Study of Frequency and Characteristics of Red Blood Cell Alloimmunization in Thalassemic Patients: Multicenter Study from Palestine

Study of the Frequency and Specificity of Red Cell Antibodies in Patients with Hemoglobinopathies

Patients with thalassemia and sickle cell disease (SCD) require blood transfusions as part of their supportive care. However, one of the most serious side effects of this treatment is the risk of red cell alloimmunization. The goal of this study was to assess the prevalence and Specificity of red cell alloimmunization in Egyptian thalassemia and sickle cell anaemia patients. This study included 200 multi transfused Egyptian patients, one hundred and forty patients with transfusion dependent thalassaemia and sixty patients with sickle cell anaemia, who were attending the Paediatric Children Hospital-Cairo University at the period from March 2019 to October 2019. Alloantibody identification was made by Diamed- ID microtyping system. In the studied groups both thalassemia and sickle patients, the prevalence of alloimmunization was 22/200 (11%) patients. The two most often alloantibodies were, antibodies against Kell antigen (37%) and against E antigen (30%). The prevalence of alloimmunization was more in females in comparison to males, but it did not reach statistical significance and patients with thalassemia major had higher alloimmunization rates than other studied groups but was not statistically significant. In the D negative patients in the research group, alloimmunization demonstrated a statistically significant difference (p = 0.01). Age, gender, age of transfusion onset and splenectomy were not contributing factors to the antibody presence in the group of patients being investigated. Before receiving blood transfusions, extended red blood cell phenotyping should be thought of as a crucial procedure for hemoglobinopathies patients who would likely have several transfusions. It is advised that haemoglobinopathies patients in Egypt be checked through phenotyping of RBC units for Kell and all Rh antigens to be phenotyped before starting transfusion in these patients which is also standard of care for these patients presently.

Is it reasonable for the use of Rh-ee blood? A hospital-based survey from a southern medical center in Taiwan

Identification of alloantibodies and achieving a reduction in the rate of red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization are important issues to prevent transfusion complications. The aim of this study was to identify the antigen and alloantibodies in our patients and to study the association of alloimmunization with previous transfusion. Transfusion records from the blood bank of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital between 2015 and 2017 were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Antigen and antibody identification was performed using routine blood bank methods. In total, 56,422 transfusion records from 2015 to 2017 were included in the study. Among them, 1858 alloantibody episodes were found in the pre-transfusion survey, and anti-Mia, anti-E, and cold antibodies were the most common alloantibodies, with a prevalence of 3.29% (1858/56,422). Among them, 130 episodes involved newly found alloantibodies with no alloantibodies found in the previous transfusion survey. Tracing back to these newly transfusion-induced alloantibodies, the antibody was found with a mean of 10.8 ± 7.8 units of packed RBC transfusion, a mean of 66.3 ± 52.8 days, and with a mean of 4.3 ± 2.7 times of transfusion from the first transfusion therapy. An antibody survey revealed that Rh-ee (62.1%) was the most common phenotype in these newly identified antibodies. In summary, this hospital-based study revealed that RBC alloantibody rates were present at rates of 3.29%, with anti-Mia, anti-E, and cold antibodies being the most common alloantibodies. Among them, anti-E was the most commonly developed alloantibody. Given that the Rh-ee group is the most common phenotype in our population, the strategy of using Rh-ee blood for Rh-ee recipients is reasonable for transfusion safety.