From DMEK to Corneal Endothelial Cell Therapy: Technical and Biological Aspects

Exploring Single-cell RNA sequencing as a decision-making tool in the clinical management of Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has enabled the identification of novel gene signatures and cell heterogeneity in numerous tissues and diseases. Here we review the use of this technology for Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD). FECD is the most common indication for corneal endothelial transplantation worldwide. FECD is challenging to manage because it is genetically heterogenous, can be autosomal dominant or sporadic, and progress at different rates. Single-cell RNA sequencing has enabled the discovery of several FECD subtypes, each with associated gene signatures, and cell heterogeneity. Current FECD treatments are mainly surgical, with various Rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitors used to promote endothelial cell metabolism and proliferation following surgery. A range of emerging therapies for FECD including cell therapies, gene therapies, tissue engineered scaffolds, and pharmaceuticals are in preclinical and clinical trials. Unlike conventional disease management methods based on clinical presentations and family history, targeting FECD using scRNA-seq based precision-medicine has the potential to pinpoint the disease subtypes, mechanisms, stages, severities, and help clinicians in making the best decision for surgeries and the applications of therapeutics. In this review, we first discuss the feasibility and potential of using scRNA-seq in clinical diagnostics for FECD, highlight advances from the latest clinical treatments and emerging therapies for FECD, integrate scRNA-seq results and clinical notes from our FECD patients and discuss the potential of applying alternative therapies to manage these cases clinically.

The proliferative effects of stem cells from apical papilla-conditioned medium on rat corneal endothelial cells

The cornea, positioned at the forefront of the eye, refracts the light for focusing images on the retina. Damage to this transparent structure can lead to various visual disorders. The corneal endothelial cells (CECs) are crucial for transparency and homeostasis, but lack the ability to reproduce. Significant damage results in structure destruction and vision impairment. While extensive research has aimed at the restoring the corneal endothelial layer, including endothelial proliferation for functional monolayers remains challenging. Our previous studies confirmed the proliferative activity of stem cells from apical papilla-conditioned medium (SCAP-CM) on the retinal pigmented epithelium as a single cell layer. This study investigates how SCAP-CM influences the proliferation and migration of CECs. Our results introduced Matrigel, as a new matrix component for in vitro culture of CECs. Moreover, 60% of SCAP-CM was able to stimulate CEC proliferation as well as migrate to repair wound healing during 24 h. Confluent CECs also expressed specific markers, ATP1a1, ZO-1 and CD56, indicative of CEC characteristics, aligning with the recapitulation of differentiation when forming a homogenous monolayer at the same level of isolated CECs without in vitro culture. These findings suggested that SCAP-CM administration could be useful for future preclinical and clinical applications.

An effective method for culturing functional human corneal endothelial cells using a xenogeneic free culture medium

Endothelial dysfunction is a leading cause of corneal blindness in developed countries and the only available treatment is the endothelial transplantation. However, the limited availability of suitable donors remains a significant challenge, driving the exploration of alternative regenerative therapies. Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products show promise but must adhere to strict regulations that prohibit the use of animal-derived substances. This study investigates a novel culture methodology using Plasma Rich in Growth Factors (PRGF) as the only source of growth factors for primary cultures of human corneal endothelial cells (CECs). CECs were obtained from discarded corneas or endothelial rings and cultured in two different media: one supplemented with xenogeneic factors and other xenogeneic-free, using PRGF. Comprehensive characterization through immunofluorescence, morphological analyses, trans-endothelial electrical resistance measurements, RNA-seq, and qPCR was conducted on the two groups. Results demonstrate that CECs cultured in the xenogeneic-free medium exhibit comparable gene expression, morphology, and functionality to those cultured in the xenogeneic medium. Notably, PRGF-expanded CECs share 46.9% of the gene expression profile with native endothelium and express all studied endothelial markers. In conclusion, PRGF provides an effective source of xenogeneic-free growth factors for the culture of CECs from discarded corneal tissue. Further studies will be necessary to demonstrate the applicability of these cultures to cell therapies that make clinical translation possible.

A Comparison of the Corneal Thickness Following Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To compare the central corneal thickness before and after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), and to evaluate the recipient corneal thickness following DSAEK.

METHODS

The corneal thickness was compared between two groups of eyes following DMEK and DSAEK, performed by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2017. We evaluated the recipient corneal thickness and central corneal thickness pre- and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Recipient corneal thickness was defined as the corneal thickness without graft thickness.

RESULTS

We included DMEK and DSAEK eyes (n = 26 each), which were similar in terms of their etiologies. Preoperatively, there was no significant difference in the central corneal thickness between the groups (DSAEK, median [interquartile range]: 721 [606.5 to 847.8] µm; and DMEK: 690 [618 to 722.3] µm; p = 0.30). Despite the tendency of the central corneal thickness to be significantly greater (p < .01) at 6 months following DSAEK (619.5 [607.8 to 661.3] µm) compared with that following DMEK (497.5 [475.8 to 525.3] µm), there was no significant difference at 6 months between the recipient corneal thickness following DSAEK (488.5 [443.8 to 515] µm) and central corneal thickness following DMEK (p = 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

DSAEK eyes display a similar tendency of stromal thinning as DMEK eyes.

Risk Factors for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Rejection: Current Perspectives- Systematic Review

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a corneal endothelial transplantation procedure with selective removal of a patient's defective Descemet membrane and endothelium. It is replaced with a healthy donor Descemet membrane and endothelium without a stromal component. Corneal graft rejection can be at the level of epithelium, stroma as well endothelium. DMEK graft rejection is relatively less common than rejection with DSAEK or penetrating keratoplasty, and a good outcome may be achieved with prompt management. The clinical picture of DMEK rejection is usually similar to endothelial rejection in Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK/DSAEK), which generally manifests as pain, redness, reduction in visual acuity, stromal edema, endothelial rejection line, keratic precipitates at the back of the cornea and corneal neovascularization. However, more subtle forms of rejection or immune reactions are more common in DMEK compared to DSAEK eyes. Early clinical diagnosis, prompt intervention, and meticulous management safeguard visual acuity and graft survival in these cases. Intensive topical steroids form the mainstay in the management of DMEK rejection. Sometimes, oral or intravenous steroids or other systemic immunomodulators may be required. DMEK graft failure can be primary or secondary, and failure usually requires a second procedure in the form of repeat DMEK or DSEK or penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). A detailed literature search was performed using search engines such as Google Scholar, PubMed, and Google books, and a comprehensive review on DMEK rejection was found to be lacking. This review is a comprehensive update on the risk factors, pathophysiology, primary and secondary graft failure, recent advances in diagnosis, prevention of rejection, and updates in the management of DMEK rejection. The review also discusses the differential diagnosis of DMEK failure and rejection, prognosis, and future perspectives considering DMEK failure and rejection.

A Combined Procedure of Intrastromal Corneal Rings Explantation and Penetrating Keratoplasty in a Patient With Keratoconus: A Case Report

Keratoconus is a non-inflammatory and degenerative corneal ectasia that determinate progressive steepening of paracentral cornea with development of irregular astigmatism and visual function deterioration. According to the stage of the pathology, different methods of correction can be used: rigid contact lenses may be used to alter corneal shape and partially correct astigmatism, corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) and intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation can reinforce corneal stroma to slow disease progression. Late-stage treatment comprehend anterior lamellar keratoplasty or penetrating keratoplasty. We evaluated a 31-year-old patient who was subjected to bilateral ICRS implantation combined with CXL due to keratoconus. This led, after 9 months, to ring extrusion in his left eye, corneal thinning and microperforation into the aqueous chamber with residual irregular astigmatism of 4.50 D. cyl. 10°. The patient underwent ICRS explantation and PKP during the same surgical session. After 15 months of follow-up, the BCVA was 0.2 LogMAR with a residual astigmatism of 6.3 dpt.

Potential Effect of Human Platelet Lysate on in vitro Expansion of Human Corneal Endothelial Cells Compared with Y-27632 ROCK Inhibitor

Purpose

Corneal endothelial cell (CEC) therapy can be used as a promising therapeutic option for patients with various corneal endothelial dysfunctions. In this study, we compared the proliferative effect of human platelet lysate (HPL), as a xeno-free medium supplement, with Y-27632 Rho/rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitor, as a well-known proliferative and adhesive agent for CECs, and fetal bovine serum (FBS) as the control, in the culture medium of human corneal endothelial cells (HCECs).

Methods

We isolated HCECs from human donors and treated the cells as three different treatment groups including 20% HPL only, 10 μM Y-27632 ROCK inhibitor, combination of 20% HPL and 10 μM Y-27632 ROCK inhibitor, and 20% FBS as the control group. ELISA cell proliferation assay and cell counting was performed on the treated cells. Finally, HCECs were characterized by morphology and immunocytochemistry (ICC).

Results

There was no significant proliferative effect of HPL on cell proliferation compared with the cells treated with Y-27632 ROCK inhibitor or the combination of HPL and Y-27632 ROCK inhibitor, but all the respected treatments had significant inducible effect on cell proliferation as compared with FBS-treated cells. The cells grown in all three treatment groups exhibited CEC morphology. Also, there was a higher expression of Na+/K+-ATPase and ZO-1, as CEC characteristic markers, in the culture of HCECs treated with HPL as compared with FBS.

Conclusion

HPL offers a xeno-free and affordable medium supplement for CEC expansion that can be used in clinical applications.

Application of mesenchymal stem cells in corneal regeneration

Due to delicate its structure, the cornea is susceptible to physical, chemical, and genetic damages. Corneal transplantation is the main treatment for serious corneal damage, but it faces significant challenges, including donor shortages and severe complications. In recent years, cell therapy is suggested as a novel alternative method for corneal regeneration. Regarding the unique characteristics of Mesenchymal stem cells including the potential to differentiate into discrete cell types, secretion of growth factors, mobilization potency, and availability from different sources; special attention has been paid to these cells in corneal engineering. Differentiation of MSCs into specialized corneal cells such as keratocytes, epithelial and endothelial cells is reported. Potential for Treatment of keratitis, reducing inflammation, and inhibition of neovascularization by MSCs, introducing them as novel agents for corneal repairing. In this review, various types of MSCs used to treat corneal injuries as well as their potential for restoring different corneal layers was investigated.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Protect Human Corneal Endothelial Cells from Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Mediated Apoptosis

Corneal endothelial dystrophy is a relevant cause of vision loss and corneal transplantation worldwide. In the present study, we analyzed the effect of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) in an in vitro model of corneal dystrophy, characterized by endoplasmic reticulum stress. The effects of MSC-EVs were compared with those of serum-derived EVs, reported to display a pro-angiogenic activity. MSC-EVs were able to induce a significant down-regulation of the large majority of endoplasmic reticulum stress-related genes in human corneal endothelial cells after exposure to serum deprivation and tunicamycin. In parallel, they upregulated the Akt pathway and limited caspase-3 activation and apoptosis. At variance, the effect of the serum EVs was mainly limited to Akt phosphorylation, with minimal or absent effects on endoplasmic reticulum stress modulation and apoptosis prevention. The effects of MSC-EVs were correlated to the transfer of numerous endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-stress targeting miRNAs to corneal endothelial cells. These data suggest a potential therapeutic effect of MSC-EVs for corneal endothelial endoplasmic reticulum stress, a major player in corneal endothelial dystrophy.

Focus on cell therapy to treat corneal endothelial diseases

The cornea is a multi-layered structure which allows fine refraction and provides both resistance to external insults and adequate transparency. The corneal endothelium ensures stromal hydration, failure of which, such as in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, after trauma or in aging, may lead to loss of corneal transparency and induce blindness. Currently, no efficient therapeutic alternatives exist except for corneal grafting. Thus corneal tissue engineering represents a valuable alternative approach, which may overcome cornea donor shortage. Several studies describe protocols to isolate, differentiate, and cultivate corneal endothelial cells (CEnCs) in vitro. Two main in vitro strategies can be described: expansion of eye-native cell populations, such as CEnCs, or the production and expansion of CEnCs from non-eye native cell populations, such as induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs). The challenge with these cells is to obtain a monolayer of CEnCs on a biocompatible carrier, with a specific morphology (flat hexagonal cells), and with specific functions such as programmed cell cycle arrest. Another issue for this cell culture methodology is to define the adapted protocol (media, trophic factors, timeframe) that can mimic physiological development. Additionally, contamination by other cell types still represents a huge problem. Thus, purification methods, such as Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS), Magnetic Ativated Cell Sorting (MACS) or Sedimentation Field Flow Fractionation (SdFFF) are useful. Animal models are also crucial to provide a translational approach for these therapies, integrating macro- and microenvironment influences, systemic hormonal or immune responses, and exogenous interactions. Non-eye native cell graft protocols are constantly improving both in efficacy and safety, with the aim of being the most suitable candidate for corneal therapies in future routine practice. The aim of this work is to review these different aspects with a special focus on issues facing CEnC culture in vitro, and to highlight animal graft models adapted to screen the efficacy of these different protocols.

Laminin 511 Precoating Promotes the Functional Recovery of Transplanted Corneal Endothelial Cells

Corneal endothelial dysfunction is a major cause of corneal blindness and is mainly treated by corneal transplantation. However, the global shortage of donor cornea hampers its application. Intracameral injection of cultured primary corneal endothelial cells (CECs) was recently confirmed in clinical trials. However, abnormal adhesion of the grafted CECs affects the application of this strategy. In this study, we explored if laminin 511 (LN511) improves the therapeutic function of the intracameral CEC injection for corneal endothelial dysfunction. To mimic the late stage of corneal endothelial diseases, intense scraping was developed to remove CECs and extracellular matrix of the posterior Descemet's membrane (DM) without DM removal in rabbits. Then, Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) and LN511 were intracamerally injected as the control and intervention groups, respectively. We found that the injected LN511 could settle and form a coating on the posterior surface of DM. After CEC transplantation, corneal clarity of rabbits in the LN511 group was rapidly recovered within 7 days, whereas the corneal recovery took 14 days in the DPBS group. Corneal thickness of LN511 group decreased to 413.3 ± 20.8 μm 7 days after operation, which was significantly lower than 1086.3 ± 78.6 μm of DPBS group (p < 0.01). Moreover, for the grafted CECs, LN511 promoted the rapid adhesion, tight junction formation, and expression of Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase and ZO-1. In vitro analysis revealed that the functions of LN511 on the cultured human CECs mechanistically depended on the cell density and the nuclear-cytoplasmic translocation of the Yes-associated protein. Our study demonstrated that LN511 precoating promoted the adhesion of the transplanted CECs and enhanced the functional regeneration of the corneal endothelium. Thus, our data suggested that the strategy of LN511 precoating and CECs' intracameral injection could be a potential method for the therapy of corneal endothelial dysfunction. Impact statement Intracameral injection of cultured corneal endothelial cells (CECs) is a potential alternative therapy for corneal endothelial dysfunction and has been proven to be effective in clinical trials. However, abnormal adhesion of the grafted CECs affects its application. In this study, intense scraping was developed to remove CECs and extracellular matrix of the posterior Descemet's membrane (DM) without DM removal for the therapy of late stage of corneal endothelial diseases. Laminin 511 was intracamerally injected to form a coating, improve the posterior DM, enhance the adhesion of the grafted CECs, and promote the functional regeneration of CEC transplantation through Yes-associated protein signaling.

Scaffold-Free 3-D Cell Sheet Technique Bridges the Gap between 2-D Cell Culture and Animal Models

Various tissue engineering techniques have been created in research spanning two centuries, resulting in new opportunities for growing cells in culture and the creation of 3-D tissue-like constructs. These techniques are classified as scaffold-based and scaffold-free techniques. Cell sheet, as a scaffold-free technique, has attracted research interest in the context of drug discovery and tissue repair, because it provides more predictive data for in vivo testing. It is one of the most promising techniques and has the potential to treat degenerative tissues such as heart, kidneys, and liver. In this paper, we argue the advantages of cell sheets as a scaffold-free approach, compared to other techniques, including scaffold-based and scaffold-free techniques such as the classic systemic injection of cell suspension.

Advances in culture, expansion and mechanistic studies of corneal endothelial cells: a systematic review

Human corneal endothelial cells are notorious for their restricted proliferative ability in vivo and in vitro. Hence, injury or dysfunction of these cells may easily result in blindness. Currently, the only treatment is to transplant a donor cornea that contains a healthy corneal endothelium. However there is a severe global shortage of donor corneas and there remains an unmet clinical need to engineer human corneal grafts with healthy corneal endothelium. In this review, we present current advances in the culture, expansion, and molecular understandings of corneal endothelial cells in vitro in order to help establish methods of engineering human corneal endothelial grafts.

Engineering of Human Corneal Endothelial Cells In Vitro

Human corneal endothelial cells are responsible for controlling corneal transparency, however they are notorious for their limited proliferative capability. Thus, damage to these cells may cause irreversible blindness. Currently, the only way to cure blindness caused by corneal endothelial dysfunction is via corneal transplantation of a cadaver donor cornea with healthy corneal endothelium. Due to severe shortage of donor corneas worldwide, it has become paramount to develop human corneal endothelial grafts in vitro that can subsequently be transplanted in humans. Recently, we have reported effective expansion of human corneal endothelial cells by reprogramming the cells into progenitor status through use of p120-Kaiso siRNA knockdown. This new reprogramming approach circumvents the need of using induced pluripotent stem cells or embryonic stem cells. Successful promotion of this technology will encourage scientists to re-think how "contact inhibition" can safely be perturbed to our benefit, i.e., effective engineering of an in vivo-like tissue while successful maintaining the normal phenotype. In this review, we present current advances in reprogramming corneal endothelial cells in vitro, detail the methods to successful engineer human corneal endothelial grafts, and discuss their future clinical applications to cure corneal blindness.