily and extensively all over the peritoneal cavity as the primary site of metastases. The invasion through the abdominal wall muscles is rare but the penetration and passing through these muscles to the subcutaneous tissue are extremely rare. A 62-year-old male patient known to have pseudomyxoma peritonei presented with gluteal abscess. After 2 weeks from the abscess drainage, the patient underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). He tolerated the operation well and discharged home in a good condition. Even with extensive appendiceal mucinous neoplasms presented with the penetration of the abdominal wall muscles, still aggressive management should be considered.

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma with a rare presentation of disseminated intraperitoneal sarcomatosis: A case report

•

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma can present with disseminated intraperitoneal sarcomatosis.

•

Fluorescence in situ hybridization for MDM2 gene amplification is diagnostically discriminative.

•

Prognosis is poor and the benefit of chemotherapy remains uncertain.

•

Novel targeted therapies involving MDM2 and CKD4 inhibitors may emerge as viable systemic therapy options.

Introduction

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma is rare and tends to present with discrete tumors in the retroperitoneum, limbs and trunk. Majority of cases arise de-novo as primary tumors, while a minority occur as recurrences of well-differentiated liposarcomas. There has been no previous report of dedifferentiated liposarcoma presenting as disseminated intraperitoneal sarcomatosis.

Presentation of case

This report describes a young Asian female with disseminated intraperitoneal sarcomatosis arising from de-novo dedifferentiated liposarcoma, and discusses the diagnostic challenges faced in this highly unusual disease presentation. Initial biopsy was unconclusive, and considerations included sclerosing mesenteritis or an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was subsequently performed and showed amplification of the MDM2 gene. A diagnosis of dedifferentiated liposarcoma was then made.

Discussion

This was an extremely unusual presentation of advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma that was eventually diagnosed using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Prognosis is poor and the only viable treatment options was palliative chemotherapy.

Conclusion

The diagnosis of dedifferentiated liposarcoma should be considered early and surgery carried out when still feasible.

A Simplified Peritoneal Sarcomatosis Score for patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Background

With the introduction of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), long-term survival can be achieved in selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancy. In patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis (PS), CRS/HIPEC remains a topic of debate. It is important that patient selection and outcome be improved with a tool that better predicts survival in such patients. To this end, we devised a Simplified Peritoneal Sarcomatosis Score (SPSS) adopted from the previously-described peritoneal surface disease severity score (PSDSS).

Methods

Patients were included if they were diagnosed with PS and underwent CRS/HIPEC with intended complete cytoreduction between 2007 and 2017. To calculate SPSS, we recorded symptoms (none =0, present =1), peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) (≤10=0, >10=1), and grade of tumor (low =0, high =1). Thus, SPSS ranged from 0 to 3. SPSS-L (low) included patients with score of 0-1; SPSS-H (high) included patients with scores 2-3. Survival curves were generated using Kaplan-Meier method according to the two tiers of SPSS.

Results

Twenty-five patients were included. Mean age was 51.84±10.75 years. Median follow-up was 18 months. Compared to SPSS-H, SPSS-L patients had a longer median overall survival (OS) (36±16 vs. 16±6 months, respectively; P=0.021) and a longer median disease-free survival (DFS) (36±16 vs. 16±6 months, respectively; P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, advanced disease (SPSS-H) was an independent predictor of OS (P=0.020) and DFS (P=0.018).

Conclusions

SPSS can be used as a tool for patient selection for surgery, prognosis prediction, and stratification into clinical trials of PS patients.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in seven patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis from uterine sarcoma

Peritoneal sarcomatosis from uterine sarcoma is a rare disease with no effective treatment and poor prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has successful results in peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal/gynecological origins. We show that CRS/HIPEC is safe, feasible, and may benefit selected patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis from uterine sarcoma.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of pseudomyxoma peritonei: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) results from perforated appendiceal tumors. It is usually diagnosed preoperatively by imaging. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), although aggressive long procedure with high complications rate, was considered the optimal treatment. This study is aiming to study the role of CRS and HIPEC in the management of PMP and assess the outcome.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study which was conducted at King Faisal Hospital and Research Center, a tertiary care hospital during the period from November 2008 to June 2016. Approval of the Research Advisory Council was obtained. Forty-one procedures of CRS and HIPEC were performed in 38 patients. Using the open abdomen technique, CRS was performed using standard peritonectomy procedures and visceral resections directed toward the complete elimination of tumors from abdominopelvic cavity. HIPEC was performed using mitomycin C in a dose of 30 mg/m² and allowed to circulate in abdominopelvic cavity for 90 min at 41.0 to 42.2 °C.

RESULTS

Forty-one procedures were performed in 38 patients. Three procedures were done as repeat CRS and HIPEC. No perioperative mortality. Cystoscopy and bilateral ureteric stents in 35 procedures (85.5%). Hospital stay (range 9-85 days) average is 21 days. Follow up period is 1-84 months, and median follow up is 54 months. Five-year survival rate is 92%. Median 5-year disease-free survival rate is 60%. Two patients died during the follow up period by septic shock and one patient died from disease progression.

CONCLUSION

CRS and HIPEC is well-tolerated and feasible management for PMP.

Multi-institutional study of peritoneal sarcomatosis from uterine sarcoma treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Uterine sarcoma (US) is a rare tumor representing 1% of female genital tract malignancies. Peritoneal sarcomatosis (PS) after US, diminishes median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) alone, with or without systemic chemotherapy is <1 year and 6 months, respectively. A multi-institutional review of PS from US was conducted to evaluate CRS and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and effects on survival outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 36 patients from 7 specialized international centers was performed. Selection criteria included PS of uterine origin with CRS/HIPEC treatment. Clinical data were analyzed. OS and PFS were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients underwent a total 38 HIPEC procedures performed from 2005 to 2014; 35 previous treatment and 1 primary treatment. Twenty-nine (81%) LMS patients, 3 (8%) endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), 3 (8%) adeneosarcoma (AS), and 1 (3%) categorized as other. Median PCI was 16 (range: 2-39), 10 patients had PCI ≥20. Thirty-four patients (94%) had complete cytoreduction (CC 0-1), 19 patients recurred. CRS/HIPEC OS at 1, 3, and 5-years was 75%, 53%, and 32% respectively, with median OS of 37 months (CI 95%: 20-54). PFS in 32 patients with CC at 1, 3, and 5-years was 67%, 32% and 32%, respectively with median PFS of 18.9 months (CI 95%: 6.7-31).

CONCLUSIONS

CRS/HIPEC is a promising treatment modality for patients with PS. Histological subtype may influence survival. A global prospective registry of patients to further assess the efficacy of CRS/HIPEC is needed.