Unusual Case of Osseointegrated Dental Implant Migration into Maxillary Sinus Removed 12 Years after Insertion

The Endoscopic Removal of a Detached Dental Implant Cap in the Maxillary Sinus During the Waiting Period: A Case Report

Displacement of dental implants into the maxillary sinus is one of the common dental complications. However, it is rare that dental implants cause the displacement of multiple components due to separation. Here, we describe an unusual case of a 43-year-old man who had a missing implant in the maxillary sinus after an implant procedure. There was a two-week waiting period before we performed the removal during which the cap had unexpectedly separated from the body and freely moved into the ostium by sinus activity. The body was independently extracted intraorally. The remaining cap was secondly removed by utilizing nasal endoscopy. There were no complications in the postoperative period and the patient reported no symptoms of sinusitis after two months of follow-up. We experience unexpected events in the course of treating a displaced implant into the maxillary sinus. Our case report may provide several learning points for the removal of a missing implant.

Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of mandibular bone tissue regeneration

The purpose of the study was to perform an immunohistochemical and histological evaluation of samples taken from different bone regeneration procedures in atrophic human mandible. 30 patients (15 men and 15 women, age range of 35–60 years), non-smokers, with good general and oral health were recruited in this study and divided into three groups. The first group included patients who were treated with blood Concentration Growth Factors (bCGF), the second group included patients who were treated with a mixture of bCGF and autologous bone, while the third group of patients was treated with bCGF and tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite (TCP-HA). Six months after the regenerative procedures, all patients undergone implant surgery, and a bone biopsy was carried out in the site of implant insertion. Each sample was histologically and immunohistochemically examined. Histological evaluation showed a complete bone formation for group II, partial ossification for group I, and moderate ossification for group III. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the three groups, and the best clinical result was obtained with a mixture of bCGF and autologous bone.