Hemodynamic Response to Upper Airway Obstruction in Hypertensive and Normotensive Pregnant Women

Validation of self-applied unattended polysomnography using Somte V2 PSG (Somte) for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in pregnant women in early to mid-gestation

PURPOSE

Polysomnography (PSG) may be completed in the home environment (unattended), and when self-applied, allow the collection of data with minimal healthcare worker intervention. Self-applied, unattended PSG in the home environment using Somte PSG V2 (Somte) has not been validated in pregnant women in early to mid-gestation. We undertook a study to evaluate the accuracy of Somte compared to attended PSG. The agreement between apnoea hypopnea index (AHI) and respiratory disturbance index (RDI) scores in Somte and PSG in early to mid-gestation were assessed.

METHODS

Pregnant women (≤ 24 weeks gestation) were scheduled for PSG and Somte within a 7-day window, in any order. Somte were self-applied and completed in the home. Somte were scored blinded to PSG result. AHI was the primary outcome of interest, though an AHI ≥ 5 or RDI ≥ 5 on PSG was considered diagnostic of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA). AHI, RDI, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) was calculated and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were produced. Bland-Altman plots were used to determine agreement. Technical issues occurring during tests were explored.

RESULTS

Twenty-four participants successfully completed both tests between March 2021 and January 2023. PSG were completed at around 14.1 weeks' gestation (IQR 13.4, 15.7). The time interval between Somte and PSG was a median of 4 days (IQR 2, 7 (range 1-12)). Five (20.8%) women had OSA on PSG at AHI ≥ 5 and 10 (41.6%) women had OSA on PSG at RDI ≥ 5. Somte and PSG did not differ in the measurement of AHI ((1.8, 1.6, p = 0.09) or RDI (3.3, 3.5), p = 0.73). At AHI ≥ 5, diagnostic test accuracy (area under the ROC curve) of Somte was 0.94, sensitivity 80.0%, specificity 94.7%, PPV and NPV were 80.0% and 94.7% respectively. At RDI ≥ 5, diagnostic test accuracy (area under the ROC curve) was 0.95, sensitivity 60.0%, specificity 93.0% and PPV and NPV were 85.7% and 76.4% respectively. The confidence limits of Bland-Altman plots were 6.37 to - 8.89 at cut off AHI ≥ 5 and 8.89 to - 10.43 at cut off RDI ≥ 5. Somte failed to start in four tests. Technical issues were reported in both Somte (n = 13, 54.2%) and PSG (n = 6, 25.0%).

CONCLUSION

Self-applied, unattended Somte may provide an acceptable substitute to attended PSG in the identification of OSA in pregnant women in early to mid-gestation in this small sample but may fail to detect cases of OSA, particularly when using RDI as the diagnostic marker.

Common sleep disorders in pregnancy: a review

In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of common sleep disorders during pregnancy, including their characterization, prevalence, risk factors, and possible contribution to maternal and fetal outcomes. We conducted a quasi-systematic literature search of the MEDLINE database and identified 744 studies from 1991 through 2021, inclusive, that met our inclusion criteria. We synthesized the existing literature on sleep disorders during pregnancy and highlighted controversies, research gaps, and needed clinical developments. Our review covers a range of sleep disorders, including insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, restless legs syndrome, and circadian rhythm disorders. We discuss the prevalence of these disorders in pregnancy and their potential impact on maternal and fetal health outcomes. We also explore the relationship between sleep disorders, pre-pregnancy comorbidities such as obesity, and pregnancy-related conditions such as gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia. In addition to summarizing the existing literature on sleep disorders during pregnancy, we also highlight opportunities for further research in this area. We suggest that future studies should strive to employ validated and objective measurement tools for sleep disorders and prioritize utilization of longitudinal methods with participant follow-up through postpartum, mid-life, menopause, and beyond. We also put forward investigation into the impact of circadian rhythm disruption on reproductive physiology and early pregnancy outcomes as an area of important work. Overall, our review provides valuable insights on sleep and reproduction and into common sleep disorders during pregnancy and their potential impact on maternal and fetal health outcomes.

Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in high risk pregnancy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) during pregnancy is a risk factor for preeclampsia possibly through a link to placental physiology. This study evaluates the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on the modulation of blood pressure and the reduction in preeclampsia in women with high-risk pregnancy and OSA.

METHODS

A multicenter open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing CPAP treatment versus usual antenatal care was conducted in three academic hospitals in Bangkok, Thailand. Participants included singleton pregnant women aged older than 18 years with any high-risk condition (i.e., chronic hypertension, obesity, history of preeclampsia or gestational diabetes in the previous pregnancy, or diabetes), and OSA (respiratory disturbance index 5-29.99 events/hour by polysomnography), who presented either in the first trimester (gestational age, GA 0-16 weeks) or subsequently developed OSA during the 2nd trimester (GA 24-28 weeks). The primary endpoint was blood pressure during antenatal care. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of preeclampsia. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed with additional per-protocol and counterfactual analyses for handling of nonadherence.

RESULTS

Of 340 participants, 96.5% were recruited during the first trimester. Thirty participants were later excluded leaving 153 and 157 participants in the CPAP and usual-care groups for the modified-intention-to-treat analysis. CPAP adherence rate was 32.7% with average use of 2.5 h/night. Overall, CPAP treatment significantly lowered diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by - 2.2 mmHg [95% CI (- 3.9, - 0.4), p = 0.014], representing approximately - 0.5 mmHg per hour of CPAP use [95%CI (- 0.89, - 0.10), p = 0.013]. CPAP treatment also altered the blood pressure trajectory by continuously lowering DBP throughout pregnancy with mean differences (95% CI) of - 3.09 (- 5.34, - 0.93), - 3.49 (- 5.67, - 1.31) and - 3.03 (- 5.20, - 0.85) mmHg at GA 18-20, 24-28, and 32-34 weeks, respectively compared to 0-16 weeks. Preeclampsia rate was 13.1% (20/153 participants) in the CPAP and 22.3% (35/157 participants) in the usual-care group with a risk difference (95% CI) of - 9% (- 18%, - 1%, p-value = 0.032) and a number-needed-to-treat (95% CI) of 11 (1, 21).

CONCLUSIONS

CPAP treatment in women with even mild-to-moderate OSA and high-risk pregnancy demonstrated reductions in both DBP and the incidence of preeclampsia. CPAP treatment also demonstrated a sustained reduction in DBP throughout gestation. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.GovNCT03356106, retrospectively registered November 29, 2017.

Sleep Disturbance in Pregnancy

Sleep is vital to life, even when women enter into pregnancy state. Good sleep is important for a healthy pregnancy. Sleep disturbances are common during pregnancy and can be due to the change of pregnancy itself or the results of sleep disorders. There is growing evidence linking sleep disturbances with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Differentiation of sleep disorders in order to provide appropriate treatment as well as promoting good sleep for pregnant women is important. A multidisciplinary team to provide sleep care during antenatal period may be needed.

Polysomnographic features of pregnancy: A systematic review

Symptoms of sleep disturbances are common among pregnant women and generally worsen across gestation. Pregnancy-related sleep disorders are not only associated with a poor quality of life of the affected mothers, but also with adverse perinatal outcomes, including perinatal depression, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and preterm birth. The current knowledge about the impact of sleep disorders during pregnancy largely derives from the results of sleep surveys conducted in various populations. However, the number of studies examining changes in objective sleep variables during pregnancy via polysomnography has progressively increased in recent years. Here we systematically reviewed the polysomnographic studies available in the literature with the aim to describe the sleep pattern and to identify possible markers of sleep disruption in pregnant women. Based on our analysis, subjective worsening of sleep quality across gestation is related to objective changes in sleep macrostructure, which become particularly evident in the third trimester. Pregnancy per se does not represent an independent risk factor for developing major polysomnography-assessed sleep disorders in otherwise healthy women. However, in women presenting predisposing factors, such as obesity or hypertension, physiological changes occurring during pregnancy may contribute to the onset of pathological conditions, especially sleep-disordered breathing, which must be carefully considered.