Research Progress of the Functional Role of ACK1 in Breast Cancer

Non-Receptor Tyrosine Kinases: Their Structure and Mechanistic Role in Tumor Progression and Resistance

Protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) function as key molecules in the signaling pathways in addition to their impact as a therapeutic target for the treatment of many human diseases, including cancer. PTKs are characterized by their ability to phosphorylate serine, threonine, or tyrosine residues and can thereby rapidly and reversibly alter the function of their protein substrates in the form of significant changes in protein confirmation and affinity for their interaction with protein partners to drive cellular functions under normal and pathological conditions. PTKs are classified into two groups: one of which represents tyrosine kinases, while the other one includes the members of the serine/threonine kinases. The group of tyrosine kinases is subdivided into subgroups: one of them includes the member of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), while the other subgroup includes the member of non-receptor tyrosine kinases (NRTKs). Both these kinase groups function as an "on" or "off" switch in many cellular functions. NRTKs are enzymes which are overexpressed and activated in many cancer types and regulate variable cellular functions in response to extracellular signaling-dependent mechanisms. NRTK-mediated different cellular functions are regulated by kinase-dependent and kinase-independent mechanisms either in the cytoplasm or in the nucleus. Thus, targeting NRTKs is of great interest to improve the treatment strategy of different tumor types. This review deals with the structure and mechanistic role of NRTKs in tumor progression and resistance and their importance as therapeutic targets in tumor therapy.

ZNF692 promotes osteosarcoma cell proliferation, migration, and invasion through TNK2-mediated activation of the MEK/ERK pathway

BACKGROUND

Osteosarcoma is a diverse and aggressive bone tumor. Driver genes regulating osteosarcoma initiation and progression remains incompletely defined. Zinc finger protein 692 (ZNF692), a kind of Krüppel C2H2 zinc finger transcription factor, exhibited abnormal expression in different types of malignancies and showed a correlation with the clinical prognosis of patients as well as the aggressive characteristics of cancer cells. Nevertheless, its specific role in osteosarcoma is still not well understood.

METHODS

We investigated the dysregulation and clinical significance of ZNF692 in osteosarcoma through bioinformatic method and experimental validation. A range of in vitro assays, including CCK-8, colony formation, EdU incorporation, wound healing, and transwell invasion tests, were conducted to assess the impact of ZNF692 on cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in osteosarcoma. A xenograft mouse model was established to evaluate the effect of ZNF692 on tumor growth in vivo. Western blot assay was used to measure the protein levels of MEK1/2, P-MEK1/2, ERK1/2, and P-ERK1/2 in cells that had been genetically modified to either reduce or increase the expression of ZNF692. The relationship between ZNF692 and tyrosine kinase non-receptor 2 (TNK2) were validated by qRT-PCR, chromatin immunoprecipitation and luciferase reporter assays.

RESULTS

Expression of ZNF692 was increased in both human osteosarcoma tissues and cell lines. Furthermore, the expression of ZNF692 served as an independent predictive biomarker in osteosarcoma. The results of the survival analysis indicated that increased expression of ZNF692 was associated with worse outcome. Downregulation of ZNF692 inhibits the proliferation, migration, and invasion of osteosarcoma cells, whereas upregulation of ZNF692 has the opposite impact. Western blot assay indicates that reducing ZNF692 decreases phosphorylation of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2, whereas increasing ZNF692 expression enhances their phosphorylation. U0126, a potent inhibitor specifically targeting the MEK/ERK signaling pathway, partially counteracts the impact of ZNF692 overexpression on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of osteosarcoma cells. In addition, ZNF692 specifically interacts with the promoter region of TNK2 and stimulates the transcription of TNK2 in osteosarcoma cells. Forcing the expression of TNK2 weakens the inhibitory impact of ZNF692 knockdown on P-MEK1/2 and P-ERK1/2. Similarly, partly inhibiting TNK2 counteracts the enhancing impact of ZNF692 overexpression on the phosphorylation of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2. Functional tests demonstrate that the suppressive effects of ZNF692 knockdown on cell proliferation, migration, and invasion are greatly reduced when TNK2 is overexpressed. In contrast, the reduction of TNK2 hinders the ability of ZNF692 overexpression to enhance cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.

CONCLUSION

ZNF692 promotes the proliferation, migration, and invasion of osteosarcoma cells via the TNK2-dependent stimulation of the MEK/ERK signaling pathway. The ZNF692-TNK2 axis might potentially function as a possible predictive biomarker and a promising target for novel therapeutics in osteosarcoma.

Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Dual Inhibitors of EGFRL858R/T790M/ACK1 to Overcome Osimertinib Resistance in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancers

Activation of the alternative pathways and abnormal signaling transduction are frequently observed in third-generation EGFR-TKIs (epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors)-resistant patients. Wherein, hyperphosphorylation of ACK1 contributes to EGFR-TKIs acquired resistance. Dual inhibition of EGFRL858R/T790M and ACK1 might improve therapeutic efficacy and overcome resistance in lung cancers treatment. Here, we identified a EGFRL858R/T790M/ACK1 dual-targeting compound 21a with aminoquinazoline scaffold, which showed excellent inhibitory activities against EGFRL858R/T790M (IC50 = 23 nM) and ACK1 (IC50 = 263 nM). The cocrystal and docking analysis showed that 21a occupied the ATP binding pockets of EGFRL858R/T790M and ACK1. Moreover, 21a showed potent antiproliferative activities against the H1975 cells, MCF-7 cells and osimertinib-resistant cells AZDR. Further, 21a showed significant antitumor effects and good safety in ADZR xenograft-bearing mice. Taken together, 21a was a potent dual inhibitor of EGFRL858R/T790M/ACK1, which is deserved as a potential lead for overcoming acquired resistance to osimertinib during the EGFR-targeted therapy.

Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of (R)-8-((Tetrahydrofuran-2-yl)methyl)pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidin-7-ones as Novel Selective ACK1 Inhibitors to Combat Acquired Resistance to the Third-Generation EGFR Inhibitor

Activated Cdc42-associated kinase 1 (ACK1) alterations have been considered to mediate bypass acquired resistance to the third-generation EGFR inhibitors (ASK120067 and osimertinib) in NSCLC. Despite many efforts to develop ACK1 small molecule inhibitors, no selective inhibitors have entered clinical trials. We used structure-based drug design to obtain a series of (R)-8-((tetrahydrofuran-2-yl)methyl)pyrido [2,3-d]pyrimidin-7-ones as novel selective ACK1 inhibitors. One of the representative compounds, 10zi, potently inhibited ACK1 kinase with an IC₅₀ of 2.1 nM, while sparing SRC kinase (IC₅₀ = 218.7 nM). Further, 10zi displayed good kinome selectivity in a profiling of 468 kinases. In the ASK120067-resistant lung cancer cell line (67R), 10zi dose-dependently inhibited the phosphorylation of ACK1 and downstream AKT pathway and showed a strong synergistic anti-tumor effect in combination with ASK120067 in vitro. Additionally, 10zi also exhibited reasonable PK profiles with an oral bioavailability of 19.8% at the dose of 10 mg/kg, which provided a promising lead for further development of new anticancer drugs.

Domain Architecture of the Nonreceptor Tyrosine Kinase Ack1

The nonreceptor tyrosine kinase (NRTK) Ack1 comprises a distinct arrangement of non-catalytic modules. Its SH3 domain has a C-terminal to the kinase domain (SH1), in contrast to the typical SH3-SH2-SH1 layout in NRTKs. The Ack1 is the only protein that shares a region of high homology to the tumor suppressor protein Mig6, a modulator of EGFR. The vertebrate Acks make up the only tyrosine kinase (TK) family known to carry a UBA domain. The GTPase binding and SAM domains are also uncommon in the NRTKs. In addition to being a downstream effector of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and integrins, Ack1 can act as an epigenetic regulator, modulate the degradation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), confer drug resistance, and mediate the progression of hormone-sensitive tumors. In this review, we discuss the domain architecture of Ack1 in relation to other protein kinases that possess such defined regulatory domains.

Co-targeting of ACK1 and KIT triggers additive anti-proliferative and -migration effects in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) harbor mutated receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) KIT/PDGFRA, which provides an attractive therapeutic target. However, a majority of GISTs ultimately develop resistance to KIT/PDGFRA inhibitor imatinib, multiple therapeutic targets will be identified as a reasonable strategy in imatinib-resistant GISTs. Biological mechanisms of non-RTK activated CDC42 associated kinase 1 (ACK1) are still unclear, which has been found to be activated in GISTs. In the current report, ACK1 overexpression is demonstrated in GIST cell lines and biopsies. RNA-seq analysis and immunoblotting show that ACK1 expression is dependent on imatinib treatment time in GIST-T1 cell line. The colocalization/complex of KIT and ACK1 in GIST cells are observed, and ACK1 activation is in a partially KIT and CDC42 dependent manner. Treatment with a specific ACK1 inhibitor AIM-100 or ACK1 siRNA, mildly suppresses cell viability, but markedly inhibits cell migration in imatinib sensitive and in imatinib resistant GIST cell lines, which is associated with inactivation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAF/MAPK signaling pathways, and inhibition of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, evidencing upregulation of E-cadherin and downregulation of ZEB1, N-cadherin, vimentin, snail, and/or β-catenin after treatment with AIM-100 or ACK1/CDC42 shRNAs. Combination inhibition of ACK1 and KIT results in additive effects of anti-proliferation and pro-apoptosis as well as cell cycle arrest, and inhibition of invasiveness and migration in vitro and in vivo, compared to either intervention alone through dephosphorylation of KIT downstream intermediates (AKT, S6, and MAPK). Our data suggest that co-targeting of ACK1 and KIT might be a novel therapeutic strategy in imatinib-resistant GIST.

Small Molecules Targeting Activated Cdc42-Associated Kinase 1 (ACK1/TNK2) for the Treatment of Cancers

Activated Cdc42-associated kinase 1 (ACK1/TNK2) is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase with a unique structure. It not only can act as an activated transmembrane effector of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) to transmit various RTK signals but also can play a corresponding role in epigenetic regulation. A number of studies have shown that ACK1 is a carcinogenic factor. Blockage of ACK1 has been proven to be able to inhibit cancer cell survival, proliferation, migration, and radiation resistance. Thus, ACK1 is a promising potential antitumor target. To date, despite many efforts to develop ACK1 inhibitors, no specific small molecule inhibitors have entered clinical trials. This Perspective provides an overview of the structural features, biological functions, and association with diseases of ACK1 and in vitro and in vivo activities, selectivity, and therapeutic potential of small molecule ACK1 inhibitors with different chemotypes.

Long and short non-coding RNA and radiation response: a review

Once thought of as arising from "junk DNA," noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have emerged as key molecules in cellular processes and response to stress. From diseases such as cancer, coronary artery disease, and diabetes to the effects of ionizing radiation (IR), ncRNAs play important roles in disease progression and as biomarkers of damage. Noncoding RNAs regulate cellular processes by competitively binding DNA, mRNA, proteins, and other ncRNAs. Through these interactions, specific ncRNAs can modulate the radiosensitivity of cells and serve as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of radiation damage, whether from incidental exposure in radiotherapy or in accidental exposure scenarios. Analysis of RNA expression after radiation exposure has shown alterations not only in mRNAs, but also in ncRNAs (primarily miRNA, circRNA, and lncRNA), implying an important role in cellular stress response. Due to their abundance and stability in serum and other biofluids, ncRNAs also have great potential as minimally invasive biomarkers with advantages over current biodosimetry methods. Several studies have examined changes in ncRNA expression profiles in response to IR and other forms of oxidative stress. Furthermore, some studies have reported modulation of radiosensitivity by altering expression levels of these ncRNAs. This review discusses the roles of ncRNAs in the radiation response and evaluates prior research on ncRNAs as biomarkers of radiation damage. Future directions and applications of ncRNAs in radiation research are introduced, including the potential for a clinical ncRNA assay for assessing radiation damage and for the therapeutic use of RNA interference (RNAi).

TNK2 promoted esophageal cancer progression via activating egfr-akt signaling

Background

This study investigated the clinical implication of TNK2 expression in esophageal cancer patients’ cancer tissue samples.

Methods

The expression of TNK2 in esophageal cancer tissues and para‐carcinoma tissue was assessed with immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis; besides, the proteins of CDC42, EGFR, and Akt were also analyzed. Then, Kaplan‐Meier survival curves of TNK2 protein expression level were assayed with 184 esophageal cancer patients from TCGA database. Moreover, with multiple linear regression analysis, we detected the correlations of TNK2 expression associated with tumor differentiation degree and metastasis status.

Results

It revealed that TNK2 was highly expressed in the cytoplasm of esophageal cancer tissues compared with para‐carcinoma tissue; besides, the proteins of CDC42, EGFR, and Akt were also up‐regulated in different levels of esophageal cancer tissues. However, there was no significant difference of the overall survival time of TNK2 protein expression in 184 esophageal cancer patients from TCGA database (p = 0.37). But, in the included study samples of our study, there was positive coefficience between TNK2 protein expression and differentiation degree in esophageal cancer with multiple linear regression analysis [R = 0.928, 95% confidence interval (0.085‐0.12)].

Conclusion

Our results indicated that TNK2 was a potential diagnostic marker and promoted esophageal cancer progression through activating EGFR‐AKT signaling.