Multiple Low Frequency Ultrasound Enhances Bactericidal Activity of Vancomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms

Effects of low-frequency ultrasound combined with anti-MRSA agents on the mouse model of pulmonary infection

The treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-induced pneumonia with antibiotics alone poses considerable challenges. To address these challenges, low-frequency ultrasound (LFU) emerges as a promising approach. In this study, a mouse pneumonia model was established through intratracheal injection of MRSA to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of LFU in combination with antibiotics. Minimal inhibitory concentration was assessed, and the distribution of antibiotics in the lung and plasma was determined using liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Various parameters, including the survival rate, histopathology, lung bacterial clearance, and the expressions of cytokines and inflammation-related genes, were evaluated before and after treatment. Compared with the infection group, both the antibiotic-alone groups [vancomycin (VCM), linezolid, and contezolid (CZD)] and the groups in combination with LFU demonstrated an improvement in the survival status of mice. The average colony-forming units of lung tissue in the LFU combination groups were lower compared with the antibiotic-alone groups. While no significant changes in C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were observed, histopathological results revealed reduced inflammatory damage in LFU combination groups. The secretion of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha was decreased by the combination treatment, particularly in the VCM + LFU group. Furthermore, the expressions of MRSA virulence factors (hla and agrA) and inflammation-related genes (Saa3, Cxcl9, and Orm1) were further reduced by the combinations of LFU and antibiotics. Additionally, LFU treatment facilitated the distribution of VCM and CZD in mouse lung tissue at 30 and 45 min, respectively, after dosage.IMPORTANCETreating pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with antibiotics alone poses significant challenges. In this in vivo study, we present compelling evidence supporting the efficacy of low-frequency ultrasound (LFU) as a promising approach to overcome these obstacles. Our findings demonstrated that LFU enhanced the effectiveness of vancomycin, linezolid, and contezolid in an MRSA pneumonia model. The combination of LFU with anti-MRSA agents markedly improved the survival rate of mice, accelerated the clearance of pulmonary bacteria, reduced inflammatory injury, inhibited the production of MRSA endotoxin, and enhanced the distribution of antibiotics in lung tissue. The application of LFU in the treatment of pulmonary infections held substantial significance. We believe that readers of your journal will find this topic of considerable interest.

Emodin Combined with Multiple-Low-Frequency, Low-Intensity Ultrasound To Relieve Osteomyelitis through Sonoantimicrobial Chemotherapy

Treatment of osteomyelitis is still challenging, as conventional antibiotic therapy is limited by the emergence of resistant strains and the formation of biofilms. Sonoantimicrobial chemotherapy (SACT) is a novel therapy of low-frequency and low-intensity ultrasound (LFLIU) combined with a sonosensitizer. Therefore, in our study, a sonosensitizer named emodin (EM) was proposed to be combined with LFLIU to relieve acute osteomyelitis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) through antibacterial and antibiofilm effects. The efficiencies of different intensities of ultrasound, including single (S-LFLIU, 15 min) and multiple ultrasound (M-LFLIU, 3 times for 5 min at 4-h intervals), against bacteria and biofilms were compared, contributing to developing the best treatment regimen. Our results demonstrated that EM plus S-LFLIU or M-LFLIU (EM+S-LFLIU or EM+M-LFLIU) had significant combined bactericidal and antibiofilm effects, with EM+M-LFLIU in particular exhibiting superior antibiofilm performance. Furthermore, it was suggested that EM+M-LFLIU could produce a large amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS), destroy the integrity of the bacterial membrane and cell wall, and downregulate the expression of genes involved in oxidative stress, membrane wall synthesis, and bacterial virulence, as well as that of other related genes (agrB, pbp3, sgtB, gmk, zwf, and msrA). In vivo studies, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and bacterial quantification of bone tissue indicated that EM+M-LFLIU could also relieve osteomyelitis due to MRSA infection. Our work proffers an original approach to bacterial osteomyelitis treatment that weakens drug-resistant bacteria and suppresses and degrades biofilm formation through SACT, which may provide new prospects for clinical treatment. IMPORTANCE Antibiotic therapy is the first choice for clinical treatment of osteomyelitis, but the formation of bacterial biofilms and the emergence of many drug-resistant strains also create an urgent need to find an alternative treatment to effectively eliminate the infection. Recently, LFLIU has come to be considered a safe and promising method of debridement and antibacterial therapy. In this study, we found that ultrasound and EM have a significant combined antibacterial effect in vivo and in vitro, which may play an antibacterial role by stimulating the production of ROS, destroying the bacterial cell wall, and inhibiting the expression of related genes. Our study expands the body of knowledge on the antibacterial effect of drugs-specifically emodin (EM)-through combined physiotherapy. If successfully integrated into clinical practice, these methods may reduce the burden of high concentrations of drugs needed to treat bacterial biofilms and avoid the growing resistance of bacteria to antibiotics.

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) for biofilm treatments. Possible synergy between aPDT and pulsed electric fields

Currently, microbial biofilms have been the cause of a wide variety of infections in the human body, reaching 80% of all bacterial and fungal infections. The biofilms present specific properties that increase the resistance to antimicrobial treatments. Thus, the development of new approaches is urgent, and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has been shown as a promising candidate. aPDT involves a synergic association of a photosensitizer (PS), molecular oxygen and visible light, producing highly reactive oxygen species (ROS) that cause the oxidation of several cellular components. This therapy attacks many components of the biofilm, including proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids present within the biofilm matrix; causing inhibition even in the cells that are inside the extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). Recent advances in designing new PSs to increase the production of ROS and the combination of aPDT with other therapies, especially pulsed electric fields (PEF), have contributed to enhanced biofilm inhibition. The PEF has proven to have antimicrobial effect once it is known that extensive chemical reactions occur when electric fields are applied. This type of treatment kills microorganisms not only due to membrane rupture but also due to the formation of reactive compounds including free oxygen, hydrogen, hydroxyl and hydroperoxyl radicals. So, this review aims to show the progress of aPDT and PEF against the biofilms, suggesting that the association of both methods can potentiate their effects and overcome biofilm infections.

A review of bacterial biofilm control by physical strategies

Biofilms are multicellular communities of microorganisms held together by a self-produced extracellular matrix, which contribute to hygiene problems in the food and medical fields. Both spoilage and pathogenic bacteria that grow in the complex structure of biofilm are more resistant to harsh environmental conditions and conventional antimicrobial agents. Therefore, it is important to develop eco-friendly preventive methodologies to eliminate biofilms from foods and food contact equipment. The present paper gives an overview of the current physical methods for biofilm control and removal. Current physical strategies adopted for the anti-biofilm treatment mainly focused on use of ultrasound power, electric or magnetic field, plasma, and irradiation. Furthermore, the mechanisms of anti-biofilm action and application of different physical methods are discussed. Physical strategies make it possible to combat biofilm without the use of biocidal agents. The remarkable microbiocidal properties of physical strategies are promising tools for antimicrobial applications.

Inhibitory effects of ultrasound irradiation on Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate whether low-intensity continuous and pulsed wave ultrasound (US) irradiation can inhibit the formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms, for potential application in the treatment of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI).

METHODS

S. epidermidis biofilms that formed on the bottom surfaces of 6-well plates were irradiated on the bottom surface using the sound cell incubator system for different intervals of time.

RESULTS

US irradiation with continuous waves for 24 h notably inhibited biofilm formation (p < 0.01), but the same US irradiation for 12 h had no remarkable effect. Further, double US irradiation with pulsed waves for 20 min inhibited biofilm formation by 33.6%, nearly two-fold more than single US irradiation, which reduced it by 17.9%.

CONCLUSION

US irradiation of a lower intensity (I_SATA = 6-29 mW/cm²) than used in a previous study and lower than recommended by the Food and Drug Administration shows potential for preventing CRBSI caused by bacterial biofilms.

Antimicrobial effects of airborne acoustic ultrasound and plasma activated water from cold and thermal plasma systems on biofilms

Bacterial biofilms are difficult to inactivate due to their high antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, new approaches are required for more effective bacterial biofilm inactivation. Airborne acoustic ultrasound improves bactericidal or bacteriostatic activity which is safe and environmentally friendly. While, plasma activated water (PAW) is attracting increasing attention due to its strong antimicrobial properties. This study determined efficacy of combined airborne acoustic ultrasound and plasma activated water from both cold and thermal plasma systems in inactivating Escherichia coli K12 biofilms. The application of airborne acoustic ultrasound (15 min) alone was significantly more effective in reducing E. coli counts in 48 and 72 h biofilms compared to 30 min treatment with PAW. The effect of airborne acoustic ultrasound was more pronounced when used in combination with PAW. Airborne acoustic ultrasound treatment for 15 min of the E. coli biofilm followed by treatment with PAW significantly reduced the bacterial count by 2.2-2.62 Log10 CFU/mL when compared to control biofilm treated with distilled water. This study demonstrates that the synergistic effects of airborne acoustic ultrasound and PAW for enhanced antimicrobial effects. These technologies have the potential to prevent and control biofilm formation in food and bio-medical applications.

Low-Frequency Ultrasound Enhances Bactericidal Activity of Antimicrobial Agents against Klebsiella pneumoniae Biofilm

Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilms on inserted devices have been proposed as one of the important factors for hospital-acquired infections, which cause increased resistance to currently used antibiotics. Therefore, it is urgently necessary to develop new treatments with more efficient bacterial clearance. In the present study, we aimed at investigating whether low-frequency ultrasound (LFU) could enhance the bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents (meropenem (MEM), tigecycline (TGC), fosfomycin (FOM), amikacin (AMK), and colistin (COL)) against K. pneumoniae biofilm infection. K. pneumoniae biofilm was cultivated on the catheter in vitro. Synergistic effects were observed in groups of single ultrasound (S-LFU, 5 min) or multiple ultrasound (M-LFU, 5 min every 8 h (q8h)) in combination with MEM, TGC, and FOM. However, AMK and COL did not show the synergistic effect with either S-LFU or M-LFU. S-LFU in combination with FOM only significantly decreased bacterial counts right after ultrasound, while M-LFU could prolong the synergistic effect until 24 h. The results showed that LFU in combination with antimicrobial agents had a synergistic effect on K. pneumoniae biofilm, and M-LFU might extend the time of synergistic effect compared with S-LFU.