Silicone-Induced Granuloma of Breast Implant Capsule (SIGBIC): Histopathology and Radiological Correlation

Why Is the Baker Classification Inadequate for Classifying Silicone Implant Fibrous Capsules?

Baker's clinical classification is adopted as the gold standard for grading complications related to silicone implants. Despite being widely used for this purpose, the classification has several limitations, highlighting subjectivity, reproducibility, and interobserver agreement. In this technical report, we aim to present the reasons for the inadequacy of the Baker classification for breast implants and the main factors contributing to false-negative results using recent theories of surface tension of fluids and gel bleeding. We also present an alternative classification proposal using magnetic resonance imaging of the breasts.

Breast silicone implants' pericapsular impairment: current underdiagnosed status

Many complications related to silicone implants have been reported recently, from clinical symptoms manifestations to association with some specific types of cancer. During the early 2010s, it was believed that implants were biocompatible and inert to the human body and that gel bleeding/leakage events were rare and without repercussions for the human body. However, at the end of 2010s, several studies pointed out that gel bleeding was more frequent than previously believed, and the pathogenic potential of free silicone should not be ignored. The Food and Drug Administration recommends performing magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic patients 5-6 years after implant placement. The descriptors in the Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System lexicon seem outdated for classifying the new generations of implants with cohesive gel, which hinders the diagnosis of device complications. In this review, supported by our research data publications related to silicone implants for 6 years on a prospective study protocol, most of them being original articles, we summarized the main complications observed in clinical practice and discuss the impact of these changes on patients' outcomes focusing on the pericapsular space.

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a Potential Material for the Repair of Maxillofacial Defect Compared with E-poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (e-PTFE) and Silicone

Silicone and e-poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (e-PTFE) are the most commonly used artificial materials for repairing maxillofacial bone defects caused by facial trauma and tumors. However, their use is limited by poor histocompatibility, unsatisfactory support, and high infection rates. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has excellent mechanical strength and biocompatibility, but its application to the repair of maxillofacial bone defects lacks a theoretical basis. The microstructure and mechanical properties of e-PTFE, silicone, and PEEK were evaluated by electron microscopy, BOSE machine, and Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy. Mouse fibroblast L929 cells were incubated on the surface of the three materials to assess cytotoxicity and adhesion. The three materials were implanted onto the left femoral surface of 90 male mice, and samples of the implants and surrounding soft tissues were evaluated histologically at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-surgery. PEEK had a much higher Young's modulus than either e-PTFE or silicone (p < 0.05 each), and maintained high stiffness without degradation long after implantation. Both PEEK and e-PTFE facilitated L929 cell adhesion, with PEEK having lower cytotoxicity than e-PTFE and silicone (p < 0.05 each). All three materials similarly hindered the motor function of mice 12 weeks after implantation (p > 0.05 each). Connective tissue ingrowth was observed in PEEK and e-PTFE, whereas a fibrotic peri-prosthetic capsule was observed on the surface of silicone. The postoperative infection rate was significantly lower for both PEEK and silicone than for e-PTFE (p < 0.05 each). PEEK shows excellent biocompatibility and mechanical stability, suggesting that it can be effective as a novel implant to repair maxillofacial bone defects.

Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis and cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis: two sides of the same coin or distinct entities?

Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is a benign mimic of breast carcinomas. It is defined histologically by the presence of granulomas and inflammation. The closely related cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis (CNGM) shows lipogranulomas, with a reported association with corynebacteria. A large cohort of IGM was reviewed to compare clinical, microbiological and histological features between non-CNGM IGM and CNGM. Cases of IGM were reviewed for histological parameters including the presence of lipogranulomas and composition of inflammatory cells. Clinical data were obtained through hospital records. The cohort included 79 cases, including 51 non-CNGM IGM and 28 CNGM. Comparing non-CNGM IGM and CNGM, there were no differences in clinical or demographical data, other than a younger age of presentation (36.2 vs 41.5 years, p=0.012) for CNGM. Most IGM resolved within the follow-up period (n=57/64, 89.1%), with similar outcomes regardless of treatment (p>0.05). In CNGM, there were more infiltrates of neutrophils (p=0.001), histiocytes (p=0.047), and multinucleated giant cells (p=0.006), but less lymphocytes (p=0.008). Corynebacteria was cultured in two (25%) cases of CNGM, and one non-CNGM IGM (14.3%). Gram-positive bacilli were identified in two cases of CNGM. 'Early' lipogranulomas were observed closely associated to inflamed ducts in three cases of CNGM. Apart from age, there was no distinct clinical or microbiological feature for CNGM. These findings do not support CNGM as a distinct entity. Rather, CNGM-pattern may represent a continuum of IGM, possibly age-related and attributable to ductal inflammation and cystic changes in the breast parenchyma.

Silicone Granuloma Mimicking a Lymphatic Metastasis in a Lung Cancer Patient: A Case Report

Silicone granulomas are rare, benign lesions that may occur after breast augmentation. Occasionally, a careful differential diagnosis is necessary because lymphadenopathy or malignancy is suspected based on an imaging study. A 56-year-old woman who visited the hospital due to a lung nodule in the left upper lobe (LUL) underwent a staging work-up with the suspicion of lung cancer. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography and chest computed tomography revealed the LUL nodule and a lesion in the left internal mammary chain (IMC), suggesting lymphadenopathy. Diagnostic wedge resection was performed, followed by curative surgery. The final biopsy result confirmed that the LUL nodule was pathologic stage IB adenocarcinoma; unexpectedly, the lesion in the left IMC was a silicone granuloma.

Progressive sensory ataxia and breast implant rupture, an uncommon presentation of a debated concept: a case report

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (ASIA) is a concept introduced by Shoenfeld to group various disease entities believed to be triggered by an infection, silicone exposure or other external stimuli. A causal link between the use of silicone and the development of autoimmune diseases and lymphoma has been suggested in the past. Sjögren's Syndrome (SS) is one of the autoimmune diseases that has been postulated as an example of ASIA syndrome. Although typically characterized by sicca, SS can manifest as a ganglionopathy as the primary presenting symptom. To our knowledge, this is the first case report in which a ganglionopathy unveiled an underlying SS in the context of a possible ASIA syndrome.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe a case of a 44-year-old woman who developed rapidly progressive sensory loss in the 4 limbs with a walking impairment due to the severe sensory ataxia. After extensive work-up, she was diagnosed with a ganglionopathy as the first symptom of SS, and the concurrent diagnosis of a bilateral breast implant leakage with severe inflammation due to silicone bleeding. After surgical removal of the prostheses and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy, stabilization of symptoms was achieved.

CONCLUSION

This case report brings to attention the possibility of a sensory ganglionopathy as first and isolated symptom of SS. The occurrence of SS in the setting of ASIA stir up the discussion about the safety of silicone breast implants.

Fundamentals of Breast Implant Illness and Device Imaging

The past six decades of silicone breast implant history encompass manufacturing secrecy, regulatory laxity, inadequate informed consent, clever advertising, overly simplistic research methodology, diverse and controversial opinions, changing social patterns, safety issues, information ambiguity, speculation, and deception. This review addresses the verifiable clinical, radiological, and pathological aspects of these devices, particularly with regard to silicone bleeding. This information can favorably assist practitioners and radiologists facing diagnostic challenges encountered in patients with silicone breast implants.

Breast Implant Illness: Surgical, Autoimmune, and Breast Reconstruction Associations

Breast implant illness refers to a combination of different symptoms related to breast implant surgery, including fatigue, brain fog, and arthralgias. This malaise occurs after cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgeries, although it has not been proven to be a disease. Even recent studies have reported concluding statements of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment as unclear and widely unknown. Therefore, this review aimed to determine the associations between the manifestations of breast implant illness in surgery and breast reconstruction, as well as the autoimmune responses involved. Complications associated with breast implants include breast pain, capsular contracture, infections, as well as other manifestations specific to breast reconstruction. Moreover, patients with implants may present with new-onset systemic sclerosis, Sjögren’s syndrome, and connective tissue diseases. However, the incidence of capsular contracture has steadily decreased with each generation of implants, particularly since the development of textured implants, as well as with the use of antibiotics and antiseptic pocket irrigation. However, the incidence of anaplastic large cell lymphoma has increased with the use of textured implants. Remarkably, the autoimmune response to these implants remains unclear. Therefore, close follow-up, careful observation of any symptom presentation, and evidence-based treatment decisions are necessary for patients with breast implants.

Comparison of the Incidence of Capsular Formation in Two-Stage, Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using an Insertion Funnel and Sizer

Purpose

Capsular formation around breast implants can produce various complications, including erythema, tenderness, discomfort, and breast deformation. Moreover, the capsule is thought to be correlated with breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. The proposed technique of capsule reduction can prevent some of these complications. Thus, the authors suggest a no-touch technique in two-stage, implant-based breast reconstruction. Patients and Methods. This single-center retrospective study evaluated the medical records and digitalized pathological slides of patients who underwent two-stage, implant-based breast reconstruction between February 2018 and May 2019. The selected patients were divided into group A and group B. Group A underwent a no-touch technique that included the following two steps: (1) using a sizer as the frame to create the submuscular and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) pocket for expander insertion and (2) inserting the expander through the funnel. After the second stage of implant insertion, the capsule was harvested for biopsy of the ADM, chest wall, and muscle.

Results

This study included 33 breasts (31 patients): 18 in group A and 15 in group B. The capsular thicknesses of the ADM, the chest wall, and the muscle of group A were significantly thinner than those in group B. Pearson's correlation coefficient indicated negative correlations between capsular thickness and age; underlying disease; lesion side; interval of two-stage implant insertion; size of the expander; and radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or hormone therapy.

Conclusion

To reduce the incidence of capsular formation following breast reconstruction using prostheses, a no-touch technique that uses a funnel and sizer to avoid implant contact is both efficient and beneficial.

Foreign body granuloma around implantable pulse generator for deep brain stimulation: Two case reports

We report two cases of granuloma that occurred around an implantable pulse generator (IPG) for deep brain stimulation. Both cases showed no signs of infection and disappeared after moving the IPG and removing the granulation. If a noninfectious mass is formed, the relocation of IPG may improve it.

Palpable Lumps after Mastectomy: Radiologic-Pathologic Review of Benign and Malignant Masses

Patients who have undergone mastectomy, with or without reconstruction, are not universally screened with mammography or US. Therefore, clinical breast examination by the physician and patient-detected palpable abnormalities are crucial for detecting breast cancer or recurrence. Diagnostic US is the first-line modality for evaluation of postmastectomy palpable masses, with occasional adjunct use of diagnostic mammography for confirming certain benign masses. In the setting of a negative initial imaging evaluation with continued clinical concern, diagnostic MRI may aid in improving sensitivity. Knowledge of the typical multimodality imaging appearances and locations of malignant palpable abnormalities-such as invasive carcinoma recurrence, cancer in residual breast tissue, radiation-induced sarcoma, and metastatic disease-is crucial in diagnosis and treatment of these entities. In addition, familiarity with the range of benign palpable postmastectomy processes-including fat necrosis, fat graft, seroma, granuloma, neuroma, fibrosis, and infection-may help avoid unnecessary biopsies and reassure patients. The authors review common and rare benign and malignant palpable masses in mastectomy patients, describe multimodality diagnostic imaging evaluation of each entity, review radiologic and pathologic correlation, and acquaint the radiologist with management when these findings are encountered. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Side effects in breast implants related to radiotherapy in breast cancer reconstructive surgery

•

Radiotherapy may alter silicone shell permeability and predispose gel bleeding.

•

Adjuvant radiotherapy to silicone implants resulted in earlier detected complications on BMRI.

•

Radiotherapy and silicone implants are associated to a new disease in patients cured from breast cancer.

Breast reconstructive surgery with silicone implants is routinely one of the techniques performed immediately after a mastectomy and before adjuvant radiotherapy. Implant shell degradation may result in gel bleeding that can trigger capsular disease. The silicone corpuscle in contact with the implant fibrous capsule can promote an inflammatory reaction, identified as silicone-induced granuloma which is, related to clinical complaints referred to as breast implant illness.

This short communication aims to demonstrate and discuss the impact of radiotherapy's side effects on patients with post-mastectomy reconstructive breast surgery with silicone implants followed by adjuvant radiation therapy.

The Breast Tumor Microenvironment: Could Silicone Breast Implant Elicit Breast Carcinoma?

Complications related to breast implants have received much attention recently. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, silicone-induced granuloma of breast implant capsule, and breast implant illness are the main complications reported in the medical literature. However, the literature contains limited evidence regarding the possibility of silicone implants eliciting breast carcinoma. In this manuscript, we propose a theory in which the immune response to silicone breast implant gel bleeding acts as a triggering point for tumor oncogenesis in breast tissue. This hypothesis is derived from our findings of a case of invasive and undifferentiated medullary carcinoma in a patient with a silicone breast implant. The following concepts have been used to support this theory: 1) silicone bleeding from intact breast implants; 2) metaplasia: an adaptation to injury and precursor to dysplasia and cancer; 3) T-cell dysfunction in cancer immunity; 4) inhibitory cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME); 5) morphogenesis and bauplan; and 6) concepts underlying medullary carcinoma. We propose that the inflammatory process in response to silicone particles in the pericapsular glandular tissue favors the development of cellular mutations in specialized epithelial cells. This reverse morphogenesis could have resulted in breast carcinoma of the medullary type in the present case.

Understanding Silicone Breast Implant-Associated Complications for Radiologists

미용적 성형 및 유방암 수술 후 재건의 목적으로 사용되는 실리콘 보형물의 사용이 국내외에서 크게 증가함에 따라 진료 영역에서 실리콘 보형물 삽입술을 받은 환자들을 어렵지 않게 접하게 되었다. 기존에 알려져 있던 보형물의 파열이나 구축과 같은 합병증 외에 최근에는 유방 보형물 연관 역형성 대세포 림프종과 같은 악성 종양과의 연관성도 보고되면서 보형물 관련한 영상 검사가 증가하고 있다. 이러한 상황에서 영상의학과 의사들은 보형물 삽입술을 받은 환자에 대해 어떤 검사가 필요하고 어떤 영상 소견이 보형물 관련 합병증을 시사하는지에 관한 충분한 지식을 갖추고 있어야 할 것이다. 본 종설에서는 영상의학과 의사들이 알아야 하는 실리콘 보형물의 다양한 합병증과 이들의 영상 소견에 대해 다루고자 한다.

Not All That Shines on a PET Scan Is Cancer: A Silicone-Induced Granuloma Masquerading as Malignancy

PET/CT scans are frequently used in the initial workup of suspicious lesions but not all that lights up on a PET is cancerous. We wish to discuss a case of silicone-induced granuloma mimicking malignancy and the role of other imaging modalities for further workup.

Synchronous breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) and silicone induced granuloma of breast implant capsule (SIGBIC): What to learn

We recently described silicone induced granuloma of breast implant capsule (SIGBIC) as an implant capsule illness related to intact silicone breast implants. The precursor to SIGBIC development is gel bleeding/shedding from the implant shell/interior content. Currently, although the literature widely discussed the pathogenesis of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), the trigger point for its development is still a black-box. In this case report, we report a 46-year-old woman with SIGBIC diagnosis in her right breast and BIA-ALCL in her left breast, diagnosed with ultrasound and breast magnetic resonance. Microscopy confirmed silicone bleeding from the implant surface/ content. The imaging findings reported that SIGBIC and BIA-ALCL were similar; however, BIA-ALCL had an intracapsular collection.

Silicone Induced Granuloma of Breast Implant Capsule (SIGBIC) diagnosis: Breast Magnetic Resonance (BMR) sensitivity to detect silicone bleeding

Objective

To evaluate the sensitivity (S) of BMRI to detect silicone gel bleeding in a prospective observational study, including consecutive patients referred for BMRI scan.

Methods

From January 2017 to March 2018, we evaluated patients with breast implants referred for BMRI in a prospective observational study. For SIGBIC diagnosis, we adopted three new original imaging features: black drop signal; T2* hyper signal mass; and delayed contrast enhancement, considered as irrevocable signs to detect gel bleeding (GB). Histology confirmed the presence of a silicone corpuscle in breast implant capsular specimens. The accuracy of BMRI SIGBIC findings to predict GB was determined. We also compared SIGBIC diagnosis criteria to those features proposed by the BI-RADS léxicon, considered as equivocal findings.

Results

208 patients had SIGBIC diagnosis at BMRI, and the histology confirmed GB in all cases. There were no false-positive results. Compared to the BI-RADS equivocal findings (S = 0.74), SIGBIC criteria had better sensitivity for GB diagnosis.

Conclusion

SIGBIC diagnosis has high sensitivity to predict GB by the three irrevocable BMRI features described by the authors. We suppose GB is underdiagnosed in clinical practice by BI-RADS features.

Trial certification

Study protocol: Plataforma Brasil CAAE: 77215317.0.0000.0072.