The Prominent Role of HMGA Proteins in the Early Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers

HMGA1 As a Potential Prognostic and Therapeutic Biomarker in Breast Cancer

Background

High-mobility group AT-hook1 (HMGA1) protein plays an important role in various diseases. However, the contribution of HMGA1 in breast cancer remains to be tapped.

Methods

The expression of HMGA1 was analyzed in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and TIMER database, and immunohistochemistry was performed in 39 breast cancer (BC) patients. The correlation between HMGA1 expression and prognosis was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier plotter (KM plotter) in patients with breast cancer. Then, cBioPortal and bc-GenExMiner were requisitioned to analyze the contribution of HMGA1 expression to clinical features. In order to reveal the function of HMGA1 in breast cancer cells, enrichment analysis was performed using the clusterProfiler R software package. Moreover, CCK8 assay, EdU assay, and Cell Cycle Assay were performed to assess the proliferation, and transwell assay was used to evaluate cell migration and invasion. Flow cytometry was used to explore the role of HMGA1 on cell apoptosis. After that, the effect of HMGA1 on signaling pathways in BC cells was detected by western blot.

Results

HMGA1 was highly expressed in a variety of tumors tissues, including BC. High HMGA1 expression was correlated with poor prognosis in BC patients. Meanwhile, HMGA1 expression was increased in molecular phenotypes with poor prognosis (ER-, PR-, and HER2+) and associated with high-grade group, lymph node metastasis, and NPI (Nottingham Prognostic Index). Further, function analysis revealed HMGA1 was enriched in DNA replication and cell cycle pathways in breast cancer. Moreover, knockdown of HMGA1 caused apoptosis, inhibited proliferation, migration, and invasion of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, in which the oncogenic signaling pathway of PI3K/AKT/MMP9 played a critical role.

Conclusions

HMGA1 was important for breast cancer progression and was a critical prognostic indicator, prompting a potential therapeutic target of breast cancer.

Asiaticoside Suppresses Gastric Cancer Progression and Induces Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress through the miR-635/HMGA1 Axis

Objective

Gastric cancer is a prevalent malignant tumor with high morbidity and poor prognosis. Asiaticoside (AC) has antitumor effects, while its role in gastric cancer is elusive. Thus, this study investigated the effect of AC on gastric cancer progression.

Methods

Cell viability and migration were determined using the CCK-8 and Transwell migration assay. Endoplasmic reticulum stress was detected through measuring the expressions of GRP78, Chop, and hnRNPA1 by Western blot. The luciferase assay confirmed the relationship between miR-635 and High Mobility Group AT-Hook 1 (HMGA1). The effect of AC on tumor growth was evaluated by establishing a xenograft tumor. The survival rate of mice was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

AC suppressed gastric cancer cell viability and restrained cell migration. AC inhibited the expressions of the cell proliferation marker PCNA and EMT-related marker N-cadherin and increased E-cadherin expression. AC elevated the levels of GRP78 and Chop and suppressed the level of hnRNPA1. In addition, AC restrained gastric cancer proliferation and migration ability and induced endoplasmic reticulum stress by upregulating miR-635 expression. Furthermore, HMGA1 was proven to be a target of miR-635. AC constrained gastric cancer cell proliferation and migration and promoted endoplasmic reticulum stress by regulating HMGA1. Moreover, AC suppressed in vivo tumor growth and improved the survival time of mice. Additionally, AC elevated the expressions of miR-635, E-cadherin, GRP78, and Chop and inhibited Ki-67, HMGA1, N-cadherin, and hnRNPA1 expressions in tumor tissues of mice.

Conclusion

AC suppressed gastric cancer progression and induced endoplasmic reticulum stress via the miR-635/HMGA1 axis, providing a valuable drug against gastric cancer.

High Mobility Group A 1 Expression as a Poor Prognostic Marker Associated with Tumor Invasiveness in Gastric Cancer

The prognosis of advanced gastric cancer remains poor. Overexpression of high mobility group A 1 (HMGA1) in breast cancer and neuroblastoma indicates a poor prognosis. However, the relationship between HMGA1 expression and gastric cancer development remains unclear. Treatment strategies can be developed by identifying potential markers associated with gastric cancer. We used a constructed tissue array and performed hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical staining. We quantified the staining results and performed statistical analysis to evaluate the relationship between HMGA1 expression and prognosis. HMGA1 expression was related to the expression of Ki-67, caspase3, CD31, N-cadherin, fibronectin, pAkt, and pErk. In the Kaplan–Meier graph, higher HMGA1 expression levels were associated with a relatively poor survival rate (p = 0.04). High expression of HMGA1 leads to a low survival rate, which is associated with HMGA1, proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and tyrosine kinase.

Analysis of Influencing Factors on the Occurrence and Development of Gastric Cancer in High-Incidence Areas of Digestive Tract Tumors Based on High Methylation of GPX3 Gene

Stomach cancer is the second largest cause of cancer-related mortality globally, and it continues to be a reason for worry today. Inhalation of the stomach cancer risk factor H. pylori produces large levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). When combined with glutathione reductase, glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3) catalyzes the reduction of hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxides. To get a better understanding of the GPX3 gene's role in the illness, the researchers used quantitative real-time RT-PCR to examine the gene's expression and regulation in gastric cancer cell lines, original gastric cancer samples, and 45 normal stomach mucosa adjacent to malignancies. According to the research, GPX3 expression was decreased or silenced in eight of nine cancer cell lines and 83 percent of gastric cancer samples (90/108) as compared to normal gastric tissues in the vicinity of the tumor (P < 0.0001). It was found that 60 percent of stomach cancer samples exhibited DNA hypermethylation after analyzing the GPX3 promoter (P=0.007) (a methylation level of more than 10 percent, as measured by bisulfite pyrosequencing). In stomach tumors, we found a statistically significant reduction in the amount of GPX3 DNA copies (P < 0.001). The gene expression of SNU1 and MKN28 cells was restored after treatment with 5-Aza-2′ Deoxycytidine to reduce GPX3 promoter methylation. Genetic and epigenetic alterations lead GPX3 to be dysfunctional in gastric cancer. This indicates that the systems that regulate ROS have been disrupted, and GPX3 may be implicated in the development of gastric cancer, as shown by our results when evaluated alone and in combination.

GRP75-mediated upregulation of HMGA1 stimulates stage I lung adenocarcinoma progression by activating JNK/c-JUN signaling

Background

Recurrence is a major challenge in early‐stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) treatment. Here, we investigated the role and mechanism of high‐mobility group AT‐hook 1 (HMGA1) and glucose‐regulated protein 75‐kDa (GRP75) in stage I LUAD and evaluated their potential as biomarkers for predicting the recurrence and prognosis of stage I LUAD.

Methods

The TCGA dataset was used to investigate the clinical significance of HMGA1 and GRP75 in early‐stage LUAD. The biological functions of HMGA1 and GRP75 in LUAD were investigated both in vitro and in vivo through overexpression and knockdown experiments. The interaction and regulation between HMGA1 and GRP75 were evaluated with coimmunoprecipitation and ubiquitination assays. The downstream signaling pathway of the GRP75/HMGA1 axis was investigated by mRNA‐sequencing analysis.

Results

Both HMGA1 expression levels and GRP75 expression levels were associated with recurrence in stage I LUAD patients. In particular, HMGA1 had potential as an independent prognostic factor in stage I LUAD patients. Overexpression of GRP75 or HMGA1 significantly stimulated LUAD cell growth and metastasis, while silencing GRP75 or HMGA1 inhibited LUAD cell growth and metastasis in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, GRP75 inhibited ubiquitination‐mediated HMGA1 degradation by directly binding to HMGA1, thereby causes HMGA1 upregulation in LUAD. In addition, the GRP75/HMGA1 axis played its role by activating JNK/c‐JUN signaling in LUAD.

Conclusions

The activation of GRP75/HMGA1/JNK/c‐JUN signaling is an important mechanism that promotes the progression of stage I LUAD, and a high level of HMGA1 is a novel biomarker for predicting recurrence and a poor prognosis in stage I LUAD patients.

Esophageal Cancer Development: Crucial Clues Arising from the Extracellular Matrix

In the last years, the extracellular matrix (ECM) has been reported as playing a relevant role in esophageal cancer (EC) development, with this compartment being related to several aspects of EC genesis and progression. This sounds very interesting due to the complexity of this highly incident and lethal tumor, which takes the sixth position in mortality among all tumor types worldwide. The well-established increase in ECM stiffness, which is able to trigger mechanotransduction signaling, is capable of regulating several malignant behaviors by converting alteration in ECM mechanics into cytoplasmatic biochemical signals. In this sense, it has been shown that some molecules play a key role in these events, particularly the different collagen isoforms, as well as enzymes related to its turnover, such as lysyl oxidase (LOX) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). In fact, MMPs are not only involved in ECM stiffness, but also in other events related to ECM homeostasis, which includes ECM remodeling. Therefore, the crucial role of distinct MMPs isoform has already been reported, especially MMP-2, -3, -7, and -9, along EC development, thus strongly associating these proteins with the control of important cellular events during tumor progression, particularly in the process of invasion during metastasis establishment. In addition, by distinct mechanisms, a vast diversity of glycoproteins and proteoglycans, such as laminin, fibronectin, tenascin C, galectin, dermatan sulfate, and hyaluronic acid exert remarkable effects in esophageal malignant cells due to the activation of oncogenic signaling pathways mainly involved in cytoskeleton alterations during adhesion and migration processes. Finally, the wide spectrum of interactions potentially mediated by ECM may represent a singular intervention scenario in esophageal carcinogenesis natural history and, due to the scarce knowledge on the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in EC development, the growing body of evidence on ECM’s role along esophageal carcinogenesis might provide a solid base to improve its management in the future.