Thrombotic Microangiopathy Secondary to Intravenous Abuse of Opana® ER

Relative potency of intravenous oxymorphone compared to other µ opioid agonists in humans - pilot study outcomes

AIMS

Intravenous (IV) misuse of the µ opioid analgesic oxymorphone has caused significant public health harms; however, no controlled data on its IV abuse potential are available. The primary aims of this pilot study were to directly compare IV oxymorphone to IV oxycodone, morphine, and hydromorphone on a subjective measure of drug liking and to assess relative potency.

METHODS

Participants (n = 6) with opioid use disorder, physical dependence, and current IV use completed this two-site, within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, inpatient pilot study. During each session, one IV dose (mg/70 kg) was administered: oxymorphone (1.8, 3.2, 5.6, 10, 18, 32), hydromorphone (1.8, 3.2, 5.6, 10, 18), oxycodone (18, 32, 56), morphine (18, 32), and placebo. Data were collected before and for 6 h after dosing. Primary outcomes included safety/physiological effects, subjective reports of drug liking, and relative potency estimates.

RESULTS

All active test drugs produced prototypical, dose-related µ opioid agonist effects (e.g., miosis). Oxymorphone was more potent than the comparator opioids on several measures, including drug liking and respiratory depression (p < 0.05). Across abuse-related subjective outcomes, oxymorphone was 2.3-2.8-fold more potent than hydromorphone and 12.5-14-fold more potent than oxycodone (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the relatively small sample size, this pilot study detected robust oxymorphone effects. Oxymorphone was far more potent than the comparator opioids, particularly on abuse potential outcomes. Overall, these findings may help explain surveillance reports that demonstrate, after adjusting for prescription availability, oxymorphone is injected at the highest frequency, relative to other prescription opioids.

Polyethylene Oxide Molecular Size Determines the Severity of Atypical Thrombotic Microangiopathy in a Guinea Pig Model of Acute Intravenous Exposure

In 2017, Opana ER was voluntarily removed from the U.S. market based on concerns that its risks outweighed its therapeutic benefits. The data that supported this conclusion were based on postmarketing evaluation that demonstrated increased intravenous abuse associated outbreaks of HIV, hepatitis C, and uniquely, a thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP)-like syndrome. In 2017, the cause was mechanistically linked to intravenous exposure of the high-molecular weight polyethylene oxide (PEO), an excipient component of the drug product. However, it was unknown how differing PEO preparations might alter this response in vivo. Knowing the likelihood of a PEO driven atypical thrombotic microangiopathy with hemolytic uremic syndrome (TMA-HUS), this study was specifically designed with the primary objective focused on understanding the impact of PEO molecular weight on TMA-HUS in a guinea pig model of acute repeat PEO (1, 4, and 7 MDa) dosing. Results from this analysis suggest that repeated dosing with PEO 4 and 7 MDa, but not 1 MDa induced a marked intravascular hemolysis with schistocytes, mild anemia, thrombocytopenia, hemoglobinuria, and kidney injury, consistent with observations of a TMA-HUS-like syndrome. Nonetheless, observations of tissue microthrombi, complement or altered von Willebrand factor involvement were not observed, which would be consistent with a definitive TMA. Further, only 7 MDa PEO dosing was associated with marked renal hypoxia. Taken together, this study defines renal injury risk with PEO formulations >1 MDa that is driven by a robust intravascular hemolysis and potentially, tissue hypoxia.