Significance of EGFR and PTEN Expression and PLR and NLR for Predicting the Prognosis of Epithelioid Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma

Prognostic role of CD74, CD10 and Ki-67 immunohistochemical expression in patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis and treatment of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) are still challenging. The aim of the present study was to explore the correlation between CD74, CD10, Ki-67 and clinicopathological parameters, and identify independent prognostic factors of DMPM.

METHODS

Seventy patients with pathologically proven DMPM were retrospectively reviewed. The expression of CD74, CD10 and Ki-67 in peritoneal tissues was detected by immunohistochemical analysis using standard avidin biotin complex (ABC) immunostaining technique. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to assess prognostic factors. The nomogram based on the Cox hazards regression model was established. C-index and calibration curve were performed to evaluate the accuracy of nomogram models.

RESULTS

The median age of DMPM was 62.34 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 1: 1.80. CD74 expression was identified in 52 (74.29%) of 70 specimens, CD10 in 34 (48.57%) specimens, and higher Ki-67 in 33(47.14%) specimens. CD74 was negatively associated with asbestos exposure(r = -0.278), Ki-67(r = -0.251) and TNM stage(r = -0.313). All patients were effectively followed up in the survival analysis. Univariate analysis revealed that PCI, TNM stage, treatment, Ki-67, CD74 and ECOG PS were associated with DMPM prognosis. CD74 (HR = 0.65, 95%Cl:0.46-0.91, P = 0.014), Ki-67(HR = 2.09, 95%Cl:1.18-3.73, P = 0.012),TNM stage (HR = 1.89, 95%Cl:1.16-3.09, P = 0.011), ECOG PS(HR = 2.12, 95%Cl:1.06-4.25, P = 0.034), systemic chemotherapy (HR = 0.41, 95%Cl:0.21-0.82, P = 0.011) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HR = 0.34, 95%Cl:0.16-0.71, P = 0.004) were independent predictors by multivariate Cox analysis. The C‑index of the nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) was 0.81. The OS calibration curve showed good agreement between nomogram-predicted and observed survival.

CONCLUSIONS

CD74, Ki-67, TNM stage, ECOG PS and treatment were independent factors affecting prognosis of DMPM. Reasonable chemotherapy treatment might improve the prognosis of patients. The proposed nomogram was a visual tool to effectively predict the OS of DMPM patients.

Prognostic significance of inflammation-related and electrolyte laboratory variables in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

Objective

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a kind of pleural cancer characterized by low incidence but high invasiveness. There is heterogeneity in survival among patients with MPM. Inflammation-related and electrolyte laboratory variables were previously reported as potential predictors of survival. We evaluated the relationship between overall survival and pre-treatment biomarkers.

Materials and methods

Patients diagnosed with MPM in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital for more than 10 years were screened for this study. All basic, clinical, radiologic and laboratory variables were collected. The COX univariable and multivariable analysis were used to explore prognostic related risk factors.

Results

Ninety patients with MPM were included. The median follow-up of all patients was 57 months [interquartile range (IQR): 27–100 months]. The median survival time was 24 months (IQR: 12–52 months). Univariate survival analyses indicated that age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, treatment, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, calcium, lymphocyte, hemoglobin, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-white blood cell ratio (MWR) were significantly related to survival. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that age [hazard ratio (HR), 2.548; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.145–5.666; p = 0.022], calcium (HR, 0.480; 95% CI 0.270–0.855; p = 0.013), PLR (HR, 2.152; 95% CI 1.163–3.981; p = 0.015), and MWR (HR, 3.360; 95% CI 1.830–6.170; p < 0.001) might have a significant impact on the prognosis.

Conclusion

Calcium, MWR, and PLR might be related to the prognosis of MPM patients. Analyzing the relationship between the results of inflammation-related and electrolyte laboratory variables in peripheral blood and prognosis could help clinicians evaluate the situation of patients.

Prognostic factors and the prognostic role of inflammation indices in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Background

In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic factors of malignant pleural mesothelioma and the prognostic value of inflammation indices in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Methods

Between January 2002 and December 2019, a total of 132 patients (74 males, 58 females; mean age: 55 years; range, 31 to 79 years) diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma were retrospectively analyzed. Patients" demographic data and laboratory results were recorded. The prognostic value of the following five inflammation indices was evaluated: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, advanced lung cancer inflammation index, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, and prognostic nutritional index.

Results

Of all patients, 81% (n=107) were aged 65 or older and 61.4% (n=81) had an epithelioid histology. Of 12 variables examined in the multivariate analysis for their relationship with survival, age ≥65 years, non-epithelioid subtype, and prognostic nutritional index <40 were found to be poor prognostic factors. Based on the score constructed from these factors, the good prognostic group (score 0-1) had a median overall survival of 21 months and a one-year survival rate of 77.9%, while the poor prognostic group (score 2-3) had a median overall survival of nine months and a one-year survival rate of 29.7%.

Conclusion

Our study results indicate that age ≥65 years, prognostic nutritional index <40, and non-epithelioid histological subtype are poor prognostic factors of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

A single-center retrospective cohort study of perioperative systemic chemotherapy in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a rare variant of malignant mesothelioma, representing 10-15% of malignant mesothelioma cases. The preferred therapeutic approach is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) accompanied by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC); the role of systemic chemotherapy is not well established. While some limited retrospective studies report worse outcomes with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, our institution has favored the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for symptom relief and surgical optimization. The aim of our study was to assess the outcomes of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, compared to those receiving adjuvant or no perioperative chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of treatment-naïve, non-papillary DMPM patients seen at our institution between 1/1/2009 and 9/1/2019. We explored the effect of type of systemic therapy on clinical outcomes and estimated median overall survival (mOS) using Kaplan-Meier curves. Hazard ratios (HR) calculated by Cox proportional hazard model were used to estimate effect of the exposures on overall survival.

RESULTS

47 patients were identified with DMPM (median age at diagnosis 61.2 years, 76.6% epithelioid histology, 74.5% white race, 55.3% known asbestos exposure). CRS was performed in 53.2% of patients (25/47); 76.0% of surgical patients received HIPEC (19/25). The majority received systemic chemotherapy (37/47, 78.7%); among patients receiving both CRS and chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was more common than adjuvant chemotherapy (12 neoadjuvant, 8 adjuvant). Overall mOS was 84.1 months. Among neoadjuvant patients, 10/12 underwent surgery, and 2 were lost to follow-up; the majority (9/10) had clinically stable or improved disease during the pre-operative period. There were numerical more issues with chemotherapy with the adjuvant patients (4/8: 2 switches in platinum agent, 2 patients stopped therapy) than with the neoadjuvant patients (2/10: 1 switch in platinum agent, 1 delay due to peri-procedural symptoms). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with worse mOS compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (mOS NR vs 95.1 mo, HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.18-4.5, p = 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

When used preferentially, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in DMPM patients was not associated with worse outcomes compared to adjuvant chemotherapy. It was well-tolerated and did not prevent surgical intervention.

Development and validation a simple model for identify malignant ascites

The differential diagnosis of benign ascites and malignant ascites is incredibly challenging for clinicians. This research aimed to develop a user-friendly predictive model to discriminate malignant ascites from non-malignant ascites through easy-to-obtain clinical parameters. All patients with new-onset ascites fluid were recruited from January 2014 to December 2018. The medical records of 317 patients with ascites for various reasons in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University were collected and reviewed retrospectively. Thirty-six parameters were included and selected using univariate logistic regression, multivariate logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to establish a mathematical model for differential diagnosis, and its diagnostic performance was validated in the other groups. Age, cholesterol, hypersensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in serum, ascitic fluid adenosine deaminase (AF ADA), ascitic fluid lactate dehydrogenase (AF LDH) involvement in a 5-marker model. With a cut-off level of 0.83, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the ROC of the model for identifying malignant ascites in the development dataset were 84.7%, 88.8%, 87.6%, and 0.874 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.822-0.926), respectively, and 80.9%, 82.6%, 81.5%, and 0.863 (95% CI,0.817-0.913) in the validation dataset, respectively. The diagnostic model has a similar high diagnostic performance in both the development and validation datasets. The mathematical diagnostic model based on the five markers is a user-friendly method to differentiate malignant ascites from benign ascites with high efficiency.

The combination of pretreatment prognostic nutritional index and neuron-specific enolase enhances prognosis predicting value of small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Tumor and immune-inflammatory biomarkers have been demonstrated to be closely associated with cancer prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aims to assess the prognostic value of pretreatment prognostic nutritional index (PNI), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 301 SCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy was performed. Overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox hazard analyses.

RESULTS

The median OS for total cases was 15.0 months. On univariate analysis, tumor stage (P < 0.001), pretreatment PNI (P < 0.001), CEA (P = 0.039), NSE (P = 0.010), distant metastasis numbers (P < 0.001), and thoracic radiotherapy (P < 0.001) were found to be the predictors of OS. Multivariate analysis showed limited stage, high PNI, NSE < 15 μg/L, and chemoradiotherapy were positive independent prognostic factors (P < 0.05). Low PNI and NSE ≥ 15 μg/L were closely correlated with a high tumor burden status. Three cohorts of SCLC with significant different survival outcomes were divided based on variable PNI and NSE levels. Patients with high PNI and NSE < 15 μg/L showed the best OS of 24.5 months, while patients with low PNI and NSE ≥ 15 μg/L had the worst survival outcome of 10.0 months. Patients with low PNI and NSE < 15 μg/L or high PNI and NSE ≥ 15 μg/L had the similar outcome of 16.5 and 17.0 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment PNI and NSE were independent prognostic factors of SCLC. The combination of PNI and NSE enhanced the OS predicting ability, and patients with high PNI and NSE < 15 μg/L had the best survival outcome.