Prevalence and Clinical Profile of Drug Eruptions among Antiretroviral Therapy-Exposed HIV Infected People in Yaoundé, Cameroon

Immune-Mediated Adverse Drug Reactions (IM-ARDs) in the Form of Drug-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions (CARD) Due to Clindamycin in an Human Immunodeficieny Virus (HIV) Patient

BACKGROUND Many drugs have been reported to cause immune-mediated adverse drug reactions (IM-ADRs) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients; the most common is cutaneous adverse drug reaction (CADR). Immune thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP) is frequent in HIV patients, and it can be caused HIV, opportunistic infections, or drugs. Although drugs can cause immune thrombocytopenia, termed drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia (DIIT), there has been no study on DIIT in HIV patients. CASE REPORT A 33-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital with pruritic skin lesion over the entire body, which started 7 days before. He was diagnosed with HIV infection, brain toxoplasmosis, and pulmonary tuberculosis 2 weeks before admission, and was given trimethoprim sulphamethoxazole, isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. Clindamycin was added 10 days before admission. Skin examination revealed generalized erythematous macules with palpable petechiae and purpura. The platelet count was 141 000/µL when he was diagnosed with HIV, and it was 2000/µL at the time of admission. Clindamycin was discontinued and he was given steroids and platelet transfusion. The skin lesions improved along with an increased platelet count. He was discharged on the 10th day of admission, with platelet count of 42 000/µL. When he returned to the outpatient clinic on the 15th day, his platelet was 54 000/µL. The skin lesions had resolved completely and become hyperpigmented, and no purpura or petechiae were seen. CONCLUSIONS We present a case of an HIV patient with IM-ADR in the form of DIIT in conjunction with CADR that might have been caused by clindamycin.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions among people living with human immunodeficiency virus in a tertiary care hospital in Johor, Malaysia

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADRs) among people living with HIV (PLWH) are common. Data on drug eruptions among PLWH in Malaysia are limited. Thus, our study aimed to determine the clinical patterns of cADRs among PLWH and the risk factors associated with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among PLWH who developed cADRs presenting to our dermatology clinic from June 2020 to December 2020. The Naranjo scale was used for drug causality assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 78 PLWH were recruited with a male-to-female ratio of 12:1. The maculopapular eruption was the commonest type of cADRs (75.6%), followed by drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) (15.4%). SCAR is defined as a potentially life-threatening, immunologically mediated, drug-induced disease, accounting for 17.9% of the cases. Most of the patients were on antiretroviral therapy (ART) (85.9%), with efavirenz + tenofovir/emtricitabine being the most common combination (80.6%). Efavirenz (51.3%) was the main culprit drug implicated, followed by trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (23.1%) and nevirapine (11.5%). CD4 T-cell count <100 cells/μL (p = 0.006) was the independent risk factor for SCAR. Most cases had probable causal relationships with the culprit drugs (84.6%) and were not preventable (93.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The commonest cADR seen in PLWH was maculopapular eruption, while efavirenz, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and nevirapine were the three main implicated drugs. Most of the cases had probable drug causality and were not preventable. PLWH with CD4 count <100 cells/μL were particularly at risk of developing SCAR. Overall, this study showed that immune suppression and polypharmacy as a consequence of opportunistic infection prophylaxis are important factors contributing to the increased risk of ADRs among PLWH.

Loss of tolerance 5 days after discontinuing sulphonamide introduced via desensitization in delayed reaction

The fixed drug eruption is a non-immediate hypersensitivity reaction to drug, characterized by recurrent erythematous or violaceous, rounded, well-defined border plaques, which always appear in the same location every time the culprit drug is administered. The usual practice is to avoid the drug involved and to use a structurally different drug. However, there are situations in which there is no safe and effective therapy. In such situations, desensitization is the only option. We describe the case of a patient who presented fixed eruption due to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, who underwent successful desensitization, but required a repeat procedure twice due to relapse after inadvertent full-dose reintroduction. In non-immediate hypersensitivity reaction to drug, the indication is controversial and there is no technical standardization. Furthermore, the time at which such tolerance is lost after discontinuing the drug involved is unknown. In severe non-immediate reactions of types II and III, desensitization is contraindicated. The patient underwent desensitisation to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim three times − the first with recurrence of lesions and the second and third without manifestations, all concluded successfully and with no premedication.

Drug hypersensitivity in HIV infection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune-mediated adverse drug reactions (IM-ADRs) are many times more common in HIV-infected patients. Usual offending drugs include antiretroviral and antiinfectives, but the burden of specific drug IM-ADRs is population-specific; changing as new and fixed dose combinations enter the market, and drug-resistance patterns demand. This review considers recent literature on epidemiology, mechanisms, clinical management and prevention of IM-ADRs amongst persons living with HIV/AIDS.

RECENT FINDINGS

Epidemiological studies continue to describe high rates of delayed hypersensitivity to known offenders, as well as similar reactions in preexposure prophylaxis. IM-ADRs to oral and injectable integrase strand transfer inhibitors are reported with expanding use. The clinical spectrum and management of IM-ADRs occurring in HIV-infected populations is similar to uninfected; with exceptions such as a recently described severe delayed efavirenz DILI with high mortality. Furthermore, the context can be unique, such as the lower than expected mortality in a Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) cohort from a HIV/TB high burden setting. Programmatic data showing the near complete elimination of Abacavir drug hypersensitivity syndrome following implementation of HLA-B57:01 screening is a stellar example of how prevention is possible with mechanistic insight.

SUMMARY

IM-ADRs remain a challenge in persons living with HIV. The complexities posed by polypharmacy, overlapping drug toxicities, drug interactions, overlap of IM-ADRs with other diseases, limited alternative drugs, and vulnerable patients with advanced immunosuppression with high mortality, necessitate increased use of drug provocation testing, treat-through and desensitization strategies. There is an urgent need for improved diagnostics and predictive biomarkers for prevention, or to guide treat-through, rechallenge and desensitization approaches.