PAX8 Distinguishes Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Mimicking Sarcoma

Immunohistochemistry Markers in Ovarian and Fallopian Tube Neoplasms: a Comprehensive Review

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has emerged as a crucial tool in diagnosing and managing ovarian cancer, offering invaluable insights into tumor biology and guiding therapeutic decisions. The intricate histopathological landscape of ovarian cancer presents challenges in accurate diagnosis and classification. IHC offers a complementary approach, aiding in the characterization of tumor subtypes, prognostication, and prediction of treatment response. By targeting specific biomarkers, IHC enables the identification of diverse histological features and molecular alterations associated with ovarian malignancies. The integration of IHC into routine diagnostic workflows enhances diagnostic accuracy, aids in the subclassification of ovarian tumors, and facilitates personalized treatment strategies. Emphasis is placed on the judicious selection of antibody panels tailored to specific clinical scenarios, ensuring optimal utilization of resources and minimizing diagnostic pitfalls. Overall, this review underscores the pivotal role of IHC in refining the diagnosis, prognostication, and management of ovarian cancer, highlighting its significance in the era of precision medicine. By leveraging the molecular insights provided by IHC, clinicians and pathologists can optimize patient care and improve outcomes in ovarian cancer management.

Case report: Ureteric bud intestinal-type adenocarcinoma involving the cervix was misdiagnosed as a large cervical fibroid

Background

Malignant tumors of the ureteric bud are not common, and cervical involvement is even rarer. So far, there have been no such cases in the literature.

Case summary

A 50-year-old woman developed intermittent light bleeding in the past 7 months and lower abdominal pain in the past 2 months. The human papillomavirus 16 (HPV) DNA, P16 chemical staining, thinPrep cytology test (TCT), and cervical and cervical canal tissue biopsy were all negative. Pelvic color Doppler ultrasound exhibited incomplete mediastinal uterus and heterogeneous echo from the cervical canal to the posterior wall of the cervix. Pelvic contrast-enhanced CT showed left cervical mass, left retroperitoneal mass, absence of the left kidney, and mediastinal uterus. An increase in human epididymal protein 4 (HE4) (133.6 pmol/L) was detected, while other tumor markers were at normal levels. Based on these examination results, a diagnosis of "cervical fibroids, left retroperitoneal mass, incomplete mediastinal uterus, left kidney deficiency"[SIC] was conducted, and expanded hysterectomy, right adnexectomy, and left retroperitoneal mass resection were performed. Through intraoperative rapid pathological diagnosis, postoperative pathological diagnosis combined with the re-evaluation of laboratory, and imaging and intraoperative examination results, the patient was diagnosed with ureteric bud intestinal-type adenocarcinoma involving the cervix. The patient has been tracked and followed up for approximately 11 months. She underwent six courses of chemotherapy. At present, the medication has been discontinued for 4 months, and there is no recurrence, metastasis, or deterioration of the tumor.

Conclusion

For large masses of the cervix, it is feasible for the operation to be performed, improving the prognosis. There were a few limitations. A preoperative aspiration biopsy of masses was not performed to differentiate benign from malignant. Preoperative urography was not performed to clarify the function of the malformed urinary system structure. Partial cystectomy should be performed simultaneously with the resection of the ureteric bud for intestinal-type adenocarcinoma. In this case, a partial cystectomy was not performed, which can only be compensated with postoperative chemotherapy. Moreover, this patient did not undergo genetic screening, and it is currently unclear whether there are any genetic mutations associated with ureteric bud intestinal adenocarcinoma.

The Differential Diagnosis of Medullary-Based Renal Masses

CONTEXT.—

Renal malignancies can be divided into cortical- and medullary-based tumors, the latter of which classically infiltrate the renal parenchyma by extending between nonneoplastic structures. Although high-grade cortical tumors can rarely exhibit the same growth pattern, the infiltrative morphology should elicit a differential diagnosis to be considered in each case. However, these diagnoses can be challenging to distinguish, especially on small renal biopsy samples.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide an overview of the clinical, gross, and microscopic findings; genetic and molecular alterations; and immunohistochemical evaluation of medullary-based renal tumors and other tumor types with overlapping morphologies and growth patterns.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and personal observations were used to compile the information in this review.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Collecting duct carcinoma is a prototypical medullary-based tumor, and although diagnostic criteria exist, it remains a diagnosis of exclusion, especially with ancillary techniques aiding the recognition of established as well as more recently described neoplasms. Other medullary-based malignancies included in the differential diagnosis include renal medullary carcinoma/renal cell carcinoma unclassified with medullary phenotype, fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma, and upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Moreover, other rare entities should be excluded, including metastatic carcinoma, lymphoma, and melanoma. In addition to potential prognostic differences, accurate diagnoses can have important surgical and clinical management implications.