Biomechanical Comparison of Pedicle Screw Augmented with Different Volumes of Polymethylmethacrylate in Osteoporotic and Severely Osteoporotic Synthetic Bone Blocks in Primary Implantation: An Experimental Study

Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw fixation strength in synthetic bones: Effects of screw shape, core/thread profile and cement augmentation

Pedicle screw loosening resulting from insufficient bone-screw interfacial holding power is not uncommon. The screw shape and thread profile are considered important factors of the screw fixation strength. This work investigated the difference in pullout strength between conical and cylindrical screws with three different thread designs. The effects of the thread profiles on the screw fixation strength of cannulated screws with or without cement augmentation in osteoporotic bone were also evaluated. Commercially available artificial standard L4 vertebrae and low-density polyurethane foam blocks were used as substitutes for healthy vertebrae and osteoporotic bones, respectively. The screw pullout strengths of nine screw systems were investigated (six in each). These systems included the combination of three different screw shapes (solid/cylindrical, solid/conical and cannulated/cylindrical) with three different thread profiles (fine-thread, coarse-thread and dual-core/dual-thread). Solid screws were designed for the cementless screw fixation of vertebrae using the standard samples, whereas cannulated screws were designed for the cemented screw fixation of osteoporotic bone using low-density test blocks. Following specimen preparation, a screw pullout test was conducted using a material test machine, and the maximal screw pullout strength was compared among the groups. This study demonstrated that, in healthy vertebrae, both the conical and dual-core/dual-thread designs can improve pullout strength. A combination of the conical and dual-core/dual-thread designs may achieve optimal postoperative screw stability. However, in osteoporotic bone, the thread profile have little impact on the screw fixation strength when pedicle screws are fixed with cement augmentation. Cement augmentation is the most important factor contributing to screw pullout fixation strength as compared to screw designs.

[Biomechanical study of a newly-designed Y type pedicle screw in osteoporotic synthetic bone]

Objective

To evaluate the biomechanical stability of a newly-designed Y type pedicle screw (YPS) in osteoporotic synthetic bone.

Methods

The osteoporotic synthetic bone were randomly divided into 3 groups ( n=20). A pilot hole, 3.0 mm in diameter and 30.0 mm in deep, was prepared in these bones with the same method. The YPS, expansive pedicle screw (EPS), and bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw (CICPS) were inserted into these synthetic bone through the pilot hole prepared. X-ray film examination was performed after 12 hours; the biomechanical stability of YPS, EPS, and CICPS groups was tested by the universal testing machine (E10000). The test items included the maximum axial pullout force, the maximum running torque, and the maximum periodical anti-bending.

Results

X-ray examination showed that in YPS group, the main screw and the core pin were wrapped around the polyurethane material, the core pin was formed from the lower 1/3 of the main screw and formed an angle of 15° with the main screw, and the lowest point of the inserted middle core pin was positioned at the same level with the main screw; in EPS group, the tip of EPS expanded markedly and formed a claw-like structure; in CICPS group, the bone cement was mainly distributed in the front of the screw and was dispersed in the trabecular bone to form a stable screw-bone cement-trabecular complex. The maximum axial pullout force of YPS, EPS, and CICPS groups was (98.43±8.26), (77.41±11.41), and (186.43±23.23) N, respectively; the maximum running torque was (1.42±0.33), (0.96±0.37), and (2.27±0.39) N/m, respectively; and the maximum periodical anti-bending was (67.49±3.02), (66.03±2.88), and (143.48±4.73) N, respectively. The above indexes in CICPS group were significantly higher than those in YPS group and EPS group ( P<0.05); the maximum axial pullout force and the maximum running torque in YPS group were significantly higher than those in EPS group ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the maximum periodical anti-bending between YPS group and EPS group ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with EPS, YPS can effectively enhance the maximum axial pullout force and maximum rotation force in the module, which provides a new idea for the design of screws and the choice of different fixation methods under the condition of osteoporosis.