One-Year Efficacy and Safety of Combined Photorefractive Keratectomy and Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking after Intacs SK Intracorneal Ring Segment Implantation in Moderate Keratoconus

Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation Followed by Simultaneous Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy and Corneal Cross-Linking for Contact Lens-Intolerant Keratoconus

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Keraring implantation followed by simultaneous topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (TGPRK) and corneal cross-linking (CXL) in the management of keratoconus.

METHODS

This is a single-center, private practice, retrospective review. Patients with keratoconus who were intolerant to contact lens wear underwent implantation of the Keraring, followed by TGPRK with CXL from 2 to 36 months after implantation. Main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refraction (cylinder and spherical equivalent), keratometry (steep, maximum, and central), and central corneal thickness (CCT). Patients were followed up for 3 to 60 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven eyes from 45 patients were included. The mean time between Keraring and TGPRK/CXL was 6.0 ± 6.0 months. Patients were followed up for a mean of 28.6 ± 20.1 months after Keraring insertion. At 12-month follow-up, there was a statistically significant improvement in mean UDVA (0.94 ± 0.49-0.35 ± 0.23, P < 0.01), CDVA (0.39 ± 0.26-0.17 ± 0.15, P < 0.01), cylinder (-4.97 ± 2.68 to -1.74 ± 1.25, P < 0.01), steep keratometry (51.25 ± 3.37-45.03 ± 2.27, P < 0.01), central keratometry (52.59 ± 4.98-46.99 ± 3.53, P < 0.01), and maximum keratometry (58.78 ± 4.22-50.76 ± 3.42, P < 0.01). These results were sustained at 48-month follow-up. CCT decreased at 12 months after TGPRK (461.84 ± 27.46-418.94 ± 45.62, P < 0.01) and remained stable at 60 months. Postoperatively, 2 eyes (3.51%) had corneal haze, resulting in decrease in CDVA; 1 was treated successfully with repeat PRK; and 1 patient (1.75%) had wound melt due to partial Keraring extrusion, which settled with repositioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Keraring implantation followed by simultaneous TGPRK and CXL appears to be effective in the long term in improving UDVA, CDVA, cylinder, CCT, and keratometry in patients with keratoconus who are intolerant to contact lenses.

Combined corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking following intracorneal ring segment implantation in management of moderate keratoconus

PURPOSE

Keratoconus (KC) leads to gradual progressive loss of vision in young and adult patients. For the purpose of visual rehabilitation and for hindering KC progression in patients, we designed this study. The main aim of this study is to help the KC patients to improve and stabilize their vision.

METHODS

This prospective consecutive uncontrolled study includes 36 eyes of 36 patients with moderate degree of KC. All patients underwent combined wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK) and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (ACXL) after intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation. Different measures will be evaluated at baseline, after ICRS implantation, and at one, 3, 6, and 12 months after combined (TPRK and ACXL). These measurements are uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), corneal indices based on Scheimpflug tomography, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) based on (Sirius, Schwind) tomography.

RESULTS

There were significant improvements in logMAR (UDVA and CDVA) and reduction in sphere, manifest cylinder, MRSE, maximal keratometry, and mean keratometry after ICRS implantation in the first stage. After TPRK and ACXL as the second stage, there were significant improvements in visual acuity of both logMAR UDVA and CDVA. Reduction in refractive outcomes, including MRSE, sphere, and manifest cylinder. All corneal indices including steep, flat, mean, and maximal keratometries had been decreased. Furthermore, there were significant improvements in the final root mean square, HOAs, and coma aberrations from baseline.

CONCLUSION

In moderate KC, triple therapy of ICRS implantation followed by combined TPRK and ACXL appears to be a safe and effective approach. This approach provides an improvement in visual acuity, refraction, corneal indices, and HOAs. These improvements were maintained for 1 year postoperatively. It also halts KC progression.

[Excimer laser in keratoconus management]

Visual rehabilitation in keratoconus is a challenge, notably because of the significant irregular astigmatism and optical aberrations that it induces. Many surgical techniques have been developed in addition to, or in the case of failure of, spectacles and rigid gas permeable contact lenses: intracorneal ring segments, intraocular lenses, excimer laser and, as a last resort, keratoplasty. Excimer laser photoablates the cornea, allowing remodeling of its surface. There are various treatment modes (wavefront-optimized, wavefront-guided and topography-guided), allowing performance of a customized treatment if needed. Its use in keratoconus has been described since the 2000s, alone or in combination with other procedures. For example, the combination of photoablation and corneal cross linking, a technique that increases corneal rigidity and in so doing can slow or even stop the progression of keratoconus, proved its efficacy and safety in many studies, and various protocols have been described. A triple procedure, including intracorneal ring segments, excimer laser and cross linking, has also given some very promising results in progressive keratoconus, providing a significative improvement in visual acuity and topographic data. The combination of excimer laser and intraocular lenses remains a poorly explored lead that might provide some satisfactory results. The objective of this review is to summarize the recent data on excimer laser in keratoconus management.

Corneal cross-linking (CXL) combined with refractive surgery for the comprehensive management of keratoconus: CXL plus

The past two decades have witnessed an unprecedented evolution in the management of keratoconus that demands a holistic approach comprising of inhibiting the ectatic progression as well as visual rehabilitation. The advent of corneal cross-linking (CXL) in the late 1990s resulted in long-term stabilization of the ectatic cornea along with limited reduction in corneal steepening and regularization of corneal curvature. However, CXL as a standalone procedure does not suffice in rehabilitating the functional vision especially in patients who are unwilling or intolerant towards contact lenses. The concept of “CXL plus” was proposed which incorporates adjunctive use of refractive procedures with CXL in order to overcome the optical inefficiency due to corneal irregularity, decrease the irregular astigmatism, correct the residual refractive error and improve functional visual outcome in keratoconus. Several refractive procedures such as conductive keratoplasty (CK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (t-PTK), intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation, phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation and multiple other techniques have been combined with CXL to optimize and enhance the CXL outcome. This review aimed to summarize the different protocols of CXL plus, provide guidelines for selection of the optimum CXL plus technique and aid in decision-making for the comprehensive management of cases with primary keratoconus in addition to discussing the future and scope for innovations in the existing treatment protocols.