Assessment of Acute Pain Management and Associated Factors among Emergency Surgical Patients in Gondar University Specialized Hospital Emergency Department, Northwest Ethiopia, 2018: Institutional Based Cross-Sectional Study

Nurses' pain management practices for admitted patients at the Comprehensive specialized hospitals and its associated factors, a multi-center study

BACKGROUND

Pain is the most common challenge that most hospitalized patients complain of and is influenced by several patients, nurses, and institutional-related factors. Most studies in Ethiopia on pain were focused on surgical illnesses only.

OBJECTIVE

To assess nurses' pain management practice and associated factors for admitted patients at Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A multi-center institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted at the five randomly selected Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals of the Amhara region from May 01 to June 01, 2022. A multi-stage sampling method was employed to select a total of 430 nurses and patients for whom the nurses were responsible. Data were collected using standard self-administered, structured, and checklist questionnaires from nurses, patients, and patients' charts respectively. The modified Bloom's criteria categorized the overall practice as good, moderate, and poor. Data were checked, coded, and entered into Epi-Data version 4.6 and exported to SPSS version 25. An ordinal logistic regression model was applied, and variables with a p-value < 0.05 with a 95% CI in the multivariable analysis were considered significant.

RESULTS

The study evaluated the pain management practices of 430 nurses and only a quarter had good pain management practices. Those nurses with first degrees and above education level (AOR = 2.282) and who attended in-service training (AOR = 2.465) were found to have significantly higher pain management practice. Expected though patients with painful procedures (AOR = 5.648) and who had severe pain (AOR = 2.573) were receiving better pain management practices from their nurse care provider. Nurses working in the institutions with a pain-free initiative focal person (AOR = 6.339) had higher pain management practices.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Overall, the majority of nurses had poor pain management practices. Higher educational levels, in-service training, and assigning a pain-free focal person had an impact on pain management services. Patients with higher pain levels and painful procedures were getting better attention. Hospital administrations need to provide due attention to the pain management of hospitalized patients by providing in-service training and educational opportunities to improve the capacity of nurses. Patients would be benefited considerably if hospitals focus on assigning focal persons for advocating regular pain management for admitted patients regardless of their pain level.

Assessment of adequacy and appropriateness of pain management practice among trauma patients at the Ethiopian Aabet Hospital: A prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Pain is unpleasant sensory and emotional experiences associated with actual and/or potential tissue damage. It is the most common and prevalent reason for emergency departments (ED) visits with prevalence over 70% in the world.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The study aimed to assess the adequacy and appropriateness of pain management at Aabet Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

METHODS

A hospital-based prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Aabet hospital from December 1, 2020 to March 30, 2021. Adult trauma patients having pain (at least score 1 on Numeric Rating Scale) with Glasgow Coma Scale score > 13 were eligible to participate in the study. The pain intensity was evaluated at the time of admission (o minute) and then at 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes. The time of the first analgesics was registered. The adequacy and the appropriateness of the pain management were calculated through pain management index (PMI).

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-two (232) participants were included in this study of which 126 (54.3%) were admitted due to road traffic accident followed by fall 44(19%). Only 21 (9.1%) study participants received the first analgesic treatment within 30 minutes while 27(11.6%) participants had no treatment at all within 240 minutes. The mean pain intensity score at admission was 5.55 ± 2.32 and reduced to 4.09 ± 2.69. Nearly half 110 (47.4%) of the study participants were treated inadequately (PMI (-) score). There was a weak and negative correlation between PMI and time to analgesia (r = - .159, p = 0.0001). The type of analgesia used, the time to analgesia, and the degree of pain may predict 65% of the variance in PMI score (R2 = 0.65, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

From the results of this study, it can be concluded that acute pain in trauma patients was under and inappropriately treated.

Clinical emergency care quality indicators in Africa: a scoping review and data summary

OBJECTIVES

Emergency care services are rapidly expanding in Africa; however, development must focus on quality. The African Federation of Emergency Medicine consensus conference (AFEM-CC)-based quality indicators were published in 2018. This study sought to increase knowledge of quality through identifying all publications from Africa containing data relevant to the AFEM-CC process clinical and outcome quality indicators.

DESIGN

We conducted searches for general quality of emergency care in Africa and for each of 28 AFEM-CC process clinical and five outcome clinical quality indicators individually in the medical and grey literature.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed (1964-2 January 2022), Embase (1947-2 January 2022) and CINAHL (1982-3 January 2022) and various forms of grey literature were queried.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies published in English, addressing the African emergency care population as a whole or large subsegment of this population (eg, trauma, paediatrics), and matching AFEM-CC process quality indicator parameters exactly were included. Studies with similar, but not exact match, data were collected separately as 'AFEM-CC quality indicators near match'.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Document screening was done in duplicate by two authors, using Covidence, and conflicts were adjudicated by a third. Simple descriptive statistics were calculated.

RESULTS

One thousand three hundred and fourteen documents were reviewed, 314 in full text. 41 studies met a priori criteria and were included, yielding 59 unique quality indicator data points. Documentation and assessment quality indicators accounted for 64% of data points identified, clinical care for 25% and outcomes for 10%. An additional 53 'AFEM-CC quality indicators near match' publications were identified (38 new publications and 15 previously identified studies that contained additional 'near match' data), yielding 87 data points.

CONCLUSIONS

Data relevant to African emergency care facility-based quality indicators are highly limited. Future publications on emergency care in Africa should be aware of, and conform with, AFEM-CC quality indicators to strengthen understanding of quality.