Digital Lengthening to Treat Finger Deficiency: An Experience of 201 Digits in 104 Patients

Role of microsurgical techniques combined with Ilizarov techniques in limb salvage and functional reconstruction of thermal‑crush injuries of the hand: A case report

The Ilizarov technology was proposed by Former Soviet orthopedic physician Ilizarov. It is a medical method to reconstruct missing tissues. Ilizarov technology combined with soft tissue stretching technology is of great significance in the treatment of common orthopedic problems like bone defects, finger absence, joint contracture and joint stiffness following thermal-crush injuries of the hand. In the present study a 25-year-old male patient sought for limb salvage treatment 1 month after sustaining thermal-crush injuries of the right hand and forearm. The patient had been treated by another hospital with multiple procedures of debridement, and recommended for forearm amputation. The patient was diagnosed with: i) Postoperative infection of thermal-crush injuries of the right hand and right forearm; ii) comminuted open fractures of the proximal and distal phalanges of the right thumb; iii) osteomyelitis; iv) palm skin defects with exposed tendons; and v) skin defects of the opisthenar and the forearm. After a series of treatments including debridement, removal of necrotic tissue, tissue transplantation, skin pedicle, bone lengthening, external shaping, tissue release, joint fusion, traction and rehabilitation exercises, the patient recovered some hand function. Overall, thermal-crush injuries of the hand are severe, complicated combined injuries composed of both heat burn and compression injury and their treatment is challenging. Overall, microsurgery combined with Ilizarov technology can effectively reconstruct the function of complex thermal-crush injuries of the hand.

Distraction Lengthening of the Apert Thumb

BACKGROUND

The thumbs of patients with Apert syndrome are characteristically short and radially deviated, contributing to functional hand impairment. The authors report a two-staged technique for distraction lengthening of the Apert thumb using a robust cohort of pediatric patients.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed medical records of pediatric patients with Apert syndrome who underwent thumb distraction lengthening between 1999 and 2019. The technique was two-staged: (1) application of uniplanar distractor and phalangeal osteotomy, followed by (2) distractor removal, bone grafting, and fixation. Clinical records, preoperative and postoperative radiographs, and photographs were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (41 thumbs) with Apert syndrome were identified and treated (mean age at initial distraction, 11.5 years). A mean distraction gap of 31.3 mm was achieved over a median time of 40.0 days. The mean healing index was 26.3 days per centimeter. The thumbnail complex was lengthened a median length of 3.0 mm. The median follow-up time was 5.0 years, with complications occurring in 36.4 percent (eight out of 22) of patients. A delayed bone union occurred in one patient, and rotational malunion occurred in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Although long-term outcomes data are needed, thumb distraction lengthening following syndactyly release in patients with Apert syndrome is safe and should be considered to augment the overall appearance and functionality of the hand.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

A Review of Hand Feminization and Masculinization Techniques in Gender Affirming Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Anatomical characteristics that are incongruent with an individual's gender identity can cause significant gender dysphoria. Hands exhibit prominent dimorphic sexual features, but despite their visibility, there are limited studies examining gender affirming procedures for the hands. This review is intended to cover the anatomical features that define masculine and feminine hands, the surgical and non-surgical approaches for feminization and masculinization of the hand, and to adapt established aesthetic hand techniques for gender affirming care.

METHODS

The authors performed a comprehensive database search of PubMed, Embase OVID and SCOPUS to identify articles on the characterization of masculine or feminine hands, hand treatments related to gender affirmation, and articles related to techniques for hand masculinization and feminization in the non-transgender population.

RESULTS

From 656 possibly relevant articles, 42 met the inclusion criteria for the current literature search. There is currently no medical literature specifically exploring the surgical or non-surgical options for hand gender affirmation. The available techniques for gender affirming procedures discussed in this paper are appropriated from those more commonly used for hand rejuvenation.

CONCLUSION

There is a dearth of literature addressing the options for transgender individuals seeking gender affirming procedures of the hand. Though established procedures used for hand rejuvenation may be utilized in gender affirming care, further study is required to determine relative salience of various hand features to gender dysphoria in transgender patients of various identities, as well as development of novel techniques to meet these needs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. .

Limb lengthening history, evolution, complications and current concepts

Limb lengthening continues to be a real challenge to both the patient and the orthopaedic surgeon. Although it is not a difficult operative problem, there is a long and exhausting postoperative commitment which can jeopardize early good results. I aim to review the history, evolution, biology, complications and current concepts of limb lengthening. Ilizarov's innovative procedure using distraction histeogenesis is the mainstay of all newly developing methods of treatment. The method of fixation is evolving rapidly from unilateral external fixator to ring fixator, computer assisted and finally lengthening intramedullary nails. The newly manufactured nails avoid many of the drawbacks of external fixation but they have their own complications. In general, the indications for limb lengthening are controversial. The indications have been extended from lower limb length inequality to upper extremity lengthening, including humeral, forearm and phalangeal lengthening. A wide range in frequency of complications is recorded in the English literature, which may reach up to 100% of cases treated. With developing experience, cosmetic lengthening has become possible using external or internal lengthening devices with an acceptable rate of problems.Level of evidence: V.