A Rare Case of Multiorgan Calciphylaxis in a Patient with Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease

Risk factors, treatment modalities, and clinical outcomes of penile calciphylaxis: systematic review

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of case reports and case series to investigate risk factors, treatment modalities, and the outcome of penile calciphylaxis.

METHOD

We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE and Scopus databases to identify case reports or case series of penile calciphylaxis. The patient characteristics, laboratory investigations, diagnostic modalities, treatment modalities, and outcomes were extracted. We compared clinical characteristics and treatment between patients who survived or demised and between patients with clinical improvement and those without to identify the poor prognostic risk factors.

RESULTS

Ninety-four articles were included from 86 case reports and 8 case series with 121 patients. Most of the patients were on hemodialysis (78.9%). The median time since starting dialysis was 48 months (24-96 months). Sodium thiosulfate was used to treat penile calciphylaxis in 23.6%. For surgical management, partial or total penectomy was performed in 45.5% of the patients. There was no association between sodium thiosulfate use, partial or total penectomy, and improvement in clinical outcomes. The mortality rate in patients with penile calciphylaxis was 47.8% and the median time to death was 3 months (0.75-9 months). The presence of extragenital involvement was significantly related to mortality (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

A calcified penile artery results in penile calciphylaxis, a rare vascular phenomenon associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management of penile calciphylaxis includes the medical management of risk factors, surgical debridement, or penectomy. Therefore, early prevention and diagnosis as well as immediate appropriate treatment are needed.

Penile calciphylaxis-a complicated case managed with circumcision and glansectomy

Penile calciphylaxis is a serious manifestation of calcifying uremic arteriolopathy, with only a small number of cases reported in the literature. It is rare, characterized by calcification within the walls of small vessels, resulting in ischaemic changes to the skin, and is mainly seen in patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF). Management of penile calciphylaxis is difficult, with both conservative and surgical approaches advocated for. Due to their comorbidity profile, patients with penile calciphylaxis can present multiple management challenges. We present a case of penile calciphylaxis in a patient with ESRF who was initially managed conservatively, and then underwent circumcision and glansectomy due to a necrotic glans penis and non-resolving penile pain. The patient was spared a partial penectomy and went on to make a full recovery.

A rapid unfavorable penile calciphylaxis case followed by total penectomy

When the diagnosis of penile calciphylaxis is suggested, the evolution of the disease is rapidly unfavorable; in this case, a rapid medical treatment must be established to obtain an improvement of the disease to avoid penectomy.

Penile necrosis by calciphylaxis leading to gangrene in a patient with chronic renal failure on dialysis: A case report

•

Penile necrosis by calciphylaxis is a rare disease.

•

The diagnosis of CUA is often difficult.

•

The Management of this rare condition is still a matter of debate.

Introduction

Penile calciphylaxis is a rare disease whose diagnosis is not easy. It is associated with chronic renal failure. It is a result of media calcification and blood vessels’ fibrosis such as penile arteries that eventually lead to gangrene formation in extremities and penis. Calcific uremic arteriolopathy is commonly associated with secondary hyperparathyroidism and high level of calcium and phosphate.

Presentation of case

In this paper, we report a case of penile necrosis induced by calciphylaxis associated with chronic renal failure and diabetic macroangiopathy. We performed a partial and total amputation in two stages because of the wound infection. The patient died one week after a total penectomy.

Discussion

The skin biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis despite being a risky process. In most cases, appropriate medical management is advocated. The treatment of this pathology is still controversial.

Conclusion

The management of this rare situation is controversial, and its diagnosis is still difficult due to the scarcity of reported cases.