Estimating Renal Function in the Elderly Malaysian Patients Attending Medical Outpatient Clinic: A Comparison between Creatinine Based and Cystatin-C Based Equations

Comparison of Creatinine and Cystatin C to Estimate Renal Function in Geriatric and Frail Patients

The aim of this study was to compare estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with creatinine (eGFRcrea) and cystatin C (eGFRcys) in geriatric and frail patients. A retrospective, cross-sectional study was performed at a geriatric clinic in Stockholm (n = 95). The revised Lund−Malmö equation was used to calculate eGFRcrea and the Caucasian-Asian-Pediatric-Adult (CAPA) equation was used for eGFRcys. The absolute mean percentage difference between eGFRcrea and eGFRcys was used as a surrogate measure for accuracy in eGFR. Other outcome measures were consistency expressed in Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient and the proportion of consistent staging of renal failure. Subgroup analyses were performed with regard to frailty (according to Clinical Frailty Scale) and age. eGFRcys estimated lower GFR than eGFRcrea across the entire study population as well as in all subgroups (p < 0.05). Difference between the estimates increased with increasing frailty (r2 = 0.15, p < 0.01), but was not significantly affected by age (r2 = 0.004, p = 0.55). In conclusion, eGFRcys was significantly lower compared to eGFRcrea in geriatric and frail patients. Moreover, frailty had greater impact than age on the accuracy of eGFR. However, this study cannot determine if any of the estimates are preferable over the other in this patient group.

Development and Validation of Creatinine-Based Estimates of the Glomerular Filtration Rate Equation from 99mTc-DTPA Imaging in the Malaysian Setting

Introduction

Accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is very important for diagnostic and therapeutic intervention. Clinically, GFR is estimated from plasma creatinine using equations such as Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, and Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations. However, these were developed in the Western population. To the best of our knowledge, there was no equation that has been developed specifically in our population.

Objectives

We developed a new equation based on the gold standard of ^99mTc-DTPA imaging measured GFR. We then performed an internal validation by comparing the bias, precision, and accuracy of the new equation and the other equations with the gold standard of ^99mTc-DTPA imaging measured GFR.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study using the existing record of patients who were referred for ^99mTc-DTPA imaging at the Nuclear Medicine Centre, International Islamic University Malaysia. As this is a retrospective study utilising routinely collected data from the existing pool of data, the ethical committee has waived the need for informed consent.

Results

Data of 187 patients were analysed from January 2016 to March 2021. Of these, 94 were randomised to the development cohort and 93 to the validation cohort. A new equation of eGFR was determined as 16.637 ∗ 0.9935^Age ∗ (SCr/23.473)^-0.45159. In the validation cohort, both CKD-EPI and the new equation had the highest correlation to ^99mTc-DTPA with a correlation coefficient of 0.81 (p < 0.0001). However, the new equation had the least bias and was the most precise (mean bias of -3.58 ± 12.01) and accurate (P30 of 64.5% and P50 of 84.9%) compared to the other equations.

Conclusion

The new equation which was developed specifically using our local data population was the most accurate and precise, with less bias compared to the other equations. Further study validating this equation in the perioperative and intensive care patients is needed.

Estimating GFR by Serum Creatinine, Cystatin C, and β2-Microglobulin in Older Adults: Results From the Canadian Study of Longevity in Type 1 Diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is routinely used for clinical assessment of kidney function. However, the accuracy of estimating equations in older adults is uncertain.

METHODS

In 66 adults with ≥50 years type 1 diabetes (T1D) duration and 73 nondiabetic controls from age/sex-matched subgroups (65 ± 8 years old and 77[55%] were women) we evaluated the performance of estimated GFR (eGFR) by creatinine (Modification of Diet and Renal Disease [MDRD], Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology [CKD-EPI]cr), cystatin C (CKD-EPIcys, CKD-EPIcr-cys), and β2-microglobulin (β2M) compared with measured GFR by inulin clearance (mGFR). Performance was evaluated using metrics of bias (mean difference), precision (SD), and accuracy (proportion of eGFR that differed by >20% of mGFR).

RESULTS

Mean mGFR was 104 ± 18 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (range: 70-154 ml/min per 1.73 m2) and was not different between T1D and controls (103 ± 17 vs. 105 ± 19 ml/min per 1.73 m2, P = 0.39). All equations significantly underestimated mGFR (bias: -15 to -30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, P < 0.001 for all comparisons) except for β2M, which had bias of 1.9 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (P = 0.61). Bias was greatest in cystatin C-based equations. Precision was lowest for β2M (SD: 43.5 ml/min per 1.73 m2, P < 0.001 for each comparison). Accuracy was lowest for CKD-EPIcysC (69.1%, P < 0.001 for each comparison). Cystatin C-based equations demonstrated greater bias and lower accuracy in older age subgroups (<60, 60-69, ≥70 years). All equations demonstrated greater bias across higher ranges of mGFR (60-89, 90-119, ≥120 ml/min per 1.73 m2). Results were similar between T1D and controls except that β2M had lower performance in T1D.

CONCLUSION

Better estimates of GFR in older adults are needed for research and clinical practice, as this subgroup of the population has an amplified risk for the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) that requires accurate GFR estimation methods.