The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Classification in Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:5698140. [PMID: 31737668 PMCID: PMC6815540 DOI: 10.1155/2019/5698140]

Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Ultrasound Classification of Cervical Tuberculous Lymphadenitis

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the ultrasound (US) classification of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis (CTL).

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included 70 patients diagnosed with CTL. All patients underwent both conventional US and CEUS. Both methods were compared to determine their agreement with pathological CTL results.

Results

The results of conventional US classification were as follows: 18 patients (25.7%) were type I, 25 patients (35.7%) type II, 21 patients (30.0%) type III, and 6 patients (8.6%) type IV, respectively. The results of CEUS classification were as follows: 9 patients (12.9%) were type I, 33 patients (47.1%) type II, 22 patients (31.4%) type III, and 6 patients (8.6%) type IV. Conventional US classification and pathological results showed moderate agreement in terms of US classification results for CTL (Kappa = 0.693); the accuracy of conventional US classification was 78.6% (55/70), and the accuracy of types II and III were 71.0% (22/31) and 82.6% (19/23), respectively. CEUS classification and pathological results showed strong agreement (Kappa = 0.871); the accuracy of CEUS classification was 91.4% (64/70), and the accuracy of types II and III were 93.6% (29/31) and 87.0% (20/23), respectively.

Conclusion

In combined with conventional US, CEUS could provide more information on blood flow enhancement patterns and identify the area of lymph node necrosis in CTL. This could contribute to a more accurate US classification of CTL.

Cavernous hemangioma of an intrapancreatic accessory spleen mimicking a pancreatic tumor: A case report

BACKGROUND

Intrapancreatic accessory spleen (IPAS) is an uncommon condition, with the majority of cases presenting as solid lesions. Thus, this condition is frequently misdiagnosed as pancreatic solid neoplasm. Moreover, splenic cavernous hemangioma is a rare disorder, whereas lesions with a cystic appearance arising from IPAS have not been reported.

CASE SUMMARY

Herein, we present a case involving a 32-year-old male who had a complex cystic lesion in the tail of the pancreas revealed by conventional ultrasound. The lesion was misdiagnosed as a pancreatic cystadenoma because of its confusing anatomic location, as well as due to its peripheral nodular and internal septal enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced ultrasound. After multidisciplinary discussion, the patient finally underwent laparoscopic pancreatic body and tail resections. Postoperative pathology demonstrated the lesion to be a cavernous hemangioma arising from the IPAS.

CONCLUSION

Cavernous hemangioma in the intrapancreatic accessory spleen may mimic pancreatic cystadenoma, which is a condition with the potential to be malignant. Imaging follow-ups or surgical interventions may be helpful for the exclusion of malignant risks in complicated cystic lesions, especially those with parietal and septal enhancements.

Cystic pancreatic lesions, the endless dilemma

Cystic pancreatic lesions involve a wide variety of pathological entities that include neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions. The proper diagnosis, differentiation, and staging of these cystic lesions are considered a crucial issue in planning further management. There are great challenges for their diagnostic models. In our time, new emerging methods for this diagnosis have been discovered. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology with chemical and molecular analysis of cyst fluid and EUS-guided fine needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy, through the needle microforceps biopsy, and single-operator cholangioscopy/pancreatoscopy are promising methods that have been used in the diagnosis of cystic pancreatic lesions. Hereby we discuss the diagnosis of cystic pancreatic lesions and the benefits of various diagnostic models.