Measurement of Disease Activity in Ecuadorian Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Does RAPID3 Correlate with Traditional Indexes?

Correlation of Disease Activity Scores and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3) on a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Saudi Experience

Introduction This study aimed to analyze the correlation between Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3) and disease activity scores using the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)/C-reactive protein (CRP)), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) attending a single rheumatology center in Jeddah. Methods A cross-sectional study of patients with RA who fulfilled the 2010 American College of Rheumatology criteria for the diagnosis of RA between June 2018 and November 2019 was conducted. The validated Arabic version of the multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) was used. The data collected included demographic information, comorbid illnesses, concomitant medications, laboratory results, and disease activity measured using the DAS 28 ESR/CRP, CDAI, SDAI, and RAPID3. Results A total of 137 patients with RA were included in the analysis; the mean age was 53.1 (± 12) years, there were 122 (89%) females, and the mean disease duration was 8 (± 4) years. Forty-nine (44.5%) patients were treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF), 53 (48.2%) with non-anti-TNF, 8 (7.3%) with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, and 27 (20%) with synthetic disease-modifying drugs (sDMARD). The mean RAPID3 (0-10) score was 3.6 (± 2) for low disease activity. The mean DAS28 ESR was 4.16 (± 4) for moderate disease activity. The mean DAS CRP was 3.39 (± 1.2) for moderate disease activity. The mean CDAI was 13.4 (± 10.7) for moderate disease activity. The mean SDAI was 15.34 (± 11.8) for moderate disease activity. Pearson's correlations showed a strong correlation with DAS28 CRP (r=0.773, p < 0.001), SDAI (r=0.764,p < 0.001), CDAI (r=0.710, p < 0.001), and DAS28 ESR (r=0.283, p < 0.002). Conclusion RAPID3 significantly correlated with DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI scores in our patients. It is a simple, inexpensive, and patient-centered practical tool for assessing disease activity that can reflect the health-related quality of life and be easily implemented in clinical practice.

The RAPID3 questionnaire as a screening tool to reduce the number of outpatient clinic visits: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Treat-to-target strategies require frequent on-site evaluations of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), burdening patients and caregivers. However, this frequency may not be required in patients in a stable low disease activity state. The Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) is a reliable tool to detect such states in groups but has not been tested to reduce the frequency of on-site evaluations in individual patient care. In Reade, an outpatient rheumatology clinic, patients can complete the questionnaire online prior to consultation, and the results are directly fed into the electronic patient record. Focusing on low disease activity, we retrospectively studied the test characteristics of RAPID3 and its agreement with the DAS28 in our database of routine patient care.

Objective

To assess the test characteristics and agreement between de DAS28 and the RAPID3 in patients with RA, with a focus on the low disease activity categories.

Methods

We performed a retrospective database study with available clinical data collected as part of usual care from the electronic medical record at Reade Amsterdam. The dataset comprised RAPID3 assessments followed by a DAS28 within 2 weeks, obtained between June 2014 and March 2021. We dichotomized the disease activity categories for both the RAPID3 and DAS28 into low (remission and low disease activity) and high (moderate and high disease activity). With cutoff values of 2.0 for RAPID3 and 3.2 for DAS28, we calculated test characteristics and agreement (Cohen’s kappa).

Results

A total of 5009 combined RAPID3 and DAS28 measurements were done at Reade in 1681 unique RA patients. The mean age was 60 years, and 76% of patients were female with a median disease duration of 4 years. Agreement was considered fair (kappa = 0.26). In total, 1426 (28%) of the RAPID3 measurements were classified as low and could be potentially targeted to skip their consultations. The sensitivity to detect low disease activity was 0.39, specificity was 0.93, and the positive predictive value was 0.92.

Conclusion

We showed that when the RAPID3 classifies a patient into low disease activity state, the accuracy is 92%. Of all consultations, 28% could possibly be postponed following the screening with RAPID3.

Cross-cultural and clinical validation of the MDHAQ/RAPID3 questionnaire in electronic format for a Brazilian population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Patients with rheumatologic diseases are monitored fundamentally through metric tools or index calculated from clinical data and patient exams, which allow us to assess the severity of the disease and guide the therapeutic decision. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), for treatment to be optimized and considered effective, periodic assessment with composite disease activity index and a 'treat-to-target' approach is required. The Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) in the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) includes only three measures based on the central patient self-reported dataset and can be used in a 'treat-to-target' approach analogous to the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and the Disease Activity Score 28-joints (DAS28). This tool, however, has not undergone cross-cultural or clinical validation in Brazil. In this research, we performed the MDHAQ cross-cultural and clinical validation for the Brazilian population of RA patients.

METHODS

The Portuguese version of the MDHAQ was created identically in an electronic questionnaire and underwent a cross-cultural validation process with 38 participants. Test-retest was performed in 29 patients. Further, a clinical validation with 129 Rheumatoid Arthritis patients was performed. Electronic MDHAQ was answered through an online platform. We also collected socioeconomic data as well as other clinical (CDAI, SDAI, DAS28) and functional (HAQ) scores during the face-to-face assessment of patients.

RESULTS

MDHAQ/RAPID3 maintained semantic, idiomatic, as well as conceptual and experience equivalence for the Brazilian population, with 92% acceptance of participants. It showed test-retest reliability, adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.85) and correlation of the scores obtained with adequate association with the DAS28 gold standard. RAPID3 also had high sensitivity (98%), adequate specificity (48%), high negative predictive value (92%) and negative post-test probability of 8%, attributes expected for a test tool for population screening.

CONCLUSION

The use of MDHAQ/RAPID3 associated with traditional clinical measures can adequately allow for remote follow-up based on the 'treat-to-target' approach with performance comparable to the gold standard DAS28, being a viable tool in the sample of Brazilian patients with RA in the current context of telehealth.