Use of 4-Fr versus 6-Fr Nasobiliary Catheter for Biliary Drainage: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study

Efficacy of a novel integrated biliary stent and nasobiliary catheter system for accidental tube deviation in biliary drainage

Background and study aims Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage is accompanied by a risk of accidental removal of the nasobiliary drainage (NBD) tube, especially through self-removal in elderly patients. We studied the usefulness of an integrated biliary stent and nasobiliary catheter system (UMIDAS NB stent) for biliary drainage in case of accidental NBD tube removal. Patients and methods From April to November 2022, we placed a UMIDAS NB stent in 30 patients with acute cholangitis or obstructive jaundice. We evaluated the plastic stent (PS) position at the time of accidental stent removal and before the planned endoscopic procedure. In addition, we studied the ratio of successful biliary drainage and complications based on the usage of UMIDAS. Results All 11 patients with accidental stent removal exhibited correct PS position in X-ray fluoroscopy. Of the 19 patients with planned NBD tube removal, three had complete PS migration into the common bile duct and three had incomplete migration (the duodenal side flap entered the bile duct). In summary, 80% (24/30) of PS were in the correct position, and all patients had successful biliary drainage and no complications. Conclusions The UMIDAS NB stent might be useful for biliary drainage in patients with a high risk of NBD tube self-removal.

The modified pancreatic stent system for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a case-control study

Background

Prophylactic pancreatic stents after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can help prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. However most of the pancreatic stents need to be removed by another ERCP. The aim of this observational study was to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of the modified pancreatic stent system for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Methods

From November 2013 to November 2015, a total of 230 patients who had prophylactic pancreatic stent placed for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis at a single institution were identified and stratified. In this case-control design, 150 patients received an ordinary pancreatic stent, and 80 patients received the modified pancreatic stent. The main outcome measures were the difficulty level and complications of pancreatic stent placement and extraction between the two groups.

Results

In ordinary group, the average time of pancreatic stent and nasal biliary drainage placement was 3.5 ± 0.6 min. There were 13 cases of stent proximal migration (8.7%), 20 cases of stent spontaneous abscission (13.3%), 5 cases of acute pancreatitis (3.3%) (2 cases for stent abscission) and 7 cases of hyperamylasemia (4.7%) after ERCP. One hundred thirty patients received extra duodenoscope (86.7%) to remove the stent, and 4 cases had acute pancreatitis and 5 patients had hyperamylasemia after removing the proximal migratory stents. In modified group, the average time of pancreatic stent system placement was 4.9 ± 0.7 min, but there was only one case of stent abscission (1.3%), 2 cases of acute pancreatitis (2.5%) and 3 cases of hyperamylasemia (3.8%). The new pancreatic stents were removed directly under x-ray without complication.

Conclusions

The modified pancreatic stent system has the same effect of preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis, lower rate of stents proximal migration and spontaneous abscission, and the advantage of easier removed compared with ordinary pancreatic stent.