Vakula MN, Garcia SA, Holmes SC, Pamukoff DN. Association between quadriceps function, joint kinetics, and spatiotemporal gait parameters in young adults with and without obesity.
Gait Posture 2022;
92:421-427. [PMID:
34973582 DOI:
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.12.019]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Individuals with obesity have impaired gait and muscle function that may contribute to reduced mobility and increased fall risk.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
(1) what is the difference in spatiotemporal gait parameters and joint kinetics between individuals with and without obesity; (2) what is the association between spatiotemporal gait parameters, joint kinetics, and quadriceps function?
METHODS
Forty-eight young adults with obesity (BMI = 33.0 ± 4.1 kg/m2) and 48 without obesity (BMI = 21.6 ± 1.7 kg/m2) completed assessments of quadriceps function (peak torque and early/late rate of torque development (RTD)) and walking biomechanics at self-selected speed. Spatiotemporal gait parameters (stance time, double support time, double support to stance ratio, step width, step length, cadence, and gait stability ratio (GSR)) and joint kinetics (total support moment, and relative contribution from extensor moments) were compared using one-way MANOVAs. Partial correlation examined the association between the total support moment and quadriceps function, and spatiotemporal gait parameters controlling for sex and speed.
RESULTS
Individuals with obesity walked with longer stance (p = 0.01), longer double-limb support (p < 0.001), wider steps (p < 0.001), lower cadence (p = 0.03), and a greater absolute (p < 0.001) but lesser normalized total support moment (p = 0.03) compared with adults without obesity. In those with obesity, greater PT was associated with less double limb support (p = 0.011) and smaller double support to stance ratio (p = 0.006); greater early RTD was associated with less double limb support (r = -0.455, p = 0.0021), less stance time (r = -0.384, p = 0.008), and a smaller double support to stance ratio (r = -0.371, p = 0.011). In those without obesity, a larger total support moment was associated with longer step length (r = 0.512, p < 0.001), lesser cadence (r = -0.497, p < 0.001), and smaller GSR (-0.460, p = 0.001).
SIGNIFICANCE
Individuals with obesity walk with altered spatiotemporal gait parameters and joint kinetics that may compromise stability. Extended periods of support may be a strategy used by individuals with obesity to increase stability during gait and accomodate insufficient quadriceps function.
Collapse