Quantitative Relationships between Pulmonary Function and Residual Neuromuscular Blockade

A modified TOF-ratio to assess rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a comparison with the usual TOF-ratio

BACKGROUND

The TOFscan is an acceleromyographic neuromuscular monitor that calculates and displays two measurements: first, a train-of-four (TOF) ratio, or ratio of the fourth twitch in the TOF-sequence, T4, and the first twitch, T1 (T4/T1). In addition, a second, modified ratio is displayed (T4/Tr), which refers to the ratio between T4 and a reference twitch (Tr), calculated as the mean value of the four twitches in a TOF-sequence [Tr = (T1 + T2 + T3 + T4)/4]. T4/Tr is calculated before establishment of neuromuscular block.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included 35 adult patients. NMB induced by a rocuronium bolus of 0.6 mg/kg was continuously monitored at the adductor pollicis with the TOFscan and both TOF-ratios were simultaneously assessed. Primary outcome was the comparison of recovery to a TOF-ratio ≥ 0.9 calculated as T4/T1 and T4/Tr.

RESULTS

The first value of the T4/T1 ≥ 90% was 90.9 (1.1) % and the simultaneously calculated T4/Tr was 69.6 (9.3) %, P <  0.001. The first value of the T4/Tr ≥ 90% was 90.5 (1.1) %, the simultaneously T4/T1 was 97.3 (2.5) %, P <  0.001. Time from injection of rocuronium to a TOF-ratio ≥ 90% was 56.2 ± 17.1 min for the T4/T1 and 65.3 ± 19.3 min for the T4/Tr, P < 0.001. During onset, a TOF ratio ≤ 20% was reached 145.5 (50.5) s after rocuronium when considering T4/T1, and 114.5 (45) s with the T4/Tr, P <  0.001.

CONCLUSION

The present study shows the limitations of the usually determined acceleromyographic TOF ratio (T4/T1) in determining adequate neuromuscular recovery. The T4/T1 ratio significantly overestimates recovery compared with the T4/Tr ratio. Clinical decisions of adequate neuromuscular recovery based on the new T4/Tr ratio may reduce the incidence of residual paralysis and improve patient safety.

Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring and Postoperative Outcomes: A Narrative Review

Over the past five decades, quantitative neuromuscular monitoring devices have been used to examine the incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular block in international clinical practices, and to determine their role in reducing the risk of residual neuromuscular block and associated adverse clinical outcomes. Several clinical trials and a recent meta-analysis have documented that the intraoperative application of quantitative monitoring significantly reduces the risk of residual neuromuscular blockade in the operating room and postanesthesia care unit. In addition, emerging data show that quantitative monitoring minimizes the risk of adverse clinical events, such as unplanned postoperative reintubations, hypoxemia, and postoperative episodes of airway obstruction associated with incomplete neuromuscular recovery, and may improve postoperative respiratory outcomes. Several international anesthesia societies have recommended that quantitative monitoring be performed whenever a neuromuscular blocking agent is administered. Therefore, a comprehensive review of the literature was performed to determine the potential benefits of quantitative monitoring in the perioperative setting.

Ipsilateral and Simultaneous Comparison of Responses from Acceleromyography- and Electromyography-based Neuromuscular Monitors

BACKGROUND

The paucity of easy-to-use, reliable objective neuromuscular monitors is an obstacle to universal adoption of routine neuromuscular monitoring. Electromyography (EMG) has been proposed as the optimal neuromuscular monitoring technology since it addresses several acceleromyography limitations. This clinical study compared simultaneous neuromuscular responses recorded from induction of neuromuscular block until recovery using the acceleromyography-based TOF-Watch SX and EMG-based TetraGraph.

METHODS

Fifty consenting patients participated. The acceleromyography and EMG devices analyzed simultaneous contractions (acceleromyography) and muscle action potentials (EMG) from the adductor pollicis muscle by synchronization via fiber optic cable link. Bland-Altman analysis described the agreement between devices during distinct phases of neuromuscular block. The primary endpoint was agreement of acceleromyography- and EMG-derived normalized train-of-four ratios greater than or equal to 80%. Secondary endpoints were agreement in the recovery train-of-four ratio range less than 80% and agreement of baseline train-of-four ratios between the devices.

RESULTS

Acceleromyography showed normalized train-of-four ratio greater than or equal to 80% earlier than EMG. When acceleromyography showed train-of-four ratio greater than or equal to 80% (n = 2,929), the bias was 1.3 toward acceleromyography (limits of agreement, -14.0 to 16.6). When EMG showed train-of-four ratio greater than or equal to 80% (n = 2,284), the bias was -0.5 toward EMG (-14.7 to 13.6). In the acceleromyography range train-of-four ratio less than 80% (n = 2,802), the bias was 2.1 (-16.1 to 20.2), and in the EMG range train-of-four ratio less than 80% (n = 3,447), it was 2.6 (-14.4 to 19.6). Baseline train-of-four ratios were higher and more variable with acceleromyography than with EMG.

CONCLUSIONS

Bias was lower than in previous studies. Limits of agreement were wider than expected because acceleromyography readings varied more than EMG both at baseline and during recovery. The EMG-based monitor had higher precision and greater repeatability than acceleromyography. This difference between monitors was even greater when EMG data were compared to raw (nonnormalized) acceleromyography measurements. The EMG monitor is a better indicator of adequate recovery from neuromuscular block and readiness for safe tracheal extubation than the acceleromyography monitor.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE