Comparison of Efficacy and Ocular Surface Disease Index Score between Bimatoprost, Latanoprost, Travoprost, and Tafluprost in Glaucoma Patients

Ocular surface disease: a known yet overlooked side effect of topical glaucoma therapy

Ocular surface disease (OSD), a disorder affecting the lacrimal and meibomian glands and the corneal and conjunctival epithelium, is a well-known complication of topical glaucoma therapy. OSD can present as a new or pre-existing condition that virtually any anti-glaucoma formulation can exacerbate. As such, both glaucoma and OSD frequently coexist. Typical OSD symptoms include ocular discomfort, redness, burning, and dryness, whereas signs include periorbital and eyelid skin pigmentation, conjunctival scarring, and superficial punctate keratitis. Pressure-lowering eyedrops can cause toxic, allergic, and inflammatory reactions on the ocular surface. The latter can result from either preservatives or direct toxicity from the active molecule. Although usually mild, OSD can cause significant symptoms that lead to poor quality of life, decreased compliance to therapy, glaucoma progression, and worse visual outcomes. Given the chronic nature of glaucoma, lack of curative therapy, and subsequent lifelong treatment, addressing OSD is necessary. This manuscript aims to provide an up-to-date overview of OSD's signs, symptoms, and pathogenic mechanisms from glaucoma therapy toxicity.

PreserFlo™ MicroShunt Versus Ab Externo Canaloplasty in Patients With Moderate to Advanced Open-Angle Glaucoma: 12-Month Follow-Up of a Single-Center Retrospective Study

Purpose To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of the PreserFlo MicoShunt and the canaloplasty in patients with moderate to advanced glaucoma. Methods In this retrospective study, 300 patients with moderate to advanced glaucoma underwent either the implantation of the PreserFlo™ MicroShunt (group A) or a canaloplasty (group B). All patients underwent regular follow-up examinations in our department every two days, every two weeks, and every three, six, and 12 months postoperatively. Examinations included measurement of the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit-lamp biomicroscopy of the anterior and posterior segments, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using Goldmann applanation tonometry, visual field perimetry, and measurement of the endothelial cell density (ECD). Efficacy was shown by the absolute and qualified success rates calculated with the Kaplan-Meyer analysis. Results  In group A, IOP was significantly reduced at 12 months (13.37 ± 3.94 mmHg, p≤ 0.01) postoperatively in comparison to baseline (23.47 ± 8.39 mmHg). In group B, there was also a reduction in IOP at 12 months (14.32 ± 3.59 mmHg, p≤ 0.01) in comparison to the baseline (18.86 ± 5.82 mmHg). Comparing both groups, the IOP of patients who received the PreserFlo™ MicroShunt was significantly lower than the IOP of patients receiving canaloplasty after 12 months (p=0.049). Patients in both groups were treated with significantly fewer topical agents after 12 months (group A: baseline = 2.53±1.56; 12 months: 0.43 ± 0.83, p≤0.01; group B: baseline 2.62 ± 0.87; 12 months: 1.52 ± 0.99, p≤0.01). Patients receiving the PreserFlo™ MicroShunt applied significantly fewer topical agents than patients who underwent canaloplasty (p≤ 0.01). One year after surgery, the cumulative probability of absolute success was 81.33% in group A and 14.67% in group B. After one year, the cumulative probability of qualified success was 93.33% in group A and 82.00% in group B. Conclusion The PreserFlo™ as well as the canaloplasty offer many advantages and only a few disadvantages for patients with glaucoma. However, the respective patient's history and individual risk profile play an important role in the decision of the glaucoma specialist regarding the most appropriate surgical treatment for each patient. Patients with a high risk of conjunctival scarring and postoperative complications may benefit more from a canaloplasty, whereas patients who need a lower average IOP and show intolerance to any topical agents may require the PreserFlo™ implantation.

Reviewing the evidence surrounding preservative-free tafluprost/timolol fixed-dose combination therapy in open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension management: a focus on efficacy, safety and tolerability

INTRODUCTION

Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is the most important modifiable risk factor for irreversible sight loss in open angle glaucoma (OAG). The topical fixed-dose combination (FC) of preservative-free (PF) tafluprost (0.0015%) and timolol (0.5%) (tafluprost/timolol) is among the second-line IOP-lowering options for OAG and ocular hypertension (OHT).

AREAS COVERED

PubMed searches identified publications reporting key evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies examining the safety, tolerability and IOP-lowering efficacy of PF tafluprost/timolol FC therapy in OAG/OHT management.

EXPERT OPINION

Glaucoma patients are more likely to have ocular surface disease and treatment should be individualized so that target response may be achieved while considering tolerability and quality of life, according to European Glaucoma Society guidelines. PF FC therapies, such as PF tafluprost/timolol FC, avoid ocular surface exposure to toxic preservative agents and reduce the required number of treatment administrations. These properties may enhance treatment tolerability and adherence, resulting in improved IOP-lowering efficacy and disease control. Treatment outcomes from RCTs and real-world studies examining PF tafluprost/timolol FC therapy support this hypothesis, with significant IOP reductions and/or improvements in tolerability parameters demonstrated, regardless of the prior topical therapy used and even when switched directly to PF tafluprost/timolol FC treatment (without washout).

Aqueous Prostaglandin Eye Drop Formulations

Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness worldwide. It is characterized by progressive optic neuropathy in association with damage to the optic nerve head and, subsequently, visual loss if it is left untreated. Among the drug classes used for the long-term treatment of open-angle glaucoma, prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) are the first-line treatment and are available as marketed eye drop formulations for intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction by increasing the trabecular and uveoscleral outflow. PGAs have low aqueous solubility and are very unstable (i.e., hydrolysis) in aqueous solutions, which may hamper their ocular bioavailability and decrease their chemical stability. Additionally, treatment with PGA in conventional eye drops is associated with adverse effects, such as conjunctival hyperemia and trichiasis. It has been a very challenging for formulation scientists to develop stable aqueous eye drop formulations that increase the PGAs' solubility and enhance their therapeutic efficacy while simultaneously lowering their ocular side effects. Here the physiochemical properties and chemical stabilities of the commercially available PGAs are reviewed, and the compositions of their eye drop formulations are discussed. Furthermore, the novel PGA formulations for glaucoma treatment are reviewed.

Ocular Tolerability of Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL Preservative-Free versus Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL with Benzalkonium Chloride or Bimatoprost 0.3 mg/mL Preservative-Free in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

This study aimed to evaluate whether the therapeutic switch from a formulation of Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL with benzalkonium chloride (BAK) or Bimatoprost 0.3 mg/mL preservative-free to a formulation of Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL preservative-free could improve eye surface conditions in patients with glaucoma; intraocular pressure (IOP) was also evaluated. All patients meeting the inclusion criteria were eligible for the therapeutic switch to Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL preservative-free. At each check visit, enrolled patients underwent a break-up time (BUT) test, an ocular surface disease index (OSDI) test, and a three-point tonometric curve. A total of 40 patients were enrolled (23 were in therapy with Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL with BAK and 17 with Bimatoprost 0.3 mg/mL preservative-free). Significant differences of OSDI and BUT between Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL with BAK at baseline vs. Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL preservative-free at 14 and 28 days (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0003, respectively) were recorded. Similarly, significant differences of OSDI and BUT between Bimatoprost 0.3 mg/mL preservative-free at baseline vs. Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL preservative-free at 14 and 28 days (p < 0.0001 for both) were found. Bimatoprost 0.1 mg/mL preservative-free has a better tolerability profile associated with non-therapeutical inferiority in the control of IOP compared to the other Bimatoprost formulations.

Phase 2b, Randomized, 3-Month, Dose-Finding Study of Sepetaprost in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: The ANGEL Study

Purpose:

This phase 2b, randomized, observer-masked, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group, multinational (USA and Japan), multicenter study (NCT03216902) assessed the optimal dose of sepetaprost ophthalmic solution in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Methods:

After washout, patients ≥18 years (USA) or ≥20 years of age (Japan) received once-daily sepetaprost for 3 months [0.0005% (n = 43); 0.001% (n = 43); 0.002% (n = 44); and 0.003% (n = 45)], latanoprost 0.005% (n = 44) or placebo until week 6, followed by sepetaprost 0.003% until month 3 (n = 22). Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) occurrence.

Results:

Baseline mean diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) was 24.3 mmHg for latanoprost and ranged between 24.1 and 24.5 mmHg for the sepetaprost groups. Sepetaprost 0.002% had the lowest IOP at each month 3 time point (9:00 AM; 1:00 PM; 5:00 PM) of all sepetaprost concentrations (mean ± standard error: 17.6 ± 0.5; 17.4 ± 0.4; 16.7 ± 0.4 mmHg); similar values were observed with latanoprost (18.1 ± 0.6; 17.3 ± 0.5; 17.2 ± 0.5 mmHg). A positive dose–response relationship was observed with the 3 lower sepetaprost doses; sepetaprost 0.002% had numerically greater IOP-lowering effects than sepetaprost 0.003%. All sepetaprost doses had statistically significantly greater IOP reductions from baseline versus placebo at week 6 (P < 0.0001). This IOP-lowering effect was consistent between Japan- and USA-based patients. Most AEs were mild and occurred numerically less frequently with sepetaprost 0.002% (34.1%) versus latanoprost (50.0%). The most frequently reported AE was conjunctival hyperemia.

Conclusion:

In this study, sepetaprost 0.002% was the optimal concentration, showing comparable IOP-lowering efficacy and safety with latanoprost 0.005%. Most AEs were mild; occurrence was numerically lower with sepetaprost 0.002% than latanoprost 0.005%.

Efficacy, Safety and Patient-Reported Outcomes with Preservative-Free (PF) Tafluprost or PF-Dorzolamide/Timolol Compared with Preserved Latanoprost: A Prospective Multicenter Study in Korean Glaucoma Patients with Ocular Surface Disease

To compare the efficacy, patient-reported satisfaction, and safety of preservative-free (PF)-tafluprost, PF-dorzolamide/timolol and preservative-containing (P)-latanoprost in Korean glaucoma patients with ocular surface disease (OSD). In a multicenter, prospective, interventional, non-randomized, controlled 12-week trial, 107 eligible patients received PF-tafluprost (n = 37), PF-dorzolamide/timolol (n = 34), or P-latanoprost eye drops (n = 36). Outcomes included changes from baseline in OSD Index (OSDI) scores (primary endpoint), intraocular pressure (IOP), and patient-reported treatment satisfaction, and safety at 12 weeks. At 12 weeks, the mean total OSDI and subdomain (dry eye symptoms, visual-related function, environmental triggers) scores significantly improved from baseline with PF-tafluprost and PF-dorzolamide/timolol, but not with P-latanoprost. Significantly more PF-tafluprost than P-latanoprost recipients reported ‘highly improved/improved’ satisfaction (no significant difference between PF-dorzolamide/timolol and P-latanoprost). IOP changes were comparable among all three treatment groups. No new safety concerns were observed. PF-tafluprost and PF-dorzolamide/timolol showed statistically and clinically significant reductions in OSDI compared with P-latanoprost in Korean glaucoma patients with OSD.

Crossover randomized study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of preservative-free Tafluprost 0.0015% to Latanoprost 0.005% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma

Purpose:

To compare the efficacy and the tolerability of preservative-free Tafluprost 0.0015% (TP) vs Latanoprost 0.005% (LP) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods:

Prospective, randomized, crossover study included patients with early POAG attending the outpatient clinic from July 2019 to February 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A included patients receiving TP and group B receiving LP. After 2 months, treatment was stopped for 1 month (washout period) then drops were switched between the groups for further 2 months. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was recorded at baseline and monthly until 5 months. Efficacy was measured by the IOP reduction at the end of each treatment period. Tolerability was assessed both subjectively (questionnaire on ocular comfort) and objectively (ocular findings) at the end of each period.

Results:

A total of 30 patients were allocated into two groups (15 patients each). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in baseline clinical examinations. All the eyes in both groups achieved IOP reduction >20% compared to baseline values, with no statistically significant difference in between. Corneal erosions and conjunctival hyperemia were significantly higher in LP-treated eyes throughout the study, regardless of the sequence. Tear break-up time scores significantly worsened after LP at the 2^nd and 5^th month (P < 0.001and P = 0.026 respectively) but not after TP treatment (P = 0.719 and P = 0.164). Significant exacerbation in all patients’ symptoms was noticed on switching from TP to LP.

Conclusion:

Tafluprost was proved to exhibit a comparable effect on IOP control in POAG patients, as Latanoprost drops resulted in marked alleviation in both subjective and objective ocular discomfort manifestations.

Safety and Effectiveness of the PRESERFLO® MicroShunt in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Results from a 2-Year Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and effectiveness of the PRESERFLO® MicroShunt (formerly InnFocus MicroShunt®) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

DESIGN

The MicroShunt, a controlled ab-externo glaucoma filtration surgery device, was investigated in a 2-year, multicenter, single-arm study.

PARTICIPANTS

Eligible patients were aged 18-85 years with POAG inadequately controlled on maximal tolerated medical therapy with intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥18 and ≤35 mmHg and/or where glaucoma progression warranted surgery.

INTERVENTION

The MicroShunt was implanted as a standalone procedure with adjunctive use of topical Mitomycin C (MMC; 0.2-0.4 mg/mL) for 2-3 minutes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary effectiveness outcome was IOP reduction and success (not requiring reoperation or pressure failures [IOP >21 mmHg and <20% reduction in IOP]) at year 1. Additional endpoints at year 2 included IOP reduction, success, glaucoma medications, adverse events (AEs), and reoperations. Results are reported in the overall population, and subgroups of patients receiving 0.2 or 0.4 mg/mL MMC.

RESULTS

In 81 patients, mean (± standard deviation [SD]) IOP reduced from 21.7±3.4 mmHg at baseline to 14.5±4.6 mmHg at year 1 and 14.1±3.2 mmHg at year 2 (P<0.0001). Overall success (with and without supplemental glaucoma medication use) at year 1 was 74.1%. Mean (± SD) number of medications decreased from 2.1±1.3 at baseline to 0.5±0.9 at year 2 (P<0.0001), 73.8% of patients were medication free. Most common non-serious AEs were increased IOP requiring medication and/or selective laser trabeculoplasty (25.9%) and mild-to-moderate keratitis (11.1%). There were 6 (7.4%) reoperations and 5 (6.2%) needlings by year 2. In an analysis (post-hoc) according to MMC concentration, overall success was 78.1% (0.2 mg/mL) and 74.4% (0.4 mg/mL; P=0.710). In the 0.2 and 0.4 mg/mL MMC groups, 51.9% and 90.3% of patients were medication-free, respectively (P=0.001). There was a trend towards lower IOP and higher medication reduction in the 0.4 mg/mL MMC subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, mean IOP and glaucoma medication reductions were significant and sustained over 2 years post-surgery. No long-term, sight-threatening AEs were reported. Further studies may confirm potential risk/benefits of higher MMC concentration.

Comparison of BAK-preserved latanoprost and polyquad-preserved travoprost on ocular surface parameters in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension

BACKGROUND

To compare the effect of two different prostaglandin analogues (Travatan® vs. Xalatan®) on ocular surface parameters.

METHODS

This study includes 44 eyes of 44 patients with newly diagnosed primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). Patients were randomly divided into two groups and treated with either benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved latanoprost and polyquad-preserved travoprost. Changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) levels and ocular surface parameters including ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, tear breakup time (TBUT), ocular surface staining scores, and Schirmer test scores of patients were performed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment and compared.

RESULTS

The age, sex ratio, visual acuity, central corneal thickness, and cup/disc ratio were similar between the groups. A decrease in IOP levels (23.3 ± 2.5 to 15.5 ± 2.3), TBUT (5.5 ± 2.3 to 4.1 ± 1.7 s), Schirmer test values (11.3 ± 5.9 to 8.6 ± 4.7 s), and a worsening in OSDI scores (44.6 ± 15.2 to 55.1 ± 13.1) and staining scores (1.7 ± 1.6 to 2.3 ± 1.8) were observed in all patients in the first month of treatment (p < 0.05, for all). No further worsening was detected during the 1-year follow-up. There was no difference between the groups in terms of alterations in IOP levels and ocular surface parameters.

CONCLUSION

Travatan® and Xalatan® have a similar effect on IOP levels and ocular surface parameters in patients with POAG and OHT.

Efficacy and Safety of Preservative-free Latanoprost Eyedrops Compared with Preserved Prostaglandin Analogues in Patients with Open-angle Glaucoma

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of preservative-free (PF) latanoprost in glaucoma patients.

Methods

In this prospective, open-label, observational study, a total of 27 primary open-angle glaucoma patients who used benzalkonium chloride-preserved prostaglandin analogues for at least 6 months were enrolled. After changing the eye drops to PF lataprost, the intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular surface symptoms and signs were evaluated in all patients on days 0 (first visit, D0), 45 (D45), and 90 (D90).

Results

Mean IOP remained stable during the study period (14.0 ± 2.4 mmHg at D0, 13.9 ± 2.0 mmHg at D45, 13.7 ± 2.2 mmHg at D90; p = 0.603). Mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, and best-corrected visual acuity were similar before and after eye drops replacement. Bulbar conjunctival hyperemia, corneal staining, and conjunctival staining were significantly decreased over 90 days (p = 0.025, p < 0.001, p = 0.020, respectively). The ocular surface disease index score showed a statistically significant improvement from 26.4 ± 18.5 at D0 to 19.8 ± 17.0 at D45 and 15.7 ± 15.6 at D90 (p < 0.001). In the evaluation of ocular tolerability, burning symptoms and dryness were significantly decreased (p = 0.001, p = 0.040).

Conclusions

The effects of PF latanoprost on reducing IOP were comparable with those of benzalkonium chloride-preserved prostaglandin analogues, but side effects on the ocular surface were much less pronounced when PF latanoprost was used. With this efficacy, PF latanoprost could slow the progression of glaucoma by increasing patient compliance.

A Randomized Phase 2 Trial Comparing Omidenepag Isopropyl 0.002% Once and Twice Daily in Subjects With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension (SPECTRUM-6)

PRCIS

No significant difference was found between the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering of omidenepag isopropyl 0.002% once daily (QD) and twice daily (BID). However, adverse events (AEs) were higher in the BID arm; thus, QD dosing is the preferred dosing frequency for further investigation.

PURPOSE

This phase 2, randomized, double-masked, parallel-arm, multicenter study (NCT03858894) was conducted in the United States to examine whether the efficacy and safety of omidenepag isopropyl 0.002% BID dosing was superior to QD dosing in subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

METHODS

Randomized subjects (1:1) received omidenepag isopropyl 0.002% QD (n=50) or BID (n=48) for 6 weeks (after a ≤4-week washout period). IOP was measured at 8:00 am, 12:00 pm, and 4:00 pm at baseline and weeks 2 and 6. The primary efficacy endpoint was IOP at each timepoint at weeks 2 and 6. AEs were evaluated.

RESULTS

Baseline mean diurnal IOP (±SD) post washout was 25.4±2.9 mm Hg (BID) and 24.6±1.9 mm Hg (QD). At weeks 2 and 6, clinically significant IOP reductions from baseline were observed for omidenepag isopropyl BID and QD treatments. Least-squares mean (±SE) IOP differences (BID versus QD) were not statistically significant (week 2: 0.44±0.68 to 1.08±0.65 mm Hg; week 6: 0.36±0.63 to 0.68±0.68 mm Hg) at any timepoint (all P > 0.05). AEs were 3-fold greater in the BID arm (41.7%; QD: 14.0%); the most frequently reported AE was conjunctival/ocular hyperemia (BID: 22.9%; QD: 2.0%). Five subjects discontinued omidenepag isopropyl prematurely, 4 of 5 owing to AEs (BID: 4; QD: 0).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the benefit-risk profile of omidenepag isopropyl 0.002% QD was more favorable than the benefit-risk profile of BID. This difference was driven by a higher incidence of local tolerability issues in the BID arm.

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy between Preserved and Preservative-Free Latanoprost and Preservative-Free Tafluprost

In this study, we investigated the effect of preservative-free (PF) 0.0015% tafluprost (TA), to the preservative containing (PC) and the PF 0.005% latanoprost (LA) in Korean subjects. This study was conducted as a multi-center, randomized, investigator-blind, active controlled, parallel-group, clinical trial in adult patients (≥19 years) with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). After a washout period, patients with an IOP between 15 and 35 mmHg were enrolled and evaluated the efficacy, safety, and compliance at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after the first administration. A total of 137 OAG and OHT patients were randomized. Statistically significant reductions in IOP were observed in all groups. Twelve weeks after each eye drop instillation, the mean IOP reduction was −4.59 ± 2.70 mmHg (−24.57 ± 13.49%) in the PC-LA group, −4.52 ± 2.17 mmHg (−24.41 ± 11.38%) in the PF-LA, and −3.14 ± 2.83 mmHg (−17.22 ± 14.57%) in the PF-TA group. The PF-LA showed significantly better responsiveness than did PF-TA. PF-LA was better tolerated than was PC-LA. There were no adverse events that led to cessation of eye drop use in any of the groups. In conclusion, IOP decreased similarly across the groups. PF-LA may provide a good choice for OAG patients with ocular surface diseases.

Comparison of preserved bimatoprost 0.01% with preservative-free tafluprost: A randomised, investigator-masked, 3-month crossover, multicentre trial, SPORT II

IMPORTANCE

This study compares the efficacy and tolerability of a preservative-free prostaglandin analogue (tafluprost 15 mg/ml) to a prostaglandin analogue that uses 0.02% of benzalkonium chloride (bimatoprost 0.1 mg/ml).

BACKGROUND

Different prostaglandin analogues have been commercially approved, with differences in tolerability.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised, investigator-masked, 3-month crossover, multicentre trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-four patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma were randomised to two groups, after a 4-week washout period from their current topical drop regimen.

METHODS

Participants were randomised to tafluprost (Group 1; n = 33) or bimatoprost (Group 2; n = 31). At month 3, each group switched to the opposite treatment. IOP was evaluated at multiple timepoints.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was difference in mean IOP between the two groups at the final visit. Secondary outcomes included change from baseline IOP at month 3 and month 6, difference in mean IOP at month 3 and difference in IOP at all timepoints. Safety outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), adverse events, ocular tolerability, optic nerve assessment and slit lamp biomicroscopy.

RESULTS

Both medications significantly lowered IOP at month 6 compared to baseline: 5.4 mmHg (27%) for tafluprost and 6.8 mmHg (33%) for bimatoprost (p < 0.0001). No significant differences in any of the safety measures (including conjunctival hypearemia) were detected.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Bimatoprost produced a statistically significant greater IOP reduction compared to tafluprost with minimal to no difference in side effects. This should be borne in mind when weighing up the pros and cons of preserved versus preservative-free prostaglandin analogue therapy.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02471105.

Categorization of Marketed Artificial Tear Formulations Based on Their Ingredients: A Rational Approach for Their Use

Dry eye disease is a common ocular condition affecting millions of people worldwide. Artificial tears are the first line therapy for the management of dry eye disease. Artificial tear formulations contain a variety of active ingredients, biologically active excipients, and preservatives. Many of these formulations are also available as preservative-free. This study was conducted to inspect artificial tear formulations currently marketed in the United States for their active ingredients, biologically relevant excipients, and preservatives. The marketed artificial tears were examined at various US retail pharmacy chains and using the manufacturers’ website to compile information about active ingredients, inactive ingredients, and preservatives. The currently marketed artificial tears can be grouped into four categories based on their active ingredients. The artificial tears also contain biologically active chemicals listed as inactive ingredients, which have osmoprotectant, humectant, and tear film lipid layer or mucous layer mimicking properties. Most artificial tears contain vanishing type preservatives such as purite or sodium perborate and safer quaternary compound polyquaternium-1. The majority of these artificial tear formulations are also available as preservative-free single dose unit. The study provides a formulary of artificial tears based on active ingredients, biologically active excipients, and the preservative-free option. The formulary should assist healthcare providers in making a stepwise and rational selection of appropriate artificial tears for patients suffering from dry eye disease.

Long-term Results of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt in Patients With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma From a Single-center Nonrandomized Study

PRECIS

The MicroShunt was implanted in 23 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in a feasibility study. Reductions in intraocular pressure (IOP) and medications were sustained for up to 5 years with no long-term sight-threatening adverse events (AEs).

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt (8.5 mm long, 70 µm lumen surgical device, formerly known as the InnFocus MicroShunt) in POAG.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a feasibility study (NCT00772330), patients with POAG inadequately controlled on maximum tolerated therapy with IOP ≥18 to ≤40 mm Hg underwent MicroShunt implantation with adjunctive mitomycin C (0.4 mg/mL), alone or in combination with cataract surgery. Years 1 to 3 findings have previously been reported. Endpoints of this extension study included IOP reduction and success at years 4 and 5 (primary), incidence of AEs, medication use, and reoperations.

RESULTS

Mean IOP was reduced from 23.8±5.3 mm Hg at baseline to 12.8±5.6 mm Hg (year 4; n=21) and 12.4±6.5 mm Hg (year 5; n=21). Overall success (with/without medication use) was 87.0% (year 4) and 82.6% (year 5). The mean number of medications reduced from 2.4±1.0 at baseline to 0.8±1.3 (year 5). Common (≥5% of patients) AEs included corneal edema (n=4), transient hypotony (n=4), bleb-related complications (n=3), and device touching the iris (n=3). There were 4 reports of serious AEs and 2 reoperations.

CONCLUSIONS

In this extension study, sustained reductions in mean IOP and medications were observed up to 5 years post-MicroShunt implantation. There were no reports of long-term sight-threatening AEs and a low rate of postoperative interventions.

NCX 1741, a Novel Nitric Oxide-Donating Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor, Exerts Rapid and Long-Lasting Intraocular Pressure-Lowering in Cynomolgus Monkeys

Purpose: We studied the IOP-lowering effects of NCX 1741, a novel nitric oxide (NO)-donating derivative of the phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor, avanafil, in Cynomolgus monkey with laser-induced ocular hypertension (OHT-monkeys). NCX 1193 (NO-donating moiety), NCX 1744 (NCX 1741 without ester nitrate moiety), and travoprost (PGF2α analogue) were used for comparison. Ocular exposure after NCX 1741 dosing also was addressed. Methods: Vehicle (phosphate buffer pH 6.0, Kolliphor^® 5%, DMSO 0.3%, benzalkonium chloride 0.02%), NCX 1741, NCX 1193, NCX 1744, or travoprost were instilled (30 μL; single dose) masked and conscious IOPs were measured by pneumatonometry. LC-MS/MS-based methods were employed to monitor ocular exposure of NCX 1741 and main metabolites after ocular dosing in New Zealand White rabbits. Results: NCX 1741 (2.2%, 0.8 μmol/eye) lowered IOP with an E_max (ΔΔIOP, IOP change vs. pre-dose and vehicle) between 5 and 8 h post-dosing (ΔΔIOP_5h, -5.3 ± 2.0 mmHg and ΔΔIOP_8h, -6.0 ± 2.1 mmHg). Conversely, equimolar (0.47%, 0.8 μmol/eye) NCX 1193 IOP-lowering effects were maximal 3 h post-dosing (ΔΔIOP_3h, -4.7 ± 1.6 mmHg) and declined thereafter (ΔΔIOP_5h, -1.6 ± 1.1 mmHg). In a follow-up study, NCX 1741 (1.5%, 0.5 μmol/eye) was more effective than NCX 1744 despite a similar duration. Further, NCX 1741 was as effective as travoprost (0.1%, 0.06 μmol/eye) at 5 and 8 h post-dosing (travoprost, ΔΔIOP_5h, -3.4 ± 2.2 mmHg and ΔΔIOP_8h, -4.9 ± 1.3 mmHg) but had shorter duration (NCX 1741, ΔΔIOP_24h, -1.5 ± 1.1 mmHg; travoprost, ΔΔIOP_24h, -7.1 ± 2.8 mmHg). NCX 1741 resulted in significant aqueous humor exposure, as determined by the levels of the main metabolite, avanafil. Conclusions: NCX 1741 rapidly and effectively lowers IOP in OHT-monkeys for several hours post-dosing. How these effects translate in humans is still to be defined.

Comparison between Latanoprost, Travoprost, and Tafluprost in reducing intraocular pressure fluctuations in patients with glaucoma

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacies of latanoprost 0.005%, travoprost 0.004%, and tafluprost 0.0015% in reducing diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations in patients with newly diagnosed primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

METHODS

In this prospective randomized clinical trial, 60 patients who were newly diagnosed with POAG were divided into three equal groups. Patients were examined at presentation and at second and sixth weeks. Diurnal phasing of IOP was conducted using a calibrated Goldmann applanation tonometer. IOP measurements were recorded from 8:00 am to 9:00 am, from 3:00 pm to 4:00 pm, and from 7:00 pm to 8:00 pm.

RESULTS

The study groups were distributed similarly in terms of age and gender (p-values: 0.76) and the participants had a mean age of 52.98 ± 13.43 years. The IOP at the day of inclusion was not statistically significant among the three groups (p-values 0.27, 0.51, and 0.64 at 8 am, 2 pm, and 8 pm, respectively). Similar nonsignificant differences were noticed on the follow-up visits. However, the tafluprost group showed a significant reduction in IOP on the follow-up visit at the second week at 8 pm (30.5% reduction, p-value: 0.03). All three drugs showed a comparable and significant reduction in IOP and IOP fluctuations. The pattern of side effects was similar in all the groups.

CONCLUSION

Latanoprost, travoprost, and tafluprost show a similar effectiveness in reducing the mean IOP and the diurnal IOP fluctuation in POAG. Importantly, the three drugs have comparable tolerability with insignificant differences regarding the pattern of their side effects.

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of travoprost and latanoprost for the management of open-angle glaucoma given as an evening dose

As intraocular pressure (IOP) is primarily higher in the morning, an evening dose of prostaglandin analogs is typically used as monotherapy to decrease IOP in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Travoprost (TV) has reported efficacy in treating open-angle glaucoma; however, the safety and efficacy may be different compared with that for latanoprost (LT). The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of an evening dose of TV compared with that of LT in treating open-angle glaucoma. Data including IOP, results of lid and slit-lamp examination and ophthalmoscopy, as well as adverse effects in 250 affected eyes from patients with open-angle glaucoma who received either TV (n=89) or LT (n=161) once in the evening for 3-months were included in the analyses. At the end of treatment, TV (23.45±1.52 vs. 19.15±1.01 mmHg; P<0.0001) and LT (23.93±2.11 vs. 19.45±1.11 mmHg; P<0.0001) successfully lowered the IOP. In addition, there was no significant difference in the reduction of IOP values at the end of treatment between the two groups (P=0.120). Furthermore, there were no adverse effects on visual acuity (P>0.05), except for non-visual acuity, for example hyperemia (P<0.0001 for both groups), while there was a significant increase in the number of patients with dry eyes receiving TV (P=0.020) and a significant increase with eyelid swelling (P=0.036) and headache (P=0.037) in patients receiving LT. In conclusion, evening doses of TV and LT had the same efficacy and manageable adverse effects in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma (level of evidence, 3).

The use of preservatives in dry eye drops

Topical ocular preparations are widely recommended by health care professionals, or chosen by patients, to help manage dry eye disease (DED). The chronic and progressive nature of DED may result in the administration of topical products several times a day, over a period of many years. Given DED is a condition that by definition affects the ocular surface, it is important to understand how the repeated use of eye drops may impact the ocular surface, influence clinical signs, affect symptoms, and impact the overall disease process of dry eye. The component in topical preparations with the greatest potential to adversely affect the ocular surface is the preservative. This paper reviews the literature in relation to the use of preservatives in formulations for dry eye. The ocular effects of benzalkonium chloride (BAK) are summarised and compared to the performance of alternative preservatives and preservative-free formulations. Use of preserved and preservative-free drops in relation to the management of varying stages of DED is discussed.

Effect of systemic antihypertensives on change in intraocular pressure after initiating topical prostaglandins for primary open-angle glaucoma

Purpose

There is a limited understanding of factors that influence the efficacy of topical glaucoma medication. Our study is a long-term, case–control analysis of how systemic antihypertensive (anti-HTN) medications influence the change in IOP after initiating prostaglandin (PG) drop therapy.

Materials and methods

A retrospective chart review of 3,781 patients was performed on patients with a diagnosis of glaucoma suspect that progressed to primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) by ICD-9 codes over a 10-year period. Inclusion criteria consisted of the following: 1) progression from preglaucoma to glaucoma diagnosis in a time span of ≥6 months; 2) two visual fields recorded between these dates; 3) initial average IOP of both eyes of ≥21 mmHg; and 4) initiation of topical PG therapy alone. IOP (in mmHg) was measured at initiation of PG drops and at next visit.

Results

One hundred eleven patients were qualified for analysis. Patients not on anti-HTN agents had an average IOP decrease of 6.38±0.56 mmHg. Comparatively, patients on anti-HTN agents had an average IOP decrease of 6.66±0.48 mmHg (P=0.61). In addition, there was no statistical difference between IOP decrease between patients on single vs multiple systemic anti-HTN agents (P=0.85). There were eight nonresponders to PGs on no anti-HTN medications and 12 nonresponders on anti-HTN medication (P=0.55).

Conclusion

Systemic anti-HTN medication use did not significantly impact IOP reduction after topical PG initiation for POAG. Additionally, nonresponse to PG therapy was not correlated to systemic anti-HTN use.

Efficacy of the travoprost/timolol fixed combination versus the concomitant use of travoprost 0.004% and timolol 0.1% gel formulation

Purpose

To compare the hypotensive effect of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination (TTFC) to the concomitant use of travoprost and timolol 0.1% gel formulation (Trav + Geltim).

Materials and methods

Thirty-three patients (62 eyes) were enrolled and divided into two groups. Patients in group 1 (31 eyes) received the TTFC and patients in group 2 (31 eyes) received the concomitant treatment with Trav + Geltim. Patients on previous antiglaucoma treatment discontinued their drops for 2–4 weeks before starting their new treatment (TTFC or Trav + Geltim). The drops were instilled in the evening in group 1 and in group 2, the prostaglandin was installed in the evening, and timolol in the morning. IOP was measured at 1 and 3 months after the initiation of treatment at four time points during the day (09:00, 12:00, 15:00, and 18:00).

Results

Both groups showed significant IOP reduction from baseline at all time points at 1 and 3 months. When the two groups were compared, group 2 showed slightly better hypotensive effect that reached statistical significance only at the 18:00 time point at both 1 and 3 months.

Conclusion

Both the TTFC and the concomitant use of the travoprost/timolol gel showed similar hypotensive effect with the latter being slightly more potent in reducing the IOP.

Effect of a Topical Combination of Latanoprost and Pranoprofen on Intraocular Pressure and the Ocular Surface in Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients

Objective

A prospective study was performed to observe the effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) eyedrops on intraocular pressure (IOP) and the ocular surface in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients treated with 0.005% latanoprost eyedrops.

Methods

Forty-eight subjects were randomized into two study groups (NSAID and control). Latanoprost was continued for 10 weeks in all subjects. At the end of week 4, pranoprofen was added in the NSAID group, and treatment lasted for 4 weeks, whereas patients in the control group were treated with latanoprost alone. IOP was measured in both groups every 2 weeks, and the changes in the ocular surface in the NSAID group were evaluated once a month.

Results

Pranoprofen addition resulted in a decrease in IOP in the NSAID group compared to the control group (p < 0.01). After pranoprofen was discontinued, IOP significantly increased in the NSAID group (p < 0.01), remaining approximately at the same IOP as when they were being treated with latanoprost alone. During the same examination, no significant variations in IOP were found in the control group. Patients who were treated with latanoprost alone showed gradual improvements in ocular surface symptom scores and conjunctival hyperemia scores during the first four weeks of treatment (p < 0.01). When pranoprofen eyedrops were added, ocular surface symptom scores decreased (p < 0.01), but conjunctival hyperemia scores did not change significantly.

Conclusions

For POAG patients treated with latanoprost, the combination of pranoprofen can not only significantly enhance the latanoprost-induced IOP-lowering effect but also relieve the uncomfortable ocular symptoms caused by latanoprost.

The impact of topical intraocular pressure lowering medications on the ocular surface of glaucoma patients: A review

Purpose

To assess the literature on the effects of topical intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications on the ocular surface. Ocular surface assessment in these patients is seldom a priority for most clinicians since the ultimate goal of management is to preserve vision.

Methods

A literature search of articles (English only) on the subject matter was conducted and their findings summarized.

Results

This review assesses the prevalence of dry eye symptoms in glaucoma patients on topical IOP-lowering medications. We extensively reviewed the effects of the preservatives and active ingredients in these medications on the ocular surface. In particular, the effects of benzalkonium chloride (BAK), a widely used preservative, on meibomian glands are explored. Also mentioned in this review is the association between duration of therapy and severity of dry eye symptoms. The role of the pH of medications in the development of ocular surface disease is also reviewed. Finally, we probed the occurrences of ocular allergic reactions with the use of topical IOP-lowering medications.

Conclusions

The preservatives and active agents in most topical glaucoma medications are implicated in the prevalence of ocular surface discomfort. Whilst clinicians involved in glaucoma care are encouraged to assess the ocular surface routinely, further studies are needed to demonstrate the contributions of other physiochemical properties of these medications to the development of ocular surface disease in these patients.