Standardized Duplex Ultrasound-Based Protocol for Early Diagnosis of Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis: Results of a Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study

Ultrasound for monitoring different stages of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in a transplanted kidney: A case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a well-recognized, but uncommon complication in patients with kidney transplantation, which poses challenges in diagnosis and poor prognosis due to its low incidence and nonspecific clinical manifestations. As a routine follow-up examination method for kidney transplant patients, ultrasound (US) plays a significant role in the diagnosis of PTLD. Therefore, it is critical to evaluate the ultrasonic characteristics of PTLD in transplanted kidney patients for early detection and diagnosis.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 59-year-old female patient was unexpectedly found with a mass in the hilum of the transplanted kidney 12th month after transplantation, which gradually grew up in the following 4 months. The latest US examination found hydronephrosis. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) demonstrated a hypo-enhancement pattern in arterial and parenchymal phases and showed a new irregular area lacking perceivable intensification within the mass, which was considered necrosis. Meanwhile, the patient developed an acute increase in serum creatinine from 122 to 195 μmol/L.

DIAGNOSIS

A US-guided biopsy was conducted with the final pathological diagnosis of PTLD (polymorphic).

INTERVENTIONS

After receiving 3 times of rituximab and symptomatic treatment, blood creatinine returned to normal but the mass was still progressing in the patient. Therefore, the treatment approach was modified to immune-chemotherapy.

OUTCOMES

The patient was in a stable condition to date.

LESSONS

PTLD is a rare complication in a transplanted kidney. US and CEUS are the preferred imaging methods in renal transplant patients due to their good repeatability and no nephrotoxicity. This case demonstrates that continuous dynamic monitoring by using US and CEUS has significant value in the detection and diagnosis of PTLD in a transplanted kidney, suggesting early clinical intervention to avoid further progression.

Outcomes of kidney transplantation from uncontrolled donors after circulatory death vs. expanded-criteria or standard-criteria donors after brain death at an Italian Academic Center: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The use of kidneys from "expanded criteria" donors after brain death (ECD) and uncontrolled donors after circulatory death (uDCD) has been warranted to increase the pool of donors for kidney transplantation (KT). However, there is lack of evidence on the feasibility and safety of KT from such donors in the Italian setting.

METHODS

We queried our prospectively KT database to select patients undergoing KT from deceased donors (uDCDs, ECDs, and standard-criteria donors [SCD] after brain death) from January 2017 to December 2020, comparing the perioperative and mid-term functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 172 KTs were included. The donor's profile was different among the study groups, while recipients' characteristics were similar expect for median age. Grafts from uDCDs and ECDs had longer median cold ischemia times as compared to grafts from SCDs. The proportion of patients experiencing DGF, the median hospitalization, as well as the overall and major complications rate, were significantly higher among recipients from uDCDs. The proportion of patients needing dialysis at last follow-up was significantly higher among recipients from uDCDs (33.3% vs. 8.5% vs. 5.4%, P<0.001). However, the median eGFR at the last follow-up was lower for recipients from ECDs compared to those from uDCDs and SCDs, respectively (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

While "marginal" donors represent a relevant source of organs, KTs from uDCDs carry higher risks of major surgical complications, DGF, and worse graft survival as compared to KT from both ECDs and SCDs. As such, the use of grafts from uDCDs should be carefully assessed balancing the potential benefits with the risk of primary no function and the subsequent immunological sensitization.

Robotic Versus Open Kidney Transplantation from Deceased Donors: A Prospective Observational Study

Background

While robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) from living donors has been shown to achieve favourable outcomes, there is a lack of evidence on the safety and efficacy of RAKT as compared with the gold standard open kidney transplantation (OKT) in the setting of deceased donors, who represent the source of most grafts worldwide.

Objective

To compare the intraoperative, perioperative, and midterm outcomes of RAKT versus OKT from donors after brain death (DBDs).

Design, setting, and participants

Data from consecutive patients undergoing RAKT or OKT from DBDs at a single academic centre between October 2017 and December 2020 were prospectively collected.

Intervention

RAKT or OKT.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The primary outcomes were intraoperative adverse events, postoperative surgical complications, delayed graft function (DGF), and midterm functional outcomes. A multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed the independent predictors of DGF, trifecta, and suboptimal graft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <45 ml/min/1.73 m²) at the last follow-up.

Results and limitations

Overall, 138 patients were included (117 [84.7%] OKTs and 21 [15.3%] RAKTs). The yearly proportion of RAKT ranged between 10% and 18% during the study period. The OKT and RAKT cohorts were comparable regarding all graft-related characteristics, while they differed regarding a few donor- and recipient-related factors. The median second warm ischaemic time, ureterovesical anastomosis time, postoperative complication rate, and eGFR trajectories did not differ significantly between the groups. A higher proportion of patients undergoing OKT experienced DGF; yet, at a median follow-up of 31 mo (interquartile range 19–44), there was no difference between the groups regarding the dialysis-free and overall survival. At the multivariable analysis, donor- and/or recipient-related factors, but not the surgical approach, were independent predictors of DGF, trifecta, and suboptimal graft function at the last follow-up. The study is limited by its nonrandomised nature and the small sample size.

Conclusions

Our study provides preliminary evidence supporting the noninferiority of RAKT from DBDs as compared with the gold standard OKT in carefully selected recipients.

Patient summary

Kidney transplantation using kidneys from deceased donors is still being performed with an open surgical approach in most transplant centres worldwide. In fact, no study has compared the outcomes of open and minimally invasive (robotic) kidney transplantation from deceased donors. In this study, we evaluated whether robotic kidney transplantation using grafts from deceased donors was not inferior to open kidney transplantation regarding the intraoperative, postoperative, and midterm functional outcomes. We found that, in experienced hands and provided that there was a time-efficient organisation of the transplantation pathway, robotic kidney transplantation from deceased donors was feasible and achieved noninferior outcomes as compared with open kidney transplantation.

Assessment and management of transplant renal artery stenosis. A literature review

BACKGROUND

transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) following kidney transplantation is a possible cause of graft failure. This review aimed to summarize the evidence about physiopathology, diagnosis and early and late effectiveness of the endovascular treatment (EVT), including angioplasty and stenting procedures.

METHODS

a literature research was performed using Pubmed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library databases (January 2000 to September 2020) according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they describe EVT, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stent placement of TRAS, published in English and with a minimum of ten patients.

RESULTS

56 studies were included. TRAS incidence ranges from 1% up to 12% in transplanted kidneys. The TRAS risk factors were: elderly donor and recipient, cytomegalovirus match status, Class II Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA), expanded donor criteria, delayed graft functioning and other anatomical and technical factors. The highest frequency of TRAS presentation is after 3-6 months after kidney transplantation. The most frequent localization of stenosis was para-anastomotic (ranging from 25% to 78%). In 9 studies, all patients were treated by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in 16 studies all patients received percutaneous transluminal stenting (PTS) and in 21 series patients received either PTA or PTS. The Twelve months patency rates after EVT ranged from 72% to 94%. The overall complication rate was 9%, with pseudoaneurysms and hematomas as most frequent complications.

CONCLUSION

TRAS can be successfully and safely treated through an endovascular approach. Stent delivery seems to guarantee a higher patency rate compared to simple angioplasty, however further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Endovascular Treatment of Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular treatment through either percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) alone or stenting has been previously used as a treatment for transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS). This review aimed to investigate the results of endovascular treatment for renal artery stenosis in transplanted kidneys as compared with the outcomes of interventions, medical management, and graft survival in non-TRAS patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and Scopus was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in which studies that reported outcomes of the treatment of TRAS via the endoluminal approach were identified, and their results were meta-analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies with a total of 1522 patients were included. A significant reduction of serum creatinine level was found, favoring the stenting group, with a mean difference of 0.68 mg/dL (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-1.19; Z=2.60, p=0.0009). Comparison of pre- and post-intervention values of any intervention revealed a significant decrease in overall serum creatinine level (0.65 mg/dL; 95% CI, 0.40-0.90; Z=5.09, p=0.00001), overall blood pressure, with a mean difference of 11.12 mmHg (95% CI, 7.29-14.95; Z=5.59, p=0.00001), mean difference in the use of medications (0.77; 95% CI, 0.29-1.24; p=0.002), and peak systolic velocity (190.05; 95% CI, 128.41-251.69; p<0.00001). The comparison of serum creatinine level between endovascular interventions and best medical therapy favored endovascular intervention, with a mean difference of 0.23 mg/dL (95% CI, 0.14-0.32; Z=5.07, p<0.00001). Graft survival was similar between the treated patients and those without TRAS (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.75-1.28; p=0.091). The overall pooled success rate was 89%, and the overall complication rate was 10.4%, with the most prevalent complication being arterial dissection.

CONCLUSION

The endovascular treatment of TRAS improves graft preservation and renal function and hemodynamic parameters. PTA + stenting appears to be a more effective option to PTA alone in the stabilization of renal function, with additional benefits from decreased restenosis rates. Further high-quality studies could expand on these findings.

Endovascular treatment for transplant renal artery stenosis: A retrospective cohort study

Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) is the most common (1%-23%) vascular complication following kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to review our experience with an endovascular approach to treat TRAS.We retrospectively reviewed kidney transplant recipients who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) due to TRAS in our institute from January 2009 to December 2015. We analyzed the patient's baseline characteristics, postoperative renal function, blood pressure evolution, and the number of pre- and post-procedure antihypertensive drugs.A total of 21 patients (15 men, 6 women) were treated with the endovascular technique. The predominant presentation was graft dysfunction (76.2%). Stenosis or hemodynamic kinking was located at the anastomosis in 7 (33.3%) patients, proximal to the anastomosis in 13 (61.9%) patients, and distal the anastomosis in 1 (4.8%) patient. PTA without stent placement was performed in 7 patients (33.3%), and PTA with stent placement was performed in 14 patients (67.7%). Serum creatinine levels demonstrated no difference between the pre-procedure level and that on discharge day (1.61 mg/dl [0.47-3.29 mg/dl] vs 1.46 mg/dl [0.47-3.08 mg/dl]; P = .33). The glomerular filtration rate also showed no difference between the pre-procedure value and that on discharge day (53.6 ml/min [22.4-145.7 ml/min] vs 57.0 ml/min [17.56 -145 ml/min]; P = .084). Systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) varied from 137 mm Hg (120-160 mm Hg) and 84 mm Hg (70-100 mm Hg) pre-procedure to 129 mm Hg (90-150 mm Hg) and 79 mm Hg (60-90 mm Hg) at discharge, respectively (P = .124 and P = .07). The number of antihypertensive medications significantly decreased from 1.5 (0-6) pre-procedure to 0.5 (0-2) at discharge (P = .023). In our study, there were no technical failures, procedure-related complications or deaths. During the follow-up period, the free-from-reintervention rate was 100%, and graft failures occurred in 2 patients (9.5%) due to rejection.Endovascular procedures for TRAS show a high technical success rate with a low complication rate and a low reintervention rate. PTA showed a trend toward a positive impact on lowering serum creatinine, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure and improving estimated glomerular filtration rate, and the number of antihypertensive medications could be significantly reduced after this procedure.

Analysis of the Peak Systolic Velocity in the Transplant Renal Artery Anastomosis to Determine Normal Values in Patients Without Graft Dysfunction

Objective:

The primary purpose is to define the mean renal artery anastomosis peak systolic velocity (RAA PSV) and the renal artery anastomosis to external iliac artery ratio (RAA-to-EIA) of renal transplant recipients without graft dysfunction. Moreover, to determine associations with type of vascular anastomosis and type of graft.

Materials and Methods:

This is a single-center retrospective analysis of kidney transplant recipients. Recorded variables included recipient age, type of vascular anastomosis, type of graft, RAA PSV, and external iliac artery PSV (EIA PSV). Such variables were evaluated on different postoperative follow-up periods.

Results:

There was a high degree of reliability between the RAA PSV and EIA PSV ( P < .001). The mean RAA PSV was 174 cm/s ± 72.9 cm/s with 95% confidence interval (CI) (162.2 cm/s-185.5 cm/s].

Conclusion:

This study highlights the importance of determining the normal range of RAA PSV and showed that a high PSV does not necessarily indicate dysfunction.

The University of Florence Technique for Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation: 3-Year Experience

Objective: To report the University of Florence technique for robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) from living donor (LD) and deceased donor (DD), highlighting the evolution of surgical indications and technical nuances in light of a single surgeon's learning curve.

Materials and Methods: A dedicated program for RAKT from LDs was developed at our Institution in 2017 and implemented later with a specific framework for DDs. All RAKTs were performed by a single highly experienced surgeon. Data from patients undergoing RAKT between January 2017 and December 2019 were prospectively collected in a dedicated web-based data platform. In this report we provide a comprehensive step-by-step overview of our technique for RAKT, focusing on the potential differences in peri-operative and mid-term functional outcomes between LDs vs. DDs.

Results: Overall, 160 KTs were performed in our center during the study period. Of these, 39 (24%) were performed with a robot-assisted laparoscopic technique, both from LDs (n = 18/39 [46%]) and from DDs (n = 21/39 [54%]). Eleven (11/39 [18%]), 13(13/39 [26%]), and 15 (15/39 [30%]) RAKTs were performed in 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively, highlighting an increasing adoption of robotics for KT over time at our Institution. Median time for arterial (19 min for LD and 18 min for DD groups), venous (21 min for LD, 20 min for DD) and uretero–vesical (18 min for LD and 15 for DD) anastomosis were comparable between the two groups (all p > 0.05), as the median rewarming time (59 min vs. 56 min, p = 0.4). The rate of postoperative surgical complications according to Clavien–Dindo classification did not differ between the two study groups, except for Clavien–Dindo grade II complications (higher among patients undergoing RAKT from DDs, 76 vs. 44%, p = 0.042). Overall, 7/39 (18%) patients (all recipients from DDs) experienced DGF; two of them were on dialysis at last FU.

Conclusions: Our experience confirms the feasibility, safety, and favorable mid-term outcomes of RAKT from both LDs and DDs in appropriately selected recipients, highlighting the opportunity to tailor the technique to specific recipient- and/or graft-characteristics. Further research is needed to refine the technique for RAKT and to evaluate the benefits and harms of robotics for kidney transplantation from DDs.

The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound versus Doppler Ultrasound in Grading Renal Artery Stenosis

Objective

This study is aimed at exploring the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in grading renal artery stenosis.

Methods

122 renal arteries with suspected renal artery stenosis were selected. DSA, DUS, and CEUS were performed for all patients with suspected renal artery stenosis in the research. DSA was selected as the gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of CEUS or Doppler ultrasound (DUS) in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis were analyzed. The consistency between CEUS and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was compared. The accuracy of DUS or CEUS in grading renal artery stenosis was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and compared between groups.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CEUS in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis were 88.9%, 87.8%, 88.5%, 93.5%, and 80.0%, respectively. There was no significant difference in grading renal artery stenosis between CEUS and DSA (X² = 0.643, P = 0.424). 77 of the 122 renal arteries were diagnosed with the stenosis rate more than 30% by CEUS. Compared with the results of DSA, the kappa value of CEUS was 0.749 (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

CEUS is accurate in grading renal artery stenosis, and it may represent the method of choice in diagnosing renal artery stenosis.

Intraoperative assessment of ureteral and graft reperfusion during robotic kidney transplantation with indocyanine green fluorescence videography

BACKGROUND

The aim of this paper is to report the first preliminary experience with intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence videography (IFV) to assess graft and ureteral reperfusion during robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT).

METHODS

We prospectively collected data from consecutive patients undergoing RAKT and IFV from living-donors at our Institution between January 2017 and April 2018. RAKT was performed following the principles of the Vattikuti-Medanta technique. ICG was injected intravenously after vascular anastomoses to quantitate graft and ureteral fluorescence signal. The signal intensity within selected intraoperative snapshots was evaluated for renal parenchyma, ureter and vascular anastomoses. A systematic review of the English-language literature about the topic was performed according to the PRISMA statement recommendations.

RESULTS

Six patients were included. Neither conversions to open surgery nor major intra- or postoperative complications were recorded. At a median follow-up of 12 months (IQR 8-13), median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 64.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 45.3-98.4). Intraoperative quantitative assessment of ICG fluorescence was successful in all patients. Of the five studies selected by our review, mostly prospective studies, all including open KT series. Yet, most studies were limited by lack of quantitative measures of IFV fluorescence.

CONCLUSIONS

IFV during RAKT is feasible and safe and provides a reliable assessment of graft reperfusion. Larger studies are needed to standardize the technique and to evaluate the association between fluorescence signal, ultrasound parameters and postoperative kidney function.