Preemptive Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparing the Effects of Single Dose Combining Celecoxib with Pregabalin and Repetition Dose Combining Celecoxib with Pregabalin: Double-Blind Controlled Clinical Trial

Can an Enhanced Recovery Protocol Result in a Safe and Effective Outpatient Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Outpatient total knee arthroplasty (OP TKA) is found to benefit patients as well as the health care system. Studies on OP TKA have been limited to unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to determine if enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols can result in performing simultaneous bilateral TKA (SBTKA) safely and effectively in the OP setting.

METHODS

This retrospective study compared patients who underwent SBTKA in an OP setting (OP group, n = 100) using an ERAS protocol from April 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022, and a propensity-matched historical group (inpatient group, n = 100) operated in an inpatient setting via conventional protocol from July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020. The complication rate, readmission rate, visual analog score (VAS), range of motion (ROM), and Knee Society Score (KSS) were compared between the groups in the early postoperative and follow-up periods up to 1 year.

RESULTS

We found a comparable complication rate (4 versus 7%, P = .4) and readmission rate (2 versus 3%, P = .7). The VAS score was significantly lower in the OP group on day 1, day 2, day 7, and day 14 postsurgery (P < .001). The KSS and ROM were significantly better in the OP group after 14 days (P < .001). The VAS, KSS, and ROM were comparable between the groups at 1 month and later follow-up periods (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

An ERAS protocol in SBTKA patients resulted in safe same-day discharge with better early functional outcomes compared with conventional practices. The results from similar future studies can alleviate surgeon and patient concerns about OP TKA.

Comparison of the effects of preoperative celecoxib and gabapentin on pain, functional recovery, and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Background

Acute pain is one of the main complaints of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which causes delayed mobility, increased morphine consumption, and subsequently increased costs. Therefore, the present study was performed to evaluate the preventive effect of preoperative celecoxib and gabapentin on reducing patient pain as a primary outcome after TKA surgery.

Materials and Methods

This randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial was performed on 270 patients with osteoarthritis that were candidates for TKA surgery allocated into three groups. In the first group, 900 mg of gabapentin was administered orally on a daily basis for 3 days before surgery. In the second group, 200 mg of oral celecoxib was administered twice daily for 3 days before surgery. In the third group, oral placebo was administered twice daily for 3 days before the surgery. The patients' pain score and knee and its functional score were recoded.

Results

The mean of reduction pain in gabapentin and celecoxib groups was significantly lower than that of the control group at 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery (P < 0.001); however, two groups were not significantly different from each other (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the two medication groups were not significantly different in this regard (P > 0.05). In addition, the knee score in the gabapentin group with the means of 85.40 ± 5.47 and the celecoxib group with the means of 87.03 ± 3.97 were significantly higher than those of the control group with the means of 78.90 ± 4.39 in the 1^st month after the surgery (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

According to the results of the present study, the preventive administration of gabapentin and celecoxib showed a significant and similar effectiveness on reducing patient pain after TKA surgery and on improving the KSS and quality of life scores.

Enhanced recovery after surgery for major orthopedic surgery: a narrative review

Background

With increasing interest in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), the literature on ERAS in orthopedic surgery is also rapidly accumulating. This review article aims to (1) summarize the components of the ERAS protocol applied to orthopedic surgery, (2) evaluate the outcomes of ERAS in orthopedic surgery, and (3) suggest practical strategies to implement the ERAS protocol successfully.

Main body

Overall, 17 components constituting the highly recommended ERAS protocol in orthopedic surgery were identified. In the preadmission period, preadmission counseling and the optimization of medical conditions were identified. In the preoperative period, avoidance of prolonged fasting, multimodal analgesia, and prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting were identified. During the intraoperative period, anesthetic protocols, prevention of hypothermia, and fluid management, urinary catheterization, antimicrobial prophylaxis, blood conservation, local infiltration analgesia and local nerve block, and surgical factors were identified. In the postoperative period, early oral nutrition, thromboembolism prophylaxis, early mobilization, and discharge planning were identified. ERAS in orthopedic surgery reduced postoperative complications, hospital stay, and cost, and improved the patient outcomes and satisfaction with accelerated recovery. For successful implementation of the ERAS protocol, various strategies including the standardization of care system, multidisciplinary communication and collaboration, ERAS education, and continuous audit system are necessary.

Conclusion

The ERAS pathway enhanced patient recovery with a shortened length of stay, reduced postoperative complications, and improved patient outcomes and satisfaction. However, despite the significant progress in ERAS implementation in recent years, it has mainly focused on major surgeries such as arthroplasty. Therefore, further efforts to apply, audit, and optimize ERAS in various orthopedic surgeries are necessary.

Pre-emptive analgesia with methylprednisolone and gabapentin in total knee arthroplasty in the elderly

The aim of this study is to assess whether administration of gabapentin and methylprednisolone as “pre-emptive analgesia” in a group of patients above 65 years of age would be effective in complex pain management therapy following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One hundred seventy patients above 65 years were qualified for the study, with exclusion of 10 patients due to clinical circumstances. One hundred sixty patients were randomly double-blinded into two groups: the study group (80 patients) and the control group (80 patients). The study group received as “pre-emptive” analgesia a single dose of 300 mg oral (PO) gabapentin and 125 mg intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone, while the control received a placebo. All patients received opioid and non-opioid analgesic agents perioperatively calculated for 1 kg of total body weight. We measured (1) pain intensity level at rest (numerical rating scale, NRS), (2) life parameters, (3) levels of inflammatory markers (leukocytosis, C reactive protein CRP), and (4) all complications. Following administration of gabapentin and methylprednisolone as “pre-emptive” analgesia, the NRS score at rest was calculated at 6, 12 (p < 0.000001), 18 (p < 0.00004) and 24 (p = 0.005569) h postoperatively. Methylprednisolone with gabapentin significantly decreased the dose of parenteral opioid preparations (p = 0.000006). The duration time of analgesia was significantly longer in study group (p < 0.000001), with CRP values lower on all postoperative days (1, 2 days—p < 0.00001, 3 days—p = 0.00538), and leukocytosis on day 2 (p < 0.0086) and 3 (p < 0.00042). No infectious complications were observed in the first postoperative days; in the control group, one patient manifested transient ischemic attack (TIA). The use of gabapentin and methylprednisolone as a single dose decreased the level of postoperative pain on the day of surgery, the dose of opioid analgesic preparations, and the level of inflammatory parameters without infectious processes.

The Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib for Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of celecoxib for pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared celecoxib with a placebo in term of pain control efficacy after TKA. Primary outcomes included pain scores at 24, 48, and 72 h after TKA. Secondary outcomes included the active range of motion (ROM) at 24, 48,72 h, and 7 days postoperatively, morphine consumption over 72 h after TKA, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and total blood loss after surgery. Data analysis was conducted using RevMan version 5.3.

Results

Five RCTs involving 593 participants were included in the study. Compared with a placebo, celecoxib significantly reduced visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest at 24 h [mean difference (MD) = −0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −1.27 to −0.17; I² = 82%; P = 0.01], 48 h (MD = −1.51; 95% CI, −2.07 to −0.95; I² = 0%; P < 0.00001), and 72 h (MD = −1.30; 95% CI, −2.07 to −0.54; I² = 82%; P = 0.0009) after TKA, decreased morphine consumption over postoperative 72 h (MD = −0.73; 95% CI, −0.96 to −0.51; I² = 96%; P < 0.00001), and increased active ROM at 48 h (MD = 13.23; 95% CI, 7.79 to 18.67; I² = 0%; P < 0.00001), 72 h (MD = 6.52; 95% CI, 4.95 to 8.10; I² = 68%; P < 0.00001), and 7 days (MD = 7.98; 95% CI, 3.64 to 12.31; I² = 68%; P = 0.0003) after the operation. No significant difference was found in the active ROM at 24 h (MD = 7.60; 95% CI, −6.14 to 21.34; I² = 94%; P = 0.28) and the incidence of PONV after surgery [risk ratio (RR) = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.09; I² = 0%; P = 0.11].

Conclusion

The administration of celecoxib is an effective and safe strategy for postoperative analgesia after TKA.

Drug Utilization for Pain Management during Perioperative Period of Total Knee Arthroplasty in China: A Retrospective Research Using Real-World Data

Background and Objective: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most painful procedures and perioperative pain usually requires the use of many analgesics to relieve it. The appropriate use of analgesics to relieve patient pain is an important issue of TKA. To characterize the drug utilization for pain management during perioperative period of TKA in China using real-world data of electronic medical records. Materials and Methods: This research used the data of all inpatients who received TKA at 145 hospitals covered 31 provinces in China from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018. The exclusion criteria included pregnancy and cancer diagnosis. In the analysis of drug utilization mode (DUM), medicines were classified into 5 groups: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, non-opioid central analgesics, acetaminophen and others. Results: Among the 2017 patients included in this study, there were 1537 (76.20%) female and 480 (23.80%) male, aged 65.77 ± 7.73 years. Regarding the surgery characteristics, 1658 (82.20%) were unilateral; 1220 (60.49%) was graded Level 4; 1312 (65.05%) used local anesthesia as the main anesthesia method, and 1450 (71.89%) lasted for more than 2 h. The most common DUM was “NSAIDs + opioids” (55.92%), followed by “NSAIDs only” (17.85%), and “NSAIDs + Opioids + Non-opioid central analgesics” (17.15%). The results of the Chi-square test showed that differences in DUM were associated with surgery types, surgery levels, surgery duration, and types of anesthesia used. Up to 81.14% of the total drug expenses for pain management was spent on NSAIDs. Due to the limitation of database, this study could not subdivide operation stages, anesthesia methods, dosage forms of drugs. Conclusion: In China, the use of analgesics in perioperative period of TKA was diversified and influenced by a number of surgery characteristics. The rational use of analgesics should be considered in combination with surgery type, surgery level, surgery duration and anesthesia method.

Efficiency and safety: comparison between preoperative analgesia and postoperative analgesia using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients receiving arthroscopic knee surgery in a multicenter, randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the efficiency regarding postoperative pain control, consumption of rescue drug, patients' satisfaction and the safety of preoperative analgesia versus postoperative analgesia using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients who received arthroscopic knee surgery (AKS).

METHODS

Four hundred and sixty-four patients who received AKS were recruited in this multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Subsequently, they were randomized into PRE group (N = 232) and POST group (N = 232). In PRE group, patients received celecoxib, meloxicam or rofecoxib from 2 h pre-operation (Pre (- 2 h)) to 48 h post-operation for analgesia. In POST group, patients received celecoxib, meloxicam or rofecoxib from 4 to 48 h post-operation for analgesia.

RESULTS

h and 12 h; pain VAS at passive movement was reduced in PRE group than POST group at 6 h, 12 h and 24 h. Additionally, consumption of rescue drug (pethidine) was decreased, while overall satisfaction was increased in PRE group compared to POST group. As for adverse events, the incidences of nausea, vomiting, constipation, drowsiness and dizziness were similar between PRE group and POST group. In subgroup analysis, the pain VAS score at passive movement at 6 h and nausea and constipation incidences were distinctive among subgroups categorized by meloxicam, celecoxib and rofecoxib administration. However, no difference of other assessments was found among subgroups categorized by meloxicam, celecoxib and rofecoxib administration.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative analgesia using NSAIDs is more efficient and equivalently tolerable compared to postoperative analgesia using NSAIDs in patients who receive AKS.

Low complication rates in outpatient total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this study is to report the incidence of complications associated with outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Secondarily, 2-year minimum outcomes are reported.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2016, 928 patients underwent 1143 outpatient TKAs with the Vanguard Complete Knee System (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN). Patients were selected for outpatient surgery if they were medically optimized without a failing organ system and had sufficient support at home. Overnight stays, medical complications and early perioperative complications were assessed in this entire cohort. Two-year minimum follow-up was available on 793 patients (978 knees). Patient records were analyzed for outcome measures and revisions.

RESULTS

In 124 procedures, the patient stayed overnight for 23-h observation. Thirty-seven (3.2%) were for convenience reasons and 87 (7.6%) for medical observation. Heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were associated with increased risk of overnight stay. Excluding manipulations, reoperation within 90 days occurred in eight (0.7%) knees. Patients with 2-year minimum follow-up had significant improvements in ROM, Knee Society Clinical, Functional and Pain scores (p < 0.005). Nine (0.8%) patients required revision. Manipulations were performed on 118 (10.3%) patients. The overall deep infection rate was 0.17% (2/1143).

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient TKA is safe for a large proportion of patients. Certain medical co-morbidities increase the risk of overnight stay. Patients had significant improvement in ROM and outcome scores with low revision rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Postoperative Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common surgeries performed to relieve joint pain in patients with end‐stage osteoarthritis or rheumatic arthritis of the knee. However, TKA is followed by moderate to severe postoperative pain that affects postoperative rehabilitation, patient satisfaction, and overall outcomes. Historically, opioids have been widely used for perioperative pain management of TKA. However, opioids are associated with undesirable adverse effects, such as nausea, respiratory depression, and retention of urine, which limit their application in daily clinical practice. The aim of this review was to discuss the current postoperative pain management regimens for TKA. Our review of the literature demonstrated that multimodal analgesia is considered the optimal regimen for perioperative pain management of TKA and improves clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction, through a combination of several types of medications and delivery routes, including preemptive analgesia, neuraxial anesthesia, peripheral nerve blockade, patient‐controlled analgesia and local infiltration analgesia, and oral opioid/nonopioid medications. Multimodal analgesia provides superior pain relief, promotes recovery of the knee, and reduces opioid consumption and related adverse effects in patients undergoing TKA.