A Comparison of Oxycodone and Alfentanil in Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia with a Time-Scheduled Decremental Infusion after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Effect of Oxycodone-Based Multimodal Analgesia on Visceral Pain After Major Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

Purpose

Oxycodone is a potent μ- and κ-opioid receptor agonist that can relieve both somatic and visceral pain. We assessed oxycodone- vs sufentanil-based multimodal analgesia on postoperative pain following major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.

Methods

In this randomised double-blind controlled trial, 40 adult patients were randomised (1:1, stratified by type of surgery) to receive oxycodone- or sufentanil-based multimodal analgesia, comprising bilateral transverse abdominis plane blocks, intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion, flurbiprofen axetil, and oxycodone- or sufentanil-based patient-controlled analgesia. The co-primary outcomes were time-weighted average (TWA) of visceral pain (defined as intra-abdominal deep and dull pain) at rest and on coughing during 0-24 h postoperatively, assessed using the numerical rating scale (0-10) with a minimal clinically important difference of 1.

Results

All patients completed the study (median age, 64 years; 65% male) and had adequate postoperative pain control. The mean (SD) 24-h TWA of visceral pain at rest was 1.40 (0.77) in the oxycodone group vs 2.00 (0.98) in the sufentanil group (mean difference=-0.60, 95% CI, -1.16 to -0.03; P=0.039). Patients in the oxycodone group had a significantly lower 24-h TWA of visceral pain on coughing (2.00 [0.83] vs 2.98 [1.26]; mean difference=-0.98, 95% CI, -1.66 to -0.30; P=0.006). In the subgroup analyses, the treatment effect of oxycodone vs sufentanil on the co-primary outcomes did not differ in terms of age (18-65 years or >65 years), sex (female or male), or type of surgery (colorectal or gastric). Secondary outcomes (24-h TWA of incisional and shoulder pain, postoperative analgesic usage, rescue analgesia, adverse events, and patient satisfaction) were comparable between groups.

Conclusion

For patients undergoing major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery, oxycodone-based multimodal analgesia reduced postoperative visceral pain in a statistically significant but not clinically important manner.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052085).

Lower Background Infusion of Oxycodone for Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia, Combined with Ropivacaine Intercostal Nerve Block, in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of a lower dose background infusion of oxycodone for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with the conventional dose, following intercostal nerve block, for the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Patients and Methods

This was a prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. In total, 155 patients scheduled for elective radical lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopy were recruited from December 2018 to July 2019, of whom 140 were ultimately included in the study population. Patients were randomized to receive either oxycodone 0.25 mg/h (low-dose group, n=70) or oxycodone 0.5 mg/h (control group, n=70) as a background infusion for PCIA, following ropivacaine intercostal nerve block, for postoperative pain management. The primary endpoints were rest and dynamic visual analogue scale (VAS) scores within 72 h of the operation. The secondary endpoints were patient satisfaction scores, consumption of postoperative analgesics, times of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and adverse events.

Results

All 140 enrolled patients completed the study requirements and were included in the final analysis. The rest and dynamic VAS scores at 4 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h postoperative were comparable between the low-dose group and the control group (P>0.05). However, the low-dose group had statistically significantly higher patient satisfaction scores (P<0.001) and lower postoperative analgesic consumption (P<0.001) as well as lower incidence of nausea and vomiting (P<0.05). The times of PCA was not statistically significantly different between the two groups, and no serious adverse events occurred in either group (P>0.05).

Conclusion

A low-dose background infusion of oxycodone for postoperative PCIA can achieve a comparable analgesic effect to the conventional dose after thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Furthermore, the low-dose regimen was associated with reduced consumption of oxycodone and increased patient satisfaction.

Oxycodone versus other opioid analgesics after laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis

Background

Intravenous opioids are administered for the management of visceral pain after laparoscopic surgery. Whether oxycodone has advantages over other opioids in the treatment of visceral pain is not yet clear.

Methods

In this study, the analgesic efficiency and adverse events of oxycodone and other opioids, including alfentanil, sufentanil, fentanyl, and morphine, in treating post-laparoscopic surgery visceral pain were evaluated. This review was conducted according to the methodological standards described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched in December 2019.

Results

Ten studies were included in this review. The sample size was 695 participants. The results showed that compared with morphine and fentanyl, oxycodone had a more potent analgesic efficacy on the first day after laparoscopic surgery, especially during the first 0.5 h. There was no significant difference in sedation between the two groups. Compared to morphine and fentanyl, oxycodone was more likely to lead to dizziness and drowsiness. Overall, patient satisfaction did not differ significantly between oxycodone and other opioids.

Conclusions

Oxycodone is superior to other analgesics within 24 h after laparoscopic surgery, but its adverse effects should be carefully considered.

Oxycodone vs Sufentanil in Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Gynecological Tumor Operation: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial

Background

This study aims to compare analgesic effect and side effects of oxycodone and sufentanil in transition analgesia and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after gynecological tumor operation under general anesthesia.

Patients and Methods

A prospective, randomized, double-blind research was conducted. Patients undergoing elective gynecological tumor surgery were randomized into four groups: Group S (sufentanil transition analgesia and sufentanil PCIA), Group OS (oxycodone transition analgesia and sufentanil PCIA), Group SO (sufentanil transition analgesia and oxycodone PCIA) and Group O (oxycodone transition analgesia and oxycodone PCIA). The primary outcomes were Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at rest and coughing, accumulated opioid consumption in PCIA and patients’ satisfaction.

Results

Patients in Group OS and Group O showed shorter time of consciousness recovery and extubation after surgery. Accumulated opioid consumption in PCIA (equal to morphine) in Group SO and Group O was significantly less than that in Group S and Group OS. Patients in Group O showed lower NRS at rest and coughing, but higher patients’ satisfaction 3, 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Patients in Group SO and Group O showed a shorter time of intestinal recovery, first feeding and first-time movement.

Conclusion

Both oxycodone and sufentanil provided adequate pain relief in transitional analgesia and PCIA treatment after surgery. Oxycodone without background infusion showed less analgesic drug consumption and faster recovery than sufentanil with background infusion in PCIA after gynecological tumor operation under general anesthesia.

Efficacy of oxycodone in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with different infusion modes after laparoscopic radical surgery of cervical cancer a prospective, randomized, double-blind study

BACKGROUD

The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic and adverse effects of oxycodone with 3 different infusion modes on postoperative pain after laparoscopic radical surgery of cervical cancer.

METHODS

Ninety patients undergoing laparoscopic radical surgery of cervical cancer were randomly divided into 3 groups: Group A (continuous infusion with 0.01 mg/kg/h and a bolus dose with 0.03 mg/kg), Group B (a bolus dose with 0.03 mg/kg) and Group C (PCA was administered as a time-scheduled decremental continuous infusion based on lean body mass). A blinded observer recorded Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Ramsay sedation score (RSS), infused cumulative dose of oxycodone and side effects at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, and satisfaction during the postoperative 48 hours.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the VAS pain score when resting or coughing among 3 groups at 1, 6 and 48 hours postoperatively (P <.05). VAS was significantly higher in Group B than in Group A and C until postoperative 1, 6, and 48 hours (P <.05). There were significant differences in cumulative PCA dose among the 3 groups at 1 and 48 hours postoperatively (P <.05). Group C showed significantly less amount of cumulative PCA dose compared to other 2 groups at 1 hour, whereas cumulative PCA dose of Group A at 48 hours was significantly more than other 2 groups (P <.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative nausea and vomiting, FAS, muscle chilling score and RSS among 3 groups at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. In addition, there was no difference in overall satisfaction during 48 hours postoperatively among 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxycodone provides significant analgesic effect in 3 different infusion modes over 48 hours after laparoscopic radical surgery of cervical cancer, and a time-scheduled decremental continuous infusion of oxycodone can become a better choice for patients after surgery of cervical cancer.

New Advances in Acute Postoperative Pain Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Postoperative pain remains one of the most common challenges following inpatient and outpatient surgeries. With our advances in modern medicine, pain following surgical procedures still remains a challenge, though significant accomplishments have been made over the past few decades. This article highlights some of the promising new advances and approaches in postoperative pain management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last decade, Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways and protocols are becoming the benchmark standards for enhancing postoperative recovery. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) is an essential component of such care. Further, in the wake of serious and persistent concern on the opioid epidemic in the USA, there has been a recent renewal of interest in non-opioid alternatives or adjuncts in controlling postoperative pain, often in the context of MMA. Intravenous (IV) acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), magnesium, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, liposomal bupivacaine, and newer neuraxial and peripheral regional techniques as well as patient-controlled modalities are gaining importance. Gabapentinoids have become popular but recent meta-analytic reviews have cast doubt on their routine use in perioperative settings. Among opioids, sublingual sufentanil, IV oxycodone, and iontophoretic transdermal fentanyl hold promise. Acupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation may be useful as adjuncts in MMA packages. Genetic testing, derivatives of herbal preparations, and an extended role of acute pain services may emerge as potential areas of importance in the future. There are, however, critical gaps in good quality evidence in many of the practice guideline recommendations. In the era of opioid epidemic, several lines of evidence have emerged to support non-opioid-based drugs and approaches along with a few newer opioid formulations for postoperative pain management, although more research is needed to find the right balance of efficacy and safety.