Does Pharmacological Treatment Reduce the Incidence of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) after Transobturator Sling?

The evolution of incontinence into resolved, refractory and de novo urgency urinary incontinence following sling placement at time of prolapse repair in a large urodynamic cohort

PURPOSE

To improve counseling in women at risk of refractory and/or de novo urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) following sling placement at time of prolapse repair, we created an outcome model to characterize changes in storage dysfunction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 139 women who underwent urodynamics followed by sling or no sling placement at the time of prolapse repair over a 6-year period. Our primary outcome was the presence of UUI following sling placement. Data were analyzed in SAS using chi-square, Fisher's exact, Student's t-test, and Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

At baseline, the sling group had significantly higher subjective (62/81 [76.5%] vs. 18/58 [31.0%]; p<0.001), objective (62/81 [76.5%] vs. 6/58 [10.3%]; p<0.001), and occult (41/81 [50.6%] vs. 6/58 [10.3%]; p<0.001) stress urinary incontinence (SUI); and rates of subjective and objective UUI were similar to the no sling group prior to surgery. After surgery (mean follow-up 859 days) there was no difference with or without sling, in the rate of SUI (subjective, objective) and further SUI treatments (bulking agent, repeat sling). Higher rates of de novo (13/81 [16.0%] vs. 6/58 [10.3%]; p=0.454) and refractory (31/81 [38.3%] vs. 14/58 [24.1%]; p=0.048) UUI were noted in the sling group following surgery. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, a greater proportion of women in the no sling group did not report UUI at longest follow-up (hazard ratio 0.63; 95% confidence interval 0.37-1.06; p=0.081).

CONCLUSIONS

Women should be counseled on the risk of de novo and refractory UUI following sling placement at time of prolapse repair.

Mirabegron in female patients with overactive bladder syndrome: What's new? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Reviews assessing mirabegron's safety and efficacy, synthesize data from both genders, without providing specific details for female patients with OAB. The aim of this study is to qualitatively and quantitatively synthesize data evaluating mirabegron's use on female patients with OAB. PubMed/Scopus/Cochrane library/Web of Knowledge were searched for full texted, published in English-language and in peer-reviewed journals, up to November 2019, using the keyword "mirabegron".Jadad score modified by adding allocation concealment, MINORS and RoB were used for the Methodological quality and risk of bias assessment. Twenty-one studies were included in this review;7 RCTs, 3 non-RCTs and 11 observational studies. Controlled trials were of unclear (75%), high (12.5%) or serious risk (12.5%) of bias. Twelve weeks of mirabegron use resulted in significant decrease of urgency, frequency, nocturia and UUI by 1.3-2.2,2.04-2.33,0.42-0.5 and 0.9-1.04 episodes/24 h, respectively. Quality of life and sexual health was improved significantly. Sexual dysfunction decreased from 98% (84/85) at baseline, to 60% (51/85) after 12-weeks of mirabegron (p-value < 0.001). Mirabegron had the same efficacy as anticholinergics in improving all OAB symptoms but with fewer adverse events. Hypertension and antimuscarinics' effects (i.e dry mouth, constipation) had an incidence of 2% (28/1221) and 1.9% (23/1221) when mirabegron was administered, respectively. Mirabegron is a safe and effective alternative therapy for females with OAB. However, there is a paucity of high-quality RCTs, with large sample sizes, long-term follow-up focusing on mirabegron's comparison to other therapies, quality of life and sexual health of female patients with OAB.