Are Systematic Screening for Vitamin D Deficiency and Vitamin D Supplementation Currently Feasible for Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients?

Autoimmune inflammatory myopathy biomarkers

The autoimmune inflammatory myopathy disease spectrum, commonly known as myositis, is a group of systemic diseases that mainly affect the muscles, skin and lungs. Biomarker assessment helps in understanding disease mechanisms, allowing for the implementation of precise strategies in the classification, diagnosis, and management of these diseases. This review examines the pathogenic mechanisms and highlights current data on blood and tissue biomarkers of autoimmune inflammatory myopathies.

Ankylosing spondylitis disease activity and serum vitamin D levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To prove that serum vitamin D (VD) levels are strongly associated with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) disease activity, the association between serum VD levels and key monitoring indicators of AS disease activity has been analyzed, such as the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP).

METHODS

Studies published in PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure by August 30, 2022 were searched, and 6 studies finally met the selection criteria. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), ESR, CRP levels, and correlation coefficients between serum VD and BASDAI, ESR, CRP in AS, and control in these studies were extracted for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

When compared to controls, patients with AS had considerably lower blood 25(OH)D levels (MD = -7.53 ng/mL, 95% CI, -9.78 to -5.28, P < .001) and significantly higher ESR and CRP levels (ESR: MD = 11.75 mm/h, 95% CI, 4.20 to 19.31, P = .002; CRP: MD = 15.36 mg/L, 95% CI, 4.95 to 25.77, P = .004). Additionally, a negative correlation was discovered between serum VD levels and BASDAI, ESR, and CRP (Fisher' Z = -0.34, -0.38, -0.35, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The findings of our meta-analysis demonstrated a negative correlation between serum VD levels and the main monitoring indices of disease activity in patients with AS and verified that the differences in the continent and ethnicity may be one of the major contributors to this finding.

Calcium physiology, metabolism and supplementation: a glance at patients with ankylosing spondylitis

The aim of this review is to describe the metabolism of calcium in ankylosing spondylitis compared to physiologic conditions, and to present the current evidence on the benefits and disadvantages of calcium supplementation in these patients. A narrative review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed database and a total of 65 articles were selected. Calcium is involved in many physiopathological processes, including inflammation, bone loss and bone formation, all of which occur in ankylosing spondylitis. Many ankylosing spondylitis patients suffer from concomitant osteopenia or osteoporosis, which represent indications for calcium supplementation. Conversely, there are still concerns about the use of calcium salts for the prevention of bone fragility in non-osteoporotic or non-osteopenic patients. In these cases, biologic agents may indirectly normalize calcium dysmetabolism by rebalancing the cytokine milieu, in turn associated with bone remodeling. Calcium supplements may be disadvantageous for entheseal calcifications, but so far there are no clear data confirming that such an association exists.

A retrospective study of alendronate for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis

This retrospective study assessed the effect of alendronate for treating patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).Eighty-six patients with AS were included in this retrospective study, and were divided into 2 groups. Forty-six patients in the intervention group received alendronate plus vitamin D (400 mg/day) and calcium (500 mg/day), while 40 patients in the control group received vitamin D and calcium only, the same dose as the intervention group. The primary outcome included bone densitometry. The secondary outcomes consisted of quality of life, measured by Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) questionnaire, disease activity, measured by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and functional status, measured by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), as well as the adverse events (AEs).At the end of 6-month treatment, patients in the intervention group were not superior to the patients in the control group in bone densitometry (hip, P = .47; lumbar, P = .53), quality of life (P = .32), disease activity (P = .39), and functional status (P = .41). Moreover, no significant differences in AEs were found between 2 groups.The results of the present study showed that alendronate can neither be used to treat bone loss, nor to enhance the quality of life, disease activity, and functional status.