Microarray Normalization Revisited for Reproducible Breast Cancer Biomarkers

Refining breast cancer biomarker discovery and drug targeting through an advanced data-driven approach

Breast cancer remains a major public health challenge worldwide. The identification of accurate biomarkers is critical for the early detection and effective treatment of breast cancer. This study utilizes an integrative machine learning approach to analyze breast cancer gene expression data for superior biomarker and drug target discovery. Gene expression datasets, obtained from the GEO database, were merged post-preprocessing. From the merged dataset, differential expression analysis between breast cancer and normal samples revealed 164 differentially expressed genes. Meanwhile, a separate gene expression dataset revealed 350 differentially expressed genes. Additionally, the BGWO_SA_Ens algorithm, integrating binary grey wolf optimization and simulated annealing with an ensemble classifier, was employed on gene expression datasets to identify predictive genes including TOP2A, AKR1C3, EZH2, MMP1, EDNRB, S100B, and SPP1. From over 10,000 genes, BGWO_SA_Ens identified 1404 in the merged dataset (F1 score: 0.981, PR-AUC: 0.998, ROC-AUC: 0.995) and 1710 in the GSE45827 dataset (F1 score: 0.965, PR-AUC: 0.986, ROC-AUC: 0.972). The intersection of DEGs and BGWO_SA_Ens selected genes revealed 35 superior genes that were consistently significant across methods. Enrichment analyses uncovered the involvement of these superior genes in key pathways such as AMPK, Adipocytokine, and PPAR signaling. Protein-protein interaction network analysis highlighted subnetworks and central nodes. Finally, a drug-gene interaction investigation revealed connections between superior genes and anticancer drugs. Collectively, the machine learning workflow identified a robust gene signature for breast cancer, illuminated their biological roles, interactions and therapeutic associations, and underscored the potential of computational approaches in biomarker discovery and precision oncology.

Decision Theory versus Conventional Statistics for Personalized Therapy of Breast Cancer

Estrogen and progesterone receptors being present or not represents one of the most important biomarkers for therapy selection in breast cancer patients. Conventional measurement by immunohistochemistry (IHC) involves errors, and numerous attempts have been made to increase precision by additional information from gene expression. This raises the question of how to fuse information, in particular, if there is disagreement. It is the primary domain of Dempster–Shafer decision theory (DST) to deal with contradicting evidence on the same item (here: receptor status), obtained through different techniques. DST is widely used in technical settings, such as self-driving cars and aviation, and is also promising to deliver significant advantages in medicine. Using data from breast cancer patients already presented in previous work, we focus on comparing DST with classical statistics in this work, to pave the way for its application in medicine. First, we explain how DST not only considers probabilities (a single number per sample), but also incorporates uncertainty in a concept of ‘evidence’ (two numbers per sample). This allows for very powerful displays of patient data in so-called ternary plots, a novel and crucial advantage for medical interpretation. Results are obtained according to conventional statistics (ODDS) and, in parallel, according to DST. Agreement and differences are evaluated, and the particular merits of DST discussed. The presented application demonstrates how decision theory introduces new levels of confidence in diagnoses derived from medical data.

Decision theory for precision therapy of breast cancer

Correctly estimating the hormone receptor status for estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PGR) is crucial for precision therapy of breast cancer. It is known that conventional diagnostics (immunohistochemistry, IHC) yields a significant rate of wrongly diagnosed receptor status. Here we demonstrate how Dempster Shafer decision Theory (DST) enhances diagnostic precision by adding information from gene expression. We downloaded data of 3753 breast cancer patients from Gene Expression Omnibus. Information from IHC and gene expression was fused according to DST, and the clinical criterion for receptor positivity was re-modelled along DST. Receptor status predicted according to DST was compared with conventional assessment via IHC and gene-expression, and deviations were flagged as questionable. The survival of questionable cases turned out significantly worse (Kaplan Meier p < 1%) than for patients with receptor status confirmed by DST, indicating a substantial enhancement of diagnostic precision via DST. This study is not only relevant for precision medicine but also paves the way for introducing decision theory into OMICS data science.