HE4 Serum Levels in Patients with BRCA1 Gene Mutation Undergoing Prophylactic Surgery as well as in Other Benign and Malignant Gynecological Diseases

The Effect of Prophylactic Adnexectomy on the Quality of Life and Psychosocial Functioning of Women with the BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutations

The main purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) on the quality of life (QoL) and psychosocial functioning of patients with the BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. This survey-based study was conducted using the Blatt-Kupperman Index, the Women’s Health Questionnaire, the Perceived Stress Scale, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Beck Depression Inventory-II, and the authors’ questionnaire. All calculations were done using Statistica 13.3. The QoL after RRSO was statistically significantly lower in most domains compared with the state before surgery. The greatest decline in the QoL was observed in the vasomotor symptoms domain (d = 0.953) and the smallest in the memory/concentration domain (d = 0.167). We observed a statistically significant decrease in the level of anxiety as a state (d = 0.381), as well as a statistically significant increase in the severity of climacteric symptoms (d = 0.315) and depressive symptoms (d = 0.125). Prophylactic surgeries of the reproductive organs have a negative effect on the QoL and psychosocial functioning of women with the BRCA1/2 mutations, as they increase the severity of depressive and climacteric symptoms. At the same time, these surgeries reduce anxiety as a state, which may be associated with the elimination of cancerophobia.

Usefulness of HE4 protein in differentiation of pelvic masses in woman

Introduction

HE4 protein (human epididymis protein-4), which is the fourth subfraction of human epithelial protein, is a glycoprotein widely used as a tumor marker in ovarian cancer. If was first discovered in the epididymal epithelium and recognized as a protease inhibitor contributing to sperm maturation. The plasma HE4 concentration may also be increased in gynecological pathologies other than ovarian cancer.

Material and methods

The study was conducted between 2016 and 2017 among patients hospitalized in the Academic Department of Gynaecology. A total of 191 women were examined. Depending on the type of pathology which was the reason for hospitalization, 4 groups of patients were identified in the study. The first of these included 30 patients with ovarian cancer, the second 33 patients with benign ovarian lesion, the third 50 patients with endometrial cancer, and the fourth 28 patients with leiomyomas.

Results

The highest concentration of HE4 protein was found in women with ovarian cancer, and it was statistically significantly higher compared to all other groups. Lower HE4 protein concentration than in women with ovarian cancer was reported in women with endometrial cancer, but it was statistically significantly higher compared to patients with uterine fibroids.

Conclusions

This marker may have significant clinical value in the differentiation of benign ovarian pathology from ovarian cancer. The study confirms the validity of using HE4 results in the assessment of potential malignancy of ovarian and endometrial lesions.

Comprehensive analysis of serum tumor markers and BRCA1/2 germline mutations in Chinese ovarian cancer patients

Background

The serum tumor markers has been widely used in ovarian cancer diagnosis. BRCA1/2 germline mutations are the most common predisposing factors for ovarian cancer development. This study aimed to comprehensively investigate serum tumor markers and BRCA1/2 germline mutations and analyze their associations with ovarian cancer.

Methods

Levels of 11 serum tumor markers were examined in ovarian cancer patients and controls with benign gynecologic diseases. By integrating multiplex PCR and next‐generation sequencing technologies, BRCA1/2 germline mutations were analyzed and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The discriminative models with serum tumor markers and BRCA1/2 mutation status were constructed for ovarian cancer detection and patient stratification.

Results

Among 11 markers, six of them were significantly elevated and only beta‐human chorionic gonadotropin (β‐HCG) was significantly reduced in ovarian cancer patients. A total of 54 (23.3%) ovarian cancer patients were found to harbor BRCA1/2 deleterious mutations, and BRCA1/2 mutations were significantly associated with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer‐related tumors and family history of cancer. Carbohydrate antigen 125 showed a good performance in ovarian cancer detection as a single marker (AUC = 0.799), while a panel of eight markers showed a good performance in BRCA1 mutation detection with an AUC value of 0.974. In addition, a panel of five serum tumor markers combined with BRCA1/2 mutation status showed a good performance in lymph node metastasis prediction (AUC = 0.843).

Conclusions

We found the association between BRCA1/2 germline mutation status and serum tumor marker levels, and identified discriminative models that combined serum tumor markers with BRCA1/2 mutation status for ovarian cancer detection and patient stratification.

Does the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm Provide Better Diagnostic Performance Than HE4 and CA125 in the Presurgical Differentiation of Adnexal Tumors in Polish Women?

Aim

This study compared the diagnostic performance of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) and HE4 and CA125 for the presurgical differentiation of adnexal tumors.

Material and Methods

This prospective study included 302 patients admitted for surgical treatment due to adnexal tumors. The ROMA was calculated depending on CA125, HE4, and menopausal status.

Results

Fifty patients were diagnosed with malignant disease. In the differentiation of malignant from nonmalignant adnexal tumors, the area under curve (AUC) was higher for ROMA and HE4 than that for CA125 in both the premenopausal and postmenopausal subgroups. In the differentiation of stage I FIGO malignancies and epithelial ovarian cancer from nonmalignant pathologies, the AUC of HE4 and ROMA was higher than that of CA125. The ROMA performed significantly better than CA125 in the differentiation of all malignancies and differentiation of stage I FIGO malignancies from nonmalignant pathologies (p = 0.043 and p = 0.025, resp.). There were no significant differences between the ROMA and the tumor markers for any other variants.

Conclusions

The ROMA is more useful than CA125 for the differentiation of malignant (including stage I FIGO) from nonmalignant adnexal tumors. It is also as useful as HE4 and CA125 for the differentiation of epithelial ovarian cancer from nonmalignant adnexal tumors.

Determination of the Reference Values of the Tumor Marker HE4 in Female Population of Canton Sarajevo

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate of all gynecological tumors and represent fifth leading cause of cancer death in women, due to the absence of early symptoms of the disease and the lack of screening tests. A new HE4 ovarian cancer biomarker was found in various studies, with different populations having quite different sensitivity and specificity values as well as reference values. The tumor marker HE4 is a useful marker for ovarian cancer detection with only minimal expression in normal ovarian tissue. HE4 is particularly promising as a marker for early detection, showing its potential in differentiating women with ovarian cancer than those with benign (nonmalignant) ovarian conditions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Samples were taken in serum gel tubes, centrifuged and stored until analysis. A total of 300 respondents was included, of whom 188 were premenopausal women and 112 postmenopausal women. Respondents were divided into two groups by age: women aged 50-75 years and Control group of women aged 20-50 years. The HE4 assay was performed by the Immunological Test (ECLIA) for the quantitative determination of HE4 in human serum or plasma. Solid phase test, two-step reaction using immune 2HP and 3HD8 monoclonal antibodies ("sandwich principle").

RESULTS

Tumor markers HE4 analysis by groups indicate that in the postmenopausal group there was 92 (82.14%) of subjects with normal tumor markers HE4 and 170 (90.43%) in the premenopausal group. The elevated values of HE4 tumor markers in the postmenopausal group were in 20 (17.86%) cases and in the premenopausal group 18 (9.57%). Statistical analysis (nonparametric method) established the upper limit of the reference value of HE4 tumor markers in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

CONCLUSION

The established reference value for the women population in Canton Sarajevo for premenopausal women is <78.6 pmol/l, and for postmenopausal women <122.5 pmol/l. We found that the values of HE4 tumor markers differ significantly in premenopausal and postmenopausal women (p=0.0391). Postmenopausal women have a higher incidence of high-value tumor markers HE4. By comparison of the reference interval of the tumor marker HE4 for the population of women from Canton Sarajevo, determined by our research, with a reference interval for the German and Asian populations, we found a significant difference between the upper limit of the reference value in postmenopausal women (p<0.05), while in premenopausal women the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.4314).

Diagnostic markers for the detection of ovarian cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers

Background

Screening for ovarian cancer (OC) in women at high risk consists of a combination of carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and transvaginal ultrasound, despite their low sensitivity and specificity. This could be improved by the combination of several biomarkers, which has been shown in average risk patients but has not been investigated until now in female BRCA mutation carriers.

Methods

Using a multiplex, bead-based, immunoassay system, we analyzed the concentrations of leptin, prolactin, osteopontin, insulin-like growth factor II, macrophage inhibitory factor, CA125 and human epididymis antigen 4 in 26 healthy wild type women, 26 healthy BRCA1 mutation carriers, 28 wildtype OC patients and 26 OC patients with BRCA1 mutation.

Results

Using the ROC analysis, we found a high overall sensitivity of 94.3% in differentiating healthy controls from OC patients with comparable results in the wildtype subgroup (sensitivity 92.8%, AUC = 0.988; p = 5.2e-14) as well as in BRCA1 mutation carriers (sensitivity 95.2%, AUC = 0.978; p = 1.7e-15) at an overall specificity of 92.3%.

The used algorithm also allowed to identify healthy BRCA1 mutation carriers when compared to healthy wildtype women (sensitivity 88.4%, specificity 80.7%, AUC = 0.895; p = 6e-08), while this was less pronounced in patients with OC (sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 67.8%, AUC = 0.724; p = 0.00065).

Conclusion

We have developed an algorithm, which can differentiate between healthy women and OC patients and have for the first time shown, that such an algorithm can also be used in BRCA mutation carriers. To clarify a suggested benefit to the existing early detection program, large prospective trials with mainly early stage OC cases are warranted.