Development and characterisation of hybrid composite skin simulants based on short polyethylene fibre and bioactive glass particle-reinforced silicone

Silicone elastomers are widely recognised as artificial skins for medical prosthesis and cranial injury assessment. Since silicone is not an ideal skin simulant due to the lack of mechanical stiffness and a fibrous structure, the present study aimed to tailor the mechanical and structural characteristics of silicone by integrating biocompatible reinforcements (namely, short polyethylene fibres and bioglass particles) to develop suitable bio-integrative skin simulant candidates. The influences of short polyethylene fibres and bioglass particles in the selected platinum silicone on the mechanical properties of silicone-based composite skin simulants were investigated with various factors, including filler concentration, KMnO4 surface treatment of the polyethylene fibre, and particle size. A comprehensive assessment of the tensile, compressive, and hardness properties of the examined composites was conducted, and they were compared with the properties of human biological skin. The results exhibited that the elastic moduli and the hardness of all composites increased with the concentration of both reinforcements. While integrating only the bioglass particles had the advantage of an insignificant effect on the hardness change of the silicone matrix, the composite with polyethylene fibres possessed superior tensile elastic modulus and tensile strength compared to those of the bioglass reinforced composite. The composites with 5% untreated polyethylene fibres, KMnO4 surface-treated fibres, and bioglass reinforcements enhanced the tensile elastic moduli from the pure silicone up to 32%, 44%, and 22%, respectively. It reflected that the surface treatment of the fibres promotes better interfacial adhesion between the silicone matrix and the fibres. Moreover, the smaller bioglass particle had a greater mechanical contribution than the larger glass particle. Systematically characterised for the first time, the developed composite skin simulants demonstrated essential mechanical properties within the range of the human skin and constituted better skin alternatives than pure silicone for various biomedical applications.

Corrigendum to "Evaluation of Some Mechanical Properties of a Maxillofacial Silicon Elastomer Reinforced with Polyester Powder"

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2019/2948457.].

The Influence of Filler Particles on the Mechanical Properties of Maxillofacial Prosthetic Silicone Elastomers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Although numerous studies have demonstrated the benefits of incorporating filler particles into maxillofacial silicone elastomer (MFPSE), a review of the types, concentrations and effectiveness of the particles themselves was lacking. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to review the effect of different types of filler particles on the mechanical properties of MFPSE. The properties in question were (1) tensile strength, (2) tear strength, (3) hardness, and (4) elongation at break. The findings of this study can assist operators, technicians and clinicians in making relevant decisions regarding which type of fillers to incorporate based on their needs. The systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 26 original articles from 1970 to 2019 were selected from the databases, based on predefined eligibility criteria by two reviewers. The meta-analyses of nine papers were carried out by extracting data from the systematic review based on scoring criteria and processed using Cochrane Review Manager 5.3. Overall, there were significant differences favoring filler particles when incorporated into MFPSE. Nano fillers (69.23% of all studies) demonstrated superior comparative outcomes for tensile strength (P < 0.0001), tear strength (P < 0.00001), hardness (P < 0.00001) and elongation at break (P < 0.00001) when compared to micro fillers (30.76% of all studies). Micro fillers demonstrated inconsistent outcomes in mechanical properties, and meta-analysis of elongation at break argued against (P < 0.01) their use. Current findings suggest that 1.5% ZrSiO4, 3% SiO2, 1.5% Y2O3, 2-6% TiO2, 2-2.5% ZnO, 2-2.5% CeO2, 0.5% TiSiO4 and 1% Ag-Zn Zeolite can be used to reinforce MFPSE, and help the materials better withstand mechanical degradation.