Sexual (Dys)function after Urethroplasty

Outcomes of transecting versus non-transecting urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess outcomes of transecting vs non-transecting urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture in terms of stricture recurrence rate, sexual dysfunction, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) related to lower urinary tract (LUT) function.

METHODS

Electronic literature searches were conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Embase databases. The studied population was limited to men with bulbar urethral stricture included in studies that compared outcomes after transecting and non-transecting urethroplasty. The main outcome appraised was the stricture recurrence rate. Additionally, the incidence of sexual dysfunction appraised in three domains (erectile function, penile complications, and ejaculatory function) and PROMs related to LUT function after transecting vs non-transecting urethroplasty were assessed. The pooled risk ratio (RR) respectively for stricture recurrence, erectile dysfunction and penile complications was calculated using a fixed-effect model with inverse variance method.

RESULTS

In all, 694 studies were screened with 72 identified as relevant. Finally, 19 studies were suitable for analysis. The pooled difference between the transecting and non-transecting groups relating to stricture recurrence was not significant. Overall, the RR was 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-1.36) and the 95% CI crossed the line of no effect (line RR = 1). Overall, the RR for erectile dysfunction was 0.73 (95% CI 0.49-1.08) and the 95% CI crossed the line of no effect (line RR = 1). Overall, the RR for penile complications was 0.47 (95% CI 0.28-0.76) and the 95% CI did not cross the line of no effect (line RR = 1). Hence, the risk of penile complications was significantly lower in the non-transecting group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis of available evidence indicates that both transecting and non-transecting urethroplasties, are equal in terms of the recurrence rate. On the other hand, non-transecting techniques are better in terms of sexual function, causing less penile complications.

Urethral Injuries: Diagnostic and Management Strategies for Critical Care and Trauma Clinicians

Urologic trauma is a well-known cause of urethral injury with a range of management recommendations. Retrograde urethrogram remains the preferred initial diagnostic modality to evaluate a suspected urethral injury. The management thereafter varies based on mechanism of injury. Iatrogenic urethral injury is often caused by traumatic catheterization and is best managed by an attempted catheterization performed by an experienced clinician or suprapubic catheter to maximize urinary drainage. Penetrating trauma, most commonly associated with gunshot wounds, can cause either an anterior and/or posterior urethral injury and is best treated with early operative repair. Blunt trauma, most commonly associated with straddle injuries and pelvic fractures, can be treated with either early primary endoscopic realignment or delayed urethroplasty after suprapubic cystostomy. With any of the above injury patterns and treatment options, a well thought out and regimented follow-up with a urologist is of utmost importance for accurate assessment of outcomes and appropriate management of complications.

Erectile and Ejaculatory Dysfunction After Urethroplasty

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The goal of this paper was to evaluate the impact on erectile and ejaculatory function after anterior and posterior urethroplasty.

RECENT FINDINGS

With a rise in the use of urethroplasty, its impact on sexual function has come into question. For anterior urethroplasties, some degree of erectile dysfunction is common, but this tends to be transient, with most patients having a resolution of any de novo dysfunction by 12 months. Patients with posterior urethral strictures have a very high rate of erectile dysfunction prior to surgery and may show improvement after urethroplasty. Ejaculatory function tends to improve in patients due to alleviation of obstruction while some patients notice degradation in force of ejaculation. While urethroplasty has a minimal permanent effect on sexual function for most patients, there are some patients who notice improvement and others worsening. Patients should be counseled on these risks prior to urethroplasty.

One-year follow-up after urethroplasty, with the focus on both lower urinary tract and erectile function

Background: Urethral stricture disease (USD) represents a complex urological problem. Urethroplasty is considered the gold standard for the treatment of USD. Most available studies report outcome data obtained from retrograde urethrography and uroflowmetry. Only a limited number of papers describe the effect of urethroplasty on erectile function and their results are inconsistent. The goal of this prospective study was to evaluate the effect of urethroplasty on both lower urinary tract and erectile function using objective parameters and standardized patient-reported outcome measurement tools.Materials and Methods: A total of 55 consecutive patients with USD were enrolled into the study. Patients underwent ventral onlay urethroplasty, urethroplasty according to the Asopa technique, dorsal onlay urethroplasty, cutaneous flap urethroplasty using the Orandi technique or anastomotic repair. All patients were evaluated using uroflowmetry, urethrography, the PROM-USS questionnaire and the International Index of Erectile Function-5 questionnaire (IIEF-5) pre-operatively and consequently post-op, in 3-month intervals. This study presents the comparison of baseline pre-op parameters and parameters 12 months after the surgery using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, Wilcoxon rank sum test and the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance.Results: A significant improvement in uroflowmetry parameters, all domains of the PROM-USS questionnaire, as well as the overall score of the IIEF-5 was observed. No statistically significant differences between sub-groups were found when comparing treatment results in patients with short versus long strictures and patients with penile urethra stricture versus bulbar or membranous urethra stricture.Conclusions: Urethroplasty yielded very good functional results with respect to both lower urinary tract and erectile functions.