1
|
Groß S, Bitzer M, Albert J, Blödt S, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Caspari R, De Toni E, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Follmann M, Freudenberger P, Gani C, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Huppert P, Krug D, La Fougère C, Lang H, Langer T, Lenz P, Lüdde T, Mahnken A, Nadalin S, Nguyen HHP, Nothacker M, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Paprottka P, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plentz R, Pohl J, Recken H, Reimer P, Riemer J, Ritterbusch U, Roeb E, Rüssel J, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schlitt HJ, Schmid I, Schuler A, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stengel A, Steubesand N, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Tholen R, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Vogel A, Vogl T, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wildner D, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie biliärer Karzinome“ – Langversion 4.0. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:e213-e282. [PMID: 38364849 DOI: 10.1055/a-2189-8567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Groß
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Michael Bitzer
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Jörg Albert
- Katharinenhospital, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Stuttgart
| | - Susanne Blödt
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. (AWMF), Berlin
| | | | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz
| | - Reiner Caspari
- Klinik Niederrhein, Erkrankungen des Stoffwechsels der Verdauungsorgane und Tumorerkrankungen, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
| | | | | | | | - Markus Follmann
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | | | - Cihan Gani
- Klinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - Andreas Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Martin Götz
- Medizinische Klinik IV - Gastroenterologie/Onkologie, Klinikverbund Südwest, Böblingen
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden
| | - Peter Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühlerhöhe
| | - David Krug
- Strahlentherapie Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
| | - Christian La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Hauke Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Thomas Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | - Philipp Lenz
- Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| | - Tom Lüdde
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | - Andreas Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | - Monika Nothacker
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. (AWMF), Berlin
| | - Johann Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Karl Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek
| | - Philipp Paprottka
- Sektion für Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
| | - Philippe Pereira
- Zentrum für Radiologie, Minimal-invasive Therapien und Nuklearmedizin, SLK-Klinken Heilbronn
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - Ruben Plentz
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona
| | | | - Peter Reimer
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
| | | | | | - Elke Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II Pneumologie, Nephrologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
| | - Jörn Rüssel
- Medizinische Klinik IV Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
| | - Barbara Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I Gastroenterologie, Pneumologie und Endokrinologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Allgemeine Pathologie und pathologische Anatomie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Hans J Schlitt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
| | - Irene Schmid
- Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, LMU München
| | - Andreas Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Gastroenterologie, Alb-Fils-Kliniken, Geislingen an der Steige
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Marianne Sinn
- II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Knochenmarktransplantation mit Abteilung für Pneumologie), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Innere Medizin VI - Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | | | | | - Anne Taubert
- Klinische Sozialarbeit, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Bundesverband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik 1: Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Allergologie, Endokrinologie und Diabetologie sowie Ernährungsmedizin, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | | | - Arndt Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | - Frank Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | | | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Henning Wege
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Onkologie/Hämatologie, Gastroenterologie und Infektiologie, Klinikum Esslingen
| | - Dane Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Standort Lauf
| | - Marcus-Alexander Wörns
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie und Endokrinologie, Klinikum Dortmund
| | - Peter Galle
- 1. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Nephrologie, Rheumatologie, Infektiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Nisar Malek
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bitzer M, Groß S, Albert J, Blödt S, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Caspari R, De Toni E, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Follmann M, Freudenberger P, Gani C, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Huppert P, Krug D, Fougère CL, Lang H, Langer T, Lenz P, Lüdde T, Mahnken A, Nadalin S, Nguyen HHP, Nothacker M, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Paprottka P, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plentz R, Pohl J, Recken H, Reimer P, Riemer J, Ritterbusch U, Roeb E, Rüssel J, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schlitt HJ, Schmid I, Schuler A, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stengel A, Steubesand N, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Tholen R, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Vogel A, Vogl T, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wildner D, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Hepatozellulären Karzinoms“ – Langversion 4.0. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:e67-e161. [PMID: 38195102 DOI: 10.1055/a-2189-6353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bitzer
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Sabrina Groß
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Jörg Albert
- Katharinenhospital, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Stuttgart
| | - Susanne Blödt
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V.(AWMF), Berlin
| | | | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz
| | - Reiner Caspari
- Klinik Niederrhein Erkrankungen des Stoffwechsels der Verdauungsorgane und Tumorerkrankungen, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
| | | | | | | | - Markus Follmann
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | | | - Cihan Gani
- Klinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - Andreas Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Martin Götz
- Medizinische Klinik IV - Gastroenterologie/Onkologie, Klinikverbund Südwest, Böblingen
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden
| | - Peter Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühlerhöhe
| | - David Krug
- Strahlentherapie Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
| | - Christian La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Hauke Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Thomas Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | - Philipp Lenz
- Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| | - Tom Lüdde
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | - Andreas Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | - Monika Nothacker
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V.(AWMF), Berlin
| | - Johann Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Karl Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek
| | - Philipp Paprottka
- Sektion für Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
| | - Philippe Pereira
- Zentrum für Radiologie, Minimal-invasive Therapien und Nuklearmedizin, SLK-Klinken Heilbronn
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - Ruben Plentz
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona
| | | | - Peter Reimer
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
| | | | | | - Elke Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II Pneumologie, Nephrologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
| | - Jörn Rüssel
- Medizinische Klinik IV Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
| | - Barbara Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I Gastroenterologie, Pneumologie und Endokrinologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Allgemeine Pathologie und pathologische Anatomie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | | | - Irene Schmid
- Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, LMU München
| | - Andreas Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Gastroenterologie, Alb-Fils-Kliniken, Geislingen an der Steige
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Marianne Sinn
- II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Knochenmarktransplantation mit Abteilung für Pneumologie), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Innere Medizin VI - Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | | | | | - Anne Taubert
- Klinische Sozialarbeit, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Bundesverband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik 1: Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Allergologie, Endokrinologie und Diabetologie sowie Ernährungsmedizin, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | | | - Arndt Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | - Frank Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | | | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Henning Wege
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Onkologie/Hämatologie, Gastroenterologie und Infektiologie, Klinikum Esslingen
| | - Dane Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Standort Lauf
| | - Marcus-Alexander Wörns
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie und Endokrinologie, Klinikum Dortmund
| | - Peter Galle
- 1. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Nephrologie, Rheumatologie, Infektiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Nisar Malek
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Charalampopoulos G, Iezzi R, Tsitskari M, Mazioti A, Papakonstantinou O, Kelekis A, Kelekis N, Filippiadis D. Role of Percutaneous Ablation in the Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1186. [PMID: 37511998 PMCID: PMC10386331 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59071186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an invasive cancer accounting for <1% of all cancers and 10-15% of primary liver cancers. Intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) is associated with poor survival rates and high post-surgical recurrence rates whilst most diagnosed patients are not surgical candidates. There is a growing literature suggesting percutaneous ablative techniques for the management of patients with iCCA measuring ≤3 cm with contraindications to surgery as well as for recurrent or residual tumors aiming to provide local cancer treatment and control. Most used ablative therapies for iCCA include radiofrequency and microwave ablation with irreversible electroporation, cryoablation and reversible electroporation (electrochemotherapy) being less commonly encountered techniques. Due to the infiltrative margins of the lesion, there is a need for larger safety margins and ablation zone; multi-apparatus ablation or other variations of the technique such as balloon-assisted approaches can be utilized aiming to increase size of the zone of necrosis. The present review paper focuses upon the current role of percutaneous ablative techniques for the therapeutic management of iCCA. The purpose of this review is to present the current minimally invasive ablative techniques in the treatment of iCCA, including local control and survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Charalampopoulos
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Roberto Iezzi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncologic Radiotherapy and Hematology, A. Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Tsitskari
- Apollonio Private Hospital, 20 Lefkotheou Avenue, 2054 Strovolos, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Argyro Mazioti
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Olympia Papakonstantinou
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Alexis Kelekis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kelekis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Filippiadis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bitzer M, Groß S, Albert J, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Caspari R, De Toni E, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Huppert P, Kautz A, Krug D, Fougère CL, Lang H, Lenz P, Lüdde T, Mahnken A, Nadalin S, Nguyen HHP, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Paprottka P, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plentz R, Pohl J, Recken H, Reimer P, Riemer J, Ritterbusch U, Roeb E, Rüssel J, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schlitt HJ, Schmid I, Schuler A, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stengel A, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Tholen R, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Vogel A, Vogl T, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wildner D, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie biliärer Karzinome – Langversion. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:e92-e156. [PMID: 37040776 DOI: 10.1055/a-2026-1240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bitzer
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Sabrina Groß
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Jörg Albert
- Katharinenhospital, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Stuttgart
| | | | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz
| | - Reiner Caspari
- Klinik Niederrhein Erkrankungen des Stoffwechsels der Verdauungsorgane und Tumorerkrankungen, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
| | | | | | | | - Andreas Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Martin Götz
- Medizinische Klinik IV - Gastroenterologie/Onkologie, Klinikverbund Südwest, Böblingen
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden
| | - Peter Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühlerhöhe
| | | | - David Krug
- Strahlentherapie Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
| | - Christian La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Hauke Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Philipp Lenz
- Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| | - Tom Lüdde
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | - Andreas Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschrirugie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | - Johann Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Karl Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek
| | - Philipp Paprottka
- Sektion für Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
| | - Philippe Pereira
- Zentrum für Radiologie, Minimal-invasive Therapien und Nuklearmedizin, SLK-Klinken Heilbronn
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - Ruben Plentz
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona
| | | | - Peter Reimer
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
| | | | | | - Elke Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II Pneumologie, Nephrologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
| | - Jörn Rüssel
- Medizinische Klinik IV Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
| | - Barbara Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I Gastroenterologie, Pneumologie und Endokrinologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Allgemeine Pathologie und pathologische Anatomie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | | | - Irene Schmid
- Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, LMU München
| | - Andreas Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Gastroenterologie, Alb-Fils-Kliniken, Geislingen an der Steige
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Marianne Sinn
- II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Knochenmarktransplantation mit Abteilung für Pneumologie), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Innere Medizin VI - Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | | | - Anne Taubert
- Klinische Sozialarbeit, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Bundesverband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik 1: Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Allergologie, Endokrinologie und Diabetologie sowie Ernährungsmedizin, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | | | - Arndt Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | - Frank Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | | | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Henning Wege
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Onkologie/Hämatologie, Gastroenterologie und Infektiologie, Klinikum Esslingen
| | - Dane Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Standort Lauf
| | - Marcus-Alexander Wörns
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie und Endokrinologie, Klinikum Dortmund
| | - Peter Galle
- 1. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Nephrologie, Rheumatologie, Infektiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Nisar Malek
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sheng R, Sun W, Huang X, Jin K, Gao S, Zeng M, Wu D, Shi G. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient MRI Shows Association With Early Progression of Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma With Combined Targeted-Immunotherapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 57:275-284. [PMID: 35488518 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICCs) are diagnosed at advanced stage with an extremely poor prognosis. For these patients, combining targeted therapies and immunotherapy may have a promising therapeutic effect, and current Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria have limited applicability. PURPOSE To investigate the associations between pretreatment MRI features and the efficacy of combined targeted-immunotherapy by estimating the risk of early progression (EP) in unresectable ICC, with special emphasis on diffusion-weighted imaging. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. SUBJECTS A total of 43 unresectable ICC patients (24 with EP [disease progression ≤12 months after treatment] and 19 with nonearly progression [NEP, disease progression >12 months]), who received first-line systemic therapy with lenvatinib plus PD1 antibody combination. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE The 0-T scanner, including T1- and T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced imaging. ASSESSMENT Clinical characteristics and MR imaging features including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), as well as survival analysis of EP were evaluated. STATISTICAL TESTS Features between EP and NEP groups were compared by univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Diagnostic performance was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were applied for survival analysis of EP. The progression-free survival (PFS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared by the log-rank test. The significance threshold was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS Tumor number, tumor margin, arterial peritumoral enhancement, lymphatic metastasis, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value were significantly different between EP and NEP groups. At multivariate logistic regression analysis, ADC was the only independent variable associated with EP (odds ratio = 0.012), with an area under the curve of 0.774 (optimal cutoff value was 1.028 × 10-3 mm2 /sec). Multivariate Cox regression model proved that ADC value (hazard ratio = 0.140) and ill-defined margin (hazard ratio = 2.784) were independent risk factors. ICCs with low ADC values showed shorter PFS than those with high values (χ2 = 9.368). DATA CONCLUSION Pretreatment MRI features were associated with EP for unresectable ICC treated with combined targeted-immunotherapy, and decreased ADC value was an independent variable. EVIDENCE LEVEL 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruofan Sheng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Radiology, Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Fujian, 361006, China
| | - Wei Sun
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoyong Huang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Kaipu Jin
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Shanshan Gao
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengsu Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Dong Wu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Guoming Shi
- Department of Liver Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen X, Chen X, Zhang C, Wang X, Yuan C, Yang H, Yang L. One case of iodine-125 therapy – A new minimally invasive treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Open Life Sci 2022; 17:1309-1314. [PMID: 36249528 PMCID: PMC9518658 DOI: 10.1515/biol-2022-0473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer associated with a poor prognosis. ICC accounts for about 10% of primary liver malignancies but with increasing incidence in recent years. Recently, some studies suggested that minimally interventional therapy can be used in the treatment of ICC. However, there are few references on interventional therapy for the clinical treatment of ICC. Herein we reported a case of a 48-year-old man who suffered from ICC. The patient was diagnosed with ICC by computerized tomography scan and pathological biopsy. The patient was completely cured by minimally interventional therapy with iodine-125 seed implantation. These results provide an important reference for the treatment option of ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinju Chen
- Department of Purchasing Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, No. 19, Renmin Road, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoqi Chen
- Department of Purchasing Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, No. 19, Renmin Road, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, P.R. China
| | - Chuanlei Zhang
- Department of Purchasing Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, No. 19, Renmin Road, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, P.R. China
| | - Xinting Wang
- Department of Purchasing Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, No. 19, Renmin Road, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, P.R. China
| | - Changwei Yuan
- Department of Purchasing Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, No. 19, Renmin Road, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, P.R. China
| | - He Yang
- Department of Purchasing Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, No. 19, Renmin Road, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, P.R. China
| | - Lixia Yang
- Department of Purchasing Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, No. 19, Renmin Road, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Martin RCG, Simo KA, Hansen P, Rocha F, Philips P, McMasters KM, Tatum CM, Kelly LR, Driscoll M, Sharma VR, Crocenzi TS, Scoggins CR. Drug-Eluting Bead, Irinotecan Therapy of Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (DELTIC) with Concomitant Systemic Gemcitabine and Cisplatin. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5462-5473. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11932-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
8
|
Bitzer M, Voesch S, Albert J, Bartenstein P, Bechstein W, Blödt S, Brunner T, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Follmann M, La Fougère C, Freudenberger P, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Hammes E, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Hofmann WP, Huppert P, Kautz A, Knötgen G, Körber J, Krug D, Lammert F, Lang H, Langer T, Lenz P, Mahnken A, Meining A, Micke O, Nadalin S, Nguyen HP, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Paprottka P, Paradies K, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plauth M, Plentz R, Pohl J, Riemer J, Reimer P, Ringwald J, Ritterbusch U, Roeb E, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schmid I, Schuler A, von Schweinitz D, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stein A, Stengel A, Steubesand N, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Tholen R, Vogel A, Vogl T, Vorwerk H, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wildner D, Wittekind C, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. S3-Leitlinie – Diagnostik und Therapie biliärer Karzinome. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:e186-e227. [PMID: 35148560 DOI: 10.1055/a-1589-7854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- M Bitzer
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - S Voesch
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - J Albert
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart
| | - P Bartenstein
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, LMU Klinikum, München
| | - W Bechstein
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Transplantations- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
| | - S Blödt
- AWMF-Geschäftsstelle, Berlin
| | - T Brunner
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg
| | - F Dombrowski
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
| | - M Evert
- Institut für Pathologie, Regensburg
| | - M Follmann
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, c/o Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V., Berlin
| | - C La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Tübingen
| | | | - A Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - E Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | | | - E Hammes
- Lebertransplantierte Deutschland e. V., Ansbach
| | - T Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal-invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen, München
| | - R T Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Dresden
| | - W P Hofmann
- Gastroenterologie am Bayerischen Platz, medizinisches Versorgungszentrum, Berlin
| | - P Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühl
| | - A Kautz
- Deutsche Leberhilfe e.V., Köln
| | - G Knötgen
- Konferenz onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege, Hamburg
| | - J Körber
- Klinik Nahetal, Fachklinik für onkologische Rehabilitation und Anschlussrehabilitation, Bad Kreuznach
| | - D Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel
| | | | - H Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
| | - T Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, c/o Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V., Berlin
| | - P Lenz
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Münster
| | - A Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Marburg
| | - A Meining
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II des Universitätsklinikums Würzburg
| | - O Micke
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld
| | - S Nadalin
- Universitätsklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | | | - J Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Bremen
| | - K Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Semmelweis Universität, Asklepios Campus Hamburg
| | - P Paprottka
- Abteilung für interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
| | - K Paradies
- Konferenz onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege, Hamburg
| | - P Pereira
- Abteilung für interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
| | - T Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | | | - R Plentz
- Klinikum Bremen-Nord, Innere Medizin, Bremen
| | - J Pohl
- Interventionelles Endoskopiezentrum und Schwerpunkt Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg
| | - J Riemer
- Lebertransplantierte Deutschland e. V., Bretzfeld
| | - P Reimer
- Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe gGmbH, Karlsruhe
| | - J Ringwald
- Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | | | - E Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Gießen
| | - B Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - P Schirmacher
- Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - I Schmid
- Zentrum Pädiatrische Hämatologie und Onkologie, Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, Klinikum der Universität München
| | - A Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Alb Fils Kliniken GmbH, Göppingen
| | | | - D Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - M Sinn
- Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - A Stein
- Hämatologisch-Onkologischen Praxis Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - A Stengel
- Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | | | - C Stoll
- Klinik Herzoghöhe Bayreuth, Bayreuth
| | - A Tannapfel
- Institut für Pathologie der Ruhr-Universität Bochum am Berufsgenossenschaftlichen Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Bochum
| | - A Taubert
- Kliniksozialdienst, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Bochum
| | - J Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main
| | | | - R Tholen
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie e. V., Köln
| | - A Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Endokrinologie der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
| | - T Vogl
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Frankfurt
| | - H Vorwerk
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Marburg
| | - F Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
| | - O Waidmann
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main
| | - H Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
| | - H Wege
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - D Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Lauf an der Pegnitz
| | - C Wittekind
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig
| | - M A Wörns
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Mainz, Mainz
| | - P Galle
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Mainz, Mainz
| | - N Malek
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wacker F, Dewald C. [Local and locoregional treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma]. Radiologe 2022; 62:247-252. [PMID: 34981129 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-021-00946-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE In the new edition of the German S3-guideline published in June 2021, the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and gallbladder carcinoma are addressed for the first time. This article discusses the local and locoregional treatment options for intrahepatic CCA (iCCA). STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS Mortality is high in iCCA and the incidence is rising. In unresectable patients, treatment options include local and locoregional approaches. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS Besides recommendations regarding surgery, biliary drainage, intraductal locoregional therapy and radiation therapy, two recommendations regarding interventional radiologic therapies are included in the updated S3-guideline. Percutaneous thermal ablation via radiofrequency or microwave ablation (RFA/MWA) is suggested for unresectable tumors with up to 3 cm in diameter as primary therapy and for recurrent tumors. In advanced, liver dominant iCCA, intra-arterial therapies such as transarterial radioembolization (TARE), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) are recommended as single therapy or in combination with other therapies. ACHIEVEMENTS Due to a lack of randomized controlled studies, the efficacy of locoregional therapies in iCCA is challenging to assess; however, various cohort studies, meta-analyses and review articles confirm their efficiency. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS Interventional radiological therapies alone or in combination with systemic therapies have the potential to improve the prognosis of patients with iCCA. Due to the various therapeutic options, patients with iCCA should be treated in centers which cover the entire therapeutic spectrum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Wacker
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
| | - Cornelia Dewald
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fabritius MP, Ben Khaled N, Kunz WG, Ricke J, Seidensticker M. Image-Guided Local Treatment for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-Role of Interventional Radiology. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10235574. [PMID: 34884275 PMCID: PMC8658286 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a highly aggressive malignancy with an increasing incidence in recent years. Prognosis is poor and most patients are not eligible for resection at the time of initial diagnosis due to the anatomic location, inadequate hepatic reserve, limiting comorbidities or metastatic disease. Several locoregional therapies from the field of interventional radiology exist for patients who are not amenable for surgery, or in case of local recurrence as a single treatment modality or combined with systemic treatment. To date, evidence is limited, with most conclusions drawn from single-center studies with small patient cohorts, often treated in the salvage situation or for local recurrence after initial resection. Nevertheless, the results are promising and suggest a survival benefit in selected patients. This narrative review focuses on the use of different locoregional treatment options for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias P. Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (J.R.)
- Correspondence: (M.P.F); (M.S.)
| | - Najib Ben Khaled
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany;
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G. Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (J.R.)
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (J.R.)
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (J.R.)
- Correspondence: (M.P.F); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mukund A, V Srinivasan S, Rana S, Vijayaraghavan R, Patidar Y, Arora V, Jindal A, Choudhury A, Shasthry SM, Sarin SK. Response evaluation of locoregional therapies in combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma versus hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matched study. Clin Radiol 2021; 77:121-129. [PMID: 34789395 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the response of locoregional therapy (LRT) on combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) and compare their outcomes with propensity matched hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2011 to July 2020, 13 patients with cHCC-CC (11 men, two women, median age 56 years) and 15 IHC patients (10 men, five women, median age 60 years) were compared with 101 HCC patients (79 men, 22 women, median age 60 years) after LRT. All tumours were proven histologically. Among the 13 cHCC-CC patients, 11 received transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), one received microwave ablation (MWA) and one received TACE with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Of 15 IHC patients, eight received TACE, five received RFA, and one received MWA, and one received TACE with RFA. Propensity score matching (PSM) was done with conditional logistic regression adjusted for age, type of LRT, tumour specific features and Child-Pugh score. RESULTS After LRT, on univariate analysis an objective response was seen in 30% of cHCC-CC and 53% of IHC patients. PSM analysis demonstrated shorter progression-free survival (PFS; cHCC-CC versus HCC: 1.5 versus 7.5 months; IHC versus HCC: 6 versus 14 months, p<0.05), overall survival (OS; cHCC-CC versus HCC: 12 versus 28 months; IHC versus HCC: 18 versus 34 months, p<0.005), and poor objective response (cHCC-CC versus HCC: 25% versus 91%; IHC versus HCC: 58% versus 88%, p<0.05) in cHCC-CC and IHC patients versus HCC patients. Hypovascular tumour, macrovascular invasion, and infiltrative appearance were independent prognostic factors for OS in IHC patients. CONCLUSION cHCC-CC and IHC are aggressive tumours with a poor objective response, greater distant progression of the disease and shorter PFS and OS post LRT as compared to HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mukund
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
| | - S V Srinivasan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - S Rana
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - R Vijayaraghavan
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Y Patidar
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - V Arora
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - A Jindal
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - A Choudhury
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - S M Shasthry
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - S K Sarin
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ben Khaled N, Jacob S, Rössler D, Bösch F, De Toni EN, Werner J, Ricke J, Mayerle J, Seidensticker M, Schulz C, Fabritius MP. Current State of Multidisciplinary Treatment in Cholangiocarcinoma. Dig Dis 2021; 40:581-595. [PMID: 34695826 DOI: 10.1159/000520346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly aggressive malignancy, and its incidence seems to be increasing over the last years. Given the high rate of irresectability at the time of initial diagnosis, new treatment approaches are important to achieve better patient outcomes. Our review provides an overview of current multimodal therapy options across different specialties of gastroenterology/oncology, surgery, and interventional radiology. SUMMARY CCA is subdivided into clinically and molecularly distinct phenotypes. Surgical treatment currently is the only potentially curative therapy, but unfortunately, the majority of all patients are not eligible for resection at the time of initial diagnosis due to anatomic location, inadequate hepatic reserve, metastatic disease, or limiting comorbidities. However, multimodal treatment options are available to prolong survival, relieve symptoms, and maintain life quality. KEY MESSAGES The treatment of CCA is complex and requires close interdisciplinary collaboration and individualized treatment planning to ensure optimal patient care at specialized centers. Molecular profiling of patients and inclusion into clinical trials is highly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najib Ben Khaled
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Jacob
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation-Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Rössler
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Bösch
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation-Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Enrico N De Toni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation-Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schulz
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rohan T, Andrasina T, Juza T, Matkulcik P, Červinka D, Svobodova I, Novotná V, Bernard V, Valek V, Goldberg SN. Experimental model of occluded biliary metal stent recanalization using irreversible electroporation via a tubular catheter. Int J Hyperthermia 2021; 38:393-401. [PMID: 33682581 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1875061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate the feasibility of irreversible electroporation (IRE) for treating biliary metal stent occlusion in an experimental liver model. METHODS AND MATERIALS IRE was performed using an expandable tubular IRE-catheter placed in nitinol stents in the porcine liver. A 3-electrode IRE-catheter was connected to an IRE-generator and one hundred 100μs pulses of constant voltage (300, 650, 1000, and 1300 V) were applied. Stent occlusion was simulated by insertion of liver tissue both ex vivo (n = 94) and in vivo in 3 pigs (n = 14). Three scenarios of the relationship between the stent, electrodes, and inserted tissue (double contact, single contact, and stent mesh contact) were studied. Electric current was measured and resistance and power calculated. Pigs were sacrificed 72 h post-procedure. Harvested samples (14 experimental, 13 controls) underwent histopathological analysis. RESULTS IRE application was feasible at 300 and 650 V for the single and double contact setup in both ex vivo and in vivo studies. Significant differences in calculated resistance between double contact and single contact settings were observed (ex-vivo p ˂ 0.0001, in-vivo p = 0.02; Mann-Whitney). A mild temperature increase of the surrounding liver parenchyma was noted with increasing voltage (0.9-5.9 °C for 300-1000 V). The extent of necrotic changes in experimental samples in vivo correlated with the measured electric current (r2 = 0.39, p = 0.01). No complications were observed during or after the in-vivo procedure. CONCLUSION Endoluminal IRE using an expandable tubular catheter in simulated metal stent occlusion is feasible. The relationship of active catheter electrodes to stent ingrowth tissue can be estimated based on resistance values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Rohan
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - T Andrasina
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - T Juza
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - P Matkulcik
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - D Červinka
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Department of Power Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - I Svobodova
- Department of Pathology, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - V Novotná
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Department of Power Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - V Bernard
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biophysics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - V Valek
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Seidensticker M, Schütte K, Seidensticker R, Mühlmann M, Schulz C. Multi-modal and sequential treatment of liver cancer and its impact on the gastrointestinal tract. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 48-49:101709. [PMID: 33317790 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Hepatic tumors include hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC), a small subgroup of tumors (approx. 1%) are classified as combined hepatocellularcholangiocellular carcinomas. Different stage-dependent therapeutic approaches comprise resection, local ablative techniques, locoregional therapies, systemic treatment, liver transplantation in selected cases and possible combination of these treatment modalities. This review summarizes current knowledge on multi-modal treatment strategies for liver cancer focusing on gastrointestinal side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Seidensticker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
| | - Kerstin Schütte
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken, Marienhospital, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Ricarda Seidensticker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc Mühlmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schulz
- Medical Department II, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ameli S, Shaghaghi M, Kamel IR, Zaheer A. Therapy Response Imaging in Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Malignancies. MEDICAL RADIOLOGY 2020:117-137. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-31171-1_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
|
16
|
Hernandez MC, Bergquist JR, Leiting JL, Ivanics T, Yang L, Smoot RL, Nagorney DM, Truty MJ. Patient-Derived Xenografts Can Be Reliably Generated from Patient Clinical Biopsy Specimens. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:818-824. [PMID: 30756315 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04109-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) are clinically relevant human cancer models that can be used to guide individualized medicine. We aimed to generate PDX models from clinically obtained biopsy specimens (surgical or image-guided) hypothesizing that low volume biopsy specimens could provide sufficient viable tissue to successfully engraft PDX models from patients with unresectable or metastatic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS We maintain a prospective high volume gastrointestinal malignancy PDX program. With informed consent and institutional approval, biopsy specimens (surgical or image-guided) were obtained from patients with unresectable or metastatic tumors: pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), cholangiocarcinoma, gastric and gallbladder carcinoma. Biopsies were implanted into immunodeficient mice. Tumor growth was monitored, viable tumor was passed into subsequent generations, and histopathology was confirmed. RESULTS In this study, biopsy specimens from 29 patients were used for PDX engraftment. Successful PDX engraftment was variable with highest engraftment rates in gastric and gallbladder carcinoma specimens (100%) compared to engraftment rates of 33% and 29% in PDAC and cholangiocarcinoma respectively. PDX models created from metastasis biopsies compared to unresectable primary tumor tissue demonstrated higher engraftment rates (69% versus 15.4%, p = 0.001). PDX models demonstrated higher engraftment rates when biopsies were obtained during surgical operations (n = 15) compared to image-guided (n = 14) (73% versus 14%, p = 0.003). Patient age, pretreatment status, or ischemic time was not different between biopsy methods. CONCLUSIONS PDX models can be successfully created from clinical biopsy specimens in patients with metastatic or unresectable GI cancers. The use of clinical biopsy specimens for PDX engraftment can expand the repertoire of stage-specific PDX models for downstream basic/translational research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew C Hernandez
- Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Division of Subspecialty General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - John R Bergquist
- Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Division of Subspecialty General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Jennifer L Leiting
- Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Division of Subspecialty General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Tommy Ivanics
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Lin Yang
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rory L Smoot
- Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Division of Subspecialty General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - David M Nagorney
- Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Division of Subspecialty General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Mark J Truty
- Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Division of Subspecialty General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schoenberg SO, Attenberger UI, Solomon SB, Weissleder R. Developing a Roadmap for Interventional Oncology. Oncologist 2018; 23:1162-1170. [PMID: 29959284 PMCID: PMC6263130 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Interventional oncology uses image-guided procedures to enhance cancer care. Today, this specialty plays an increasingly critical role in cancer diagnosis (e.g., biopsy), cancer therapy (e.g., ablation or embolization), and cancer symptom palliation (e.g., nephrostomies or biliary drainages). Although the number of procedures and technical capabilities has improved over the last few years, challenges remain. In this article we discuss the need to advance existing procedures, develop new ones, and focus on several operational aspects that will dictate future interventional techniques to enhance cancer care, particularly by accelerating drug development and improving patient outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Interventional oncology is vital for cancer diagnosis, therapy, and symptom palliation. This report focuses on current interventional procedures and techniques with a look toward future improvements that will improve cancer care and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan O Schoenberg
- Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ulrike I Attenberger
- Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stephen B Solomon
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Ralph Weissleder
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pandey A, Pandey P, Aliyari Ghasabeh M, Najmi Varzaneh F, Shao N, Khoshpouri P, Zarghampour M, Fouladi DF, Liddell R, Kamel IR. Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Multiparametric MR Imaging to Predict Patient Survival. Radiology 2018; 288:109-117. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018171593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ankur Pandey
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Room 143, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Pallavi Pandey
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Room 143, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Room 143, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Farnaz Najmi Varzaneh
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Room 143, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Nannan Shao
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Room 143, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Pegah Khoshpouri
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Room 143, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Manijeh Zarghampour
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Room 143, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Daniel Fadaei Fouladi
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Room 143, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Robert Liddell
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Room 143, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Ihab R. Kamel
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Room 143, Baltimore, MD 21287
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Currie BM, Soulen MC. Decision Making: Intra-arterial Therapies for Cholangiocarcinoma-TACE and TARE. Semin Intervent Radiol 2017; 34:92-100. [PMID: 28579676 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1602591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has been increasing in recent years and now represents the second most common primary hepatic cancer in the United States. The prognosis is dismal without surgical resection. In patients ineligible to receive curative treatments, locoregional therapies represent a diverse array of techniques that can stabilize or reverse tumor progression to improve overall survival and reduce tumor-related symptoms. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) have been demonstrated to be efficacious methods for this patient population. Deciding between these two options is challenging. This article reviews the differences in patient selection, preprocedural evaluation, financial considerations and availability, quality of life, and rates of complications and overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Currie
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael C Soulen
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Savic LJ, Chapiro J, Geschwind JFH. Intra-arterial embolotherapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: update and future prospects. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2017; 6:7-21. [PMID: 28261591 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2016.11.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare disease and carries a poor prognosis with surgery remaining the only curative treatment option. However, due to the late presentation of symptoms and close proximity of the tumors to central hepatic structures, only about 30% of patients are classified eligible to resection. As for palliative approaches, ICC constitutes a possible indication for loco-regional therapies (LRT). As such, intra-arterial therapies (IAT) are reported to be feasible, safe and effective in inducing tumor response in unresectable ICC. The paradigm of IAT is premised on the selective delivery of embolic, chemotherapeutic agents to the tumor via its feeding arteries, thus allowing dose escalation within the carcinoma and reduction of systemic toxicity. Conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (cTACE) so far remains the most commonly used IAT modality. However, drug-eluting beads (DEB)-TACE was initiated with the idea of more selective targeting of the tumor owing to the combined embolizing as well as drug-eluting properties of the microspheres used in this setting. Moreover, radioembolization is performed by intra-arterial administration of very small spheres containing β-emitting yttrium-90 (Y90-RE) to the site of the tumor. Clinical evidence exists in support of survival benefits for IAT in the palliative treatment of ICC compared to surgery and systemic chemotherapy. As for combination regimens, cTACE, DEB-TACE and Y90-RE are reported to achieve conversion of patients to surgery in a sequential treatment planning and simultaneous IAT combinations may provide a therapeutic option for treatment escalation. Regarding the current status of literature, controlled randomized prospective trials to compare different IAT techniques and combination therapies as well as treatment recommendations for different IAT modalities are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Jeanette Savic
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA; ; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Universitätsmedizin Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julius Chapiro
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA; ; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Universitätsmedizin Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is the second most primary liver malignancy with increasing incidence in Western countries. Currently, surgical R0 resection is regarded as the only potentially curative treatment. The results of systemic chemotherapy and best supportive care (BSC) in patients with metastatic disease are often disappointing in regard to toxicity, oncologic efficacy, and overall survival. In current practice, the use of different locoregional therapies is increasingly more accepted. METHODS A review of the literature on locoregional therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) was undertaken. RESULTS There are no prospective randomized controlled trials. For localized ICC, either primary or recurrent, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is by far the most commonly used thermal ablation modality. Thereby, a systematic review and meta-analysis reports major complication in 3.8% as well as 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of 82, 47, and 24%, respectively. In selected patients (e.g. with a tumor diameter of ≤3 cm), oncologic efficacy and survival after RFA are comparable with surgical resection. For diffuse ICC, different transarterial therapies, either chemotherapy-based (hepatic artery infusion (HAI), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)) or radiotherapy-based (transarterial radioembolization (TARE)), show extremely promising results. With regard to controlled trials (transarterial therapy versus systemic chemotherapy, BSC or no treatment), tumor control is virtually always better for transarterial therapies and very often accompanied by a dramatic survival benefit and improvement of quality of life. Of note, the latter is the case not only for patients without extrahepatic metastatic disease but also for those with liver-dominant extrahepatic metastatic disease. There are other locoregional therapies such as microwave ablation, irreversible electroporation, and chemosaturation; however, the current data support their use only in controlled trials or as last-line therapy. CONCLUSION Dedicated locoregional therapies are commonly used for primary and recurrent ICC as well as liver-only and liver-dominant extrahepatic metastatic disease. Currently, the best evidence and most promising results are available for RFA, HAI, TACE, and TARE. In cohort studies, the overall survival rates are similar to those obtained with surgery or systemic therapies. Prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to compare safety and efficacy between different surgical, interventional, and systemic therapies, as well as their combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christof M Sommer
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heilbronn, Germany; Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Hans U Kauczor
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Philippe L Pereira
- Clinic for Radiology, Minimally Invasive Therapies and Nuclear Medicine, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn GmbH, Heilbronn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Channual S, Pahwa A, Lu DS, Raman SS. Enhancements in hepatobiliary imaging: the spectrum of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid usages in hepatobiliary magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016; 41:1825-41. [PMID: 27225503 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0767-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) is a unique hepatocyte-specific contrast agent approved for clinical use in the United States in 2008. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR has shown to improve detection and characterization of hepatic lesions. Gd-EOB-DTPA is now being routinely used in daily clinical practice worldwide. Therefore, it is important for radiologists to be familiar with the potential uses and pitfalls of Gd-EOB-DTPA, which extends beyond the assessment of focal hepatic lesions. The purpose of this article is to review the various usages of Gd-EOB-DTPA in hepatobiliary MR imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Channual
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 757 Westwood Plaza Rm 1921H, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
| | - Anokh Pahwa
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 14445 Olive View Drive, Sylmar, CA, 91342, USA
| | - David S Lu
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 757 Westwood Plaza Rm 1921H, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Steven S Raman
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 757 Westwood Plaza Rm 1921H, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|