Significance of Preoperative Systemic Immune Score for Stage I Gastric Cancer Patients

Association between adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in stage I gastric cancer patients after curative resection

Background

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on survival outcomes of patients with stage I gastric cancer (GC) after curative resection remains controversial. We aimed to determine whether these patients would benefit from AC.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with pathologically confirmed stage I GC who underwent curative resection between November 2010 and December 2020. Patients were divided into AC and non-AC groups, then a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to minimize the selection bias. Potential risk factors including age, pN stage, pT stage, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor size, histological type, and carcinoembryonic antigen level were used as matching covariates. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared between groups using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

A total of 902 consecutive patients were enrolled and 174 (19.3%) patients were treated with AC. PSM created 123 pairs of patients. Before PSM, patients receiving AC had lower 10-year RFS rates (90% vs 94.6%, P = 0.035) than those who did not receive AC; the two groups had similar 10-year DSS rates (93.8% vs 95.0%, P = 0.240). After PSM, there were no statistical differences in the 10-year RFS (90.9% vs 93.0%, P = 0.507) or DSS rates (93.5% vs 93.6%, P = 0.811) between the two groups. Similar results were found in the stage IA and IB subgroups. Moreover, these findings were not affected by AC cycles.

Conclusions

The addition of AC could not provide survival benefits for patients with stage I GC after surgery and follow-up is thus recommended. However, large-scale randomized clinical trials are required.

Association of systemic inflammation and body mass index with survival in patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas

Objective

The systemic inflammation index and body mass index (BMI) are easily accessible markers that can predict mortality. However, the prognostic value of the combined use of these two markers remains unclear. The goal of this study was therefore to evaluate the association of these markers with outcomes based on a large cohort of patients with gastric cancer.

Methods

A total of 2,542 consecutive patients undergoing radical surgery for gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma between 2009 and 2014 were included. Systemic inflammation was quantified by the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). High systemic inflammation was defined as NLR ≥ 3, and underweight was defined as BMI < 18.5 kg/m².

Results

Among 2,542 patients, NLR ≥ 3 and underweight were common [627 (25%) and 349 (14%), respectively]. In the entire cohort, NLR ≥ 3 or underweight independently predicted overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR): 1.236, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.069-1.430; and HR: 1.600, 95% CI: 1.350-1.897, respectively] and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR: 1.230, 95% CI: 1.054-1.434; and HR: 1.658, 95% CI: 1.389-1.979, respectively). Patients with both NLR ≥ 3 and underweight (vs. neither) had much worse OS (HR: 2.445, 95% CI: 1.853-3.225) and RFS (HR: 2.405, 95% CI: 1.802-3.209). Furthermore, we observed similar results in subgroup analyses according to pathological stage, age, and postoperative chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Our results showed that preoperative elevated NLR and decreased BMI had a significant negative effect on survival. Underweight combined with severe inflammation could enhance prognostication. Taking active therapeutic measures to reduce inflammation and increase nutrition may help improve outcomes.

Indications for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pT1N1M0 gastric cancer: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

Whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) has a survival benefit for all patients with pathological stage pT1N1M0 (Stage IB) gastric cancer (GC) remains controversial.

METHODS

All patients with surgically resected, histologically confirmed pT1N1M0 GC between January 2011 and December 2017 at the National Cancer Center, China, were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 179 patients with pT1N1M0 were identified. Survival analysis showed that both overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) were significantly different between patients treated with and without AC (p < 0.01). Independent risk factors for reduced OS identified in the Cox regression analysis in patients with pT1N1M0 cancer were sex (male sex, hazard ratio [HR] 2.470, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.294-4.718), examined lymph nodes (EN) (EN ≤ 15, HR 2.402; 95% CI 1.329-4.341), and AC (treated without AC, HR 2.554; 95% CI 1.393-4.681), which were also independent risk factors for reduced CSS. We divided patients with pT1N1M0 into three risk categories (high, moderate, and low) according to two significant prognostic factors (sex and EN) and found that both OS and CSS were significantly different between the three risk groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

An additional survival benefit related to AC is expected for selected pT1N1M0 patients. Male patients with EN ≤ 15 may be particularly appropriate candidates for AC.

New prognostic western score predicting survival after curative resection of gastric cancer

The aim of our study was to develop a prognostic score for gastric cancer patients who underwent R0 resection with curative intent, to identify high-risk patients. Three thirty three patients curatively operated for gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled in the study. To define our prognostic score pre-operative inflammation sieric markers such as neutrophil to lymphocytes ratio, platelet count, platelet to lymphocytes ratio, and other clinical pathological and surgical characteristics of our patients such as albumin preoperative level, CRP sieric level, hystological Lauren's subtype, tumor location, lymphonodal status were analyzed. Prognostic factors predicting OS were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models and a prognostic score was built. 5Y-OS was 42% with a median survival of 41 months. The multivariate analysis identified four independent prognostic factors: preoperative albumin level (HR 2.5), preoperative N/L ratio (HR 2.4), Diffuse Lauren histological subtype (HR 1.5) and TNM stage III and IV (HR 1.2). According to the relative risk of each variable we construct a prognostic score and validated it internally. Four risk classes were built and patients were statistically different stratifying according to them. More important the stratification was maintained also when patients were subdivided according to the pathological stage. In summary, we were able to construct a prognostic score that could be easily used in all the clinical contests, being it cheap and prompt. Our results, however, need to be externally validated, by a major center to be introduced into the clinical practice.

Prognostic significance of peripheral blood-derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in patients with digestive cancer

Accumulating studies reported the clinical value of derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) regarding the prediction of survival outcomes in digestive cancers, however, the prognostic significances of dNLR in these cancers were inconsistent. This study was carried out to clarify the relationship between circulating dNLR and prognosis in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Eligible publications were collected and extracted by searching Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to November 21, 2018. The prognostic impact of dNLR in subjects with GI cancers was assessed with the overall hazard ratios (HRs). A total of 26 studies with up to 13,945 participants were recruited. Our findings showed that peripheral blood dNLR before treatment could be a useful prognostic predictor in digestive cancers, an elevated dNLR indicated a shorter overall survival (OS) in GI tumors (HR, 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-1.51). Furthermore, its significant prognostic value for OS was also confirmed in subgroup analyses stratified by disease type, publication year, type of research, detection method, geographic location, cut-off value, treatment, analysis type, follow-up time and disease stage. In addition, high dNLR was significantly associated with worse cancer-specific survival (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04-1.47) and inferior event-free survival (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.11-1.33) in patients with digestive cancers. Our study showed elevated peripheral blood dNLR may indicate unfavorable outcomes in digestive cancer.

Implication of lymph node staging in migration and different treatment strategies for stage T2N0M0 and T1N1M0 resected gastric cancer: a SEER population analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore the differences between stage T2N0M0 and stage T1N1M0 gastric cancer (GC) and to identify the necessity of adjuvant treatment (AT) for these stages.

METHODS

Between years 2004 and 2015, 1971 stage IB GC patients who underwent radical surgery were recruited using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. We conducted univariate/multivariate analyses, the propensity score matching and evaluated gastric cancer-specific survival (GCSS) and overall survival (OS) with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

T1N1M0 had a significantly worse survival than T2N0M0 in both GCSS and OS before and after the propensity score matching. Examined lymph nodes (ELN) ≤ 15 and T1N1M0 were independent risk factors for worse GCSS and OS in stage IB GC. The absence of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) was an independent risk factor for worse GCSS and OS in T1N1M0 but not in T2N0M0. AT demonstrated similar GCSS and OS with surgery alone (SA) for T2N0M0 but better survival for T1N1M0. Compared to CT and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) group, SA demonstrated significantly worse GCSS and OS for T1N1M0. There was no significant difference between CT and CRT in both T2N0M0 and T1N1M0 stages. T2N0M0 had a better survival than T1N1M0 in ELN ≤ 15 subgroup. However, similar survival was demonstrated in ELN > 15 subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

T2N0M0 GC has a better survival rate than T1N1M0 GC when ELN are ≤ 15. Moreover, T2N0M0 GC may not benefit from AT. T1N1M0 GC requires CT but not adjuvant radiotherapy.