The Efficacy of Intravitreal Conbercept for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Central serous chorioretinopathy: An evidence-based treatment guideline

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a relatively common disease that causes vision loss due to macular subretinal fluid leakage and it is often associated with reduced vision-related quality of life. In CSC, the leakage of subretinal fluid through defects in the retinal pigment epithelial layer's outer blood-retina barrier appears to occur secondary to choroidal abnormalities and dysfunction. The treatment of CSC is currently the subject of controversy, although recent data obtained from several large randomized controlled trials provide a wealth of new information that can be used to establish a treatment algorithm. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of our current understanding regarding the pathogenesis of CSC, current therapeutic strategies, and an evidence-based treatment guideline for CSC. In acute CSC, treatment can often be deferred for up to 3-4 months after diagnosis; however, early treatment with either half-dose or half-fluence photodynamic therapy (PDT) with the photosensitive dye verteporfin may be beneficial in selected cases. In chronic CSC, half-dose or half-fluence PDT, which targets the abnormal choroid, should be considered the preferred treatment. If PDT is unavailable, chronic CSC with focal, non-central leakage on angiography may be treated using conventional laser photocoagulation. CSC with concurrent macular neovascularization should be treated with half-dose/half-fluence PDT and/or intravitreal injections of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor compound. Given the current shortage of verteporfin and the paucity of evidence supporting the efficacy of other treatment options, future studies-ideally, well-designed randomized controlled trials-are needed in order to evaluate new treatment options for CSC.

Intravitreous injection of conbercept for bullous retinal detachment: A case report

BACKGROUND

Diffuse retinal pigment epitheliopathy (DRPE) associated with bullous retinal detachment is a severe variant of DRPE that is frequently misdiagnosed and often improperly treated.

CASE SUMMARY

A 36-year-old female patient complained of "painless vision decline in the left eye with obscuration for 10 d". Slit-lamp microscopic fundus examination revealed white-yellow subretinal exudates in the posterior pole in both eyes, retinal detachment with shifting subretinal fluid in the left eye, and no retinal hiatus. Fundus fluorescein angiography revealed multiple subretinal leakage foci and localized hypofluorescent lesions with patched hyperfluorescence. There was fluorescence leakage in the retinal vessels in the retinal detachment area and occluded blood vessels in the lower and peripheral areas. Indocyanine green angiography revealed multifocal lamellar hyperfluorescence in the middle stage and low fluorescence in the retinal detachment area in the late stage. Retinal anatomical reduction significantly improved with intravitreal conbercept injections.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal injection of conbercept can anatomically reattach the retina in patients with bullous retinal detachment.

Efficacy of intravitreal conbercept combined with panretinal photocoagulation for severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy without macular edema

AIM

To assess efficacy of intravitreal conbercept (IVC) injection in combination with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) vs PRP alone in patients with severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (SNPDR) without macular edema (ME).

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with SNPDR without ME (56 eyes) were divided into the PRP group and IVC+PRP group (the pulse group) in this retrospective clinical study. Conbercept was intravitreally administered to patients in the pulse group 1wk before treatment with PRP and followed up for 1, 3, and 6mo. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), center foveal thickness (CFT), visual acuity (VA) improvement, and adverse reactions were compared between groups.

RESULTS

In the PRP group, the BCVA reduced at 1 and 3mo before improving at 6mo. In the pulse group, baseline BCVA decreased continuously at 1mo, increased at 3 and 6mo. BCVA in the pulse group was better than that in the PRP group at 1, 3, and 6mo. There was an increase in CFT in the PRP group during follow-up compared with baseline. In the pulse group, CFT was increased at 1mo relative to baseline, steadily decreased to the baseline level at 3 and 6mo. There was a more significant reduction in CFT in the pulse group during follow-up compared with the PRP group. The effective rates of VA in the PRP and the pulse groups were 81.48% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

As PRP pretreatment, a single dose of IVC administration has beneficial effects for preventing PRP-induced foveal thickening and increasing VA in patients with SNPDR without ME.

Comprehensive evaluation of intravitreal conbercept versus half-dose photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

AIM

To compare the safety and efficacy of conbercept intravitreal injection and half-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) in treating chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

METHODS

This study was retrospective. Thirty-seven patients (37 eyes) with chronic CSC received conbercept injections while 57 patients (57 eyes) were treated with half-dose PDT. All subjects were followed in 6mo. Outcome measures included change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF).

RESULTS

There was no adverse event observed in either treatment group. At the 6-month follow-up, 26 eyes (70.3%) in the conbercept group and 54 eyes (94.7%) in the half-dose PDT group (P<0.05) reached full resolution of SRF. The mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA significantly improved (P<0.001) in both treatment groups with better outcome at early phase in the half-dose PDT group (2wk, 1, and 2mo, P<0.05). All subjects experienced significant CMT improvement (P<0.001) with no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The SFCT also improved in all subjects (P<0.001) with better outcome in the half-dose PDT group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both intravitreal conbercept and half-dose PDT are safe to use in treating chronic CSC. By 6mo, both treatment groups are efficacious in improving BCVA, reducing CMT and SFCT, and resolving SRF in eyes with chronic CSC. Half-dose PDT may show better outcome at initial phase of treatment in chronic CSC. Longer follow-up period is necessary to study for long-term effect and safety.

Efficacy of intravitreal injection of conbercept on non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a retrospective study

Objective

This study assessed the efficacy of conbercept for patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR).

Methods

In this retrospective clinical study, 54 patients with NPDR (54 eyes) were treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept using a 3+ pro re nata regimen and followed up for 12 months. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), area of hard exudate (HE), and number of microaneurysms (MAs) were used as indicators of therapeutic effects. Systemic adverse reactions were recorded to assess safety.

Results

During the 12-month follow-up period, the mean number of injections was 6.12 ± 1.89 on demand. From baseline to the 12-month follow-up, the BCVA of patients with NPDR increased from 0.71 ± 0.20 logMAR to 0.43 ± 0.16 logMAR, CFT decreased from 424.26 ± 64.89 μm to 269.27 ± 44.79 μm, and the number of MAs declined from 79.53 ± 27.18 to 33.34 ± 16.53. Moreover, the area of HE was significantly reduced after 9 months of treatment. There were no serious systemic adverse events during the follow-up.

Conclusions

Intravitreal injection of conbercept has a stable and robust effect on patients with NPDR over a 12-month follow-up period. Thus, conbercept is an effective and feasible treatment for NPDR.