The Significant Influence of the Neuroendocrine Component on the Survival of Patients with Gastric Carcinoma Characterized by Coexisting Exocrine and Neuroendocrine Components

Equivalent Survival between Gastric Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Gastric Small-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

According to the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms, gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) can be further divided into gastric large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (GLNEC) and gastric small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (GSNEC). Whether the prognoses of the two types have a discrepancy has long been disputed.

METHOD

We collected patients diagnosed with GLNEC or GSNEC in the National Cancer Center of China between January 2000 and December 2020. The characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. We further verified our conclusion using the SEER dataset.

RESULTS

A total of 114 GNEC patients, including 82 patients with GLNEC and 32 patients with GSNEC, have completed treatment in our hospital. Clinicopathologic differences were not observed between patients with GSNEC and GLNEC concerning the sex, age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tumor location, tumor size, stage, treatment received, the expression of neuroendocrine markers (CD56, Chromogranin A, synaptophysin), and score on the Ki-67 index. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates of GLNEC and GSNEC were 89.0%, 60.5%, and 52.4%, and 93.8%, 56.3%, and 52.7%, which showed no statistically significant differences. This result was confirmed further by using the SEER dataset after the inverse probability of treatment weighting.

CONCLUSIONS

Although with different cell morphology, the comparison of prognosis between the GLNEC and GSNEC has no significant statistical difference.

Better Prognosis of Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Than Gastric Adenocarcinoma among Whites in the United States: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Based on SEER

It was generally believed that the prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) was worse than gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). However, almost all previous studies compared the prognosis of GNEC and GAC based on East Asians. In this study, we evaluated the clinicopathological features and prognosis of GNEC and GAC in Whites. Patients with GNEC and GAC were identified from 2000 to 2018 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We used propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to match the age, sex, TNM stage, and treatments received between GNEC and GAC, then compared the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the two types. A total of 392 cases of GNEC and 12,835 cases of GAC in Whites were recognized. After PSM, the 5-year OS rates of GNEC and GAC were 50.3% and 43.0%, respectively (p = 0.010). The 5-year CSS rates of GNEC and GAC were 57.4% and 50.1%, respectively (p = 0.012). Besides, multivariable cox regression analyses showed that GNEC was an independent predictor of improved OS (HR 0.719; 95% CI 0.607–0.853) and CSS (HR 0.691; 95% CI 0.571–0.835) in the matched data. The prognosis of GNEC was better than GAC in Whites, showing significant ethnic differences. Appropriate treatments and follow-up strategies for GNEC in Whites are probably different from East Asians. The potential genetic and molecular mechanisms need to be further explored.

Serum lipid levels correlate to the progression of gastric cancer with neuroendocrine immunophenotypes: A multicenter retrospective study

PURPOSE

Dyslipidemia was associated with gastric adenocarcinoma or neuroendocrine tumors, but its role in a more malignant entity, gastric cancer with neuroendocrine immunophenotypes (GCNEI), was unclarified. This study sought to explore the relationship between serum lipid levels and the biological behaviors of gastric cancer with neuroendocrine immunophenotypes (GCNEI).

METHODS

Patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), GC with NEC components (GC-NEC), or GC expressing NE marker(s) but no NE morphology (GC-NENM) were enrolled from three centers. Their preoperative serum lipid levels, demographic, and clinicopathological information were analyzed and compared with those of patients with pure adenocarcinoma (PAC) or a background population selected from 10,061 health-check people by propensity-score matching.

RESULTS

A total of 342 GCNEI patients were enrolled. Compared with the background population, total cholesterol (TCHO) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels were lower in GCNEI. Compared with PAC, GC-NENM and GC-NEC showed lower triglyceride (TG) levels, while, carcinoma with NE morphology showed higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Among GCNEI subtypes, GC-NEC differed from the others by higher LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels. A higher LDL-C level and(or) lower TG, HDL-C levels correlated to higher stages or large tumor sizes in GC-NENM, and a lower HDL-C level correlated to large tumor sizes in GC-NEC. A higher LDL-C level, lower TG, HDL-C, and non-HDL levels increased the risk of GC-NEC, and lower TG, and HDL-C levels increased the risk of GC-NENM and NEC.

CONCLUSION

GCNEI had distinct and heterogeneous serum lipid patterns, which correlated to tumor development and progression.